DRUG ANALYSIS, (DELETED)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
00146388
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
January 17, 2025
Document Release Date:
January 15, 1983
Sequence Number:
Case Number:
Publication Date:
August 15, 1952
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 106.36 KB |
Body:
.0-'""-
r VIA:
'TO
�-4;�
4..
I.
� I
�('
AIM
4 (SrECIFY AIR OR SEA POOCH)
FROM
.SUBJECT: GENERAL-
:, ,
�
SPECIFIC-- Drug Analysis,
Ref: MEI ,0
DIS NO.
k
DATE: 15 AuE1.17,t 1952
/173,.M., /
�
n connection with the request of paragraph 1 of reflrence,.
:as advised of the action desired of him and his
hereinafter. is no longer located '
served in his stead.
The "we" of ,report is used in the editorial sense since
he alone discussed Subject analysis mithl
.2.
report is as follows:
"a. The analysis referred to the_reference document
was performed at thE
This laboratory has since moved from(
, the director of the
'was most cooperative with us
in our effort to obtain more information concerning the analysis
which had been performed in his laboratory a year ago.
c. The anal sis was performed
- She is a graduate of the and also hasshad
; 1:�� � training at th ,whAwch is operated by the
�
Although still in her twdhties
one as being very competent.
d./ readily recalled the details of the sample
and analysis of the previous year. She remembered that the volume
was quite small and stated that all of the sample was used to complete
the analysis." In an, event if some of the sample had been left,
were agreed thrlt there was no chance
impresses
that it would be found in the laboratory, since a cene,ral houna�
cleaning had taken place on the occasion of the move toilliallarfrom
and all odds and ends were discarded at that Lime.
7 .
t
5 1-28 A
MAR. 1949
o.�:;1F7 n17'17'L h.� t.ho
hc,vitiv:r. it c(,n;:in'.o61r: ;;ith i:r.�0n
:J o-liko precipitF.to :..i!emed to ho of baorin.1 na'.hro.
000urrmco of Li: Lo prvIpLed h.7r to contrifnso in
order to cloar the 51.n.ornan", liquid before iTocendinr. with
r.11,71r,,17. As reported !.r.viou:ly, 1.1. ra. or liquid rsulted from
this oper:ition.
I �
1
f. Uitrn-zne ppper 1J.n5 117�yd �o 1otor:An-7 1_110 or
liqndd. Arconlinq to11111111110 s5ne the r,..ro,tni icatd siii7hL1,y
acid, the pH as proably in ef
Tv' used for the I.oxilor-icn.7 letorminations
v-r,-; n71 11:!:7,7c1 cn moi.nodo doscribed in ,H7
:.;tnt,es Arry. J=os arl GenL:kow, (.;lcon J.,
5th Edition, Lca'and Febicer, 1944.
7ujiw,ra test for chlorvi h:drate ;Ind chloroform p. 3%4
7n.ritrates
328
Alkaloid: .12S -
i.Fimil,r tests wero run chi Lho creen precipitate. On
micrescopic e:,Pmination, t.r. reoipiL:ite (130 not shc..,r ,7r75ta11ino
5r,2cturc. M.her, chloroform, ncid, n.nd eYtrcts of Lho
precipitn,te wore m.r1 nnd us0d to teL for the n�ub.itancos mentioned
Frovieusl:;.. AfL0r oyt,ractien, the pr-cir:itete vms
under the micr.,:pe,.with the previous result of no crystalline
form being e:chibited.
o5 guito positive of the r,��sults obtail,cd
the n.hslyticll work of the provious and cluiLo wiliing
tc ,--,ake the s!_tem-nL 'the nznmple contained noiv of Uho tvic agents
tested fur above, of thr�t I m sure'.
j. It is our oonsidorod crinion that none of '.he original
F =p1e submatt t n '1111111111111111111111111.11111 13 av:11].A.b30.
n17,, re.01 Lnnt 1I t1' n.%).ditional information is possible from the
work done a year no on this sample."
Dist:
C-
1 - Mice of 3ecurity
pan
, . ....i....'n " . ''..L. l� � - -1,...1, �.',,.../J�� .� : ': --r������4!!`...."..%),..4.7---:'' '"*.r"....4-�Hf'''.4'.''''.:it".;.'"....474-- '-rt,r''.4'j''''''''';''''''w;s:;��r"-t-.-"';"4"--',-''*'4-',�:;'--:2'"'".'7�''P:-.-c'j':`j'-'''r-A7-'�':;::L::ll'c''r--.''.;';41:r-':';"1"''I'.'"."-#':;:4;4's:'" ..r.'-'
_ A,,,..........
'-.....4.,1*Irgr'ele.,1*-1.. . . %.#....... " . ' . .7 -77 - ."' 1'71., " r ....' . ' ,.. V . .� �,���'4�41,-.L. ' *1 "' � � � . i ,