INDO-BURMESE AGREEMENT ON BORDER DEMARCATION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP08C01297R000100210002-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 4, 2012
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 16, 1967
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP08C01297R000100210002-8.pdf244.98 KB
Body: 
9MGIN/F I "7. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/21 : CIA-RDP08001297R000100210002-8 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARA RP fO FZ,P AF. EUR FE N EA CU INR 10 L FOC) AID 2)11-k24 AGR COM FRB INT LAB TAR TR .XMB MR CIA NAVY A-740 NO. UNCLACEIFIEg? TO : Department of State L FOR RM USE ONLY HANDLING INDIC ATO\RO 61), INFO : HONG KONG, RANGOON, BOMBAY CALCUTTA, MADRAS, RAWALPINDI \ DACCA FROM 4aemba sy NZW DEL4, DATE: /4_.( /I ;='t e, , SUBJECT :'Indo-Burmase Agreement on Border Demarcation REF : A-739 Larch 161 1967 J20 Qc" 2he Governments of India and Burma signed an agreement in Rangoon on -1 USIA N2SA March 10 formally to delimit and demarcate the boundary between the two - countries. The agree:a:Int, which is subject to ratification within three 6 ?D;a:cc CI eafacces: months, provides for the establishment of a Joint Boundary Comaission to plan and carry out the demarcation,prepare boundary maps, and draft a boundary treaty. The agreement was signed by Colonel Ky5 Maung on behnlf of the Bunncse Government and by K. E. Kannanpilly, Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Exter1'.0. Affairs for the Goveranent of India. A Press Note on the agreement issued by the YEA said that the agreaent would."further strengthen the friendly relations between the two countriesn :AtET.A spokesman added that the Indo-Burmese boz?der had giveh_n_o_dif2icn111 and that there vsre no disputesneoncerning the border, but the absence of a fornal treaty was the ht by both Govern-lents to be undo7jrab1e. According to the spokesman, Kannanipilly had gone to Rangoon to discuss ways of preventing the movement of hostile elements across the Indo-Burmese frontiers, but in the course of discussions it was found thnt it would be useful to have a formal boundary agreement. Ba!LES IMCLAC=OTT7T LD FORM 4-02 DS-323 , ? ?LC77 :77:73 7-,7C.T;-.71t1C?E7i7c7777o776'?; P G (17' EILDEPTJM2I..7LY El Out Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/21 : CIA-RDP08001297R000100210002-8 !c, RM/R '454 ."?ik2 E.1.1 r .11.1 ii It r1. I . _ i? Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/21 : CIA-RDP08001297R000100210002-8nr1n -infigf) 42i 4M.1gjiL. 32 Vg1.74 FOR RM USE ONLY REP I AF ARA EURI FE REA 'NT Cu INR FB0 I Al 0 COM I FRB LAB I TAR XMB MR ARMY CIA NAVY L 050 Arc USIA NSA -5 A-191 CONFIDENTIAL NO. TO DEPARTMENT OF STATE ,0,0 4_ 2- 15u (cm 4-1;4,( HANDLING INDIC TOR /4 IVED Ca/ GE!)/40t7 INFO : BANGKOK, CALCUTTA CHIiNGMAII DACCA, MANDALAY, NEW DELHI, RAWALPINDI FROM SUBJECT: REF L_ CONFIDENTIAL Amembassy RANGOON :AF11 G fit`.1 ISEY , dAtLi Match It', 1967 Burma-India Boundary Agreement; Border Discussions between Burmese and Thai and between Burmese and Pakistani Officials 1. Burma and India signed a boundary agreement in Rangoon on March 10, 1967. Newspaper reports did not provide details of the agreement and mentioned no particular problem areas but merely said, "The Agreement provides for establishment of a Joint Boundary Com- mission which will plan and carry out the demarcation of the boundary between the two countries, prepare boundary maps and a draft boundary treaty". Shri K. M. Kannampilly, Joint Secretary of the South Asia Division of the Ministry of External Affairs, signed the agreement for India; Colonel Kyi Maung, a fast-rising officer on the Army General Staff, signed for Burma, 2. We are inclined to believe that there are some politically sensitive features in this agreement. Both Burmese and Indian officials in Rangoon are quite close-mouthed about the agreement; in conversation with Embassy officers they attempt to pass off the agreement as quite routine. Yet the amount of discussion that took place between the two sides prior to the agreement would indicate some unusual features. Indian External Affairs Minister Chagla (accompanied among others, by Kannampilly) visited Burma on January 20, reportedly to discuss economic and cultural matters and to get acquainted with General Ne Win and Foreign Minister U Thi Han. On February 17 Kannampilly brought a delegation to Burma, reportedly to discuss matters discussed earlier by Chagla. GROUP-3 Downgraded at 12-year intervals, not automatically declassified. FORM 4.62 DS -323 rifted by: 1 POL/LCON:Lii gelow/elc EPT. USE ONLY In FlOm Clearances: Lontents and Llassitica n A proved by: 40WECONIECI am Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/21 : CIA-RDP08001297R000100210002-8 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/21 : CIA-RDP08001297R000100210002-8 Rangoon A-191 CONFIDENTIAL 2 Finally Kannampilly made a third trip to Rangoon and it was announced that he signed a border agreement, of which there had been no mention earlier. 3. On the Burmese side, it is curious that the agreement was signed by Colonel Kyi Maung rather than a Foreign Office official. (He should not be confused with another Colonel Kyi Maung, a former member of the Revolu- tionary Council who has been under detention since 1965.) Colonel Kyi Maung is not a member of the Revolutionary Council and is not attached in any way to the Foreign Office. He was promoted to full colonel only in 1966 but is now reportedly one of the top colonels on the general staff of the Burma Army. The fact that Colonel Kyi Maung signed for the Burmese leaves room for speculation that General Ne Win may have thought the matter so sensitive that he preferred it to be handled by one of his trusted officers rather than by the Foreign Office. 4. Continuing the speculation, if the agreement is politically sensitive it would presumably be so only with refennce to a third party, such as Pakistan or China. If the former, it migAt involve the Indian troubles with Mizo tribesmen and rumored Pakistani assistance through Burmese territory to these tribesmen. If the Latter, it might involve demarcation of the area where Burmese, Chinese, and Indian borders meet. A local newsman is propounding the theory that by signing the agreement Burma has accepted the Indian version of the China-India border in that area. 5. In February Burma had border discussions with both Pakistan and Thailand. In both cases the discussions involved local officials. The meeting with the Pakistanis was at Maungdaw, Burma. The meeting with the Thais was at Chiengrai, Thailand. There is a formal Burma-Thai General Border Committee, but according to press reports this was the first meeting of the committee in four years. Nothing has appeared here as to the substance of either meeting. Comment. It is difficult to fathom what, if anything, is behind this flurry of activity relating to Burma's borders with its non-communist neighbors. There are a number of recent reports that relatively large groups of Chinese refugees have been crossing the inadequately policed border into northern Burma from Yunnan. Conceivably Ne Win could be tidying up his other borders in anticipation of border troubles in the north. Alternately, the activity could be related to the current (Thailand) or potential (India and PakistaL) use of foreign sanctuary by Burma's ethnic insurgent groups, whose depreda- tions have increased noticeably in recent months. BYROADER CONFIDENTIAL Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/21 : CIA-RDP08001297R000100210002-8