SUMMARY OF BRIEFING PAPER AGENCY PROMOTION POLICY
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
September 2, 2009
Sequence Number:
3
Case Number:
Publication Date:
April 23, 1977
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 137.39 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2009/09/02 : CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
Next 3 Page(s) In Document Denied
Iq
STAT
Approved For Release 2009/09/02 : CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
u Approved For Release 2009/09/02 : CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
SUMMARY OF
BRIEFING PAPER
Agency Promotion Policy
In the CIA, selection for promotion is competitive, based on evaluation
and ranking at least annually in comparison to the employee's peers and judged
on performance, qualifications, experience and value to the Agency.
This system is designed.to promote on excellence rather than on the
current position grade. The individual promoted above grade position must
be properly reassigned within two years.
Recruiting for the Agency is done centrally by the Office of Personnel.
Once the employee has entered on duty, he/she has historically been the
responsibility of the parent career service. In 1973 the Agency conducted
an extensive review of the different practices among the then 23 career
services. As a result, in 1974 these services were reduced to five under
direct supervision of the Deputies and the delegated head of the DCI or
E service. There still remain.some differences due in part to the unique
requirements of the particular services. The Office of Personnel continues
to monitor these with a view to increasing uniformity as practicable.
Statistics from the FY 1976 Annual Personnel Plan showed that 26 percent
of the Agency was promoted, of which 10 percent were "fast track" - about
half the time in. grade of the others. This figure compares favorably with
government and private corporations. The DDO as a career service has a
comparatively smaller "fast track" record (6 percent).
Following Executive Advisory Group discussion in October 1976, the
regulation on promotion policies attached) was revised. The 25X1
regulation now uniformly establishes that promotion is competitive and
based on the qualification to undertake higher level responsibilities.
The Agency's Personnel Development Program, conducted annually, is
designed to force Directorate management to identify and prepare executive
talent from GS-13 up for high level (GS 16-17) jobs as they become vacant.
Additionally, in 1977 this plan has been enlarged to include nominations
from all career services for some 0 key senior positions. The Agency 25X1
has, since 1974, even with hiring slowdowns and ceiling reductions, managed
to increase the number of young senior officers. Employees GS-13 to GS-18
aged under 40 rose 15 percent (10 percent for DDO).
An employee survey in August 1976, two and one-half years after the
inception of the present personnel management system, showed sufficient
negativism and confusion to trigger many new initiatives in Agency personnel
management.
Approved For Release 2009/09/02 CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
Approved For Release 2009/09/02 CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
J1'd; iuLi'd a F
Employees judge their progress by comparison with peers in the Agency
and outside in government and industry. The average DDO.officer spends
somewhat more time between promotions in senior grades. The average GS-14
in the DDO is 46, compared to 44 in the DDI.
Steady reductions in personnel since 1968 have been achieved mainly
by attrition and controlling the influx of young officers. Attrition of
professionals in the CIA is 6 percent, compared to 15 percent Government-
wide. While the overall promotion rate for the Agency is 26 percent
annually, promotion of GS-14's for 1976 in the DDO was 15 percent; GS-151s,
10 percent; and GS-16's, 2 percent. It is little better in the other
directorates. Should there be further reductions, especially in supergrade
ceiling, the picture will worsen.
A recent survey on morale in the Agency shows factors other than
promotion which discourage the young employee. Slow progress in promotion
may not be the root cause for-discontent, but a discontent generated by
other factors may easily focus on promotional problems. Years of cutbacks
are beginning to take a toll.
Distribution:
Orig - Adse (DDCI)
'- ER
2 - DDA
1 - D/Pers Chrono
1 - D/Pers Subject
1 - DD/Pers/P$C
1 - FWMJ Chrono
D/Pers:FWMJanney:bkf (19 Apr 77)
Approved For Release 2009/09/02 : CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
Approved For Release 2009/09/02 : CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5
Iq
Next 19 Page(s) In Document Denied
Approved For Release 2009/09/02 : CIA-RDP05T00644R000601730003-5