TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRESIDENT'S NEWS CONFERENCE ON FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC MATTERS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP09T00207R001000030041-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 5, 2011
Sequence Number: 
41
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 10, 1977
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP09T00207R001000030041-7.pdf99.66 KB
Body: 
f-rrr.-;Pn ON.1'AtF Approved For Release 2011/08/05: CIA-RDP09TOO207RO01000030041-7 NEW YORK TIMES 10 MARCH 1977 Transcript of the resident's News Conference on Foreign and Domestic Matters 7. Classified Information Q. Mr. President, last week in -an interview you expressed concern about. sified . information.:- Admiral' Turner, your choice to head the C.I.A., has.said, favor criminal penalties for that, for disclosure by Government officials of that type of information. But Vice President Mondale -said he's opposed- to it. I wonder, sir, if ydu'd tell us' where you- stand on that issue, do A. Well, my own- interest would be to minimize the use of any criminal penalties for disclosure of information. There are other penalties that can be used without criminal charges. And I think that Vice President Mondale drew et , ..hat procedure we will follow. My own hope would be that w could t h d e preven t e isclosure of intelligence or information that might be damaging to our national se- curity rather than trying to control that problem by the imposition of legal criminal penalties. , ..; .:, Q. Could you elaborate on how you might prevent that, Mr. President? - A. Well I think, first of all, is a tight-, er control over the-number of people- highly sensitive, that might damage _e relationship between our own country and our friends and allies. And we've ?iready initiated steps-.to that degree.; As you. know; Admiral Turner's: only' getting his. presence. felt in-.the defense administered;to,:him,=,sr t I $= j But we'll make sure that- the public . knows.- what. new policies we impose; But the one that's easiest to describe and also very difficult to do, is to make sure that. we?don't have too many peo. ple knowiag about- matters that they don't need. to know And.! also that. we can protect the legitimate confidential- ity of agreements. between ourselves and our allies. Now I .would never permit anything- .that was either illegal or improper. And we've got:: a. very. good arrangement;- that was primarily set up by President Ford, to prevent abuses. The-.Intelli-- gence Oversight Board is-made up - of three distinguished men, appointed. by- President Ford, who have compllete? ac- cess to any operation conducted by the intelligence forces. Senator Inouye's- committee in the Senate and, I think, six committees in the House also have access to this in- formation. And of course, I'm monitor- ing it myself. And I think Admiral Turner's integrity, is also a guarantee that there will, be no future abuses. But that doesn't mean that every- thing that we do-in gathering intelli- gence-on which -our security _ might. veryt,rwell depend-has to be revealed, to -the public-. And drawing of that'dti tinction-is one that's my responsibility. And I think I can handle it. 4 9. Inquiry on Helms Q. Mr. President, it is widely reported that a grand fury in Washington may be -`nvesti-atinc Richard Helms; the. former C.I.A. director, to see whether' to move forward on a case. And it is reported that perhaps the jury will want to see certain C.I.A. documents, and I presume you would be the final arbiter. Have you been asked for those documents, and what will be your poli- cy if you are asked for them in this case or any other case? A.?I have not been asked for any, documents, and the Helms case has not come to my attention, either officially or even indirectly, from any of the peo- ple involved. Whether or not to proceed with the case will be the exclusive right of the Justice Department: The-revelation of any documents" that affect our national security will be my own judgment in this or other cases. And I can't respond any further than that, because that's all I know about the subject. . a Q. If r may, sir. A. Yes, sir. Q. The problem, -as you know, relates to, I guess, national security considerations I on one hand and the legal.system and I justice on the other. Given the recent history, I just wonder how closely you i will weigh those two? - . A.. Well, the prosecution of the case has nothing to do with me. That will be a judgment made by the Justice De- partment. The actual revelation to a grand jury or, in case of a trial if it should ever evolve, of confidential or of secret material would have ; to be judged byme. Q. That would control, sir, would it not, whether the-prosecution could go forward even if it chose? A. It may or may not. At that point; the responsi- bility for making a, judgment and the, responsibility for the consequences. of an. inaccurate judgment, if it should 'occur,.would be my uwn.::: y,* Approved For Release 2011/08/05: CIA-RDP09TOO207RO01000030041-7