TRAINING EVALUATION
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP54-00337A000100120007-5
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date:
August 8, 1998
Sequence Number:
7
Case Number:
Content Type:
FORM
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP54-00337A000100120007-5.pdf | 100.67 KB |
Body:
Appromsd For R aselhC#94tRDP54-00 7A000100120007-5
This evaluation ie ised on a course of weeks duration in which there were students. In inter-
preting evaluations, the amount of opportunity for observation of individual students should be considered.
This evaluation should not be used as a sole or even major basis for action. It is primarily intended to
furnish information on how well the student learned the subject matter or skills taught. Secondarily,
incidental observations of interest are reported. These have significance only as they are related to other
Information. Unless otherwise stated, performance is evaluated in terms of standards :set by the instructors
or in relationship to performance of those who have or who are taking the course. The evaluation is without
regard to position, grade, or length of service in the Agency. These factors must be taken into account in
:interpreting the report.
14aine:
Date of Birth:
Position,
Section I: Identifying Information
Course and Inclusive Dates:
Did you observe any incidents that sug-
gested this person lacked motivation
for an Agency career?
Did you observe any incidents that led
you to question this person's security
mindedness?
Did you observe any incidents which
indicated that this person has diffi-
culty in getting along with others?
Did you observe any incidents which
led you to believe that this person
had an unfavorable attitude toward
the course?
Did you observe
Office:
Da)s Absent:
this student interfered with instruc-
tional and classroom activities?
Did you observe any outstanding trait
or characteristic that ycu believe
should be taken into account either in
dealing with this person or in plan-
ning his career?
Do not answer 'yes' unless the person
is well described by the trait. If
'yes' explain fully below.
please circle the appropriate
Please explain more fully if answer to any of the above questions is `yes.'
Subject;
Section I]J: Knowledge
Gentile StandingI
1. Based on
Instructor' a Rating2
2. Scale used: Failure, Poor, Satisfactory,
Excellent, Superior.
Approved For Releasef~DP54-00337A000100120007-5
Approved For Release t -.Fft5P -M 337A000100120007-5
Instructor's Evaluation Based On:
Skill
Course Instruction
- - -
Incidental Observation
Associates' Evaluation
----__~_
Centilel
Standi~
Ratin&
Rating
Gentile2 Standing
Ability to write reports
Facility in oral expression
Other:
I.Based on 2.
Based on:
Section V. Attitudes and Personality Traits
Explanation: The distribution of scores for the class is shown for each trait or attitude rated, Red X's are
for the instructors' ratings, black X's are for associates' ratings. The student's mark is circled.
Trait or Attitude RATING: Failure Poor Satisfactory Excellent Superior
Section VI. Adjusted Overall Evaluation
Directions: In terms of all factors observed during the course and taking into account this person's age,
experience in Agency, grade, and general area of work, indicate, by placing an X in the appropriate box,
your judgment of his performance in the course.
1. He was inadequate in his performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. He was barely adequate in his performance and performed acceptably only
in a limited range of assignments ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. He performed acceptably, but was barely adequate in some respects . . . . .
4. He was a typically effective student who performed in a competent,
dependable manner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .
5. He performed at a high level of competence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. He performed at an extremely high level that only a few students have
surpassed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. He performed at a level of competence that excelled all other students
who have taken this course . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Report here general information, extenuating circumstances, or recommendations not included elsewhere in
this report:
(If more space is needed attach standard t
Approved For Release : CIA-RDP54-0031YA& 1b0120007-5
Chief Instructor