Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close

Congress hopefuls vow to be pork-free

continued from page 3

Social Networks
facebookFacebook
twitterTwitter

"Republican Senate candidates from around the nation, from Mark Kirk in Illinois to Marco Rubio in Florida, have campaigned to stop the earmark favor factory and I trust them to keep their word when they get here," he said. "If Republicans fail to take a stand against earmarks next year, it will send a terrible message to Americans that our party hasn't learned its lesson."

Another option would be for Republicans to require more transparency in the process, although Democrats have made huge strides in the past four years by passing rules requiring lawmakers to publish all their special spending requests and to print the earmarks awarded along with each bill's text. The rules also limit the types of earmark requests allowed.

Democrats have largely watched from the sidelines and have needled Republicans as they struggle with the issue, particularly after House Republicans dropped references to earmarks from their Pledge to America, a lengthy agenda released last month.

"I'm not surprised by that, because they quadrupled earmarks when they were in charge," said House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat. "We have halved earmarks and made them transparent and fully reportable by members when they request them."

Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican and a longtime earmark foe, said limiting the practice will not be enough.

"I'm all for transparency, but the reality is, they will always find ways around it. That's what I've found," he said.

© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments

lionhart says:

29 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

Earmarks are a sinister way for congresspeople to buy votes. That illustrates how superficial the thinking of most people is about the insidious nature of earmarks. Earmarks are actually the greatest destroyer of local rule and the biggest booster of a bloated fed. Government there is. Think about it, If it's Fed. money it's free. We don't have to pay for our tennis courts. We may participate in paying for someone else's bridge but we get our tennis courts free. Meanwhile the Fed. Gov. expands it's tenticles of control and our representatives can use our tax dollars to buy our votes. Both ways we get hosed. Let's ditch the federal largesse and pay for what we need locally with local funds. You'd be amazed at how that tends to sharpen our ideas about what is "nice to have" and what is essential.

jwright673 says:

1 hour, 5 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

If anyone believes this I have some swampland in the Gobi desert for sale. These germs will give up their pork, earmarks and graft when there's nothing left to barter. A plague on all of them.

BritishGoy says:

1 hour, 18 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

There's what seems to me a fundamental flaw in every government Bill: the last sentence "and for other puposes". The idea that any Bill can include an amendment or any other content dealing with something that has nothing whatever to to with its stated purpose seems totally crazy to me.

View all comment(s) on this article.

Post a comment

Title

Not Registered Yet?

Comment on articles. Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts. Sign up today.

Happening Now

Please click for more

Most Read

    Independent voices from the TWT Communities

    Movies in Toto

    Interviews and movie reviews, including DVD and Blu-ray reviews.

    Autism Unexpected

    Thoughts on the unexpected emotions, difficulties and joys involved in raising a special-needs child.

    Baseball's Labyrinth

    A statistically slanted view of baseball, brought to you by a disciple of the Bill James movement.