Canada -   

Ignatieff unveils $1-billion homecare plan

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Ignatieff speaks in Gatineau, Que.
The Liberal leader makes a major policy announcement regarding family healthcare. He says the plan will have two major elements including a compassionate employment insurance benefit plan and a family care benefit plan that would be paid to lower and middle class families.

Font-size: Bigger  Smaller  Share Share Print Print Comments Comments(59)

Photos

Slideshow image

View Larger Image

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Oct. 5 2010 12:53 PM ET

Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff is pledging $1 billion to help Canadians care for sick or elderly relatives, a key part of his party's election platform.

Ignatieff said Tuesday he plans to pay for his family-care program by eliminating corporate tax cuts proposed by the Conservative government, including a 1.5 percentage point cut slated to kick in Jan. 1.

The Liberal plan would include:

n A new refundable family care tax benefit of up tp $1,350 a year. The Liberals predict some 600,000 families would be eligible for the refund, costing the state about $750 million each year.

n A broader and longer-lasting family care benefit that would replace the compassionate-care benefit awarded under the Employment Insurance program. As many as 30,000 Canadians could qualify for the new benefit, for a total cost of roughly $250 million a year, according to Liberal estimates.

The current benefit grants six weeks of EI to Canadians caring for a relative determined by a doctor to have less than six months to live. About 5,000 people receive the benefit each year.

The new system would offer up to six months of EI to those caring for gravely ill – though not necessarily dying – relatives. Family members could split the benefit among them, and the six months could be spread over the course of a year or used all at once.

Ignatieff unveiled his proposal in Gatineau, Que., at the home of a family struggling to care for a sick relative.

Conservatives shot back, saying the Liberal plan to squash corporate tax cuts would compromise the nation's economic recovery and trigger more job losses.

Government House leader John Baird said his party's commitment to bolstering the economy will bring more relief to families than the Opposition's proposed program.

He noted the Harper government has continued to increase transfer payments to the provinces for health care, even at the height of the economic crisis.

Ignatieff's pledge falls short of a national homecare program, which many experts say will become increasingly vital as baby boomers age. Liberals say that kind of program will have to be discussed with the provinces, who oversee all healthcare services.

Until today, Ignatieff has vowed to fund his platform promises by freezing corporate taxes at the current rate of 18 per cent, indefinitely suspending a reduction to 16.5 slated for 2011 and a second drop to 15 per cent the following year.

But with no sign of an election this year, the Liberal leader has had to clarify that his government would effectively reverse the upcoming reduction to retain some $1.8 billion in tax revenue.

Liberal strategists maintain that the homecare crisis is more pressing than further lowering the corporate tax rate. They say some 2.7 million Canadians are providing care for relatives and 40 per cent of them are drawing on their life savings to get by.

With files from The Canadian Press

Please Add Comments( )

Bill from Winnipeg
said

Liberal Promises never happen.........Never have and never will. They are snake oil salesmen...............


Majid Najah
said

The homecare crisis is more urgent it's a FACT!


David
said

Put the taxes up Iggy so we can all pay for for everything and in turn pay more sales tax too. Business will find elsewhere to go as they planned, with the previous dictatorship, before we elected the conservatives. Higher taxes, no job, higher cost of living; this will really make taking care of your family easier Iggy really it will, NOT!


Greg in the Hammer
said

This is sound policy that reflects the demographics of our society. Of course, the CONS don't want you to know about the demographics of our society so they cancel the long form census. Then, they hope you'll stand with your hand over your heart as new fighter jets stream red white and blue overhead. At least if you don't they can deem you unpatriotic and throw you in a fancy new prison


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

"We want to look after you, because we're compassionate." Typical Liberal strategy. Pander to all the hollowheaded pumpkins in the field at Nanny State Farms. Will a significant number of Canadians fall for this vote-buying garbage? Quite possibly. Hope not.


C-Note in Whitby
said

Tory times are tough times. Their opposition to this sort of socially smart policy is their way of saying "thanks" to the people who worked hard and paid taxes in this country, but find themselves need assistance in their greatest hour of need. At least the Tory's are focussed on things that matter to Canadians like keeping firearms unregistered, building new jails for the criminals we don't have, and buying unnecessary fighter jets for the stealth wars we won't be fighting.


Glenn C
said

Iggy, you don't have 1 mil never mind 1 b, Get serious man, we are not idiots out here. That's why we dont want you in power, making wild promises that can not keep!


Tim
said

More taxes on both us taxpayers and the business community equals less jobs available and less money for us to spend on the economy. Something the Liberals and the NDP have never understood.


Ken Durham
said

Yup, empty promises and a pathetic attempt to reverse anything and everything the Conservatives have put in place. This so-called liberal party are clearly bitter to the point of making foolish promises with taxpayers dollars knowing full well they'll never be carried out. A majority government is coming next election. It will be championed by Stephen Harper. The liberals will then cast aside yet another inept leader and try again. Adios liberals.


Steve
said

I am sick of the partisan games. Conservative supporters will say anything to blast the Liberals. If Harper would have introduced this program, the Cons would be praising Harper and support the new program. The Conservatives are spending more money than any other government in Canadian history. They cut taxes and increased spending. They were left with a $13 billion surplus and yet they have created a $54 billion deficit in a few short years. Stop spending money on prisons, war planes, and unnecessary meetings. This government has cut $54 billion of corporate taxes, but God forbid the Liberals make a proposal to spend $1 billion a year to help Canadians care for their loved ones while they are ill. The Conservatives are proposing to spend billions on prisons, war planes, and bailing out corporations. Governments are supposed to work for the people and not huge corporations, this government has its priorities mixed up. Canada's national debit clock just hi 545 billion & is going deeper into debit at a rate of more than one hundred thousand per minute. Harper's lying & reckless spending has to stop. Ignatieff would be a much better PM. The liberals have been our government the majority of the time, that's why Canada is such a great place to live. We would be in the same shape as the US if Harper would have gotten his way, but the liberals wouldn't let Harper deregulate our banks.


Greg in Cambridge
said

This guy's really good at spending your money isn't he.I've rarely seen a more blatant example of vote buying that this.Going after the sick,elderly vote. How low can he go.


Brian
said

Helping ill family members is much more important than giving the wealthy yet another tax break. Its time that corporations took more responsibility in the way of paying taxes.Corporations just got a two billion dollar a year tax break in BC that is downloaded to the average taxpayer.Enough with corporate welfare for profitable companies.


Pip
said

So the Liberals want to portray the Conservatives and Harper as ". . . a cold Conservative prime minister squandering billions". Having accused Harper of wasting/squandering billions on stimulus money that THE LIBERALS insisted on, that is rather a cheap shot. But then, that is all the Liberals have been capable of for years - cheap. They would not even spend a small amount of money to send our troops to Afghanistan in locale-appropriate BDU's! I cannot take Mr. Ignatieff seriously, as he seems to have no clue as to the nation's needs, only his ideas of what the nation's needs OUGHT to be according to his ideology. That and reality do not coincide.


Doug BC
said

It is about time this problem is being addressed in this country.


LDL in ONT
said

Man is this ever transparent, he should have continued on and said that " we in the Liberal party also like puppy dogs and ice cream" Welcome to the Liberal Nanny State Utopia ( and more taxes to pay for it all should, heaven forbid they actually form a government)


Help aMERICA
said

It's sad that Harper listened to the Liberals and NDPthat got us into the debt in the first place.


Rick
said

Promises, promises, if anyone party in this Government made a promise to cut government jobs and their pay rates by 50% then we might all get out and vote in the next election. At the rate the libs in Ontario are going we will end up like Grease and have more government than people to pay them Dalton has only added 27% more to his government and we all sit back and complain but are too lazy to get up and do something about it but this is another good reason not to vote Fiberal.


Kim
said

The aging population and anticipated increases in need for long term care is well documented. The options are pretty limited - institutionalization or home care. Most often this is the responsibility of the children (or child) - and most often the burdeon of care falls to a female member of the family. Regardless, of who is providing the care - it will take a toll on his/her ability to continue to contribute to his/her own retirement plan and income. This proposal addresses a need. It may not be the perfect solution but at least its being recognized and now, its under discussion. This does more for Canadians than any of Harper's ideas.


Warren Buffett
said

Raise taxes of the "rich corporations." Good one. If these corporations are so rich then why don't these people who say such direct their RRSP into their stock? Then they will be rich too. We have a very fragile economic recovery on now. Obama has spent themselves into massive debt which will cause high inflation and higher interest rates. Corporations need a tax cut now to help economic stability and growth. Not tax them out of existence like the political ideological short sighted liberal plan.


MrBob_58
said

The Liberals want to send a billion dollars to help care for the eldery. Sounds ok to me. We will all get old and some of us will need the help. Better than spending a billion dollars for a party/ photo op like our current government did..


Adam Baum
said

Or we could spend this 1 Billion on a 2 day security tab. Liberals would spend 1 Billion on helping the sick and elderly, the conservatives would spend a billion on a 2 day photo op. The choice is yours, who will you vote for?


mike in NB
said

Who's money is he going to take? I already have enough burden looking after a sick grandchild and three children with hearing aids. This 'compassionate man' has no compassion for me.


Brett in Montréal
said

Nice to see someone thinking of our aging populations instead of the doom and gloom CONS who will need to stir up some crisis to try to hold on to power. The Canadian public is finally waking up and seeing how destructive and secretive the CONS are and that there are better options. Mr.Ignatieff and the Liberals are the best choice for Canada and here is hoping that we have an election soon and get Herr Harper and his goosestepping minions out of office.


Al - Ottawa
said

Here we go again, more promises. I trust him as far as I can throw my car. And let's supposed they keep a promise for once, and they cancel "corporate tax cuts". What happens when companies move their business overseas since there is no incentives to stay here? Oh yeah, more people losing their jobs. Then again, with Emperor Iggy's plan to have people receive EI after working 45 days per year, I guess people should be able to find enough work per year to reach that. We'll just increase taxes on corporations more to pay for that, which would make even more companies leave the country, which in turn means more people losing their jobs... hey, wait a minute, isn't this a vicious circle?


West Coast Guy
said

This is so much needed; to be with a dying member of a family in the last few months of life is critical. The difference between a compassionate small "l" liberal and a mean spirited small "c" conservative. Harper has been pretending he's a "liberal" and we all know now after his 4 years of power he is a mean spirited conservative. A clear distinction in the next election.


Retired David in Dartmouth
said

Lookout defence budjet....looks like the F-35 will be blown out of the sky to pay for this....or the Navy's Supply ships.....or the new air transports the airforce got.. Hey Iggy...do you mind lettting us in on HOW this will be paid for..? I never did appreciate you fat cats trying to buy my vote with our money.....Shame on you!!!


JB in Calgary
said

@ Liberal Supporters. You are all falling right into the hands of the Liberal Party. They know that only about 5% of the population has taken any sort of higher level economics courses and they count on it. You see corporate tax cuts as giving money to the rich, when in fact it allows the companies to hire more people and expand their business. You see building our military as a waste of money, we'll see what you say when an airliner gets hijacked in Toronto and the only planes we have are in Cold Lake, Alberta. You see this liberal plan as caring for the people, when in fact it is the age old Liberal plan, throw more money at every problem and hope that the return is high enough so as to boast about how it worked out; if it doesn't, just throw more money at it and tax the corporations.


George Alberta
said

So we could pay for this program for more than a year at the same cost of just one weekend G20 photo op spent by our present " leader ". It's a great idea taking the money from rich corporations rather than taking it from the working man. Businesses will still stay in business they just won't make those ridiculous amounts of money.


GWWH
said

God will you partisan CONservative idiots stop with the crap. OMG ... what do you propose to do with 40% of our population in 10 years? Open up nursoing home jails to house them for billions more? We need to take care of the future, and those that spent their lives contributing. No plan is perfect ... I have 2 elderly parents whose health is failing slowly. They need my support, and they pay handsomely for other services they need. We all need to take a step back and stop with the CONbots ... I wonder how you will feel when you are no longer able to look after yourself and the Harper boys stick you in a ward with 20 other old people with no quality of life. You reap what you sow people


Dan from Northern Ont
said

Nothing in life is free. Unless we want to end up a mess like Greece, pumping ridiculous amounts of money into free perks is just going to spoil our citizens until the bubble bursts.


MARG MM
said

Sounds good on the surface, but we all know how Liberal promises turn out. Remember"we will get rid of the GST, we will have universal daycare", never happened. If they regain power, they will simply say the promises they made are unaffordable, therefore will not happen. Of course they could (as they have done before) cut transfer payments to the provinces, "raid" other departments , etc,etc. It might make the Liberals seem compassionate, but vote getting is much more important to them. Certainly more can be done to help families care for their elderly, and ill members,but I just don't trust the Liberals when they say they will do it. While many agree with not cutting taxes to Corporations, lets remember that it is Corporations that employ the majority of Canadians, thus keeping our economy moving.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

Garbage in garbage out policy. What possible logic is there to redirecting massive resources to the demographic that will contribute the very least to Canada's future. If you want to improve the country's future use resources to increase the number pursuing higher education. The insane self-defeating money grab that is the student loan program has discouraged countless capable young people from seeking the knowledge and skills that are going to be desperately needed to support the economy.


Sam
said

This is what Canada needs, government that cares, not scares. Thank you Mr Ignatieff for offering good policies to Canadians, Harper has nothing but bad ideas that cost our country billions & we get nothing in return.


Joe
said

I remember Dalton McTaxme saying he won't raise taxes. Who ever trusts a Liberal politician deserves to go to a mental hospital.


Jeff
said

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't "trickle down" economics proven not to work when Reagan tried it? Why are the conservatives trying to revive it?


Bob Loblaw
said

Ahh Mr. Baird with his free market magic... corporate tax cuts will heal the sick and educate our children! Let's get these ideologically motivated kooks OUT and replace them with someone who will actually get to doing the work government is supposed to do, instead of just trying to dismantle it.


Fiscally Left
said

It's apparent from the comments that those a little short on the learnin can't see a good policy when it's presented.


Allen
said

This sounds a lot like the Red Book, and look what happen to those promises. Just more of the same from the LPC (Loser Party of Canada).


CYL
said

Iggy, I do not understand this pledge. Here goes another increase in taxes which we do not need. He can promise anything, I do not buy it. With every government spending it's taxes that gonna pay for it and we are already choking. If they say there won't be tax increases, they are liars because one way or another we pay !!!


W. J Dunlap
said

As long as I can remember the name "Muroney", I never again will vote PC! The PC party is totally devoted to the corporate world and the Liberal party is devoted to the people. It's a simple as that and it has always been thus. The corporations finance the PC party to get it into power and for four years the corporate fleecers gorge themselves. Then the people get wise, realize they've been taken and get rid of them. Any Social benefits we have today were ALL brought in by a Liberal Party with the help of the NDP. Simple fact. Elect PC, and you lose them. REMEMBER MULRONEY!


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said

Another of many Liberal promises that will never see the light of day. This Liberal "pledge" is nothing more than a grab for votes, anyone who thinks any different is dreaming ! Promises are cheap !


Eric
said

I love how there're a few people on here declaring they're sick of partisan attacks... then proceed to spout the equivalent of "HARPER'S A POOPY HEAD" while lauding the Liberals as our saviors.I agree, enough of the partisanship. The Conservatives aren't perfect but neither are the Liberals. To think otherwise is ignorance at its worst.


Hal
said

This guy sounds more like Dalton.If we elect the federal Liberal/NDP/Block Coalition out taxes will go thru the roof!


bob
said

So cancel the tax cuts to the engine that runs the country in order to put more money into social programs? Corporations are going to make money one way or another. If you tax them high, then they cut operating cost which results in lost jobs. That sounds smart to me. So in the long run when you have more people on government assistance programs because they lost their corporate job, how do the liberals plan on covering all these cost?


Indigo Soul
said

The Conservatives aren't even addressing the major problem of how to care for our aging population, so kudos to Iggy for trying. But the Liberal solution is short-sighted. Support for families is definitely needed but it won't be nearly enough. So while it makes for good PR, the fact is our healthcare system is quietly going bankrupt from aging diseases such as dementia and its getting worse as our baby boomers age. Right now its costing Canadians $50M A DAY. In another 10 years we won't be able to afford these care costs unless some new treatment or cure is found. The feds MUST put money into research for a cure or we are hooped. Its the only viable long-term solution. There ARE plans out there, but Ottawa isn't listening.

Ned
said

Good work Micheal finally a politician working for the good of Canadians. I can't trust the neocons any further than I can throw my house.


Jon In London ON
said

It was a wise and learned man who said - a democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship. Wise words indeed.


mike in NB
said

@ west coast guy - are you saying the mean ones are the government bullies who want to take my hard eaned money without my permission? Or is it that you are saying its the mean ones who want to let me do what I know is best for my own money? Name calling is becoming such a Canadian thing to do these days. Maybe we should think twice before we stereotype Americans about their attitudes. Ignorance comes from all sides and none of it is helpful.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

"Me political cave-dweller. Me think private sector bad; public sector good. Government take care of people. Corporations evil. Me vote Liberal."


steve
said

This is money well spent and cost less than the g20/g8 fiasco.

The Conservatives are notorious for undermining the public good, sqaundering money and rarely paying out moneys pledged.


steve
said

This what a government should be doing: plan programs that benefit people! Freeing Canadians from the cost burden of caring for the elderly would benefit the economy with better productivity and available discretionary spending capital. To all the NeoCons out there: how does a program like this get in the way of business?


dogcat
said

sounds to me that the another election is not to far off...let harper stay for a little longer and he will force to make the people decide if we spend our monies on planes and other toys or on the people....we are all getting older


Frank Buchan
said

The plan is irrelevant because we can't pay for it. Further taxes are not really an option, and bigger government programs are not an option. As to the cons versus liberals nonsense, all the rhetoric in the world doesn't change the flat fact that we cannot afford this kind of spending. Maybe if the past six governments of every brand hadn't mismanaged finances so badly, and had taken care of the basic business of streamlining services, we could. But, we can't. Not until we return the role of the federal government to what it was intended to do, and eliminate all the waste.


ike
said

It seems a lot better option than blowing a billion and then some in three days on a conference like the current government did. Funny how the newcons did not complain about their taxes then.


Bob,Calgary
said

this is typical Liberal tactics. It is very easy to promise money for homecare because it is a win-win proposition for the Liberals. Who would argue that money spent on such a program is not a good thing. And add to that the money would be taken from those big,bad Canadian corporations who get a free ride on the backs of taxpayers. Many Canadians, with a basic distrust of big companies believe all this Liberal B.S. However if one thinks clearly about the future it makes imminent sense to continue reducing the tax burden on Canadian business. If the Provinces continue to reduce their corporate rates and the Feds continue to do the same this makes Canada a more attractive place to invest. Business investment creates jobs and puts Canadians to work which , in the long run, generates more tax revenue. I expect the Liberals next policy announcement will somehow involve kicking the U.S., their other favourite target. And if they can't figure out a strategy that involves the U.S. let's take a dig at Alberta another tactic which sells well in Eastern Canada. I don't necessarily love the Conservatives but , on economic issues, they are light years ahead of the Liberals. At least they think about the future and what helps Canada in the long run. The Liberals just want to get in power again so they can statrt back on the road to ruining the country i.e. trade Trudeaumania for Iggymania.


Matt
said

Seriously. How STUPID is Ignatieff? All this announcement does is draw attention DIRECTLY to the fact the Liberals DON'T keep their election promises. Iggy has promised national daycare. That was a Liberal election promise in 1993, 1997, 2000, 2004. Iggy promises Garegiver reform. That was a Liberal election promise in 1997, 2000, 2004. They did NOTHING to keep those promises WITH MAJORITY governments and when Canada's economy was booming. Now we're expected to believe they will keep those expensive promises with Canada in a fragile econimoc recovery from the worldwide recession????


James T Murphy
said

Instead of the liberal typical plan of raising taxes and then distributing our money back to whom ever they deem fits their political agenda, why not give us all a tax cut so we will have the resources to take care of the sick and elderly on our terms and not the liberal's. That makes sense but takes the power away from big brother government which the libs can't stomach.


charlie
said

The last time I voted Liberal, Chretien was going to abolish the GST. Still waiting for that one, and waiting ......The Conservatives reduced my tax burden - how about that? I am also looking for all the soldiers, on the streets, with guns, that the Liberals assured me would be there as soon as Harper took over. Likewise, I am also still waiting for the implosion of Canadian society that the Liberals assured me would happen once the Conservatives took power from their enlightened and entitled hands. I was fooled once - never again.


M.M.B. Ont
said

Iggy has been blowing off steam about the high deficit that not only the Conservatives but the Liberals and NDP are responsible for as well. Now suddenly he is not worried about the deficit but instead feels he can tax us poor working people even more by spending more. Reduction in corporate taxes are necessary if people are to work. What about all our young people graduation out of colleges and Universities? Where will the jobs be for them when all the companies will have closed or moved. Who will then help support this country because our young people will have to go where the jobs are.. to other countries. The fighter jets are necessary in order to be prepared in case Canada is attacked and we all know that could happen any time. Ontarians are being taxed to the hilt already by a Liberal gov't where we have hardly any extra left after we pay the high cost of gas, heating fuel and hydro and water with the added HST. I certainly will never trust a Liberal gov't and certainly not Iggy who really does not know Canadians. He is just buying votes on the backs of the ill and elderly. Empty and costly Liberal promises.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Facebook

Share this article with Facebook

DIGG

Share this article with Digg

Newsvine

Share this article with Newsvine

Delicious

Share this article with delicious

Email

Share this article.
Send Email

Twitter

Share this article with Twitter

StumbleUpon

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Reddit

Share this article with Reddit

Yahoo! Buzz

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz

Most Talked about Stories

These are HR issues more than technology issues. Flat out, the government has too many fingers in too many pies, and too many people working at cross purposes. Streamline government, return it to its aggregate purposes, and most of this would be less threatening.

Frank Buchan

Bureaucrats with BlackBerrys a risk: privacy report