AL-QADHDHAFI THREATENS WAR WITH U.S. IN INTERVIEW

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 30, 2012
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 29, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4.pdf425.65 KB
Body: 
1111M 16~ Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 NORTH AFRICA Q I ALGERIA Bendjedid Ends Talks With Al-Qadhdhafi, Returns LD291636 Algiers APS in English 1451 GMT 29 Jan 86 [Text] Algiers, 29/1/86 (APS) - President Chadli Bendjedid returned here at the end of the political talks he had with Colonel al-Qadhdhafi and following the inspection and working visit in south of the country. The head of state arrived on monday in Ain-amenas in the Wilaya of Illizi coming from Hassi R'mel where he inaugurated important social and economic achievements. Bitat Meets Mexican Foreign Secretary' Amor LD291314 Algiers APS in Arabic 0700 GMT 29 Jan 86 [Text] Algiers.29 Jan (APS) - Rabeh Bitat, member of the Politburo (of the Algerian FLN Party) and speaker of the Peop- le's National Assembly (parliament), yesterday received Ber- nardo Sepulveda Amor, secretary of foreign relations of the United Mexican States. Their talks dealt with bilateral relations between Algeria and Mexico and their future consolidating, as well as the latest developments in various regions of the world. The two sides also exchanged views on consolidating cooperation between the two countries' parliaments and on the 75th International Parliamen- tarian Union session. Al-Qadhdhafi Threatens War With U.S.'in Interview LD292304 Tripoli Television Service in Arabic 2056 GMT 29 Jan 86 [French Television Channel 2 interview with Libyan Leader Mu'ammar al-Qadhdhafi by unidentified reporter on 27 Jan- uary, place not given; questions in French with Arabic translation, translated from the Arabic except where noted - recorded] [Text] [Question] Colonel Al-Qadhdhafi, good evening, you have just seen these pictures with us. The U.S. warships are sailing off the Libyan coast. You personally went to meet them in a gunboat equipped with missiles. Does this mean that the confrontation has started, if I can use use your expression? [Answer] If the maneuvers are conducted outside the Libyan territorial waters, I mean the Libyan territorial waters including the Gulf of Sidra, then they do not now concern us. If, however, they reach the Gulf of Sidra, this means they have entered Libyan territory, and this will mean that the war will definitely take place, and it will be considered as an unjustified American attack against the soil and sanctity of Libyan territory. Also, what I will propose from now onward is the banning of these maneuvers in the economic zones of the Mediterranean coun- i i ies, even outside the territorial waters, because the economic c8-lncg--~6-6D- o zone, which is the continental shelf, contains economic activities, such as exploring for resources, gas fields, oil fields, rigs, and constructions. This is in the Libyan economic zone outside the Gulf of Sidra, and in the Italian economic zone, and the Greek. economic zone and the Maltese, and the others. I will propose to these countries that they ban the implementation of military maneuvers for the United States and the others in these economic zones. As for the Gulf of Sidra, this is a closed subject. Latitude 32 degrees 30 minutes is the beginning of the Gulf of Sidra, and it is a very sensitive gulf, which divides Libya into two parts. We will never allow any force to enter into the Gulf of Sidra, because this will mean that it will divide Libyan soil, because latitude 32 degrees 30 minutes is the line that joins Misratah with Banghazi, and anyone who crosses is considered as coming between Tripoli and Banghazi. [Question] They say that there is a disparity between your power and the power of the United States. [Answer] This is not important. Does this mean that the small countries whose power is not comparable with the powers that confront them should surrender? This would mean that we have to surrender the land to the strong, and we would all collapse and loose our independence. Even the power of Rance is not equivalent to the power of America and the Soviet Union. Does this mean that if it is confronted by the Soviet Union or America, then it should surrender its independence? This subject is not open for discussion. The important thing is that this is our right. If we are resorting to force as the only arbiter, then that is it, the stronger party snatches the land, and we announce that the rest have no rights. [Question] A few days ago you said precisely: I am ready to set the Mediterranean on fire and turn it into blood. [Answer]Of course, if Libya is subjected to aggression, this would bean unjust and unjustified aggression. Consequently, Libya will defend itself. Aggression would come from the Mediterranean, the U.S. bases in the Mediterranean and the U.S. fleets in the Mediterranean. This means that the Mediterranean would become a war zone and acts of violence would be permissible in it and all the targets in the war zone would be exposed to possible destruction according to international law and the laws of war. [Question] Col al-Qadhdhafi, you say military objectives. You realize, however, I suppose, that in Europe, in the West, your picture, especially you are, in a way, the face of terrorism. [Answer] [Al-Qadhdhafi laughs] We must understand what ter- rorism is so that we can know who is the terrorist. In our interpretation and in the interpretation of the world what Amer- ica practices is terrorism and what the Israelis practice is terror- ism. They consider our sacred and legitimate struggle for the preservation of our independence terrorism. Therefore, there is no possibility of understanding. It seems that there are various cultures and it is regrettable that in the Americans' view is that this gap should be solved by force and that force should be the arbiter. The proof of this is that reagan has no logic, he has no argument. His argument is always to threaten to use force, Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 W AL AM Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 Q 2 NORTH AFRICA military maneuvers, economic siege, threatening war, or physical liquidation. I personally have been subjected to various oper- ations that were disclosed in America. They were preparing physical liquidation operations and assassinations against me at the order of Reagan, and implemented by the CIA. Reagan should have been put on trial as a criminal and violator of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. laws. He is' a terrorist because he terrorizes the small peoples, like the Libyan people, and he is terrorizing the people of Nicaragua. He terrorized and occupied the people of Grenada because they are a small people. He also arms the Israelis. [Question] Can we consider the operations that were carried out in Rome and Vienna as forms of legitimate resistance? [Answer] Independent states, as I have anyhow mentioned several times, who are UN members to not carry out such actions. However, the Palestinians, who are pursued by Zionism and imperialism, they see it as a suitable' action in relation to their issue; to draw the attention of the world. I do not think that we are living in an era of terrorism except that of the official terrorism practiced by America against the peoples and that practiced by Zionism. The rest are merely actions carried out by peoples or groups to draw the attention of the world'to their cause. If we were to consider the assassination of Indira Gandhi as a terrorist act - and we express our regret vis-a-vis this sad event - we also have to understand what motivated it; it was motivated by the fact that the Sikhs are a national-cum-religious group'that wants to be independent and. gain its rights. Thus, the Palestin- ians are a people who want to liberate their land and, hence, are forced to take actions that, we, as independent states, would not consider carrying out. However, those groups consider them useful and suitable actions. The dangerous terrorism' is the official terrorism practiced by America and the official terrorism practiced by the Israelis with American weapons and American backing; the Sabra and Shatilla massacres and the running over of entire families of civilians by the Israeli tanks. Why does Reagan not protest or impose a siege or ban the sale of weapons to the Israelis, who have carried out extremely horrible acts. The question seems to be of a racist and crusader nature and Reagan is Hitler No 2. This. is a new imperialism, a new Nazism resur- rected to threaten world peace. At least we are in the Mediterra- nean Sea, let them leave us in our Mediterranean Sea. We want to maintain peace, trade, tourism, culture, and mutual interests across the Mediterranean sea and let America go to the oceans and (?arms itself). [Question] We see you in this picture surrounded by your chil- dren; it is a beautiful picture. But you have training camps, and I do not mean on acts of terrorism. These are two contradictory pictures: the picture of the quiet man'and the picture... [Answer] [Al-Qadhdhafi interrupts] We have but one picture of peace and the defense of freedom and the support of the oppress- ors. In our country there are no camps that you yourself term "terrorism" [here al-qadhdhafi smiles]. First of all as far as the camps of the Palestinians are concerned, we do not consider these to be terrorist camps because these people arc defending their freedom. Add to this the fact that these camps are not in Libya now, but if the Palestinian people ask for the opening of camps on Libyan soil we will accept this request because the Palestinians are a people who have a cause, and the whole world recognizes that it is a just cause. There are no terrorist camps in our country. In actual fact, the camps of terrorism are the American and Zionist camps. This, intitself, is a psychological terrorism against us; they want to psychologically intimidate us by accusing us of practicing terrorism, and of having camps. This is a lie. There are no camps in our country. On the other hand, they display military force in our territorial waters. They threaten our territo- rial waters, independence, and security in our own homes. In actual. fact this is terrorism. This accusation is serious. This is psychological terrorism being practiced by America and Zionism against the Libyan people and against me personally. This is the most dangerous and worst type of terrorism being practiced by America and Israel. [Question in French followed by Arabic translation, translated from the French due to poor monitorability of Arabic] Col al-Qadhdhafi, terrorism, exercises [words indistinct] the dif- ference from your own mouth [as heard] is difficult to make. In any case 'thanks for these statements. We had with us in live transmission Colonel al-Qadhdhafi with the U.S. fleet still sail- ing off the Libyan coast. Thank you for these statements. [Inter- view ends and video shows Al-Qadhdhafi standing up and about to leave the studio]. 6th Fleet Maneuvers in Mediterrean Reported Naples Activity Watched NC300717 Tripoli Domestic Service in Arabic 0600 GMT 30 Jan 86 [Text] Naval Units of the U.S. 6th Fleet and other U.S. war vessels are continuing their belligerent naval and air exercises in the Mediterranean Sea opposite the Arab Libyan shores. These belligerent naval and air maneuvers are facing a sweeping wave of anger and condemnation among the various progressive and peace-loving circles in the world. The U.S. terrorist maneuvers started last Friday and will con- tinue until 31 January. It has been learned from Italian sources that there was feverish activity in the U.S. naval forces headquarters in Naples, which is under NATO command. These activities are shrouded in secrecy.. The port of Naples was the scene of movements by U.S. naval units. U.S. marines are ready and awaiting transport aboard support ships that are preparing to sail opposite Libyan shores to join the aircraft carriers Saratoga and Coral Sea. The sources added that the aicraft carrier Guadalcanal, the cruiser Eagleton, and other military support units are carrying tanks and armored vehicles and were seen moving toward the open sea. `Zionist' Ships Involved LD300936 Tripoli JANA in Arabic 0810 GMT 30 Jan 86 [Text] Kuwait, 30 Jan (JANA) - Zionist vessels and gunboats are participating in the provocative exercises being carried out by the American' 6th Fleet off the Libyan shores. Informed sources today reaffirmed that two Zionist vessels, helicopters of Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 .~ i Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 . W NORTH AFRICA V. 30Jan 86 the (Hiller) type, and four fast missile-carrying gunboats have joined the American 6th Fleet to participate in the U.S. terrorist provocative threats against the Libyan Arab people. The sources said that Admiral Ben-Shoshan is supervizing the Zionist vessels and gunboats participating in these .:imperialist U.S. threats against the Libyan Arab people. `Agressive' Maneuvers Continue . LD301218 Tripoli JANA in Arabia 1100 GMT 30 Jan 86 [Text] Tripoli,. 30 Jan (JANA) - American naval units of the 6th,Fleet and other American warships continue their aggressive naval and air maneuvers for. the 7th day in succession in the Mediterranean, off the Libyan Arab coast. These naval and air maneuvers are taking place amid strong international condemnation, and a wave of indignation and denunciation of these maneuvers, by various progressive and peace and security-loving circlesin the world. . The maneuvers began last Friday and are due to continue until tomorrow, 31 January. Letter to UN Complains of Reagan-Stands LD301557 Tripoli Domestic Service in Arabic 1330 GMT 30 Jan 86 [Text] The People's Committee of the People's Bureau for For- eign Liaison has sent a letter to the secretary general of the United Nations that says: The Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriyah draws your, excellency's attention to the hostile position expressed by the behavior of the American Administra- tion in its dealings with sovereign states in a manner constituting a direct infringement on their sovereignty, and affirming the biased attitude of this administration vis-a-vis the Third World states. The fact that President Reagan has received the leader of the so-called UNITA movement, the gang hostile to Angola, which is a member of the United Nations, the Nonaligned Movement and the Organization of African Unity, and, on the other hand, his refusal, out of enmity and bias; to meet the PLO, which. is a liberation movement struggling to ensure that the Arab Palestin- ian people get their national rights on its land from which it had been expelled due to the Zionist aggression that still exists and continues until this hour, this attitude by:a head of state like America expresses in reality' only a racist and discriminatory tendency, as well as a religious, cultural, and civilizational bias, and complete partiality favoring the Israelis andthe enemies of the Arab and African peoples. Arab League Asked To Act on U.S. Boycott LD301601 Tripoli Domestic Service'in Arabic 1330 GMT 30 Jan 86 [Excerpts] At the request of the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriyah, foreign ministers of the `Arabstates meet in the Tunisian capital today to discuss the terrorist policy followed by the head-of the U.S. Administration Reagan. The SPLAJ has called for the meeting of the Arab League foreign ministers to face up to the U.S. provocations and deci- sions to impose an economic blockade. At their meeting in the Tunisian capital, the Arab foreign ministers must realize the gravity of the situation; they are required to adopt decisive measures against the ally of the- enemy of the Arab nation, the Zionist entity, so that this may be a lesson in the future for anyone daring to follow the line of economic and military war pursued by the Reagan administration against any Arab state. All the more since we realize that Arab assets estimated at hundreds of thousands of dollars [as heard] in the Western states. This meeting was postponed until after the meeting of the EEC last Monday, a meeting that did not lead to any measures against the SPLAJ, which would have met the objectives 'sought by Reagan 'and his ally the Zionist enemy ' Tripoli TV Reports, Shows `Challenger' Explosion LD292212 Tripoli Televisibn.Service in Arabic 2004 GMT 29 Jan 86 ' [Text] The explosion of the U.S.-space shuttle'Challenger'has evoked a tragic response among circles of American' Society, which see in this incident a shabby result of U.S. technical and technological. know-how in whose strategic programs flaws-and gaps have been found that resulted. in the destruction of this shuttle less than 90 seconds after its take-off. U.S. citizens have not concealed their dissatisfaction and have strongly confronted the U.S. official circles. The failure of the 24th [as'heard] mission of the shuttle, Challenger and its destruction before its start has also made inevitable the delay of the star wars programs, for which the U.S. Administration provides the most advanced scientific and technical space know-how, until the time when new guarantees for the safety against explosion of other U.S. space shuttles in their take-off programs are-available. The explosion of a U.S.. spaceship, whose blast-off had been officially reported by international media, is a shameful result of U.S. claims to scientific superiority and techinical progress in the world. It has caused repercussions among Western and interna= tional scientific circles and world. public opinion, for which Washington cannot be envied. The shuttle Challenger exploded 90 seconds after taking off, while carrying a crew of seven Americans, including a teacher in social studies. It has been officially' confirmed that the entire crew of the shuttle that exploded over the Atlantic has died. It is worth recalling that the'shuttle Challenger's mission was postponed several times owing to technical' faults and bad weather. This event is considered the worst setback to the United States in the sphere of space. Reagan registered his disappointment and state of despair when he described the explosion as a national disaster. This' state of Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 /T) N/ r/ p-h j t NORTH AFRICA Q I Bendjedid Ends Talks With AI-Qadhdhafi, Returns LD291636 Algiers APS in English 1451 GMT 29 Jan 86 [Text] Algiers, 29/1/86 (APS) -- President Chadli Bendjedid returned here at the end of the political talks he had with Colonel al-Qadhdhafi and following the inspection and working visit in south of the country. The head of state arrived on monday in Ain-amenas in the 1Vilaya of Illizi coming from Hassi R'mel where he inaugurated important social and economic achievements. Bitat Meets Mexican Foreign Secretary Amor /_/)191314 Algiers APS in Arabic 0700 GMT 29 Jan 86 lTcxtl Algicrs.29 Jan (APS) -- Rabeh Bitat, member of the Politburo (of the Algerian FLN Party) and speaker of the Peop- le's National Assembly (parliament), yesterday received Ber- nardo Sepulveda Amor, secretary of foreign relations of the United Mexican States. Their talks dealt with bilateral relations between Algeria and Mexico and their future consolidating, as well as the latest developments in various regions of the world. The two sides also exchanged views on consolidating cooperation between the two countries' parliaments and on the 75th International Parliamen- tarian Union session. AI-Qadhdhafi Threatens War With U.S. in Interview L D292304 Tripoli Television Service in Arabic 2056 GMT 29 Jan 86 [French Television Channel 2 interview with Libyan Leader Mu'arnmar al-Qadhdhafi by unidentified reporter on 27 Jan- uary, place not given; questions in French with Arabic translation, translated from the Arabic except where noted --- recorded] [Text] [Question] Colonel AI-Qadhdhafi, good evening, you have just seen these pictures with us. The U.S. warships are sailing off the Libyan coast. You personally went to meet them in a gunboat equipped with missiles. Does this mean that the confrontation has started, if I can use use your expression? [Answer] If the maneuvers are conducted outside the Libyan territorial waters, I mean the Libyan territorial waters including the Gulf of Sidra, then they do not now concern us. If, however, they reach the Gulf of Sidra, this means they have entered Libyan territory, and this will mean that the war will definitely take place, and it will be considered as an unjustified American attack against the soil and sanctity of Libyan territory. Also, what I will propose from now onward is the banning of these maneuvers in the economic zones of the Mediterranean coun- itics, even outside the territorial waters, because the economic %' ?- ./1) / A --- . . ~/. _ zone, which is the continental shelf, contains economic activities, such as exploring for resources, gas fields, oil fields, rigs, and constructions. This is in the Libyan economic zone outside the Gulf of Sidra, and in the Italian economic zone, and the Greek economic zone and the Maltese, and the others. I will propose to these countries that they ban the implementation of military maneuvers for the United States and the others in these economic zones. As for the Gulf of Sidra, this is a closed subject. Latitude 32 degrees 30 minutes is the beginning of the Gulf of Sidra, and it is a very sensitive gulf, which divides Libya into two parts. We will never allow any force to enter into the Gulf of Sidra, because this will mean that it will divide Libyan soil, because latitude 32 degrees 30 minutes is the line that joins Misratah with Banghazi, and anyone who crosses is considered as coming between Tripoli and Banghazi. (Question] They say that there is a disparity between your power and the power of the United States. (Answer] This is not important. Does this mean that the small countries whose power is not comparable with the powers that confront them should surrender'? This would mean that we have to surrender the land to the strong, and we would all collapse and loose our independence. Even the power of Rance is not equivalent to the power of America and the Soviet Union. Does this mean that if it is confronted by the Soviet Union or America, then it should surrender its independence? This subject is not open for discussion. The important thing is that this is our right. If we arc resorting to force as the only arbiter, then that is it, the stronger party snatches the land, and we announce that the rest have no rights. IQuestion] A few days ago you said precisely: I am ready to set the Mediterranean on fire and turn it into blood. ]Answcr]Of course, if Libya is subjected to aggression, this would bean unjust and unjustified aggression. Consequently, Libya will defend itself. Aggression would come from the Mediterranean, the U.S. bases in the Mediterranean and the U.S. fleets in the Mediterranean. This means that the Mediterranean would become a war zone and acts of violence would be permissible in it and all the targets in the war zone would be exposed to possible destruction according to international law and the laws of war. [Question] Col al-Qadhdhafi, you say military objectives. You realize, however, I suppose, that in Europe, in the West, your picture, especially you are, in a way, the face of terrorism. (Answer] [A]-Qadhdhafi laughs] We must understand what ter- rorism is so that we can know who is the terrorist. In our interpretation and in the interpretation of the world what Amer- ica practices is terrorism and what the Israelis practice is terror- ism. They consider our sacred and legitimate struggle for the preservation of our independence terrorism. Therefore, there is no possibility of understanding. It seems that there are various cultures and it is regrettable that in the Americans' view is that this gap should be solved by force and that force should be the arbiter. The proof of this is that rcagan has no logic, he has no argument. His argument is always to threaten to use force, Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4 ._ N Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/30: CIA-RDP05-01559R000400410015-4