UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LIBELANT, V TANKER MEACHAM AND HER TACKLE APPAREL, FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT, ETC., IN REM.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP57-00384R001100100064-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 30, 2004
Sequence Number: 
64
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 14, 1951
Content Type: 
COURTFILE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP57-00384R001100100064-1.pdf313.9 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP57-00384R00110010006. IN TER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TEE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA . NORFOLK DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Libelant, ADMIRALTY zo. tig? AFFIDAVIT Tanker NEWHAM and her tackle apparel, furniture, equipment, etc., t in rem. STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) IS. C.D. SHIM, being duly sworn deposes and says: I as the representative in the United States of Chinese Petroleum Corporation, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of a department of the Nationalist Government of China. my attention has been called to the fact that the United States Government has commenced proceedings in this Court seeking to forfeit the American tanker MEACHAM. I have been advised that the United States Government eontends that control of Meacham Corporation, owner of the tanker ..:ZACHAU, was conferred upon certain Chinese interests. Apparently one of the principal claims of the Government in this connection is that Chinese Petroleum Corporation ?controlled" Meacham Corporation as a result of a certain promissory note which was given by Meacham Corporation to Cniness Petroleum Corporation. The purpose of this affidavit is to call to the Court's attention the provisions of this note from which it can readily be seen that Chinese Petroleum Corporation moat clearly did not and could not control the debtor corporation. A copy of the note is annexed hereto and marked Exhibit "A?. ? S ? Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP57-00384R001100100064-1 I Ileh to can the Court's particular attention to certain more important provisions in the note. The note was payable in installments over a period of over seven years. More than this, however, the position of Chinese Petroleum Corporation was particularly weak in that not only was the note in essence an income note but could, it would sem, be extended by the debtor more or less Indefinitely. In this connection the note provides: ?If the net income of the Corporation, as hereinafter -defined, shall be Insufficient to permit the payment in full of the installment or installments of this note coming due in such year, the due date of the unpaid deficiency of such Installment or installments shall be extended from year to year, if necessary, until the final maturity of this note on February 15, 1957, and thereafter for two additional years if necessary, and thereafter on mutually agreeable terms, until the Corporation has accumulated sufficient net income, as hereinafter defined, to enable it to pay such installment or installments.. It is difficult to see how e creditor *ho is in such a weak position as a holder of a note containing such provisions as the above could possibly be said to ?control' the debtor corporation. I understand that the United States Government has . called attention to the fact that the vessel MEACHA2 could not be sold without the approval of the payee of the note. Such a provision in no way places control of the debtor corporation in the hands of the creditor. It is one of the routine and con:on provisions in loans desimed to give some measure of safety to the creditor and to prevent the squander- ing or dissipation of the debtor's assets. In other words the obvious purpose of such a provision is to prevent the debtor from disposing of its principal asset at a ridiculous price anc thus in effect avoidint its obligation to repay a loan. It in no way places any ccntrol in the hands of the creditor over the .4eacham Corporaticn nor does it enable it 2. Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP57-00384R001100100T-1 to dictate the Corporation's policies or the operations or the vessel, Of course, once the note was paid in fell Chinese Petroleum Corporation would have no further slain Of any kind whatsoever against the vessel's owner, the Madam Corporation. Chinese Petroleum Corporation does not now end never his owned or had any intorest in any stock of Moadham Corpo? ration or of shy corporation affiliated with or in any way related to Aeaeham Corporation. In short, I wish to emphasis that there was no agreement or understanding whatsoever by which control of leadham Corporation was -conferred upon or permitted to be exercised by Chinese Potroloum Corporation or any employee or representative thereof and that control of the corporation was not in fact exercised by said Chinese Petroleum Corporation or any employee or reprosentative thereof. Sworn to before me this 4th day of November, 1951. ;1/4 Ncerv -1.??? krt. ? Tett Lzpae..- N1.1 - .9.. 1952 Approved For Release 2004/10/12 : CIA-RDP57-00384R001100100T-1 to dictate the Corporation's policies or the operations or the vessel, Of course, once the note was paid in fell Chinese Petroleum Corporation would have no further slain Of any kind whatsoever against the vessel's owner, the Madam Corporation. Chinese Petroleum Corporation does not now end never his owned or had any intorest in any stock of Moadham Corpo? ration or of shy corporation affiliated with or in any way related to Aeaeham Corporation. In short, I wish to emphasis that there was no agreement or understanding whatsoever by which control of leadham Corporation was -conferred upon or permitted to be exercised by Chinese Potroloum Corporation or any employee or representative thereof and that control of the corporation was not in fact exercised by said Chinese Petroleum Corporation or any employee or reprosentative thereof. Sworn to before me this 4th day of November, 1951. ;1/4 Ncerv -1.??? krt. ? Tett Lzpae..- N1.1 - .9.. 1952