AGENDA - FOR THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN ROOM 2178 NEW WAR DEPARTMENT BUILDING ON TUESDAY, 17 DECEMBER 1946, AT 2:30 P.M.

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 14
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 13, 2012
• Sequence Number: 7
• Content Type: MISC

Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
COV`FID, , TT.AL COPY 10,
I.1i.B. 12th Tlecting
CLYTRI-:L INTEUIG7TCF GROUP
ITTFLLIGT'I''C.jDVISORY BOARD
i, GFTTDn
For the Mccting to be hc1d in Room 2178
Nc~;'I Dcpartmcnt wilding
on Tucsday, 17 Dcccmbcr 194 at 2:30 M,
22
1. OV~',R-rLL POLICIES ~:T CBTFCTIV!,S FOR THE C00RDIT TIO T
OF TIT!''LLIGL'I'CE L;TT?G T ORIG DUST~?I~'aL
~'~TIaDLISI I;';~~iT1,S
C.I.G. 2ti
7or consideration of the recommendations contained in
C.Z.G. 22.
Acting Secretary,
CONFID7-'TI L
I. 12th ITCCting
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
CONFIDP_"'TTIAL COPY No. 22
I.AL.B. 12th Meeting
CENTRAL INTELLIGTCF .GROUP
INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY BOARD
Minutes of Meeting held in Room 2178
New ..ar De artment -Bu 1din on Tues a cem a 2:30 P.M.
i~ I I w.r.Ir~er nT~`I~..r?~rl
Lt. General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, Director of
Central Intelligence, in the Chair
P. BE'RS -PRE TT
I III-rl,
Mr. William A. Eddy, Special Assistant to the
Secretary of State for Research and In-
telligence
Maj. General Stephen J. "-Chamberlin," Director
of Intelligence, WDGS 41
Rear Admiral. Thomas B. Inglis, Chief of naval
Intelligence
Brig. General John A. Samford,-Deputy Assistant
Chief of Air Staff-2
-ALSO. PRESnTT
Mr. A. Sidney Buford, Department of State
Colonel E. J. Treaoy, U.S.A.
nAntAin R. X. Davis, U . r .
Central Intelligence Group
Central Intelligence Group
SECRETARIAT
Mr. J. S. Farman, Acting Secretary, N.I.A.
25X1
25X1
COrTF' DETTIAL
A 12th Meeting
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
C - ,.. F N I A L
l.. COORDINATION OF CO BCTIONT ACTIVITIES
(C.I.G.
G] ERAL VATTDJ`'TTBFRG stated that he understood that
there was some confusion as to why C.I.G. 18/3, as oiro4lated,
only includes the texts of the proposed N.I.A. Directive and
omits the proposed text of the C.I.G. Directive. He stated
that C,I,G. 18/2, as circulated on November 21, included-'both
a proposed N,I.A. Directive and a proposed C.I.G. Directive-,
but the transmitting letter carefully specified that I.A.B.
approval was requested only for the TT.I.A. Directive. There-
fore, in consideration' of the State Department's urgent request
for early consideration of the N.I.A. Directive, it was circu-
lated in C.I.G. 18/3 with the amendments proposed by the I.A.B.
ad hoc committee. He said that at the same time the completed*_
draft of the C.I.G, Directive was circulated to the ad hoc
committee members since there had not been time--to present
this cleaned up text to them; however, the ad hoc committee
had approved this text in pencil form at its last meeting.
General Vandenberg pointed out that_C.I.G. 18/2 has only
minor changes from C.I.G. 18/2 in the N.I.A. Directive section
and that at the last I,A.B. meeting general approval of the
N.I.A. Directive had been given and no specific requests for
changes therein had been made. He said that he believed that
the I.A.B. would be able to approve without extensive discus-
sion the text as presented in C.I.G. 18/3, particularly since
his proposals for implementation, as contained in the ad hoe
committee's final draft, include-all suggestions made by the
agencies' ad hoc representatives and were concurred in by them
at their final meeting. General Vandenberg recommended that
in paragraph 1 c of the proposed N,I.A. Directive the words
"unproductive duplication and uncoordinated overlap shall be
discontinued so . . ." be allowed to remain.
MR. EDDY stated that he would like to recommend that
paragraphs 2 a and c of the proposed C.I.G. implementing
Directive should be included in the proposed T.I.A. Directive
since paragraph 2 a included allocations by subject and
CONFIDB TIAL
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
COPTVI Df?TIAL
paragraph 2 c xeserv@d #@ rJ4hJ A sgegao? repeat
even on secondary jp~@p@qt t@ jig own agenar anything it
desired,
GE.!\TERAL VAITDEPTBERG they @@ @d qw A.2 @p4 0,i"fi,i, felt
about the State Department's reoommendation as indicated above.
GENERAL CHAMBEMIN stated that after some discussion
in the Intelligence Division, 'f+DGS, they were not sure whether
the meaning of paragraph 2 o of the proposed C.I.G. Directive
4W
was understood. He went on to state that all G-2 reports were
submitted on duplicating pads and questioned whether or not
G-2's representatives in the field should merely pass over to
the proper agency at the post or the Embassy whatever informa-
tion they might have.
P/!R. EDDY then stated that this was his understanding.
GETTERaL CHAr7BERLIN stated that he would object to any
interpretation to indicate that, for example, the State
Department's representative report directly to him or his
representative (General ChamberlIn's) report directly to the
State Department.
MR. EDDY then stated that those reports would be passed
on to the representatives in the field and a copy sent to the
State Department.
GTNER4L CHAMBI IN then said that he would like to
indicate that all the information passed in from the field,
except radiographic forms, from the MA's come on a duplicating
pad and not as copies.
G 17 RAL V'ITDE'_`TBERG then stated that there was no in
tention to have any such interpretation as indicated by General
Chamberlin.
GFaTERAL CILJ ERLI?T stated that he had no desire to
make any change in the paragraph but that he wanted to be sure
that somebody would not object to the Intelligence Division
following its usual procedures of sending the duplicating pad
to the Intelligence Division in Washington since the information
contained therein was given immediately to the agency concerned.
C0i': FIDEI?TIAL
r,
T' 1 9 Mr-otinn - 2
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
CO1TFIDETTTIAL
MR. ZDDY then stated that in this paragraph they wanted
the men in the field who name"across intelligence not of primary
interest to them, but of secondary interest, to pass that inform-
ation to the field representative of the agency primarily con-
cerned. Nothing, however, should prevent a representative from
reporting to his own department chief for staff purposes.
GfTERAL WJ DMTBFRG then stated that what Mr. Eddy had
just said was the principle that was being enunciated in the
directives and he would be the first to protest if the agencies
were to stop sending information that was not of primary
interest to them to C.I.G.
ADMIRAL INGLIS then stated that to' clarify this para-
graph we should be rather careful of the wording.
GMTERAL CHAMBTFLIN then stated that he had this comment
to make after reading these directives The C.I.G. end TT.I.A.
Directives uniformly violate the basic principle that in assign-
ing a task, the task should be described in sufficiently clear
language for an agency to understand. The agency should be per-
mitted to instruct its subordinates in its ovn language and that
he did not propose to send a C.I.G. Directive to his own people.
GF TR:~L VI DET BT'RG then stated that the implementation
of C.I.G. Directives by the agencies concerned was "their own
business.'"
DPrI2"iL IT'GLIS then suggested the following change in
the language of the paragraph in question: "That we delete the
word 'directly' in the second line of sub-paragraph e and insert
in the third line before the word 'representative' the word
'field' and then in the last line instead of 'copies' insert
'information to.' It would then read: 'Intelligence information
and material regardless of the collector, shall wherever possible
be transmitted to the agency most concerned through the field
representative of that agency. However, the collector may also
send information to his own agency."
MR. EDDY stated that he did not believe that he could
approve the rewording of paragraph 2 a, as indicated by Admiral
Inglis.
C017ID31 TIAL
1, AB
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
CO.TTFZDI TLj,
GTFTTERRL CF,4111317RLIN then stated that the Intelligence
Division distributed to no one outside of the War Department
unless a request was received through the Reading Panel and
that no automatic gigtri?4ttpp wqa made to the State Department's
representative on the Reading Panel unless he (8tste Depart-
ment's representative) requested it.
MR.'EDDY.then stated that he thought the purpose was
to get information to the agency primarily concerned and most
interested.
GLTTER,,L C1!.,%TIB_ERLIN then stated "providing the agency
is interested."
MR. EDDY then went on to state that he would not
expect reports on military and naval matters to appear in-the
State Department's Reading Panel which had been collected by a
Vice-Consul where there was no military or naval representative
present. Mr. Eddy further stated that he concurred in that a
report prepared by military or naval personnel should have dis-
semination made in Washington; however, that political intelli-
gence should be screened by the State Department, and military
and air intelligence, for example, should be passed to the man
in the field who represented that service. When such reports
come to the Department's Reading Panel concerned that Department
can then send these reports wherever they may deem necessary.
The reporting officer's obligation is then the same as formerly -
"He sends a copy of his information to his own agency."
GETFR.RL S ;17ORD then asked whether the use of the word
"copy" meant it was identified by being outside the agency's
primary field.
MR. J'DDY stated that before, when the State Department
had an opportunity to get naval information, the Vice-Consul
would send that information to the naval attache, since he
(the Vice-Consul) couldn't interpret it and there would be
confusion if they were to send it to the Statc Department.
1- JMIRhL INGLIS stated that that was the very reason
why he had recommended the re-wording of paragraph 2 c in order
to avoid. describing how a copy of a report'was to be sent to G-2
or O.PT.I.
COT,TFIDPTi TIAL
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
C0T-FI DTTTL~L
MR. EDDY stated that in Washington it is recognized
as a report that is to be produced or distributed and be
available in the department of primary interest,
1,D!iIR L I1TGLIS then stated that he suppoood that this
fact would be written across the face of the report; that it
was a naval subject, and that the Military ~ttaihej for exam ?
had picked it up and given the informatioh to the Naval 1Lttaehe.
Ldmiral Inglis went on to state that the Military :attache could,
for example, write across the fade of the report "I have given
this information to the Naval Jttaohe, s'
GT ?LRRL CHriPTBERLTTT stated that he did not want to
change his system since his people were abcustomed to put in
reports on duplicating pads and as these reports came in they
were placed on a mimeograph machine and the number of copies
indicated by the Reading Panel were run off. Thus copies arc
available for State, Navy, L-2 and C.I.G.
MR. EDDY then stated that he foresaw difficulties in
the future if the State Department, for example, disseminated
iidely and also had Reading Panels and disseminated reports
from military and naval observers, and some dissemination was
made the other way around. Mr. Eddy went on to state that he
felt that distribution of reports should be made by the Depart-
ment having primary interest.
GTT?EPJ L CH.,T'IBERLIN then stated that there could be
very easily inserted a statement in the report which would
indicate to whom the report had been submitted.
MR. EDDY suggested that paragraph 2 c could possibly
read ". . . field representatives of the agency most concerned.
Hoy%evcr, the collector may send copies to his own agency.,,
G? 'TEP.-,L CJ':.JTBFRLII7 stated that he did not object to
that wording. However, he wanted to be sure that everyone knew
of the kind of copy used by the Intelligence Division, namely,
a repeating pad. He went on to state that the Intelligence
Division made distribution within its own agency and that they
could attempt to keep from distributing to other agencies unless
such agencies' representatives on the Reading Panel insisted on
having the information.
f7ATTTi,TT Ml,TTT F T
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
COTT FI DETTTI.~,L
MR. EDDY qucstin-)ned v.hether or not there were "other
people" on the Rending Panel.
GENER.,L CN1-J?B RLTIT Stated tIhst the only agencies out-
side of the War Department having representatives on the
Intelligence Division Reading Panel were the State and Navy
Departments, and occasionally C.I.G.
MR. EDDY then suggested that paragraph 2 c of the
proposed C.I.G. Directive read: "Intelligence information
material regardless of the collector shall wherever possible
be transmitted immediately to the field representative of the
agency most concerned. However, the collector may send copies
to his own agency."
MR. EDDY then distributed a proposed change in the
wording of the first page of the proposed TT.I.A. Directive.
Mr. Eddy, after some discussion of this proposal, stated that
political and economic intelligence had been bracketed in the
State Department for a number of years. Furthermore, modern
economics are no more political, as related to political, that
we used to study in school. It now pertains to industrial
establishments, in addition to protection for most of our
American trade. The State Department is quite prepared to have
economic intelligence not allocated, but recognized as a vital
interest.
GTN RL4L CTT13? B RLITT stated that this was difficult for
him to go along with and that he could say frankly that he
thought it was splitting a field that should never be split.
He went on to say that the field of intelligence covered not
only collection but also production of intelligence, and it
was his feeling and had been all along that the Intelligence
Advisory Board should get down to the fundamental principles
and solve the overall responsibilities for these departments
for the whole intelligence field, as suggested at the last
meeting of the Intelligence Advisory Board. General Chamberlin
then said that apparently the Intelligence Advisory Board was
not in complete agreement along these lines so he was willing
to go along with this splitting of the collection field,
CONFI DZTTIAL
1, 12th !IEetina - 6
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
CONFIDENTIAL"
before the Intelligence Advisory Board tackled the fundamental
principles since he thought-that this, perhaps, was a forward
step.
GENERAL VAATDPT~BFRG said then he agreed with the ultimate
objective as stated by General Chamberlin and that this was a
forward step. He went on to say that the Intelligence Advisory
Board was going to have to cooperate and bite this problem off
piece by piece. General Vandenberg further said that there are
many things that the Intelligence Advisory Board can not now
agree upon. However, there were some things on which there could
be agreement by one or two of the members giving room.
GITTERAL SAMFORD stated that he thought it would be
better to keep the allocation by subject, which was a step
forward, in the proposed C.T.G. Directive, instead of placing
it in the proposed N.I.A. Directive.
GENERAL VANDENBERG said that he agreed with General
Samford's statement, but if, as we go along, we find that we
need something else done, amendments could be made. Further,
that he would rather make amendments than make the original
directives too broad.
MR. EDDY stated that he wished to propose that para-
graph 1 b of the proposed N,I.ii. Directive be changed to read
as follows: "The American Ambassador or Minister, or the.
ranking U. S. Foreign Service Officer of each Diplomatic Mission
or Foreign Service Post shall be responsible for insuring proper
implementation of a coordinated collection program in that area.
In areas where a U. S. Commander has the predominant responsi-
bility, he is the Senior U. S. Representative responsible for
insuring proper implementation of a coordinated- collection
program in that area."
CAPTAIN DAVIS then stated that the Navy had a comment
to make. The 7th Fleet, for instance, operates outside the
governing principles of this entirely. That thought was inter-
checked in C.T.G. 18/2 end was in line as recommended. He asked
if something similiar to the following could not be put back -
"V;here foreign service establishments and a senior U. S.
military commander both have jurisdiction in an area, each will
CQNFIDE TTIAL
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
CON, FIDHTTTIAL
be responsible for the activities of the personnel under his
administrative control."
GFRL VANDHVBFFRG then stated that this could ' be
accomplished by the agencies' writing their people their under-
standing of this Directive in the areas in question. He sug-
gested that instructions by the home offices of the agencies
be coordinated with ICAPS and the representatives of the agencies
in order that the instructions be written in unison. General
Vandenberg went on to say that this coordination could well be
cantered in IC..PS since that was where the agencies and C.I.G.
come together.
TAR. EDDY suggested that there would be another sentence
added to paragraph 1 b of the proposed N.I.A. Directive to read
as follows: "This does not apply to the intelligence personnel
directed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff or Theatre Commanders."
GFNER"iL C1 AAQBERLIN stated that he was somewhat confused
about the words "Senior U. S. representative" and said that he
was perfectly agreeable to using the words "Senior Diplomatic
representative."
GEIJMAL VV,NDJ?BERG then suggested that paragraph 1 b
of the proposed N.I.~~. Directive read as follows: "The senior
U. S. representative in each foreign area where the United
States maintains a forcign service mission shall be responsible
for the coordination of all collection activities within his
area, and for the proper implementation of the requirements
and responsibilities of the respective agencies."
MR. EDDY stated that "If you don't care about any
recognition in the occupied areas, I don't differ from that."
GEF,~ !,RAL WYDE TBERG stated that it was up to the agencies
to send out the proper instructions. However, he recommended
that in any border line cases that the Intelligence Advisory
Board get together On such cases before the instructions were
sent to the field.
MR. EDDY then stated that this recommendation was all
right with the State Department.
COATFIDENTEL
Lo 12t Zeeting
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
ICONFIDELTTiAL
CAPTAIN DAVIS stated that the Navy would like to have
it in the minutes that this would not specifically apply to the
operating forces.
GENERAL CHAMBERLIN suggested that paragraph 1 b of the
proposed N.I.r,, Directive be changed to read as follows: "For
the coordination of all collection activities in his area within
the spirit of the principles enunciated herein." He further
stated that he believed that it was a mistake to charge the
4?,mbassadors with the implementation of someone else's directive
and authorize them in the line of command of that particular
department since the Ambassadors were charged with coordination.
MR. EDDY said that he felt that General Chamberlin's
restriction should be in the heading and not in any one sub-
paragraph since it applies only to the limits of this Directive
within the limits of principle.
GF1`TER ,L CH- MBERLIN stated that he would hesitate to give
the Ambassadors authority to do anything they might desire. He
further stated that his statement above was binding on them
(the Ambassadors) since the Ambassadors should coordinate col-
lection of intelligence in cccordance with the agreement
reached by the Intelligence advisory Board.
GI"TTTR.L VV,PTD}NBERG repeated his suggestion that para-
graph 1 b of the proposed N.I.L. Directive read e previously
indicated.
GFT`TFRr,L C .r'!BFRLIN then stated that he wanted it very
definitely understood that his agreement with this paragraph
confines the responsibility of the implementation of the coor-
dination measures, not the implementation of the intelligence
collection.
GF 7T.,IL V.,TDF TBFRG stated that he thought that
General Chamberlin's understanding had to be accepted since he
(General Chamberlin) had certain responsibilities as does the
Chief of Naval Intelligence.
GENERAL CHIAR'MBF'RLIN then suggested another change that
he had in mind which might help to clarify paragraph 1 f of the
proposed NT,I..4'>. Directive, which change reads as follows:
"After the words 'transmission to' insert 'respective home
GANFIDB TIi,L
RiA1-i nn A
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
CONFI DENTI4 L
offices in Washington.' Paragraph 1 f would then read;
'. . . abroad are individually responsible for the collection
and for the appropriate transmission to their respective home
offices in Washington. . ."'
Genera. Chamberlin further stated that the above change
was suggested since he wanted to be sure that Military Attaches
would not transmit information direct to the State and Navy
Departments here in Washington,
GENERLL VV,NDi BERG stated that he did not feel that
this change was necessary since the Intelligence Division's
instructions to its Ma's could prevent any such action.
GMTERL~L CIL BERLIN? stated that the reason he made
this point was because it might violate another Directive which
was on its way for consideration.
MR. EDDY noted that if General Chamberlin's suggested
change above was adopted, it would prevent certain coordination
in the field.
,After further discussion it was decided to leave para-
graph 1 f of the proposed N.I.Q. Directive as originally written.
GENERAL CH MBERLINT asked if he was correct in judging
that this was authority given by the National Intelligence
t,uthority to the Lmbassadors, not the State Department, as the
senior representative.
MR. EDDY stated that he thought that it was broader
than that and that it was a matter of the President's represen-
tative abroad.
GrNER,L C1L,TJBERLIN than stated that he just wanted to
be sure that it was authority given to the Lmbassadors in view
of their position.
A1lR, EDDY went on to state that the ~~mbassador's Charge
d'Lffaires represented him just as a Deputy Commander and that
the Charge d'Jffaires had all the ambassador's authority in his
absence.
C4,PT,;1I1T D ,VIS then stated that he wanted to indicate in
the minutes that as far as the army and Navy are concerned that
the allocations contained in the proposed N.I.L. Directive were
CONFIDFr,TTIJL
12th Meeting - 10
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
Z01%TT I DFNTi,s.
a little broad and that he would like to bring forth allocations
made in a joint letter between the Army and Navy in August, 1945.
Captain Davis asked whether or not these allocations would still
in fact be in effect.
G) ERAL VANDEATBERG stated that the allocations had
purposely been 3:eft broad.
GETJERAL CHi',MBERLIN stated that he thought that the
agreement mentioned by Captain Davis would still stand.
GEJ ERtIL VANDE!TBERG stated that he could not say that
this agreement was still in effect and that it was between the
Army and Navy. General Vandenberg!v- ,,ommented ?-- "I can
not agree or disagree."
The Intelligence Advisory Board adjourned without
approving C.I.G. 18/3.
Subsequently, the Intelligence Advisory Board, by voting
slip, approved C.T.G. 18/3, (which has been published as N.I.A.
Directive No. 7) with the following changes:
Paragraph 2 c of the proposed C.I.G. .Directive to read
"Intelligence information and material regardless of the col-
lector shall, wherever possible, be transmitted immediately to
the field representative of the agency most concerned. However,
the collector may also ?end copies to his own agency." inserted
as paragraph 1 b of N.I.L. Directive No. 7.
Insertion of sub-paragraphs 2 a and c, as amended, of
the proposed C.I.G. Directive into N.I.1.. Directive No. 7 as
paragraph 1 a and b, respectively.
Paragraph 1 b of the proposed TT.I.,. Directive to read
as follows: "The senior U. S. representative in each foreign
area where the United States maintains a foreign service post
shall be responsible for the coordination of all collection
activities in his area and the proper implementation of that
coordination within the spirit of the principles enunciated
herein." inserted in N.I.,,.. Directive No. 7 as paragraph 1 c.
CONFI DMTIA'AL
ILB 72th Meeting
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8
CONFIDETTTILL
Paragraph 1 c of the proposed N.I.L. Directive was
amended as follows: "In order to avoid unproductive duplica-
tion and uncoordinated overlap all collection facilities will
be utilized to their maximum within budgetary limitations for
the production of that full flow of intelligence material which
is the major need of all departments." and inserted in N.I.I.
Directive No. 7 as paragraph 1 d.
001\7 FIDI-1-T TILL
L t Meeting
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/13: CIA-RDP10-01569R000100060007-8