REPORT OF EFFICIENCY RATING - BARNARD, EDWARD T.

• Document Type: FOIA
• Keywords: PERSONNEL FILES
• Keywords: BARNARD EDWARD T
• Collection: FOIA Collection
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 0001459656
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: June 22, 2015
• Document Release Date: April 17, 2008
• Case Number: F-2007-01040
• Publication Date: April 13, 1948

(b) (3)
Standard Form No. 51, Rev.
Approved Dec. 1943 Form approved
Budget Bureau No. 50-R012.
C. S. C. Dept. Cir. No. 458 Approval expires Mar. 30, 1945.
REPORT OF
EFFICIENCY RATING
______ (21) Effectiveness in planning broad programs.
______ (22) Effectiveness in adapting the work program to
broader or related programs.
------ (23) Effectiveness in devising procedures.
______ (24) Effectiveness in laying out work and establish-
ing standards of performance for subordi-
nates.
------ (25) Effectiveness in directing, reviewing, and check-
ing the work of subordinates.
______ (26)` Effectiveness in instructing, training, and
developing subordinates in the work.
______ (27) Effectiveness in promoting high working morale.
------ (28) Effectiveness in determining space, personnel,
and equipment needs.
______ (29) Effectiveness in setting and obtaining adher-
As of --------3,3..1,Z48.-------------- based on performance during period from _______ Z~21 4_T_________ to _______s~ 3
Edward T.Barnard ----------------------- Int'elligenceOff' ccer p-5
?r Q s~_i-- C Q t c --------------------------------------------
(Organization-Indicate bureau, division, section, unit, field station)
ON LINES BELOW
MARK EMPLOYEE
if weak
if outstanding
1. Study the instructions in the Rating Official's Guide, C. S. C. Form
No. 3823A.
2. Underline the elements which are especially important in the position.
3. Rate only on elements pertinent to the position.
a. Do not rate on elements in italics except for employees in admin-
istrative, supervisory, or planning positions.
b. Rate administrative, supervisory, and planning functions on
elements in italics.
Administrative,
supervisory, or
planning --------
All others ---------
11
dl/
Maintenance of equipment, tools, instrumernts.
Mechanical skill.
Skill in the application of techniques and pro-
cedures.
(5) Attention to broad phases of assignments.
(6) Attention to pertinent detail.
______ (7) Accuracy of operations.
(8) Accuracy of final results.
(9) Accuracy of judgments or decisions.
.. ? (10) ec iveness in presenting ideas or facts.
______ (11) Industry.
______(12) Rate of progress on or completion of assign-
ments.
______(13) Amount of acceptable work produced. (Is mark
based on production records! : --------------------- )
(14) Ability fr organize his work.
(15) Effectiveness in meeting and dealing with
others.
(16) Cooperativeness.
(17) Initiative.
(18) Resourcefulness.
(19). Dependability.
______(20) Physical fitness for the work.
ADMINISTRATIVE-UNOFFICIAL
OFFICIAL:
REGULAR (X ) SPECIAL
PROBATIONAL or TRIAL PERIOD
ence to time limits and deadlines.
______ (30) Ability to make decisions.
______ (31) Effectiveness in delegating clearly defined
authority to act.
(A) -----------------------------------------------------------
(B) --------------------------------------
(C) ------------------------------------------------------------------
STANDARD
Deviations must be explained on reverse side of this form
Plus marks on all underlined elements, and no minus marks__________________
Plus marks on at least half of the underlined elements, and no minus
Adjective
rating
marks--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Very good
Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and any
minus marks overcompensated by plus.marks------------------------------------ Good
Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and minus
marks not overcompensated by plus marks_______________________________________ Fair
Minus marks on at least half of the underlined elements________________________ Unsatisfactory
Rated by ___
O?
Rating approved by efficiency rating committee -- Report to employee
Adjective
rating
Rating
official_ ---
Reviewing I""_-
officiaL _------