MEETING OF OSI ADVISORY GROUP ON UFO JANUARY 14 THRU 17, 1953

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
0005515967
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
June 24, 2015
Document Release Date: 
January 31, 2011
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2010-00651
Publication Date: 
January 21, 1953
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon DOC_0005515967.pdf173.56 KB
Body: 
C00015352 G r iorandu:n for file 0S1__!, ,/k 21 Januaiy 3,953 Meeting, of OSI Advftory Groin on UPO January- 1/,-thru -17, -1953 -?---- Declassified by a'4!" S' date _,.-_2,;, fl,, R ~a; r .. 1 -*b 0945 on Janis rr =144,-1953, an ad. hoc panel of 'scientific consultants was convened. to_ review the "Unidomtifiel rlying_0bjeets" problem. A. detailed, state-rent of the. probleim prosF:ntod to the group by CIA is attached -as-Appendix.' A. The panel consisted of'-the following: Dr. Rbbertsoa, ' MV ?Dr. Luia-Alvarea Dr. S. Gond sjt i ._ Broohhavan Dr. Thornton Pago~ OS:?-JOtsns-Hopkins Dr. J.A. 1 nek,.consultant to ATIC The following members of-the_stirf of-OSI were present for--various harts ? Dr. H.M. Chadwoll-= - _- == li.L. Clark--_ - ? P.G. Stroriz _Di,r t_XI Lt. Col. Oder-(P&E) ~_ (a) Interference with air defense -by intentioral ene;' jsing or - - by lack of ability on the art _F_o?erati. personnel- to din- criminate betueen 'radar ar oralies and actua:-. airborne weaocns ' (b)_..Related to (a), Interference with air defense ty-overloading Co="L'%icatioa lines from the air dofcn3o observation stations.'." (c} Possibility of a -psychological. -offensive by the ener r tired with respect to an actual :attacc-could conceivably seriously ? D.D. Stevenson_(Weapans) Capt. S. J, ,spelt-of ATIC; Lt. _Neash and M -0-H.- Woo of-the Yiavy panto ;, interpret4 ion lab a'L_4nacostiaa and l i jor Fouraet and Capt. - Sn.tth-of-Air--- To assist panel in-itsrevia;r_and analysis-of evidence' 2. No evidence Is available to initcatthe existence or use of any . as yet unknown (to us) fdhdsnental eeientifie principles. 2. W', evi fence is available- ti icete-any physical ibreat ) the security of.. the Cr-ii S es. . of the conclusions reached::- A f r 1 report.-on te-results of_:te ~eesti~ng is being prepared for the AD/SI byr ?. C. Damn 96u,__ It is be lieve& tbat_tte _foUowing is a -fair statement orce Direutorate-of Inligeaos_uerap$r~ rt 4. The subject nar0" is of operational interest for three reasons: 3. The subject "U?O" is not of direct-int.elligence interest. It is of_ ijiiroct intelligence. interest=-only insofar as any knowledge about the inumerable unsolved r'steriesof-the universe' are of intelligence interest. Approve for Release C 0 0 015 3 5 2 At 0245 on January 14, 1953, an ad, hoc panel of scientific o naultants couvened,to review the "unidentified dying Objects" Problem. A detailed ? statea.ent of the proble7 presented to the group by CTA is attached as Appenaix. A. she panel consisted of the -following:--following:-- Dr. Ibbertson, ? -CIT 'Dr. Luic?A1 arez Dr. S. Gondsmit., Broohhzven Dr. Thornton Pago, OR) Johns }Topk ns Dr. J.A. H'nelc, .. consultant to ATIC. of the ctisoussions: The following neabers-of the staff of OSl were present for various parts To as:rist the scientific panel i6:_3ts_-review=an3 'aaalysis_ot evidences security or the.-United States. AD/51 by ^.C. Durant but-it is belioved the-t-ithe-_following is-a-fair-statement -:. of the conclusions reached.- 1. do evidence-is .evadable to I dicate-any.phjsical tbrent ,e. the - A fi, 2 report on -the estults of the meeting= is be1ifj--pra r-a1 for the interp:ut.4 ion lab at -.Anac(jstia~, and va jor rournet and Capt. Smith of ~-ir :._ . Force Di:e;storate of Intellige!c vere_p es nt, CeLpt. T. J. 3.ppelt of ATIC; L Neas and- L?ir. - H Roo. of _ the Navy pbato---- 2. No evidonco-is-avMeblO-to-indi a the existence _or use of wry, as yet urJcnown (to us} fitndansstAl scientific rimer leer Uroct intelligence-interest -only-irsorer_asny knowledge about the lHumeraLl3 unsolved mysteries. of-the_+universp-Are_6f_ intelligence interest. 3. The subject-MM" is not=of-direct intelligekce Interest.* -It is of__ Dr. H.M. Chadwell RL. Clark-_. - :.-.._ - ' P.C. Stro:j with respect Via: an actuai a tea ,eau l conceivabay seriously (c) possibility suf. a :p_ ysolo4i.l=offensiye_by' tbe-ener tlueed concnwiwicatiorI -linesfrontheair-dcfenso observation stations, - (b) Related to (a), interference with air defense =by -overloading :. _.._- erinir..a~a beteleen dar-_ar:o.alia~_ana aett.al-eircarne veapc~s 4. ' The subject eUPO" =is of. operaitional-interest for three- reasons: (a) Interference with air-defense .-. bp_ intenti_oral enema, -fain by lack of Ability.en-the_ part -ofoperating p ._ orronnel _to di*- C00015352 it is noted that thes general-conclusions as st.atei hare do not cpeci?- ficca ly answer the nee-Is presented f A + cnl~uc A.===Yowos~eri it is antiCi.psted-__ that co.nent on these points will -b4 presented in a written statement-fr=-- the scientific panel to AD/sl j"-S=irs71~5t -reduce the defonso effort of the general-public. DBS:gl (type! 3.2-February 1953)- '??!1.11 ~~` '