DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN:

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP59-00882R000200250057-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 22, 2003
Sequence Number: 
57
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 12, 1954
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP59-00882R000200250057-8.pdf85.69 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP59-00882R00020 April 12, 1954 B-110-963 honorable J. i,}. Johnson, Chairman Interstate Coz;uaorco Couinission Bear r. Chairrian t hoferenco is made to your letter of February 16, 1951.+ wherein you state that due to erroneous administrative actions an eiaployee has been overpaid the sum of :.233.57, and that the Cotnimission is willing to forego collection of the overpayment if it is within its authority to do so. It is reported that an employee of the Commission was Cyivz n a promotion effective February 3, 1952, from GS-3 to G S-J , at which time he was receiving a per annum salary of ~; 3,590, the second longevity step in grade GS-3; that, upon being promoted to G3-11,,, he inadvertently was given the salary of :t".3.035, the first longevity stop in GS-!x, instead of ~:;3,655, the top step in that grade. It is stater}., further that, at the end of 52 calendar weeks of service, the e.nmployee was given a periodic stop increase to the second longevity step in GS-4 or :':3.,815s w rich action also was in error. Upon discovery of said erroneous actions correction was nade and the employee's salary properly established at the top step of ;,,3,655, effective January 17, 1951. You point out that the employee was not aware of the erroneous pajmcnts, ani3 tl at refunding Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP59-00882R000200250057-8 Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP59-00882R000200250057-8 ;ftw -400, -,"W WIV B-118963 of the amount of the overpayment which amounts to ~,,'' 233.57, together with the reduction in salary would result in a hardship to the employee. You are advised that the increases granted to the employee clearly were in violation of section 802(b) of the Classification Act of 1949, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 1132, and this Office is without authority to waive recovery of the illegal payments even though the employee may have been without fault in the matter. See 29 Comp. Gen. 75. Accordingly, the amount of the overpayment should be collected back from the payee. In order to alleviate any hard- ship on the employee, the refunds may be spread over a reasonable period of time to be fixed by the Commission. Sincerely, Acting Comptroller General of the United States 7/Vk U 7 ?S ~d p 31 p proved For Release D3/1a/Q4: M A 5 i 82R000200250A T-8 he