PROJECT OXYGAS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
02384121
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
September 6, 2019
Document Release Date: 
September 12, 2019
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 2, 1964
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon PROJECT OXYGAS[15687526].pdf131.65 KB
Body: 
Approved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2384121 3.3(h)(2) oRD 242.4-65/ 2 Bovienber 1964 MRMOPATIDUK rom Chief, Maritime Branch/Special Operations Mivisian SUBJECT t Project OXYGAS 1. Attached is a progress report on Project On= vhieh will, no doeht� be of interest to you. As you recall, OED undertook thio project with you for the purpont of demonstrating the technical feasibility of wing dolphins for a variety of operational purpoeen. Fraa the technical point of view, we were interested in deternining the dolphin's reliability in placing an appropriate object on a We also recognized that there would be a strioua quention of the range of the dolphin but felt that an initial achievement of range with a payload would be noet encouraging. The first technical objective bas been achieved more rapidly than anticipated. The second technical objective is now under investiga- tion, and we are hoping that we will be able to achieve a reaaonalle range, although not necessarily a uoeful operational range, by the completion of the contract period in January 1965. 2. Quite frankly this project has progressed nore rapidly than we anticipated, although unbridled enthusiasm is not justified at this time. 1 wish to emphasize that there are many difficult technical problees vhich face us which include the operational range of the anieal, conmenication problems between the animal and its handlers, deaign of an appropriate payload shape, improved. bendier training techniqees, and others. Nevertheless, there is the very real possibility that technical feaaibility will be demonntrated by January. Br. Geller of OUR, who takes a MOTO optimistic point of ylev, feels that technical feasibility has been established al- reedy. The possibility of success requires that we begin to explore where we go from here. DIV tentative thoughts on this are outlined below. 3. MB could eontinue to support �MAO at its preeent toes.. tion for another few nonths vith profit, although we are rapidly approaching the stage uhero security dictates that we move the operation to a more suitable location. You are aware of the poosi. bility of joining the Navy in using an operational testing site for this project. The decinion to demonstrate operational feasibility will require greater participation, both administratively and operationally, by SOD. As the project becomes more operational, it is my view that ORD should graftally vithdraw its participation 1 aJtaaatiC , taa Approved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2384121 Approved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2384121 SUATIM Project �XMAS 2 Novel.:lber 1964 e7cept to the extent that technical problem ariee. It night be advicable for your activity to survey other DD/P units to see whether they have requirements which eolphins :sight perform. We ohoul4 con- sider a similar survey in the DD/BT as well. I. I think we can essurae that the coat of maintainina an operational dolphin capability would be conolderably higher on an autroal basin than the current contract of approximately *100,000. The emet coat would depend, to some extent, on the availability of ravy facilities, the umber of dolphin, the operational requirements, and. the like. I suspect that considerable suirport could be obtained fraa navy on a "no coat" basis because of their intense intereat in this project. The extent of collaboration with the llavy would, of course" depend upon your ova security and operational requirements. 5. In summary, the OXYG/113 project appears to be running ahead of echedsge. I think the chances are quite good that we will demon- strate a reasonable technical feasibility thta year. I am suggesting that we begin pl=ling for follow-on phases, although I think it is prernture to rake final decisions on follow-on until technical feast. bility has been derionstrated. It may not be premature to alert appropriate Denier officials in the DIVP of the project. We would be most happy to gravid* suitable technical information and/or brief- ings at the appropriate time, =PRIV L. =RIM/ 11. D. Zeputy Assistant Director Office of Research it Development Approved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2384121