MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP12-00036R000100020053-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 26, 2013
Sequence Number: 
53
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 17, 1956
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP12-00036R000100020053-1.pdf143.9 KB
Body: 
_e Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/26: CIA-RDP12-00036R000100020053-1 ILLEGIB 1.- On this data }fr. Garrison sat with Ht. Harrison STAT and Mt. Beach of the staff of the Joint Committee on Printing to discuss the meet recent developments in connection with the transfer of the GPO- State Service Printing Plant to the Agenay. The background of this , situation was riVieved starting with the Director's letter of 4.july 1956 to the- Albite Printer which indicated that the Agency would like to 1. consider transfer of this plant to Agency control for consolidation with the Agency printing facilities in the new headquarters area to be located at Langley, Virginia. The Public Printer's favorable reply of 9 July - 1956 was mentioned, as were resultant dIscussions with GPO officials at which complete agree-lent on all phases of the transfer was reached. Also mentioned was the fact that the staff of the Joint Committee on Printing had agreed to this transfer on the basis of the merger with the Agency facilities in the now leedeluart=s area. It wee c-7;eleined that on the 1-2-Is of th:--e :rts the :eency had gen:: feh_L-i on all aspect., of the at ef the at ef C:_te end the .1.toeic .72-ecy , - ?I n3--- letitt_n to thcee esectile, 2. It we's than 1....nti:L,d that a new Ccv....1e;_e_lt was the fact that the r.g-ncy may ence,Lter ::Lfficlity in clteieLeg Lefficient fani.s with v'::ich to cc:ef..tract e-efficicnt space to haze all of its fi:nd plant facilitiee eeld all of its parser_eel. Ir. Cerrie:a peieted out that one of the peesibilities considered in this connection was the omission of the main printing plant from the headquarters area, and its retention in its present location in Alexandria, Virginia. It was also mentioned that if it was found necessary to do this, there would be a er-111 facility located in the headquarters building for the p-rpose of furnishing rush work, and the GPO facility would be merged with the main Agency facility in its Alexandria location. It was emphasized that this use considered as a possibility only in the event that it is found impossible to include the complete printing facility in the headquarters area. 3. Mr. Harrison and Pt. Beach expressed grave concern over any development which would mIce it necessary to onit the complete printing plant from the headquarters building or immediate area. Mr. Harrison stated that the committee had always felt that our printing was actually the sum and substance of all of our work, and as such should receive the CIA IN SE ONLY Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/26: CIA-RDP12-00036R000100020053-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved_ for Release 2013/08/26: CIA-RDP12-00036R000100020053-1 utmost seenrity safeguards. Ai said that this oartanly dictated that the prmtmA4xml of ell of the Armies classified printing tee La thul ?Ammdgmal.ters tending or the immediate area. Masai* rise= for this, Val. Morrison felt, was that classified printing should not be truaked great distances label quantities. Ai said that the committee looked uaxattis as A grave-iiwouritylmwma46 and tenths% such situations were at least partial justification for the braid exemptions free printing regulations Vhich the Agency enjoys. Mr. &ram also pointed out that the committee had objected to the location of the Agenarls rain ;minting plant in Alexandria for this very reason? and that they would look with disfavor upon the Agency confirming to Produce its classified' printing in this location with the beadvarterituilding located at Langley, Virginia. It use pointed out that Alexandria is further from Langley than Washington, end the roads are not nearly as good is those servicing Langley from Washington. rr. Barri/son farther stated that in his opinion the Agency decision to omit 'rest any other of its activities or functione from the rain building or immediate area vould be prefers to omitting the printing plant. Er. roach added that from a practical standpoint it read be chcaper to vat the printing plant in the building now rather than later on, as construction coats will certainly continua to rice. 4. Uhilo 1r.E,Irriaon and I. Beach made no declaim vith =poet to the mcrgcr of the CPO fccility 71.th the Lgency faci1itie5 and luenting ti s embf.ned facility at Alcnaaftria, ths above inaeated that cuch agree- Lt_nt, if obtIn, vsuld inesd be reluctantly given. Esfore lauving, cmpIlL,rit:sd again that the purpece of thio diceucaion vac to inform Ifr. Earriaon and L. Esaeh of the moot recent devolopment9, and to mention the po3aibility of the printing plant being omitted from the hmdquartere area although our objective Jo to have it located there. (19 Sept 1956) STAT STAT STAT 2 ? o; . 41RF ONLY Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/26: CIA-RDP12-00036R000100020053-1