First thoughts: Mind the (money) gap

GOP-leaning outside groups are blowing away their Democratic counterparts… Why did Dem groups disarm?... A potential downside to GOP outside groups essentially replacing the RNC… Wrapping up last night's Blumenthal vs. McMahon debate… O'Donnell and Paladino air new spots in search of a makeover… Murkowski vs. the Tea Party Express… Obama delivers remarks at White House Community College Summit at 12:15 pm ET… And previewing VA-5.

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Domenico Montanaro, and Ali Weinberg
*** Mind the (money) gap: As we mentioned a couple of weeks ago, Democratic federal campaign committees (DNC/DSCC/DCCC) have a combined $20 million cash-on-hand advantage over their GOP counterparts (RNC/NRSC/NRCC). And the DNC's impressive $16 million haul for September will only add to that edge. But in what could very well be the cycle's biggest story, GOP-leaning outside groups -- like the Rove-backed American Crossroads and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- are more than making up the gap. According to Democratic ad-tracking numbers, outside GOP groups spent a whopping $34 million in August and September, compared with just $4 million by Dem groups. And that's just in Senate races. In House races, GOP groups have spent or plan to spend some $30 million in more than 70 districts, versus $7.5 million by Dem groups. Now comes this Politico report: American Crossroads is announcing today a mammoth $4 million advertising blitz in eight key Senate contests. Indeed, the disparity is only going to grow in October, thanks to the fact that in politics, like, well anything in life: money follows winners.

*** Why did Dem groups disarm? This is turning into a financial blowout. Amazingly, Democratic outside groups are acting as if they've disarmed. Why? Some reasons we've heard from Democrats who are trying to compete on this front: 1) the economy is bad; 2) the Dem donor base is demoralized and tired; 3) some of the bigger donors are liberals, and they've been disappointed with the administration's policies; 4) the president isn't really courting the big donors; 5) Obama's attacks on the Citizens United decision have deterred them from getting involved; 6) Obama doesn't have a long-time donor network, a la the Clintons (think Terry McAuliffe); and 7) many of the Democrats' best fundraisers are ambassadors right now. And here's another reason: Dems got a tad complacent after Obama's enormous money haul in 2008. The assumption was that money wouldn't be an object, so Dem-leaning outside groups never really tried, and they believed -- deep down -- that the GOP outside groups couldn't raise the big bucks. Well guess what…

*** The one potential downside for Republicans here: However, there is one potential downside to these GOP groups essentially supplanting the Republican National Committee as the GOP's cash cow: These groups are dropping big bucks on TV ads, but are they doing the things needed for long-term success -- like building voter rolls or an effective GOTV operation? That's not something you can do quickly; it takes time. That said, this GOP outside spending should serve as a big wakeup call for Team Obama in 2012, because while he had an ENORMOUS financial advantage over John McCain (who didn't want to look like a flip-flopper on campaign finance issues), that probably won't be the case for the next GOP nominee.

*** Blumenthal vs. McMahon: Want to know why Linda McMahon's campaign finally dropped its TV ad hitting Richard Blumenthal over his misstatements about his military service? Because her campaign wanted to make sure it was a key part of last night's debate, and it was. Here was Blumenthal's response, per the Hartford Courant: "I'm proud of my military services. On a few occasions out of hundreds, I've described it inaccurately and I regret it, I take full responsibility for it. It was not intentional but that is no excuse, and I want to say that I am sorry.'' Meanwhile, McMahon had to respond to the Blumenthal charge that she was open to a reduction in the minimum wage. "That's a lie," she said. "You know that that's a lie." The New York Times: "The disagreement stemmed from a recent appearance at which Ms. McMahon was asked by reporters if she believed the minimum wage should be lowered. She did not explicitly say it should not, and Democrats have pounced on that ambiguity to suggest she favors reducing it."

*** Bewitched: In what has to be the first-ever political TV ad in which a candidate declares that he/she is NOT a witch, Delaware GOP Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell is up with her first general-election ad. "I'm not a witch. I'm nothing you've heard. I'm you." she says to the camera. "No one of us are perfect, but none of us can be happy with what we see all around us… I'll go to Washington and do what you would do." This TV ad raises the same question that Sarah Palin's vice-presidential candidacy two years ago: Whom do Americans want representing them in Congress and the White House -- folks exactly like them, or the best and the brightest?

*** Paladino's makeover: Christine O'Donnell isn't the only Tea Party candidate who has cut a spot in search of a makeover. "This campaign is not about my family," a subdued Paladino says to the camera in a new Web video. "It is not about divorces or affairs. It's about who has a plan to restore prosperity and economic growth to New York state."

*** Murkowski vs. Tea Party Express: Per NBC's Kelly O'Donnell, Sen. Lisa Murkowski -- who's running a write-in campaign after her primary defeat -- is asking Alaska TV stations NOT to run new ads paid for by the Tea Party Express, a group that backs GOP nominee Joe Miller. Murkowski's legal team sent a letter "to all Alaska broadcasters reminding them that they will be held liable for knowingly running false advertising or for knowingly broadcasting false information." Murkowski aides claim the Tea Party Express accuses Murkowski and her campaign of trying "to influence the absentee vote count." They point to Alaska elections officials who say the Aug. 24 primary was conducted fairly. Murkowski said, "This ad is vile. Accusing me of influencing the absentee voter count is dirty politics at it worst." Of course, Murkowski has her own TV ad that takes a shot at the Tea Party Express, and has called the group "extremist."

*** Obama's day: At 12:15 pm ET, President Obama delivers remarks at the White House's Community College Summit. And at 7:50 pm, he speaks to the 2010 Fortune Most Powerful Women summit.

*** 75 House races to watch: VA-5: The Democratic nominee is first-term incumbent Tom Perriello, who won by just 727 votes. His GOP opponent is state Sen. Robert Hurt. In 2008, McCain won 51% in this district – which includes Charlottesville but also the southern part of the state – and Bush won 56% in '04. As of June 30, Perriello had $1.7 million in the bank, while Hurt had nearly $216,000. Perriello voted for the stimulus, cap-and-trade, and health care. Cook rates the race as a Toss Up, and Rothenberg has it Toss Up/Tilt Republican.

*** More midterm news: In Ohio's gubernatorial contest, a new Quinnipiac poll shows that John Kasich (R) is leading Gov. Ted Strickland (D) by nine points (50%-41%), down from his 17-point lead last month (54%-37%).

Countdown to Election Day 2010: 28 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter.

Discuss this article

Jump to discussion page: 1 2
LouisJExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Daily fun...

Lou Dobbs and Rick Sanchez for office according to the spin thrift store.

Good job to Lawrence for calling the TEA partier Dobbs out to come on his show to announce a candidacy. Because that sounds like what he is trying to eventually do which will make the 2012 Republican field huge. Talk about a gap of enthusiasm of leadership. There is none.

I still don't understand how these guys continue to support crazy folk like the other O'Donnell.

TEA baggery is a mental issue that will be examined for years to come.

  • 13 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:27 AM EDT

LouisJ

I still don't understand how these guys continue to support crazy folk like the other O'Donnell.

Could it be the pessimistic doom and gloom meme (read President Obama is destroying America) is littered with supporters seemingly whose brains are the size of mice .

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:36 AM EDT

"TEA baggery is a mental issue that will be examined for years to come."

Are you referring to the sexual practice favored by some in the San Francisco area?

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:48 AM EDT

I'm referring to the TEA baggery of people that wear TEA bags on their caps in the name of the Republican Party. Isn't that what the TEA partiers represent? TEA bags? If not, then they shouldn't wear TEA bags from their caps.

  • 8 votes
#1.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:56 AM EDT

Irony is lost dept.#276

Archie (Louis) hates bigots especially those stupid polacks...:)

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:05 AM EDT

CU Farley

Are you referring to the sexual practice favored by some in the San Francisco area?

It's not a "San Francisco" thing; it's a sort of alpha chimpanzee show of dominance used by some high school bullies against some student they perceive as weak or nerdy. It's in the same category of juvenile misbehavior as tripping someone as they walk down stairs.

Given the bullying behavior the Tea partiers exhibited in town hall meetings on health care last year that got them their initial notoriety, it's a fairly apt label for the Tea Paritiers. And they used the term themselves before anyone else did. One of TPers actually said on TV: "tea bag them before they can tea bag you."

  • 7 votes
#1.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:36 AM EDT

MICE! Your right Beverly. Mice with human brains. Just like O'Donnell predicted. What a brilliant fortune teller,{of course she is a Witch, right?)

Got to love these Repugs.

  • 5 votes
#1.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:38 AM EDT

California Tom

MICE! Your right Beverly....

_________________________________________________________________________

presented without further comment...

  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:45 AM EDT

The mice got your tongue Dangerfield? I guess O'Donnell almost got it wright, she just had it backwards, in stead of mice with human brains, it's the republicans with mice brains now I get what she was talking about she was just confused.

  • 1 vote
#1.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:03 AM EDT

guess O'Donnell almost got it wright

___________________________________________________________

Again, no comment needed...

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:48 AM EDT

dangerfield

guess O'Donnell almost got it wright

___________________________________________________________

Again, no comment needed

Wow, I guess you don't need to give US another poll either?

    #1.10 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
    Reply

    Obama, Jill Biden to participate in first-ever White House summit on community colleges

    DARLENE SUPERVILLE Associated Press Writer

    October 5, 2010|2:26 a.m

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is turning the education spotlight on community colleges, enlisting career teacher and second lady Jill Biden to preside over the first-ever White House summit on the system of schools he's counting on to help produce an additional 8 million graduates by 2020.

    Obama used a Monday meeting with his economic advisers to argue that a Republican plan to cut education funding "just doesn't make sense" in a bad economy and at a time other countries are competing harder against the U.S.

    ___________________________________________________________

    Little bit of full disclosure here. I have something in common with Mrs. Biden. I have taught at the community college level myself. My beautiful bride is a retired teacher of thirty years of service to the education system. Both of us were imbued with an appreciation for the benefits and rewards of an education very early in life. So I may be just a little biased here.

    The Community College systems have been a valuable resource for quite a while now for fulfilling continuing education requirements within the Trades for licensing. They have also emerged as one of the most valuable resources for training and retraining folks to advance themselves in their professions or that have to change professions because there are no longer jobs available in their field. One of the most positive developments of the system has been to develop programs so that students can attend to either fulfill core requirements for higher education or for remedial work so that they are better prepared for attendance at a university or college. I know at least a dozen young folks who because of reduced circumstances within their families have chosen to take this route to higher education because it’s the only way they can make it work.

    Yet the Party of Wall Street and the Tea Partiers are saying that we are going to have to cut 20% out of Education or do away with the Education Department entirely. You see our legislators took away their middleman status on loans and things for Higher Education. Since they aren’t getting their cut and can’t make money on it they no longer care about it and are trying to convince folks that we either don’t need it or that we can’t afford it. How is our society going to move forward without investing in education and training so that we and our children are better prepared to deal with the challenges that lie ahead. As my dear old Redneck Daddy always told me “ Education may not be the only thing that it takes to get ahead in the world but its dang sure the most important thing “. We’ve made some positive strides in this direction last couple of years. Now is not the time to start backing up.

    • 17 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:32 AM EDT

    IR:

    I agree. Education in this country is going into the toilet. The Community College is a very important resource that often gets overlooked. For example: Nurses can get the same RN certification that is available through 4 year colleges. They are RN'S in every sense of the word. Granted they would not likely become managers (most hospitals want a 4 yr degree for that - ?? Why). They could not be officers in the military unless they get their BA/BS for the most part. But there are tons of high paying jobs you can get with a 2 year degree.

    We spend more per pupil on education than any country and the results are just dismal. Drop out rates going up, fewer graduations at both the high school and college level. We used to rank #1 in Math and Science, now we are down in the 20's. THe No Child Left Behind Bill became the NO Child Brought Forward Bill.

    Quality Education must be made available to every child in this country, not just the wealthy. This is the road to prosperity pure and simple.

    • 14 votes
    #2.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:44 AM EDT

    Our local community college here in western Pa. has so many creative and different programs--and not just for kids right out of high school. We have a program that helps displaced homemakers (for example women who have been stay-at-home moms and need to re-renter the job force due to the economy or divorce) and many other programs. I hope the summit identifies the best of these programs around the country and helps get out the word.

    Another difference between the Dems and Republicans, in my view. Could it have anything to do with the fact that community colleges tend to serve lower income folks?

    • 12 votes
    #2.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:45 AM EDT

    Independent Redneck Va.

    Thanks for the positive feedback

    Since they aren't getting their cut and can't make money on it they no longer care about it and are trying to convince folks that we either don't need it or that we can't afford it. How is our society going to move forward without investing in education and training so that we and our children are better prepared to deal with the challenges that lie ahead.

    From my vantage point I see a twofold answer

    a) They are greedy and selfish and will do anything to recapture power including sitting on their wealth; rather than provide jobs for America. If they create an environment of pessimism and uncertainty, it will allow them to continue their status quo of their private conviviality.

    b) They're mostly Republicans who are jealous of the man in the Oval Office and can't accept change.

    • 15 votes
    #2.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:00 AM EDT

    Here's a bit of News, you won't hear on 1st Read. A Northern Georgia Federal Judge, appointed by Ronnie Raygun in 1988, had to step aside while he's being investigated for Buying Cocaine, Pot, Roxycodone, from a Stripper he met in an AtlaNTA StripClub. The Judge would give the Stripper $$ to purchase the Drug's, even gave her a PillCrusher to crush the RoxyCodone & together they'd Snort the Cocaine & RoxyCodone.

    Gotta love that NO legislating from the bench crowd.

    • 9 votes
    #2.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:10 AM EDT

    Great post, IR, and so true. Community colleges have always provided education beyond English and Math and into vocation for kids who like working on cars, or fixing things. They provide training in new fields for older people. Education is the key to the future for every child and continuing education for adults in this rapidly changing environment. People do not have to become rocket scientists, doctors, engineers but without education, they will never achieve their potential. Community colleges are where we go to learn how to use the latest computer programs or take an art class or a creative writing class.

    • 8 votes
    #2.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:19 AM EDT

    Good morning folks:

    Usually, I agree with the posters who lean to the left of center, but today we have a serious difference of opinion.

    In the past, the focus of community colleges was on vocational education. Today, that simply isn't the case. After all, people who work with their hands are pretty disgusting, no? I mean all they do is build our homes, work on our cars, bring food to our tables and other such trivial enterprises.

    What we really need are people who can productively sit in front of a computer terminal for eight hours. Please! These people have completely transformed the community colleges, and then when they finally graduate from a four-year school, they are loaded with debt and can't understand why employers aren't standing in line to snatch up these wonders with their degrees in "Underwater Basket Weaving".

    Hyperbole to be sure, but we really can't absorb more "workers" with degrees in Psychology, Sociology, Ethnic Studies, and the like. (I can't begin to count the number of times I have talked to people who base their majors on how few math classes are required. Let's remember, this is a country that gives us a large number of citizens who think you can cut taxes and still balance a budget.)

    Worse, many of these "colleges" cater to students who are taking remedial education classes. You can check the stats. They're graduating high school, or dropping out, and then going to a CC to learn something they should have learned in high school. Come on! How many times do we pay for these classes?

    CC's can be a wonderful alternative for overpriced four-year colleges, at least for the first two years. However, the trades are woefully neglected and we really need these folks.

    Just like every other aspect of our failed educational system, Community Colleges need to be completely torn down and rebuilt to meet the needs of a world that is passing us by.

    • 2 votes
    #2.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:10 AM EDT

    The "I got mine, too bad for you" crowd is real heavy into criticizing education these days, in many cases going so far as to say public education should be abolished entirely. They're missing that education is and always has been an American INVESTMENT in the future of our nation. If we slack on that we fill our society with idiots, essentially polluting our environment and killing the ability to be the vital, nimble, innovative economic powerhouse that is the United States. We become a heierarchical society where social mobility is a forgotten thing and many of the best and brightest are never even discovered.

    • 9 votes
    #2.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:11 AM EDT

    David Walker - I think your post shows that we need to look at Community Colleges DIFFERENTLY; I do not think that we have a difference in opinion.

    For many, Community Colleges are great for taking the require 'core' classes that you can transfer to any 4-year University for course study. I have noted that this seems to be the 'new' direction for Community Colleges to survive economically.

    What we are not seeing a lot of are Vocational schools. Not everyone is cut out for (or wants to be in) Academia. There are some vocations that pay MORE than their academic counterparts.

    What I think is needed, and I agree with David Walker, is a new outlook on schools and opportunities that schools prepare us for. Personally, I think that majors like Psychology, History, Sociology, Political Science and Philosophy are more 'classical' and less 'practical' in our world today, even though they provide a good basis for foisting structured thought and making (and defending) rational arument. Usually these majors are 'joined' with something else, usually business related (Business Administration, Accounting).

    I think David walker makes a good argument for CHANGE. Let's hope that the new crop of educators recognise this and make the appropriate changes that will move all of us forward.

    • 5 votes
    #2.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:58 AM EDT

    Education is this country because of the Teacher's Unions, not because of the Tea Party, Republican Party or any other party you want to name. Just a month or so ago, here in Southern Illinois, teachers threatened to strike because they couldn't get their 2.5 pay increase and 2.7 step increase included in their next contract, also they demanded 100% healthcare for themselves and their families.

    Luckily their ridiculous demands were exposed by the local paper. When the union discovered how the public was against them, the negotaited a reasonable contract. I truely feel horrible that they have to pay 10% of their families healthcare costs (NOT) Now the teacher's union wastes time at the school board meetings whining about some of the teachers had to take a $600.00 A YEAR pay cut in order to pay their families healthcare costs. This time should be spent finding issues to problems in the school system. I have had several friends and neighbors who have taken $600.00 a month pay cuts to keep their jobs and these teachers are whinning over $600. a year.

    Its time for it to be against the law for teachers to unionize, and tenure must be eliminated. Charter schools and vouchers are the way to go, you could see a big difference during NBS's Education Nation between the unionized teachers (who sit on their rear end and complain) and charter school teachers who are given the latitude to teach as they need.

    I am proud to pay my property taxes for education, I have a Masters Degree in Aeronautical Engineering and if it wasn't for my elementary and high school teachers, I wouldn't be as successful as I am today, but teachers aren't what they were years ago, they only care about money and how they can screw the taxpayers.

    I have to pay for my family's healthcare, I don't get a raise every year and I don't think my taxpayers dollars should go to ensure that these lazy union members should be getting benefits that I do not receive.

    • 3 votes
    #2.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:01 PM EDT

    You know something Janet I’m getting tired of listening to that B.S. about how all the teachers are sorry and just show up a stand around all day because the unions will protect them and on and on and yada yada yada.

    Do any of you’ll folks have any idea what it takes to be a teacher. A real honest to goodness educator. Well I do because I’ve woke up beside one for over thirty years. At least on the days when she didn’t get up before I did because there were papers to Grade. Or she had to get to school early to have a conference with a struggling pupils parent at the only time they could schedule it before they went to work themselves.

    Then there was the years that she had to teach class with a student with A.D. on her lap because that was the only way to keep control of that student so the rest could learn and be safe. How about all the morning coffee that she had to give up during the week because not having an assistant she couldn’t get to the bathroom from 7:00 till 3:30. All that and all that time she worked longer hours than I did for half the money.

    So please you’ll take that tired old pile of horse apples somewhere where somebody is going to believe it because I’ve been there and done that and you have no idea what it takes to spend one day in a classroom much less 30 years. As for teacher’s not being what they once were no they aren’t. I know several young ones just getting started. They’re better

    • 7 votes
    #2.10 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:50 PM EDT

    John B, DesMoines IA:

    "....education is and always has been an American INVESTMENT in the future of our nation."

    John, you took the words right out of my mouth. Thank you for the post. Unfortunately those that scoff at education/higher education want immediate $$$ for their investments. They NEVER think about the future of OUR country. Sad

    • 3 votes
    #2.11 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:54 PM EDT

    Education certainly should not be cut, in fact more funds should be allocated to education. However, until you stop jobs in this country from being outsourced, no amount of education funding will turn the tide. Getting back from a trade show last month I saw an alarming stat. Foreign students in engineering school in the US rose from 5-8% of the class in 1990 to nearly 30% of the doctorate science degrees and 63% of engineering degrees of the class in 2006. Not only are we out-souring jobs, but we are educating the "elite" classes.

    At some point you will have to put in some form of protective measures that penalizes companies for outsourcing jobs and makes it more competitive to produce products in the US, ultimately bringing jobs back.

    • 3 votes
    #2.12 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:00 PM EDT

    Great job, IR, responding to Janet. I am tired of listening to the right blame everything on unions--unions are evil, they hurt the economy. No, big corporations shipping jobs overseas and cutting pay for workers so they can make a bigger profit and then those workers can no longer afford the products they make are what is wrong. Since Reagan, republicans have done nothing except demonize unions. People should be asking why that is. Unions protect workers from the powerful and the greedy. Too many republicans need to educate themselves on just what unions have done for them because it is a lot.

    • 4 votes
    #2.13 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:00 PM EDT

    Throwing more money at education by raising taxes is not the answer to our education problems. Like every other government program I can think of, our education system is mismanaged and needs to be fixed, but throwing money at the problem is not the answer. This administration in office seems to feel you can just throw allot of money at any problem and it will be fixed, they are dead wrong as we have seen what the Tarp money did for the economy, nothing at all. I will vote GOP in this election and have donated to the Tea Party, Christine O'Donnell (I don't even live in Delaware) and the GOP and I am sure many other Americans are doing the same. We need government to actually manage the programs it has, not create more and throw tax money at them to fix problems.

    • 2 votes
    #2.14 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:08 PM EDT

    I will vote GOP in this election and have donated to the Tea Party, Christine O'Donnell (I don't even live in Delaware)

    Guess P.T. Barnum was right... something about a sucker being born every minute...

    • 1 vote
    #2.15 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:19 PM EDT

    This administration in office seems to feel you can just throw allot of money at any problem and it will be fixed, they are dead wrong as we have seen what the Tarp money did for the economy, nothing at all.

    Rondoslade2 - I disagree with your assessment of this administration where it relates to education. The fact of the matter is that Education is an investment in OUR future, and for the the past 20 years or so we have NEGLECTED that investment, just like we have with our infrastructure. We wasted/squandered that INVESTMENT money in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    I will vote GOP in this election and have donated to the Tea Party, Christine O'Donnell (I don't even live in Delaware) and the GOP and I am sure many other Americans are doing the same. We need government to actually manage the programs it has, not create more and throw tax money at them to fix problems.

    You also need some IDEAS to fix what ails us with our Education. You have a right to donate to the Tea Party and GOP - I encourage that.

    However, are you SURE that your INVESTMENT in the Tea Party and the GOP will garner the result(s) you desire? From the GOP's track record, I would say no. We don't know the Tea Party's track record - yet.

      #2.16 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:27 PM EDT

      @ Jody.

      I have to agree that unions are not the issue. In fact, as an owner of a manufacturing company I support real living wages. Price pressure form very inexpensive imports is the largest factor when considering how to price a product in the market, and at what profit margin. And of course it is that profit margin that ultimately dictates employee compensation. Fortunately, we are more of a niche manufacturing company and are not as affected as other firms. And we stay away from mass marketed products because we cannot compete against Chinese imports, even if we set our labor costs to zero.

        #2.17 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
        Reply

        If you want to go back to the same failed policies of the previous administration - vote Republican

        If you want record deficits – vote Republican

        If you want to cut, repeal or privatize Social Security, Medicare and Veterans Benefits – vote Republican

        If you want to keep farming good paying jobs overseas at the expense of Americans – vote Republican

        If you want a party that votes against every job stimulus bill, tax cuts for small business etc., vote Republican

        If you want to create new social classes with different rights based on sexual orientation or Religious Beliefs – vote Republican

        If you think that the unemployed (thorough no fault of their own) are Hobo’s and lazy freeloaders – vote Republican

        If you want fewer regulations on Big Business and Wall Street so more employees will die in the name of Greed and another financial collapse – vote Republican

        If you want this country to be run by the richest 2% of the people and the He!! with the other 98% - vote Republican

        If you want the continued erosion of our Education System, which now sucks, vote Republican

        If you want our infrastructure to continue to crumble and put people’s lives in jeopardy – vote Republican

        This is just a partial list of what the Republican Agenda has in store for you. The proof is in the pudding so to speak. Just look at the last 20 months of rhetoric from the right and compare it to their deeds. They continue to vote no on virtually everything President Obama proposes and then claim he is not doing a good job. They have yet to acknowledge that President Obama is spending money to correct the problems created by the gross mismanagement of the previous Administration. These problems are not going to be solved overnight, the Republicans are going to throw this country into gridlock to make sure that President Obama will be ineffective.

        • 14 votes
        Reply#3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:33 AM EDT

        USNR, the record deficits you mention are a gift of the Democrats and Obama. Nice try, though.

        If something isn't done about Social Security, it will go bust. Lifting the income cap will not do it; for proof, look at Medicare. When Clinton lifted the income cap on Medicare taxes, it was supposed to make that program solvent for all time. Hasn't quite worked out that way, has it?

        Social classes are created by the people who live in communities- and by societal mores. Am I happy with a lot of the prejudice I see around me? Heck, no. However, to blame one political party is just as prejudiced. Remember Eric? His homophobic rants were a disgrace- and he was a democrat.

        Education in this country has been going downhill for years. I find it interesting that the decline neatly coincides with the D.C. Takeover. Why is it that anyone would assume that some Washington bureaucrat would know more about what a student in a local classroom needs than the teacher, parent, and local school board?

        Did we not just saddle ourselves with enormous debt that was supposed to go to 'shovel ready' infrastructure jobs? Why, yes, I believe I did hear quite a bit about that. Didn't quite work out the way Obama said it would, now did it? Turned out to be a waste of almost a trillion dollars. Oh, and by the way, First Read won't mention it, but that four to eight hundred dollar tax cut you got last year? You have to pay that back NEXT year. Might hurt the Dem's chances, so it won't be mentioned here. Except by me.

        People died in the financial collapse? Really? Did the stock market fall on them? Please- tone down the rhetoric.

        As to unemployment, well, all I can say is that there is something pretty wrong with a system that gives people 99 weeks of benefits when there are jobs being done by illegal workers because American workers refuse them. Actually, it is disgraceful.

        I know you believe that the world will end when Obama is rendered a lame duck, but it will not. Actually, if republicans do not retake the House, we just may be in for a fiscal disaster that will threaten the very existence of this nation. You might just want to consider that, before you go back to your Obama shrine.

        • 11 votes
        #3.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:12 AM EDT

        Now I've seen it all!!! LOL NJNB telling Retired to 'tone down the rhetoric'...

        I don't remember who said it yesterday but they're RIGHT you just can't MAKE this STUFF up!

        I'll be giggling at that 'whopper' all morning!

        • 9 votes
        #3.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:21 AM EDT

        nj,nb,nj

        Sorry about your delusions; you need to go find some source to backup the drivel you spout. The deficits started growing in earnest in the early 80s, grew more during bush1 and grew the most during bush2. Where it is today is because of the flawed and failed policies of the last three republican administrations.

        • 12 votes
        #3.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:24 AM EDT

        US Navy, terrific reminder. Why would anyone, except No Joe, vote republican?

        Here's a tidbit for those who continue to blame the record debt and deficit on President Obama and those who believe republicans are not deficit spenders: Carter, 42%; Reagan, 189%; Bush 41, 51%; Clinton, 39%; Bush 43, 89%. Just look at which presidents did the greatest deficit spending--GOPers. Reagan really sold Americans a crock of bull--some shining city on a hill.

        • 11 votes
        #3.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:30 AM EDT

        Nice try with the same talking points from before. Do you have any new ideas at all???

        President Obama has a stimulus bill that worked according to CBO and most leading economist both republican and democrat. It saved 3.5 million jobs and added another 600,000 in the private sector.

        He has created Financial Reform and Health care Reform

        He has proposed numerous Job Bills, all of them opposed by your Tea Bag Party

        He has proposed repealing DADT, again opposed by your party

        Unemployment extensions, medical help for 9/11 responders all opposed by your party

        An infrastructure bill that will ad 35,000 jobs for every 1 billion in investment opposed by your party

        You guys want to cut Social Security, Medicare and Veterans Health care so your richest 2% can have a tax cut that gobbles up the majority of the benefits.

        The current budget proposal of the republicans adds 1 Trillion more than President Obama's according to the CBO.

        So what have you and your Republican/Teabaggers done for us this last 20 months. What, tell us, we would all like to know.

        • 9 votes
        #3.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:35 AM EDT

        Why would anyone, except No Joe, vote republican?

        Because they believe in the constitution, private property, self worth, independence and they don't need hand outs from the government.

        • 4 votes
        #3.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:17 AM EDT

        US Navy Vet - I can only feel sorry for you. It's not even worth rebutting you talking points. Perhaps someday you will understand when the middleclass is gone (destroyed by the Republicans starting with Reagan) and all that is left are the very wealthy and the rest of us poor people. We will be a third world country with Republicans in charge tell all of us poor people that yes someday you too can be rich if you work "real" hard. In the meantime don't pay any attention to that man behind the curtain sucking all your jobs and money away......

        • 3 votes
        #3.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:25 AM EDT

        At the same time NJNB is telling liberals to "tone down the rhetoric" we get this gem: "Actually, if republicans do not retake the House, we just may be in for a fiscal disaster that will threaten the very existence of this nation. You might just want to consider that, before you go back to your Obama shrine."

        I know consistency isn't necessarily something that conservatives (or liberals for that matter) are well known for, but is it too much to ask to not have a post that contradicts itself?

        • 7 votes
        #3.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:28 AM EDT

        Laurie,

        I think you missed my message. I am a progressive democrat and will not be voting republican any time soon. I think the republican party's agenda is the destruction of the middle class. We will be left with those that have and those that do not, period. Sounds like you are saying the same thing??????

        • 6 votes
        #3.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:37 AM EDT

        Doper Baby answer to the question: "Why would anyone, except No Joe, vote republican?"

        Because they believe in the constitution, private property, self worth, independence and they don't need hand outs from the government.

        It would be nice if they let people like you fly on airlines that didn't have to operate under those burdensome Big Government FAA maintenance regulations and buy brands of food produced without those free-enterprise killing FDA food safety regulations and live in your own towns where the factories could operate without those burdensome EPA pollution regulations. It would give the Democrats a big electoral advantage since the wingnut population would be dramatically reduced.

        • 5 votes
        #3.10 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:00 PM EDT

        Navy, Thanks I will vote republican!

          #3.11 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:56 PM EDT

          Yep, hard to see that navy.

            #3.12 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:59 PM EDT

            As a person that voted for Gore, Kerry and Obama, I will be voting Republican because the Democrats, with the power they have today are not addressing basic economic concerns. Not that the republicans do, but at least they don't saddle my company with additional costs.

            And until I hear and idea other than blame coming from the Democrats on an economic turn around, that vote will stay R for the first time in over 15 years.

            • 1 vote
            #3.13 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:06 PM EDT

            I will be voting Republican and you have it all wrong. You must be watching MSNBC to get your news as they are all left wing news all day all the time. The Republicans had no failed policies and the economy was going to crash no matter who was president, due to a failure of Bank, Wall Street and Government Agencies to watch the amount of risk they were taking on with bad mortgages. that combined with Americans credit spending (way too much on credit) collapsed the economy. the economy will always go up, reach a peak and drop down, it has over and over again and will many more time in the future. This crash was compounded by policies started by the democrats for easy mortgages and credit for low income people, they got what they wanted and now we know you can't lend money to people that can't pay it back. I also know that you can't take money from wealthy people and give it poor people without eventually turning us all into poor people. This bad economy is being prolonged directly because of the Obama administrations anti business and anti investor threats of higher taxes and regulations and unless they get business friendly real fast, the economy won't get any better. Obamas mantra " re-distribute the wealth" is a farce and will never happen, but it sure gets votes. All that does is just make businesses and investors scared to do anything as they don't know what will happen to them. In the end all that voted for Obama will get a $600.00 bone in the for votes in the form of a tax credit (Bush gave you 1200.00 the year before). The Obama administration has tripled the deficit and it amounts to 44,000 dollars per US household, so don't expect any wealth to be distributed anytime soon. In the end if you are not wealthy now, you will not be any wealthier when this administration leaves office in 2 more years.

              #3.14 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:29 PM EDT

              I have to agree with Rhondo on housing.

              Gee, I can go apply and get a home without actually proving that I have a job/income? And nobody in government saw this as a problem?

                #3.15 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:36 PM EDT

                Hilarious-------- Another liberal poster proving that the liberals have a "Strangers in the Night" relationship, with the truth.

                You beat on the tea parties because you see the end of your world approaching and know there is nothing you can do about it.

                Every democratic program is predicated on taling money from the people that earned it and using if for their own ends or handing it to a 3rd party.

                We do owe Mr. Obam one thing, he has convinced us that it will never change and that the liberals will never stop.

                As soon as they have one freebie entitlement program, in place they will start on the next one.

                After Nov. of this year we will stop the funding on the Obama insurance farce, until we can remove him from office , then we repeal the insurance farce and start repealing the programs that the dems used to buy votes with , for the last 50 years.

                Those of you that have been living off of the backs of taxpayers, your life is about to get very difficult.

                Liberals, stock up on booze or the herb of your choice, the next few years are going to be tramautic for you.

                  #3.16 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:38 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  We Can Go Backward, or We Can Keep Moving Forward

                  Think Progress: MSNBC is embracing a new “progressive political identity,” with the tagline “Lean Forward.” “It’s an umbrella that’s pretty wide, but that does have a progressive sensibility,” said MSNBC President Phil Griffin. “We’re confident. We’re strong. Let’s not live in the past, let’s not live by fear.”

                  MSNBC, once the also-ran but now the No. 2 cable news channel, has a new tagline that embraces its progressive political identity. The tagline, “Lean Forward,” will be publicly announced Tuesday, opening a planned two-year advertising campaign intended to raise awareness of the channel among viewers, advertisers and distributors.

                  ______________

                  The more I see the rally this past weekend in our nation’s capital, the more proud I am of my country. What a phenomenal job done by everybody, from Ed Schultz to Al Sharpton to all the unions and to all those who traveled so far in order to show America that we are in fact OneNation. We have had almost two years of constant hate. What I saw this Saturday was so refreshing. This is the America I know. Diverse. Friendly. Caring. Inclusive. The America the teabaggers present is not the America I want to ever see again.

                  Here’s hoping this rally on Saturday will inspire people to GOTV.

                  _______________________

                  “We can go backward, or we can keep moving forward. And I don’t know about you, but I want to move forward.” Phil Griffin, President, MSNBC

                  • 13 votes
                  Reply#4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:39 AM EDT

                  Ed Shultz? Al Sharpton? They make you proud? One is a mentally unstable host of a show that nobody watches, the other is a notorious racist, rabble rouser, racial ambulance chaser and anti-Semite who has caused death and misery and racial division for the last 20 years (see Freddy's Fashion Mart AND Crown Heights Riots). Good for you Pat.

                  Some people are apparently so clueless they don't even know how much damage the communist/socialist rally last weekend will do to the Democrats. I like it that way. I put it right up there with Paul Wellstones funeral.

                  • 5 votes
                  #4.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:54 AM EDT

                  I have always thought that most Americans are optimistic, positive people. The past years of economic turmoil, war and divisiveness have eroded that somewhat so it is good to see people being positive and forward looking.

                  I thought of you this morning Pat when I saw a promo for a show about the Red Sox amazing comeback--on ESPN tonight at 8. I think it is called 4 Days in October. That was truly a performance for the ages.

                  • 5 votes
                  #4.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:09 AM EDT

                  Ed Shultz and Al Sharpton????? These are two of the biggest attention goons in America.

                  I see MSNBC is finally coming out of the closet officially. We all knew they were a liberal station without all of the deceptive tag-lines........The viewership will not increase because nobody watch the channel anyway except for a few clowns in here.

                  • 4 votes
                  #4.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:11 AM EDT

                  Pat,

                  All I saw were socialists, communists, unions driving jobs overseas and trash! What crowd?? No one showed up?? You lefties are in real trouble Nov 2nd!!!!!

                    #4.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:24 AM EDT

                    I cannot express my complete and utter shock at the news that MSNBC is actually a liberal outlet! Will it next be revealed that water is wet?

                    • 6 votes
                    #4.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:24 AM EDT

                    "All I saw were socialists, communists, unions driving jobs overseas and trash!"

                    ________

                    Wow. Just wow.

                    • 8 votes
                    #4.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:37 AM EDT

                    Joe, care to sign a petition to ban dihydrogen monoxide? It's a chemical agent found in virtually all our industrial processes, food packaging plants and is even in your home and all around you right now.

                    • 2 votes
                    #4.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:37 AM EDT

                    Cheers to MSNBC. If the right can have their own TV network, the left has the same right. There is one big difference: MSNBC does not make up stuff, they report the truth.

                    I wondered how long it would take for someone on the right to try throwing mud on the One Nation rally--surprised it didn't happen yesterday. Must be annoying for the right to see thousands of progressives, liberals, moderate democrats marching and cheering. Must have been doubly annoying to see pictures of thousands of white, black, asian, hispanic, old, middle aged, young people representing all of this country. Yes, democrats are FIRED UP, READY TO GO. As for comparing the Becksters rally--that day there were numerous rallies on the mall including those groups honoring Dr Martin Luther King.

                    • 9 votes
                    #4.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:42 AM EDT

                    Boy that rally on the mall Saturday has really got no joe all blow and CU Farley all shook up this morning. Their running scared just knowing us Democrats are united and will kick their you know whats come November.

                    • 10 votes
                    #4.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:17 AM EDT

                    Hi Jody, Iowa

                    I wondered how long it would take for someone on the right to try throwing mud on the One Nation rally--surprised it didn't happen yesterday. Must be annoying for the right to see thousands of progressives, liberals, moderate democrats marching and cheering. Must have been doubly annoying to see pictures of thousands of white, black, asian, hispanic, old, middle aged, young people representing all of this country. Yes, democrats are FIRED UP, READY TO GO. As for comparing the Becksters rally--that day there were numerous rallies on the mall including those groups honoring Dr Martin Luther King.

                    That is so true; Jody. FOX has not talked about it yet; but, it hasn't stopped people like CU Farley who says...

                    Ed Shultz? Al Sharpton? They make you proud? One is a mentally unstable host of a show that nobody watches, the other is a notorious racist, rabble rouser, racial ambulance chaser and anti-Semite who has caused death and misery and racial division for the last 20 years (see Freddy's Fashion Mart AND Crown Heights Riots). Good for you Pat.

                    CU Farley

                    Yes they do. they both are progressives not afraid to go the extra distance to fight for economic and social justice such as ...

                    unions, teachers, firefighters, police, the middle working and poor classes, the environment, FDA regulation, financial reform, education, religious tolerance, homophobia, sexism, racism, ageism, and other civil rights as well.

                    Some people are apparently so clueless they don't even know how much damage the communist/socialist rally last weekend will do to the Democrats. I like it that way. I put it right up there with Paul Wellstones funeral.

                    FYI: Communist have been following groups around for over 100 years; particularly Black groups. Did any communists /socialist speak on the podium? No they didn’t. After all, this is a free country. The Tea publican TEAPOT is supported and bankrolled by the Koch Brothers and Karl Rove's billionaire's club who suport sociopaths like militia. There is no comparison for this group which advocates violence and anarchy to Socialist/communist. Therefore you have no rational argument. If, you don’t believe me, just ask the nut bag Tea party candidate Sharon Angle. talk about her 2nd amendment remedies.
                    http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2010/09/30/jk.rise.of.militias.cnn

                    In Dr King's words... "Now, don't think that you have me in a "bind" today. I'm not talking about Communism.

                    What I'm saying to you this morning is that Communism forgets that life is individual. Capitalism forgets that life is social, and the Kingdom of Brotherhood is found neither in the thesis of Communism nor the antithesis of capitalism but in a higher synthesis. It is found in a higher synthesis that combines the truths of both. Now, when I say question the whole society, it means ultimately coming to see that the problem of racism, the problem of economic exploitation, and the problem of war are all tied together. These are the triple evils that are interrelated."
                    http://www.famous-speeches-and-speech-topics.info/martin-luther-king-speeches/martin-luther-king-speech-where-do-we-go-from-here.htm

                    J. Edgar Hoover's FBI to portray King as a Bolshevik the same as you righties portray the President as a Communist . the President is not a Communist. he is a Christian.

                    Communism will never survive in the Black Community. It is antithetical to the core beliefs of most Blacks. I bet you don't know way? Black Christians believe in God and have used that faith in God since slavery whether it was for rejoicing or to escape the drudges of slaver . That unshakable faith has endure to present day. The Black Church is the most powerful institution in its community I would argue. That's why all politicians will make their rounds to it during election. Communist do not believe in God.

                    Communism is a joke. It failed. Likewise so does yours and righties accusing the president and One nation as such.


                    • 9 votes
                    #4.10 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:48 AM EDT

                    nojonobo

                    I cannot express my complete and utter shock at the news that MSNBC is actually a liberal outlet! Will it next be revealed that water is wet?

                    Maybe next it will be revealed that Fox News routinely uses doctored videos to push their far-right agenda, writes paychecks for the major far-right presidential candidates (Huckabee, Palin, Santorum, etc.), and whose owner donates millions of dollars to the Republican Party.

                    MSNBC does have a "liberal bias," if you ignore Morning Joe, Chuck Todd, etc., who clearly lean the other way. Of course, like all good far-right conservatives, nojonobo is very good at ignoring facts that don't fit with what she wants to believe.

                    • 8 votes
                    #4.11 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:14 PM EDT

                    no joe, no bo, nj

                    I cannot express my complete and utter shock at the news that MSNBC is actually a liberal outlet! Will it next be revealed that water is wet?

                    Come on Now No Jo, a liberal Outlet ok, Hey they may be a liberal out let, but at least they don't tell out right lies. Fox news tell the same lies everyday. i stopped watching MSNBC 8 months ago because there view was at times one sided. but No Jo they don't tell out right lies.

                    Now lets go back to yeaterday, you posted me that Obama should have done Nothing when he took office about the economic mess we were in, no help for bank, no stimluas, nothing. basicly the same apporach Hoover took after depression hit. Right!!!

                    your approach you posted yesterday was Nothing is better than anything. then you went in to some things reagan did in 1987.

                    then i answered your post and i was alittle upset that you did not answer.

                    so i will ask you a series questions Mrs President, these question are being given to you after 20 months of no action from washington. remember No Jo your the president and responsible for 300 million people and the free world.

                    Your approach of nothing is better than any thing, over the last 18 months has caused,

                    unemployment of 25%.

                    Chase, citi, wells fargo, and the other major banks have failed and lending has stopped. the stock market is at 3500 and shows no signs of recovery.

                    chrysler, and GM has closed all there plants, and layed off hundreds of thousands incluiding sub-contractors tied to the auto industry. to date mrs presdient 1million people are now unemployed and will be for years to come.

                    families are forced to choose between paying rent and buying food, because you did Nothing, mrs president socal programs are broke and no additional funding is coming from washington. citys and small towns are on the brink.

                    crime rates have tripled with officers being killed nation wide at 6 per week. because of your nothing is better than anything policy, major citys as well as small town have cut there police and fire department by 2/3. and can't control society. officers are allowing many crimes to go un checked.

                    the public school system can no longer maintain existing facilities due to a completely shrunking property tax base. class sized are at 50 and growing. teachers are over whelmed with no support staff.

                    Given this mrs president, has the time come to get help to americans from washington in ther form of a stimulas bill and tax incentives for help small businesses. money to the states, or Do you think mrs president we should stay the course?

                    Now No Jo this would have been Obama press conference had he taken your advice and did nothing for the last 20 months. if he had taikn your abvice, as one of his biggest fan, i would have called for his impeachment.

                    breaking into the democatic headquaters in washington that lead to Nixon resigning would have been noting compaird to the Nothing is Better than anything policy you wanted and Hoover Did.

                    If you answer is yes do something, then why not have done something when you took office Mrs President.

                    see No Jo its easy for us to complain about what we did not like and wanted the president to do when he took office, but the difference here is that you or I are not responsible for 300 million people and the free world.

                    • 7 votes
                    #4.12 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:44 PM EDT

                    from Ed Schultz to Al Sharpton to all the unions and to all those who traveled so far in order to show America that we are in fact OneNation

                    I get a feeling the OneNation crowd is the same group that will be protesting the US's "austerity" program in a few years.

                    • 1 vote
                    #4.13 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:49 PM EDT

                    Pat, The unions here in Detroit paid for the buses fed them and in some cases paid people to go. Come on you have to pay people to support your rally's?

                      #4.14 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:01 PM EDT

                      Thank you Pat, Mass.

                      Your post has brought out the typical right-wing rhetoric of hypocrisy and hatemongers. They cannot see the forest for the trees are in the way. The problem is that they are abundant, true believers of fear and hate.

                      • 2 votes
                      #4.15 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:03 PM EDT

                      Jeff. Great post; keep it up.

                        #4.16 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:09 PM EDT

                        PAT ------- Yes , I'm sure that you were also thrilled by the signs of the Socialist Party and the Communist party.

                        Many times there seems to be littlew difference between them and liberals.

                          #4.17 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:40 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          Listening to the Tea Party ‘cringe’ worthy cast of characters…er… I mean candidates reminds me that not a one of them has laid out THEIR platforms it’s only more of the same old rhetoric with a hefty helping of hypocrisy - anger – hatred & bitterness sprinkled in!

                          I mentioned last week that you cannot rationally govern on EMOTION!

                          Since when is this their country to TAKE BACK?

                          This is OUR country to take FORWARD…

                          • 14 votes
                          Reply#5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:45 AM EDT

                          Feisty:

                          They are keeping their mouths shut for a good reason. Karl Rove's play book says if you have no new ideas and the ones you have suck, then you are best served by saying nothing. That way nobody can come back at you.

                          That is not good for the American people because now we have no way of knowing what that person stands for and are their goals the same as mine??

                          The political stage has changed. It is no longer about what politicians will do the help this country. It ia all about them (the politican), mone and power. The he!! with the country as long as they get theirs.

                          This is not going to change anytime soon I am afraid. I suspect it is going to get worst long bfore it gets better.

                          Just look at the nut jobs out there today, and people are going to vote for them. We get what we deserve, good or bad.

                          • 10 votes
                          #5.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:57 AM EDT

                          "We get what we deserve, good or bad."

                          Well you voted for Obama and all of his corruption and payoffs so "Yes" you're getting what you deserve.

                          Unfortunately the rest of us have to pay for your mistake and suffer along with you. Thanks.

                          • 1 vote
                          #5.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:31 AM EDT

                          Yes I saw the One Rally on TV this weekend, they looked like a bunch of slobs with disgusting signs. I thought unions and liberals worried about the enviroment, sure doesn't look like they care by the amount of trash they left on the mall. Nothing but a bunch of whining pigs

                          • 1 vote
                          #5.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:10 PM EDT

                          janet-489369

                          Yes I saw the One Rally on TV this weekend, they looked like a bunch of slobs with disgusting signs. I thought unions and liberals worried about the enviroment, sure doesn't look like they care by the amount of trash they left on the mall. Nothing but a bunch of whining pigs

                          What you didn't see was all the garbage the nutjobs at Beck's "Dishonorable" rally left behind because FOX NOOSE didn't put their cameras on it for you lemmings to see.

                          • 3 votes
                          #5.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:20 PM EDT

                          What you didn't see was was all the garbage the nutjobs at Beck's "Dishonorable" rally because Fox didn't their cameras on it for you lemmings t see.

                          Now Bev... I know you're not insinuating that Faux Noise would EVER distort the facts now are ya? *insert snark*

                          GOD forbid! lmao...

                          Speaking of disgusting signs... did I miss something? I didn't see any of President Obama portrayed as a witch doctor or Hitler... Hmmm I wonder why that is?

                          Oh WAIT... I know... because the signs at the One Nation rally were calling for equality for all - better education and so on...

                          • 6 votes
                          #5.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:25 PM EDT

                          Good morning fiesty, nice to see you again. Was there a rally last weekend. I didnt see much of it. Im happy to see Mr Sharpton's hairdresser could make it to the event though. I wonder what it cost the unions to pick up the trash, cause you know none of those people did.

                            #5.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:04 PM EDT

                            Feisty

                            Speaking of disgusting signs... did I miss something? I didn't see any of President Obama portrayed as a witch doctor or Hitler... Hmmm I wonder why that is?

                            Oh WAIT... I know... because the signs at the One Nation rally were calling for equality for all - better education and so on...

                            You didn't see any of those witch doctor signs on FOX NOOSE either ever since FOX got a real live witch craft practitioner. They needed to have Cristine McDonnell put on a spell for FOX Noose; as in practicing keep her D@mned mouth shut. Sarah should be D@mned too. LMAO at FOX's penchant for the unnatural.

                            • 2 votes
                            #5.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:05 PM EDT

                            John Doe 23,

                            So you are holding yourself accountable for the actions of the previous administration, and it's second term... no question.. just fact.

                            • 2 votes
                            #5.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:06 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            Whom do Americans want representing them in Congress and the White House -- folks exactly like them, or the best and the brightest?

                            - First Read

                            And why are these two concepts assumed to be mutually exclusive? What a strange comment to make . . . so "we the people" are not too bright, huh?

                            I think there is a difference between being misinformed and being stupid, and slowly but surely, I think the American people are waking up to reality.

                            I for one think that the American people are the best and the brightest, and that the attempt to tell us that we aren't is a very subtle yet oft repeated attempt to influence us to side with folks who don't have a plan or know what they are talking about because they are "straight shooters" . . . even if they never hit what they are aiming at.

                            It is the same conventional wisdom that casts the minority son of a single white mom raised by his grandparents as an "elitist".

                            This is just more beltway conventional wisdom being sold as a fact - the American people are the best and we want the best to lead us. We do not have to settle for a country run by folks wealthy enough to buy elections.

                            We are smarter than that.

                            • 12 votes
                            Reply#6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:49 AM EDT

                            "We are smarter than that."

                            No we ain't.

                            • 2 votes
                            #6.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:58 AM EDT

                            w bush:

                            lol

                            I think that we are. I think that one big problem is that the Democratic Party is always playing defense, always debunking a lie, and never leading with the truth.

                            When someone tells a lie about you and you don't try to defend yourself, folks believe the lie.

                            When all folks hear about the stimulus bill is that it didn't work, even when it did work, they are gong to believe.

                            When all folks here is how the deficit is growing, but nobody is telling them who is really responsible, they are going to believe it is those currently in power.

                            It is time for the Democratic party to take their message TO THE PEOPLE. Explain what is going on and why, and not always be saying "we aren't going to kill your grandma" and "but we CUT taxes" . . .

                            Let's go on OFFENSE for a change!

                            • 8 votes
                            #6.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:09 AM EDT

                            Amen, Nashville Fan----great post. Our people and their abilities have made us the great nation that we are and we need to remember that and keep the best and the brightest of us--who are a reflection of us--leading us in Washington.

                            I hope those progressives who have been on the sidelines listen to folks like Ed Rendell when he reminds us of what has been accomplished to date and to keep fighting for our agenda.

                            • 6 votes
                            #6.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:17 AM EDT

                            Well said. We are smarter than that--at least the huge numbers of us who find Beck, Hannity and those like them a brick or two short.

                            • 5 votes
                            #6.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:46 AM EDT

                            Sorry Jody but those two are a full brickyard short not just a couple.

                            • 6 votes
                            #6.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:26 AM EDT

                            I think there's something to be said on both sides of that statement, Nash. I believe we SHOULD be led by the best and brightest among us, but we've been sold a preference for "a regular guy we can sit down and drink a beer with" instead of "a policy wonk who knows all the details." So to that extent it means something to not be taken in by people who have imaginary conversations with the Founding Fathers and argue about who believes in science the least.

                            At the same time Americans, when taking the effort to inform ourselves, are the best and brightest even when we don't all agree. It's hard to live up to that level of discourse when the Conservative Movement has moved far from the intellectual roots of Buckley and Goldwater and into a world where ignorance isn't just bliss, it's entitlement.

                            • 5 votes
                            #6.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:56 AM EDT

                            John B, Des Moines, IA

                            we've been sold a preference for "a regular guy we can sit down and drink a beer with" instead of "a policy wonk who knows all the details." So to that extent it means something to not be taken in by people who have imaginary conversations with the Founding Fathers and argue about who believes in science the least.

                            LOL, talk about having very little knowledge; I couldn't agree more.

                            Did you see where Hannity gave Boehenor his usual handjive? He asked Boehner about his relationship with Obama. The tan man said...

                            "I come in and he'll say 'Boehner you are almost as dark as me,'" Boehner said. "Listen, we talk about golf. We'll talk about our skin color. We have a nice relationship. The problem we have is that when we talk to each other, there's no connection. I've got 11 brothers and sisters, my dad owned a bar. I was a small business guy long before I got into this business. When I talk about the real world, it doesn't seem to register."

                            http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/john-boehner/2010/10/


                            Doesn't connect to reality? Wow, talk about disconnected the President 's mother struggled to raise her kids while on food stamps. The President gets it. That's why Wall Street is not so unfriendly to the President anymore because the President is not a corporate shrill like the tan man!

                            • 3 votes
                            #6.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:43 PM EDT

                            Amen comrades, Damn the capitalists and pass the entitlements.

                              #6.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:06 PM EDT

                              Mo. You're right, it is a full brick load short.

                              • 1 vote
                              #6.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
                              Reply

                              I just read about MSNBC's rebranding campaign, and I have to say I'm all for it. NBC's series on education was fantastic. More programming like that, please! Last week, ABC hosted a Town Hall on Muslims in America, which was also highly engaging. I have always been a fan of CBS's 60 minutes, because it goes into stories in depth. It sounds to me like the new direction for MSNBC will be to do more real reporting, like the examples above, informing the public about the issues, and that, in my opinion, is what this country needs.

                              • 11 votes
                              Reply#7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:52 AM EDT

                              I watched that town hall on Muslims in America as well Amy - it was fascinating and riveting!

                              There was no denying that it's FEAR & ANGER that is driving that anti-Muslim agenda - I couldn't believe how those on the right didn't even attempt to hide their bigotry & discrimination!

                              Speaking of discrimination - anyone else hear Jim Demented's comment about how he believes that gay & sexually active woman should be BANNED from teaching our children? YIKES!

                              • 9 votes
                              #7.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:57 AM EDT

                              Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL It was riveting, wasn't it? It made me proud to be an American, too, that we can all sit down and talk about these issues and learn from one another. When we get past this good vs evil mindset, we can have a real dialogue. I like that.

                              • 5 votes
                              #7.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:21 AM EDT

                              I agree completely. We need more in-depth discussions. I've watched 60 Minutes for as long as it has been on the air because of the time spent on one topic. Fareed Zacharia's GPS also spends more time discussing single issues, lengthy debates. MSNBC's education forum was excellent as was ABC's discussion on Muslims. TV should be used more to educate people; it is only through debate and education that we can move toward greater understanding and tolerance. My criticism of FOX is not that it is conservative but that it does not educate its viewers but instead uses half truths, outright lies to further the paranoia and fear of some. FOX does not enlighten its viewers, it degrades them and in my view, keeps them uninformed.

                              • 6 votes
                              #7.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:23 AM EDT

                              Fiesty, they already are in many catholic schools. And look out 3 muslim girls schools in the UK REQUIRE full burkas to leave the buildings.

                                #7.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:07 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                An occupational hazard of being an accountant is that I always have to figure out how the finances are working--how is the person or business or in this case the Tea Party paying for itself and making any money. When I walk into a small restaurant, I'll catch myself calculating what I think the overhead is! I know--I need to get a life!! My point is that I always wondered how the Tea Party movement sprang up so quickly and seemed to be well-organized in terms of its infrastructure--things that take money like organizing rallies, signs, etc. Well--now we know---it was financed by big money donors. A movement that could have raised some valid points about some of the issues we face instead has been hijacked to serve the interests of its financers. And where was the media this whole time to tell this story?

                                • 11 votes
                                Reply#8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:54 AM EDT

                                SteelerFan:

                                Right on. Unidentified donors (thank you Supreme Court) are donating record amounts of cash to the party's. I saw a number that claims 4 to 5X the money is going to the Republican Party. If you look at what they stand for Wall Street over Main Street, Big Business over Small Business and the richest 2% you now know where the money is coming from. Karl Rove's organization pledged 52 Million to the republicans. Over 90% of those contributions come from Billionaires (with a B).

                                This country is being sold to the the highest bidder and they are not the 98% of the people.

                                Big Business wants to replace the Federal Government and the top 2% want to control it. This is right out of a Science Fiction Movie.

                                • 9 votes
                                #8.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:07 AM EDT

                                No question about it. The Conservatives got exactly the top down influence they wanted when the Citizens United decision opened the coffers for deep pocket corporate and wealthy individual donors. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/03/AR2010100303664.html

                                Something to think about the next time a Supreme Court discussion comes up and someone starts blowing smoke about "strict constructionism" and "original intent." Conservatives in the legal world will find some intellectual-sounding argument to do exactly what's good for the wealthy every time.

                                • 3 votes
                                #8.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:59 AM EDT

                                So Congress should ban contributions from corporations and unions. Funny how you don't have a problem with unions spending 1 million bucks in the Washington D.C. mayoral election to defeat the incumbent mayor who was reforming the educaction system, do you?

                                • 1 vote
                                #8.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:15 PM EDT

                                janet I'm against ALL large contributions. As our system is set up today money isn't speech, it's votes. The Koch brothers and Rupert Murdoch have more votes than I do so they get their way more often. WAY more often. Of course you'd bring the unions into it, Conservatives always do, but that's just a smokescreen for the fact that deep pocket Conservatives just blow away the resources of the unions. Allowing them to do that isn't just a difference of opinion, it's corrosive to our nation. The Citizens United decision, foisted upon us by deep pockets in the Conservative power structure and the 5 Conservatives on the SCOTUS is an attempt to put a nail in the coffin of our egalitarian, democratic society.

                                • 2 votes
                                #8.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:49 PM EDT

                                Sounds like a huge Hebrew conspiracy, hide your yamaka's.

                                  #8.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:10 PM EDT

                                  Janet - I am a "flaming liberal" and YES, there should be a ban on all monies from corporations and unions, no matter what level/location the election. It is the only way to get fair representation for we the people.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #8.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:20 PM EDT

                                  Janet--I am just as much against unions making large political contributions as I am against anyone else doing it. I am especially concerned about the ability of foreign interests to make contributions without scrutiny--I don't care which side they are on.

                                    #8.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:32 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    w

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:57 AM EDT

                                    This is a follow-up on the story about the Rural Tennessee homeowner whose house burned down because he didn't pay his 'fee'.

                                    A little further research came up with some interesting facts. They are:

                                    1. The 'fee' for Fire services was $75.

                                    2. The Country commissioners and the Mayor of this town are all Republicans.

                                    3. This 'cost' has been a part of the community structure for at least 10 years.

                                    I have not lived in a rural commuity, so I will admit that I have some bias in my thinking towards this story. However, with that bias being noted, I was just struck by the sheer mendacity of this story.

                                    Now, the homeowner did NOT pay the $75 fee that was mandated by the county that he lives in, for whatever reason. When there was a fire, the fire department came out to the homwoner's property and let the homeowner's houser burn to the ground because the $75 fee was not paid.

                                    $75.

                                    Even though, from what I have been able to gather, that the homeowner was willing to pay whatever it took to save his home, he was DENIED.

                                    Sounds familiar?

                                    When the mayor and the county commissioners were approached by the press and asked about the situation, they likened the situation to a person who has car insurance. If the homeowner doesn't pay, then they don't get the services. it was as simple as that.

                                    Or is it?

                                    My dealings with rural communities is one that I am still studying to this day. When I am in rural communities, there is a sense of community. Neighbours look out for one another. People HELP each other, and they do NOT look for renumeration in cash. People lend themselves to helping their fellow human being.

                                    This is what was SORELY lacking in this case.

                                    It seems that there was an 'I got mine, go get yours' attitude that is very UNLIKE rural communities that I have dealt with. What also struck me as odd was that the fire truck were rolled to the homeowner's property where they just sat and watched this man's house burn (along with 3 cats and a dog).

                                    Do you think that the cost of rolling the fire trucks would NOT cost more than $75? Maybe they could have saved the house and squabbled about the cost later. I am sure that the homeowner would have paid a fine and the cost(s) of getting the fire trucks out there to the property.

                                    Now, that homeowner's house has burned down. A legal fight will ensure because any homeowner's insurance that was on that house will be tapped to pay to rebuild the house.

                                    All of this for a measly $75.

                                    Maybe it is a good thing that I don't live in that rural county in Tennessee. Maybe it is a good thing that I didn't vote for the mayor or those county commissioners who were so callous in their thinking and feeling. Maybe that county is the EXCEPTION to the rule when it comes to AMERICANS looking out for AMERICANS in AMERICA.

                                    America will not survive if we have that 'I got mine' mentality.

                                    Which brings me to why I posted this in the first place. The Republicans that enacted these rules may have done so with fiscal intentions in mind, and as is their right, they are entitled to their actions. But my problem with this is that there was no COMPASSION - at all - for this homeowner whose house burned down.

                                    Is THIS want 'Compassionate Conservatism' looks like?

                                    If it is, I am so glad that America has moved on. I think that most Americans would have tolerated a BALANCE regarding this issue. Save the house and squabble over the cost later. I guarantee you that the homeowner would have been more than happy to pay whatever fine that was imposed and would have encouraged all residets of that county to pay the fee. This would have gone a long way for the betterment of that county.

                                    Now, we have an entrenched political structure that says 'Tough cookies'. We have outsiders (like me) commenting on how callous this action was.

                                    In the meantime, the poor homeowner is out on the street.

                                    For a measly $75.

                                    The takeaway is this - you get what you VOTE for.

                                    Be sure you vote on November 2nd.

                                    • 13 votes
                                    Reply#10 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:58 AM EDT

                                    Pietro: I was fascinated by that story as well. That looks like a small community, much like the one I live in. I was trying to picture myself sitting on a truck, watching a neighbor's house burn. Can't do it. I would have paid the $75 myself before I let that happen. It is a good metaphor for the Republican party, as you have said. They are content to watch America's house burn down rather than work with their neighbors, the Democratic party to help fix the economy. It is clear that the Republican Party is content to let America burn, for their own since of power, and to gain more power back. It leads a sane person to wonder why more aren't outraged about it. Add to it that "Chief Justice" Roberts has paid back his puppet masters by selling us out to the highest bidder, you have to wonder how ANY of these cretins sleep at night.

                                    • 12 votes
                                    #10.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:19 AM EDT

                                    Pietro;

                                    I hear ya. I live in a small rural town in Vermont and that would never have happened here. We do not let politics ($75.00) stand in the way of helping somebody in need. We just do what is right and that is it.

                                    Again, it is all about those that have versus those that do not. We are becoming a class society more and more every day.

                                    I hope that town makes the worst people in the world award on Keith's nightly show. Expose them for the repugnant people they are.

                                    I saw the auto insurance comparison, they republicans try to justify everything even when it is moral and/or ethically wrong.

                                    • 8 votes
                                    #10.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:20 AM EDT

                                    I have family that live in rural areas in Texas and they will tell you...if you dont pay, you get no services. Everyone that live in those areas know these things. Compassion does not pay bills.

                                    If you go to the electric company and tell that lady in the booth "I am 3 months behind, can I have a little compassion"...I bet she will give it to you alright, pull that lever and you will be in the dark until that money is in hand.

                                    About the story: You are assuming that because there are Republicans in office; they enacted that policy. How do you know it wasn't a Democrat who came up with the policy in the first place? It doesn't really matter who is in office, the law is the law....at least that is what you liberals preach.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #10.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:23 AM EDT

                                    Great post, Pietro. The homeowner was on Countdown last night and just seemed to be in a state of shock--who wouldn't be? I had the impression that it was an oversight that he hadn't paid the fee. Who among us hasn't forgotten to be a bill or mislaid it?

                                    Although I don't agree with it, I can kind of understand the thinking of the Mayor & the commissioners in terms of budget issues, costs, etc. (there goes the accountant again) but I'm surprised that the firefighters on the ground could stand there and do nothing when they had the resources to save the property. And don't get me started on the innocent pets who died.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #10.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:24 AM EDT

                                    oops, typo: since should read sense.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #10.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:26 AM EDT

                                    Pietro, correct me if i'm wrong, but I think he Lost a couple GrandKids in this Fire also.

                                    Took more than $75 to get out to Fire, Fuel, etc.

                                    Sad story indeed.

                                    Gotta Love Compasionate ConservatISM!

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #10.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:32 AM EDT

                                    Pietro

                                    I very rarely watch Olberman, but did see him interview the man who lost his house last night. A very powerful interview, Olberman just let the man talk and didn't interrupt or pontificate. It was pretty shocking that the firemen came out but didn't act to help him. The mayor and the fireman in particular should be ashamed of themselves.

                                    It is pretty scary if this is the way that Tea Party and small government types want our society to run.

                                    Fireman' Creed

                                    When I'm called to duty God,
                                    Wherever flames may rage,
                                    Give me strength to save a life,
                                    Whatever be it's age.
                                    Help me to embrace a little child,
                                    Before it is too late.
                                    Or save an older person from,
                                    The horror of that fate.
                                    Enable me to be alert,
                                    To hear the weakest shout,
                                    And quickly and efficiently,
                                    To put the fire out.
                                    I want to fill my calling and,
                                    To give the best in me,
                                    To guard my neighbor and,
                                    Protect his property.
                                    And if according to your will,
                                    I have to lose my life,
                                    Bless with your protecting hand,
                                    My children and my wife

                                    • 4 votes
                                    #10.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:32 AM EDT

                                    Thank you ITM for reinforcing what we have believed all along...

                                    Christian Conservatives are VOID of any form of compassion...

                                    Empathy be DAMNED... it's ALWAYS about the 'precious' $$$ with your kind!

                                    How ANYONE can stand and watch someones house burn down is BEYOND my comprehension!

                                    *shakes head*

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #10.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:41 AM EDT

                                    Fiesty,

                                    There you go assuming shiznit as usual. You don't know how I feel about the situation personally, I just stated what is real and not make-believe. You and your ilk can imagine this perfect utopian America where everyone loves everyone at your own peril.

                                    They watched that house burn the same way you watch black on black crime in Chicago. As long as it is in the urban area, let those ignorant .....kill each other. I know this is a dinner table conversation nightly for you and you can deny it all you want, but we know your best friend is black.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #10.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:05 AM EDT

                                    Saw this yesterday and didn’t get a chance to check on it further. There has got to be more to this story or a better reason for the lack of action by the Fire Dept.

                                    I’ve lived rural all my life. Served as a volunteer fireman until age got me to the point where I couldn’t keep up with training that the service requires. Still help them out with fundraisers and maintenance and such. The idea that any of my local guys would set and watch a neighbor’s barn or shed burn much less their house just doesn’t square up. As a matter of fact I wouldn’t want to be the one that either told them they had to let something burn or tried to stop them from doing their duty because I believe that would be a precursor to somebody getting hurt.

                                    The idea that somebody in these United States would let a neighbor’s house burn down over 75 bucks or any amount of money for that matter just doesn’t match up with any Community of Americans that I’ve ever lived in or would have been willing to live in.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #10.10 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:16 AM EDT

                                    LOL ITM... now you're a mind reader as well...?

                                    Damn... that resume of yours has got to be about 50 pages by now! ;0)))

                                    Who would of thought... a BBQ shack owner who's a part time psychic?

                                    Do you do 'readings' tableside? lmao...

                                    Thanks for playing...

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #10.11 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:18 AM EDT

                                    Pietro:

                                    The homeowner was on with Keith Olbermann last night and he did state that his homeowners insurance has been very responsive and he expects a new house out of this tragedy.

                                    It did not have to happen because he stated that they (The Commission)have made exceptions in the past. He even offered to pay the $75 at the time of the fire! It seems just a case of him forgetting to pay the bill because by his account he has paid it every year before now.

                                    Compassionate Conservatism this is not!

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #10.12 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:32 AM EDT

                                    Great post, Pietro. Keith O interviewed the home owner last night. He said when he called that he told them he would pay whatever they asked; he also said that he just forgot about the fee. It made me wonder if homeowners are sent any notice of unpaid fire fees and do they have the same kind of system for police. I found myself wondering how any fireman could stand by and watch a house burn to the ground knowing they could have done something about it. What about the families who do not have the $75 for the fee? What if they are renters and the owner does not pay the fee? Apparently, they are just out of luck. This homeowner pays taxes and some of those taxes fund the fire department. Welcome to the world of pay us or else we won't help you side of conservatives without a conscience, a heart or a soul.

                                    My town is not large. The city fire department is not the first to respond to fires outside the city, the rural fire companies are but the city sends help when needed; they do not quibble about who is in charge first, they all fight the fire together. There is no $75 yearly fee. It is part of the taxes we pay.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #10.13 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:42 AM EDT

                                    ITM, I cannot speak for Texas but in my town, if someone is having trouble paying their electric, gas or water bills, they can go to the local power company and work out a payment plan; and the utility company cannot shut off power or water during the cold winter months regardless. Our utility is publically owned by we the people.

                                    Forgot to add one thing about Keith O's interview. The homeowner also said that this has been happening only since the new chief came into office about 3 years ago; the old fire chief would never have allowed it.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #10.14 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:50 AM EDT

                                    It's good to see the conservative republicans show their true colors. They don't practice what they preach. So much for compassionate conservatism.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #10.15 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:21 PM EDT

                                    I would like to know where in the story it mentions ANYTHING about Christian Conservatives. It didn't say anything about them anywhere in the story. You people don't know who inacted that law at all, it could have very well be democrats. I too, live in a rural area in Illinois, it is very clearly explained to you when you move here that these fees must be paid or you will not receive assistance when needed. D

                                      #10.16 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:31 PM EDT

                                      I want to know where in this story it mentions Christian Conservatives, answer IT DOESN'T. I too, live in a rural area of southern Illinois, in a county that has been run by democrats and probably always will be. We too pay a fee for services and it is made very clear if you do not pay you won't receive services. If such a thing were to happen in this county I guess I could assume that a bunch of democratic athesist firemen watched the house burn down. Where I live, all local leaders are democrats, in fact they have just implemented a policy where if you have an accident in their town and not a resident of that town, you will pay for the fire and police services you receive. Christian isn't it?

                                      Here is a little story for you that happened in my county which again is run by democrats. Happened about 3 years ago on Thanksgiving weekend. A police office who must have been a democrat (not hired in St Clair County if not one) was responding to an accident on 1-64. He was driving over 100 mph, talking to his girlfriend on his cell phone, and using his laptop. He hit the car two siste were traveling in, and killed them both. After a plea bargain, he plead guilty and received three years of probation. Oh I forgot to say that he had been involved in the same type of incident just a few years prior (thanks police union) By the way, the cop is now filing for workmens comp due to injuries he received during the accident. Somehow, murders shouldn't get workmen's comp.

                                      So if I were to be like some of the posters here, I'll make the following assumptions.

                                      All cops are democrats

                                      All cops are incompetent

                                      Democrats don't value life, its okay to murder people while on the job

                                      No democrat is good at multi-tasking.

                                      So these are very ridiculous assumptions, all of you should look at your assumptions before you post them. All Christians are not republicans, all Republicans aren't Christian Conservatives.

                                        #10.17 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:01 PM EDT

                                        After the blaze, South Fulton police arrested one of Cranick's sons, Timothy Allen Cranick, on an aggravated assault charge, according to WPSD-TV, an NBC station in Paducah, Ky.

                                        Police told WPSD that the younger Cranick attacked Fire Chief David Wilds at the firehouse because he was upset his father's house was allowed to burn...

                                        I think that if the same thing happened to my family, I might have ended up 'arrested' for much the same reason.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #10.18 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:10 PM EDT

                                        Here in Detroit, if you cant pay your power bills you have two choices. Go to the Democratic administration and they pay your bills for you for a year or so. Then they will shut you down. After that people buy jumper cables and steal power. Which is what started that huge fire a few weeks back where 75 homes burned down. I hardly think the solution is to give everything to everyone that cant afford it free. Once we do that what is the impetus to do anything, to work and excel in something. A real good example, Consumers energy (power company here) had a huge event at COBO hall in down town Detroit a few weeks back. They advertised on TV that they were going to "help" people with their power bills. Thousands of people showed up and then the trouble started...... See CE was going to show people how to conserve and use less energy. Thereby helping people with their bills. There were near riots, when the people realized they were NOT going to pay the bills for them. They actually thought Obama told the power company to give them free power.

                                          #10.19 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:22 PM EDT
                                          Reply

                                          Thank you, Justice Roberts conservative activist Supreme Court for unleashing the corporate, secretive money machine poised to buy as many elections as they can so that they become even more powerful than they already are. $80 million dollars donated by a handful of billionaires and millionaires and they do not even have to tell us who they are. The question remains for this year: will all the money matter because those few donars each have only one vote. The DNC raised $16 million with 97 or 98% from grassroots, small donars giving less than $200; each of the voters has one vote, too.

                                          Economist Martin Feinstein tells President Obama to extend all the Bush era tax cuts to give business confidence. Does he have a suggestion on how to pay for those cuts which benefit so few? Seems to me the only reason business lacks confidence is the economic collapse of Sep 2008, and subsequent falling off the cliff economy. Tax cuts are the least of their concerns. A vibrant middle class would do more for business than any tax cut ever could.

                                          Democrats have achieved much during the past 20 months but there is more to do. It is time for them to start reminding people about the godd things they have done instead of allowing the Republican Tea Party to convince voters those things which help the American people are evil, socialist plots. What have republicans done lately? Care to list their achievements during the Bush years. Their Pledge to America says they want to repeal health care reform; yet within their Pledge, they claim they will pass HCR which will be all the good things in Obamacare that is already law. If those good things are bad because they were passed by democrats and signed into law by President Obama, how will the GOP/TPers explain that now they are good. Flip, flop, flip, flop.

                                          • 12 votes
                                          Reply#11 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:58 AM EDT

                                          Jody the war between the wealthy and the people is over, the rich won. The tax cuts for the rich will be made permanent, they will cut Medicare and Social Security to make up the difference, welcome to the United States of America, the land of haves and have nots.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #11.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:02 AM EDT

                                          w bush - the war is not over yet.

                                          • 8 votes
                                          #11.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:08 AM EDT

                                          This tax cut mantra has gotten stupid.

                                          You liberals claim that a tax cut is not paid for. The money belongs to the earner not the government. If the government never collects it, then it is never in he coffers. The government is not going in the coffers and sending all rich people checks as it is being described, so how can you say it is adding to the deficit?

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #11.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:30 AM EDT

                                          Pietro, Columbus, Ohio--- "w bush - the war is not over yet"

                                          Pietro the Supreme Court and Senate are lost, I mean honestly those two entities operate only to protect and expand the wealth of the wealthy, look at the Supreme Courts rulings the last few years, and the Senate, my goodness look at bill after bill that the House sends, good, honest bills that are fair for the people and business alike, the outcome without exception is always the same, the Senate turns them into a business friendly bills that disregards the best interest of the consumer, and if they can't get that done they just let them die. Now the people in their completely illogical genius are going to give the Republicans a majority back, Pietro I can't see anything positive on the horizon here, the best I can hope for is a grand awakening of the population that brings about Democrat gains in the House and Senate large enough to squelch the parliamentary shenanigans the Republicans have used to stifle our countries progress, my lack of faith in the American people to thoroughly analyze the situation before they vote is great, and the Supreme Courts decision to let Corporate America spend uncontrolled to brainwash the nation seem to be two indications that the America I remember and wished to pass on to my children is gone.

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #11.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:42 AM EDT

                                          What BS, still defending the tax cuts for the richest 2%.

                                          STTS

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #11.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:48 AM EDT

                                          "IntheMiddle, TX

                                          This tax cut mantra has gotten stupid.

                                          You liberals claim that a tax cut is not paid for. The money belongs to the earner not the government. If the government never collects it, then it is never in he coffers. The government is not going in the coffers and sending all rich people checks as it is being described, so how can you say it is adding to the deficit?"

                                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                          That's good to know inthemiddle, so following that logic instead of just the rich not paying taxes let's just not collect any taxes from anyone since how much tax money is collected by the government does not effect the deficit, you should run for office and solve the deficit issue for all of us. Your real name isn't Boenher or Mitchel is it cause those cats think just like you do

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #11.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:52 AM EDT

                                          w bush:

                                          I see as usual that sh!t went right over your head.

                                          You're excused now.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #11.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:08 AM EDT

                                          w bush - I will repeat what I posted - the war is not over yet.

                                          Pietro the Supreme Court and Senate are lost, I mean honestly those two entities operate only to protect and expand the wealth of the wealthy,

                                          Wrong. You cannot speak in the past tense when we still have elections. If we didn;t have any elections, then I would have to agree with you. The fact of the matter is this - if the wealthy DID have the 'in', why waste time with these pesky elections? The fact is that they DON'T have all of the cards, and they have to resort to 'tricking' you into giving up those cards.

                                          look at the Supreme Courts rulings the last few years, and the Senate, my goodness look at bill after bill that the House sends, good, honest bills that are fair for the people and business alike, the outcome without exception is always the same, the Senate turns them into a business friendly bills that disregards the best interest of the consumer, and if they can't get that done they just let them die.

                                          Agreed. This is because we, as an electorate, have abdicated OUR JOB to be vigilant and hold politician's feet to the fire. We have become lazy, inarticulate and distracted.

                                          Now the people in their completely illogical genius are going to give the Republicans a majority back,

                                          That may be the case, but we DON'T KNOW FOR SURE until November 3rd.

                                          Pietro I can't see anything positive on the horizon here, the best I can hope for is a grand awakening of the population that brings about Democrat gains in the House and Senate large enough to squelch the parliamentary shenanigans the Republicans have used to stifle our countries progress,

                                          w bush, who says you don't have anything positive to look forward to? You have articulated that perfectly above.

                                          my lack of faith in the American people to thoroughly analyze the situation before they vote is great, and the Supreme Courts decision to let Corporate America spend uncontrolled to brainwash the nation seem to be two indications that the America I remember and wished to pass on to my children is gone.

                                          Well, then w bush, it looks like you, me, and the rest of the electorate have some work to do. As an electorate, we have the DUTY to make sure things are running well for our country. We, as an electorate, have shirked that responsibility for MANY years. This is evidenced by only having 55% - 60% of the ELIGIBLE voters actually voting. Until that turns around, we will continue to have charlatans in office; we have them because we tolerate them.

                                          As far as Democrats are concerned, the democratic electorate is ALWAYS complaining about how spineless the Democratic legislators are. Well, my feeling is this - spineless Democratic voters are the ones voting for spineless Democratic legislators, so are we surprised that the legislators are spineless when it comes to voting on the tough issues?

                                          Remember to vote on November 2nd.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #11.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:09 AM EDT

                                          W Bush, I understand your disillusionment. At a point when we're told that the future is all for the Conservatives and it'll be a wave election it's easy to be disillusioned. Just remember this--it isn't over till you quit. I'm not going to quit. A lot of others aren't going to quit. The younger generation, those just entering the electorate and in their first few cycles are more liberal than they have been in several decades. I figure I owe it to them to hang on while they get engaged and get it done. What we're seeing is the last, desperate gasp of today's dysfunctional Conservatism. The moneyed interests will always be there, but they're a tiny minority and we DON'T have to just give up and let them run the aristocracy they so wish to establish.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #11.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:30 PM EDT
                                          Reply

                                          The Christine O'Donnell story about China got me thinking: what if China really DID invade the U.S.A.?

                                          I can see the liberals now....running around informing everyone that the most important thing to remember about it is to not be mean to ALL Chinese...."remember...most Chinese are good and it's only SOME of them ...like 40 or 50 million who have invaded and are bringing down death and destruction on America". Not only that , but "we've invaded other countries so we have no right to gripe". And then you all would complain if it was on the news that some Chinese soldiers were treated rough after being captured. You socialists are some Effed up people. I started writing this as a joke but now I'm realizing it's probably not far off the mark. ;-(

                                          • 1 vote
                                          Reply#12 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:04 AM EDT

                                          Hey, if I had a car it would have a "Free Tibet" bumper sticker on it. Don't jump to conclusions about Liberals. PS. Nixon opened the door to China, blame him!

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #12.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:14 AM EDT

                                          Why would China want invade a country they already own? The Republicans had China finance those two meaningless faux wars, remember? Or maybe Obama done that also?

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #12.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:19 AM EDT

                                          Par for the course. Somebody mention China and CU Farley gets all scared and shaking in his boots. Something else to be afraid of CU as if you didn't already have enough.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #12.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:30 PM EDT

                                          CU Farley,

                                          As a liberal Democrat, I live in an urban environment, Inland Pacific North West, where around 400 homes are within a square 1/2 mile with over 88% having multiple registered weapons inside, including mine... Bring it..!! Keep fear Alive...!!! March with Colbert... !!!

                                            #12.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:39 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            Meanwhile, back on planet Earth...

                                            "History tells us that when you have a sufficient number of polls - which we do in the case of the generic ballot - you're best off simply taking an average and staying focused on the big picture. The big picture is that Republicans are poised to have a very good November..."

                                            -Nate Silver, liberal Democrat, Obama supporter, and polling analyst, commenting today at FiveThirtyEight.com-

                                            Even here at First Read, if you squint a little, and read between the lines...at times you can actually almost see the outlines of that "big picture".

                                            • 6 votes
                                            Reply#13 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:07 AM EDT

                                            Mixed Bag - polls CHANGE - daily - so for you to use Nate Silver's quote as 'this is how it is' is misleading.

                                            The Republican leadership is already trying to 'walk back' expectations for a 'bloodbath' in November. Those polls that are taken are just snapshots of how the electorate feels at a given point in time.

                                            This election, I would admit, is too close to call. However, to think that the GOPers have a 'lock' on Congress is also premature.

                                            We will have a better handle on this issue when we get closer to November 2nd.

                                            • 6 votes
                                            #13.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:11 AM EDT

                                            The whole paragraph is more illustrative of Silver's hypothesis...

                                            In Part I, I explored why our intuition may mislead us when it comes to forecasting the outcomes of elections — for a variety of reasons, we may tend to assume that there is more uncertainty in the forecast than there really is. In Part II, I demonstrated, by contrast, that a simple average of polls has performed very well over the past six election cycles in determining the winner of the contest. For example, Senate and gubernatorial candidates who have trailed by 6 to 9 points in the polling average with a month to go until the election have won their races only about 10 percent of the time in recent years."

                                            http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/


                                            • 3 votes
                                            #13.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:22 AM EDT

                                            With all due respect, Pietro...

                                            I thought that Nate Silver's comments were relatively unambiguous in terms of the "big picture", and what it reveals.

                                            I would note that the best political handicappers in the business...people like Charlie Cook, Stu Rothenberg, and Larry Sabato are all seeing the same thing that Nate Silver is.

                                            Please don't be offended if I assign greater weight to their views of the likely outcome of the upcoming midterm elections than yours.

                                            • 5 votes
                                            #13.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:28 AM EDT

                                            Mixed Bag - with all due respect to you - I just don't buy the argument you are espousing.

                                            And I am not offend in the LEAST that you assign greater views to political handicappers than mine. I am NOT a political handicapper. I do not make a living being right 10% of the time (and conversely, being wrong 90% ofthe time).

                                            I just do not buy the argument that because the numbers of the day state one thing that is what the outcome will be.

                                            There are a lot of external factors that are applied that handicappers do NOT compensate for when they are makng their predictions. My argument is that those external factors often DO count and by NOT including those external in the calculations make for skewered results.

                                            Again, Mixed bag, you argue a nuanced point. I just think you are wrong in this case.

                                            • 5 votes
                                            #13.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:47 AM EDT

                                            Last Thursday, Larry J. Sabato and the nonpartisan University of Virginia Center for Politics updated its forecast for the upcoming midterm elections.

                                            While the prediction of a 47-seat gain for Republicans in the House remained unchanged (39-seat gain needed for a Republican majority), there was movement in the ratings of individual House races:

                                            "This week we are changing the ratings of 21 House races, all in the direction of the GOP, including 10 seats formerly listed as Toss-Ups that are now leaning into the Republican column."

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #13.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:00 AM EDT

                                            "This week we are changing the ratings of 21 House races, all in the direction of the GOP, including 10 seats formerly listed as Toss-Ups that are now leaning into the Republican column."

                                            You heard it first Republicans, no need for you to go out and vote in November, your party is a shoo-in. Sit back, relaaaax.

                                            • 3 votes
                                            #13.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:27 AM EDT

                                            What you fail to realize MB is that Nate Silver got a big ego boost last election, and he's afraid of being wrong so now he's trying to ride the common wisdom that the republicans are going to sweep the election this time. But what poor Nate doesn't realize is he's going to be so wrong this election his two years of fame is over. He fell for the pundits predictions instead of following his own instincts as he did in 2008.

                                            But keep buying into these polls what ever makes you feel good.

                                            I agree with Amy you republicans don't need to vote, the election is over and you won.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #13.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:39 PM EDT

                                            Nice try, Amy-

                                            But, your comment merely exemplifies and highlights the "refusal to acknowledge reality" mindset prevalent among most of the regulars here at First Read during this midterm election cycle.

                                            Most conservatives simply couldn't be more motivated to turn out on November 2nd.

                                            They can't wait.

                                            Trust me just this once, Amy...I am one of them, and I know.

                                            Nothing will keep them away from the polls in November.

                                            Nothing, Amy.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #13.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:50 PM EDT

                                            Mo-

                                            Please be here on November 3rd.

                                            I'm looking forward to hearing from you.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #13.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:57 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            A Legend In His Own Mind

                                            So, did you hear the one about New York Gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino's excellent work as a hostage negotiator back at Syracuse University in 1970?

                                            Apparently nobody else has either!

                                            May 8, 1970, in response to the shootings that killed 4 at a protest at Kent State, incidents broke out at campuses across the country. This included Syracuse University where students took control of the administration building.

                                            Paladino claims that he was working with Syracuse police as part of a ride-along program for law students interested in criminal justice and that he negotiated on behalf of Syracuse police chief Tom Sardino that resulted in an exchange in which Sardino took the place of university chancellor John Corbally who was being held hostage.

                                            The problem is, according to the Syracuse Post-Standard, these events did not occur.

                                            Yes, the students took control of the administration building but Corbally was not in the building at the time. Sardino and Corbally arrived at the building 15 minutes after the students took control of the building. They entered, met with students for 2 hours and then left. Corbally set up a temporary office while Sardino returned to the bulding and met with students overnight. The protest ended peacefully the next day.

                                            At no time were either Corbally or Sardino held hostage.

                                            David Bennett, a Syracuse University history professor who also met with students during the protest, calls Paladino's account a lie.

                                            "That’s completely wrong," he said. "He’s either living in Cloud Cuckooland or, shall we say, his historical memory is clouded by whatever it is."

                                            http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/10/carl_paladinos_tale_of_helping.html

                                            Nice job by the GOP and the Tea Partiers! Between "Junior Grizzly" and "The Legend of Carl Paladino" you've picked some wonderful pathological liars!

                                            • 9 votes
                                            Reply#14 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:10 AM EDT

                                            Since Obama has already stated publicly that he does not believe in "American Exceptional-ism" and since the dems seem to have officially adopted the stance that "if you do not believe as I do you are my enemy" (which is clearly evident by the nutty lib posts on here), it is definitely time for the Republicans to take back over and get some sense of sanity in Washington.

                                            All one has to do is read the kookiness on here and it becomes clearly evident that liberals are dangerous to society.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #14.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:15 AM EDT

                                            What does any of your post have to do with "The Legend of Carl Paladino" and his false claims of rescuing the chancellor of Syracuse University?

                                            Focus, man, focus!

                                            • 4 votes
                                            #14.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:41 AM EDT

                                            John Doe. Prove it, please provide the quotes but be sure to include the entire quote not just the part that suits the right's talking point. Pres Obama has numerous times talked of regaining and maintaining America's exceptionalism or does that simply not go with the Republican Tea Party narrative.

                                            • 5 votes
                                            #14.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:01 PM EDT

                                            Another Republican liar, and another Conservative trying to distract us from that with a shiny object.

                                              #14.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:41 PM EDT

                                              Jody all John Doe can do is quote what Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh, O'rielly and Fox tell him.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #14.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:47 PM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              An interesting posting

                                              http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=260#

                                              • 2 votes
                                              Reply#15 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:15 AM EDT

                                              I don't get it. Christine O'Donnell is me? Everything we have heard isn't true? Do you think she even realizes she is the one that has said what we are hearing? Could she be that delusional?

                                              She said she dabbled in witchcraft. She said she her chosen religion would have been Hari Krishna and the only reason it wasn't was she did not want to be a vegetarian because she likes meatballs. She said she had a high education background that turns out is completely untrue. She said she did not spend campaign money illegally or inappropriately yet her campaign finance filings she filed prove she did spend campaign money illegally and inappropriately. She said China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country to prove the claim that she couldn't divulge.

                                              If she did posses classified information regarding a threat to our nation by China and did not notify the authorities, well, wouldn't that be considered treason?

                                              Local Philadelphia CBS3 Eyewitness News reporter Ben Simmoneau got a very limited time to ask Christine O'Donnell some questions which he did regarding her campaign finance filings which CBS3 Eyewitness News investigated. She did not provide any answers and they referred the reporter to her attorney. Didn't she say a couple of weeks ago that she was going to focus on and talk to local media? Can't get more local for Delaware than CBS3 Eyewitness News. (Delaware is covered as part of the three local news broadcasts in the Philadelphia market.) Scroll down to watch the video where Simmoneau clearly has the campaign finance documents she filed.

                                              http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2010/10/01/one-on-one-with-christine-odonnell/

                                              • 6 votes
                                              Reply#16 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:16 AM EDT

                                              I could see that Ms. O'Donell needed to address all of the issues surrounding her but this ad struck me as totally ineffective. It is part of the culture of "never wrong" that we were discussing here yesterday---apparently she just couldn't say I've made some mistakes in my life but will work hard to represent the interests of my state. Closest she came to that was saying something like "no one is perfect". Well----that is obvious.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #16.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:34 AM EDT

                                              Anytime a candidate's first words are "I am not a witch" and ends with "I am you", the entire ad dips into the world of weird.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #16.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:04 PM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              The First Thoughts account of why Republican outside groups are outspending the Democrats is just terrible journalism. Instead of concocting nitpicky reasons to blame the Democrats and Obama, maybe Todd and Murray should talk to Rachel Maddow about the money imbalance between the parties.

                                              It's amazing to me that Todd and Murray got through the entire report without mentioning THE most important reason: these Republican groups are being financed primarily by a handful of billionaires (three of them for Rove's outfit, American Crossroads, including two of the nations worst polluters, the Koch brothers) while the Democrats are being funded primarily by tens of thousands of small donors.

                                              And all this was made possible in large part by the radical right Supreme Court overturning decades of precedent to decide that money is "speech" in the "Citizens United" case. The Roberts Court has dealt a major blow against democracy in the United States, perhaps even a death blow. But that story is just flying under the radar of all the savvy political reporters obsessed with the minutia and trivia of politics.

                                              • 8 votes
                                              Reply#17 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:20 AM EDT

                                              Man,

                                              Stop whining like a little b***h.

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #17.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:35 AM EDT

                                              We can always count on InTheMiddle to make an insightful comment about any issue.

                                              • 6 votes
                                              #17.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:38 AM EDT

                                              NO Doubt Houston!

                                              A day without our resident poster boy for anger management is like a day without sunshine!

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #17.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:49 AM EDT

                                              What's the matter Fisted Readhead.

                                              Forget to take your Prozac this morning?

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #17.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:07 AM EDT

                                              Houston. I should have read your post before I wrote mine, you said it much better.

                                              InTheMiddle. As long as the pundits continue to spin for the right, I for one, will continue to whine

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #17.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:19 AM EDT

                                              What wrong Houston? Your little sissy butt can't take criticism?

                                              Typical Liberal........."please stop hitting me, it hurts"

                                              I see you have the #1 peanut backing you....lol . We are really scared now.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #17.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:02 PM EDT

                                              Houston, enjoyed your post. The media does seem to ignore the facts whether it is that the Tea Party was funded by Armey, the Koch brothers, and other millionaires to the fact that these same people are funneling milliones into election buying.

                                              ITM, the one who can't take criticism is you. The minute someone bursts one of your world views, you name call. Reminds me of the school bully and like all bullies when someone challenges or fights back--they resort to cheap shots and sissy spewing.

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #17.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:33 PM EDT

                                              You forgot Jody, they also run away like a coward.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #17.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:54 PM EDT

                                              Mo,

                                              I'm right here...These colors don't run, trick. I know you're not stepping to me with your little ........ smerks.

                                              Jody,

                                              Criticism does not bother me. I just brush the hater's off. I can hold my own. you liberals are the weak ones. You can't stand when someone get in your face.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #17.9 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:05 PM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              vote

                                              • 4 votes
                                              Reply#18 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:26 AM EDT

                                              John Paul Stevens (born April 20, 1920) served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from December 19, 1975 until his retirement on June 29, 2010.

                                              ____________

                                              Babe Ruth's called shot was the home run hit by Babe Ruth of the New York Yankees in the fifth inning of Game 3 of the 1932 World Series, held on October 1, 1932 at Wrigley Field in Chicago. During the at-bat, Ruth made a pointing gesture, which existing film confirms, but the exact nature of his gesture is ambiguous. Although neither fully confirmed nor refuted, the story goes that Ruth pointed to the center field bleachers during the at-bat. It was supposedly a declaration that he would hit a home run to this part of the park. On the next pitch, Ruth hit a home run to center field.

                                              ____________

                                              During an interview yesterday on I believe NPR, it was revealed that Justice Stevens attended this game with his dad. Isn't that something?

                                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQlvaiDNBMQ&feature=related

                                              This is a very short video of that at bat. 35 seconds. Look at how Ruth is taunting the Cubs in the dugout as he rounds the bases after he hits his home run. I don't think he "called it". I think he was mouthing off to the Cubs prior to his home run, since they were mouthing off to him. Looks like they were all having a great time.

                                              ________

                                              Thanks SteelerFan. I'm so looking forward to this special. Those were the best of times.

                                              • 3 votes
                                              Reply#19 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:33 AM EDT

                                              The comment that "money follows winners" is in this case total nonsense. The bulk of the money being poured into Rove"s organization for sure, and probably most of the other conservative groups comes from a handful of the super rich. If democrats were ahead in the polls these people would be spending at least the same amount, if not more, to defeat them. This endless spinning for the conservative right, gets tiresome.

                                              • 6 votes
                                              Reply#20 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:48 AM EDT

                                              The posts on here prove on a daily basis that it's time for the AMA to officially recognize Liberlism as a mental disease.

                                              • 4 votes
                                              Reply#21 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:51 AM EDT

                                              ...as opposed to being a Tea Partier...in which case you need a Proctologist because you have your head stuck up your arse!

                                              • 7 votes
                                              #21.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:03 AM EDT

                                              Speaking of the AMA, does your doctor know you are off your meds again????

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #21.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:03 AM EDT

                                              ...which is better than being a lib and having it stuck up Obama's arse!

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #21.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:04 AM EDT

                                              ...which is better than being a lib and having it stuck up Obama's arse!

                                              Whew. I see you went with the "I Know You Are But What Am I" defense. I was afraid you were going to go with the "Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire" argument for a second.

                                              • 5 votes
                                              #21.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:38 AM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              It's going to be sooooo funny to see Obama get angry like a whining schoolgirl when he becomes the lame duck he deserves to be on November 3rd. LOL!

                                              This will be better than watching Pelosi's surgically altered face deteriorate.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              Reply#22 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:03 AM EDT

                                              Why is it that the right-wing fringe think that President Obama will be a 'Lame Duck' after November 2nd?

                                              The CONGRESS will be in a 'Lame Duck' session after November 2nd. The President is still the President.

                                              • 8 votes
                                              #22.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:13 AM EDT

                                              The CONGRESS will be in a 'Lame Duck' session after November 2nd. The President is still the President.

                                              Shhhh Pietro!

                                              You know how easily the SOS crowd gets confused... lol

                                              • 4 votes
                                              #22.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:21 AM EDT

                                              Yep. He'll still be the president...

                                              albeit a president that can't finish passing his payoffs for his crooked union buddies disguised as "stimulus."

                                              Awwww..... too bad for Daddy-O.

                                              Oh Fisted. Prozac. Don't forget.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #22.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:21 AM EDT

                                              John Doe - So you agree that your post was incorrect - the President is still the President and the CONGRESS will have a 'Lame Duck' period before the new Congress is sworn in.

                                              I jut wanted to get that straight.

                                              As far as the rest of your hyperbole - whatever floats your boat.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #22.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:41 AM EDT

                                              John Doe. Any proof for what you say? Any facts to support your remark? Come on, John Doe, if you have proof of what you say, why not share it so the rest of us will be as enlightened as you are.

                                              As for unions, they usually vote democrat for one reason--democrats support workers and they fight for workers' rights. I'll take one union worker over ten Massey's and twenty Koch brothers any day.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #22.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:41 PM EDT

                                              Jody you keep asking John Doe for proof, and every time you do he has to take a pain killer for the headache you keep giving him. If you keep asking him for proof he's going to overdose.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #22.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:00 PM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              "It's going to be sooooo funny to see Obama get angry like a whining schoolgirl"...

                                              "which is better than being a lib and having it stuck up Obama's arse!"

                                              __________

                                              You must be so proud of yourselves. You ARE adults I gather? And Republicans. Of course you are.

                                              • 7 votes
                                              Reply#23 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:12 AM EDT

                                              You must be so proud of yourselves. You ARE adults I gather? And Republicans. Of course you are.

                                              I used to be proud. Before a man (Obama) who clearly hates his own country became president.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #23.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:18 AM EDT

                                              You must be so proud of yourselves. You ARE adults I gather? And Republicans. Of course you are.

                                              Nothing exudes CLASS more than a bitter angry tea bagger!

                                              Sad thing is Pat... they're just getting 'warmed' up... ;0(

                                              • 4 votes
                                              #23.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:23 AM EDT

                                              "I used to be proud. Before a man (Obama) who clearly hates his own country became president."

                                              Whaaaat? I can't even fathom the mind of a person who would write such a comment. Hates his own country? Where do you get that? Because he stood up for the constitution and the right to freedom of worship enshrined there? Because he saved the American auto industry? Because he pushed for grants to develop alternative energy sources? Because he started the draw down of troops from Iraq? What ?

                                              President Obama is an intelligent and honorable man he doesn't deserve that kind of trash talk. If you disagree with his policies, state which ones and why. Personal attacks on Obama don't win you any support from rational people.

                                              • 5 votes
                                              #23.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:27 PM EDT

                                              John Doe. Care to back up your remarks with some facts. Please list exactly why you think President Obama hates this country. President Obama is intelligent, honorable, patriotic, loves his family and is a good man; and guess what he loves his country as much as you. You have no facts just empty words that make you feel better.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #23.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:51 PM EDT

                                              Be careful Jody, you just made John Doe take another pain killer he's about to overdose.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #23.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:03 PM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              "I used to be proud. Before a man (Obama) who clearly hates his own country became president.'

                                              No, it's the Republican Party who hate our country. That's all I see from your party. Hate, hate, hate. Towards everybody. Look in the freakin' mirror and listen to yourselves. It's mind boggling.

                                              • 11 votes
                                              Reply#24 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:29 AM EDT

                                              Follow the money, some call it wealth envy. Let the haves buy lobbyists to buy the laws they want passed. In the same breath yell socialist and deregulate. When the 20% who are poor become 40%, see how much you'll pay for them, or won't pay for them. No problem, just hire another lobbyist to change the law again. All poor people and lazy,welfare receiving parasites. All wealthy people are hard workers.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              Reply#25 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:31 PM EDT
                                              Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                              Leave a Comment:
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                              Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                              Stop TrackingStop Tracking