(UNTITLED)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP59-00882R000200330042-5
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 11, 2001
Sequence Number:
42
Case Number:
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 129.54 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2002/01/02: CIA-RDP59-00882R000200330042-5
DD/P 1-3824 C
a Dec
1. From time to time in the past top officials and overseas
representatives of the Agency have been confronted with the problem
of what to do about gifts in the form of remembrances and tokens
of appreciation presented to them by foreign governmental officials.
The circumstances in some cases have been such that it would probably
create misunderstandings and would give offense to the foreign
officials making the gifts if they were to be rejected at the time
of presentation -- and even more so if returned to the donors at a
subsequent date. This is particularly the case where the foreign
governmental officials are representatives of countries where the
exchange of gifts between the officials of foreign governments, and
even within governments, is regarded as customary and unexceptionab:..e.
In certain instances arising in the past the foreign governmental
officials almost appear to have arranged the timing and circumstances
of presentation in the light of their knowledge or suspicion that if
given an opportunity to decline the gift gracefully the recipients
would probably do so. One such technique has been to send the gift on
for local delivery by the Embassy of the donor government. Another has
been to time the delivery of the gift to the moment of the individual
donee's departure and then to effect delivery by a subordinate. And
there have been others, all of the kind to place the donee individually
"on the spot", and also -- in view of the possibility of giving offense
to the foreign official concerned -- raising a kind of problem for the
Agency.
2. In cases where the intrinsic value of the gift is small, v_Lz.,
in the range of $25.00 more or less, I suppose the matter could simply
be overlooked. However, where the value is considerably more than
this, and, say, running to more than $100.00, there are obvious possi-
bilities of future embarrassment to the donee and to the Agency and
also a question of principle is involved. If there are any govern-
mental statutes or regulations applicable to this problem it would je
helpful to know what they are, since in all probability they would oe
;just as applicable to the officials and representatives of this Agency
as to any other governmental department or agency. Even in the absence
of any statutes or regulations which are sufficiently clear to provide
satisfactory guidance, it seems to me desirable that we develop and
promulgate a regulation of our own for the protection of both the
Agency and the individuals who may become involved.
3. Here are a few random ideas of my own as to what an Agency
regulation on the subject might contain:
Approved For Release 2002/01/02 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000200330042-5
Approved For Release 280201{02 : CI RDP59-00882R000200330042-5
As a general rule officials and representatives of the
Agency should decline gifts and remembrances of any substantial
intrinsic value, whether they be offered by foreign govern-
mental officials or private citizens. Officials and repre-
sentatives of the Agency should, where circumstances permit,
decline such gifts on the ground that it is contrary to US
policy for them to accept. However, in cases where the cir-
cumstances and timing of the presentation are such as to
render it apparent to the donee that an attempt to decline a
gift, or to return it once delivered or received, would be
such as to create embarrassment and become the cause of mis-
understanding, the official or representative concerned may
accept the gift subject to the following conditions and pro-
cedures
a. He shall make a prompt report of the receipt
of the gift ~to the appropriate A,ency official (to be
designated by the Director).;
b. If the gift is determined to have substantial
intrinsic value, it shall be turned over to the Agency
by the individual donee and thereafter held as Agency
property.
c. Within the discretion of the appropriate Agency
official (to be designated by the Director) the donee
individual may from time to time have the custody of the
gift upon the clear understanding that he holds it as
trustee for the Agency and may be required to return it
at any time by the Agency --- and in the event of his
unwillingness or inability to produce the article upon
demand, he shall be liable to the Agency for its fair
value.
d. Within the discretion of the official (to be
designated by the Director) the individual donee may be
afforded the opportunity to purchase the gift from the
Agency for a price to be determined by an independent
appraiser selected by the Agency as having competence
to judge the value of articles of the kind concerned.
Approved For Release 2002/01/02 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000200330042-5