ANNUAL LEAVE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 27, 2001
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 14, 1956
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8.pdf161.85 KB
Body: 
? Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8 ATTACHMENT TO FIEANCE DIVISIOE 1:0TICE NO. 39( OGC HAS REVIEWED. I'vE,101,t',DUM FOR: Chief, al:Ida:XI iviun SUBJTXT Annual Leave REFERENCE Your menromtad4ii,. Dated elay 1956, Subject: "A14tal Leave 14 Aet 1956 1. Your memorandum genera4ly posee the question of' whether a traveier who is authorized to tietvel by privately owned aetomeb3.1e (hereinafter referred to as 3.)0.4 "net to exceal cost by comet; eerrier" should be charged annual leave in the auturt f the time which con? stitutes the difference betweeni the actutl- travel time aid the time - which would have been required lo travel by the desighatel) COMM carrier. We are informed that 4 t geteneilly ha e been the practice within the Agency to charge this amount oef tis the annual leeee of travelers traveling under such an autherieeelea? 2. This practice apparently has preaeoded en the theory that the maintenance of the traveler in 4 C UtY t AV:3 .fcr this differentiai. represents an excess "cost" to tie gevaealent within the waning et the phrase, "not to exceed cest.iby eemenen earrler", We have serieus reservations as to the cor cti of thie imputation. While we can conceive of instances in which Oda an ex' ad empb.esize EnteesLi, cost might be intrelved, also we leen :orce V: o aa ta which it would not. Additionally, the language enaer td erat ion, en terms , makes no mention Of annual leave, but Oeeme rathee to treat an ether clearly defined aubject and in a clearly under E, t 3. 'de have expressed ow seze a t ice ke reeare to the General Accounting Office? are tal'errad Ly thtr..eiT.tee that 3 t considers the chargine of annual leave la the tLwc f raeel autbc*rization of this type to constitute a iatter c Jrn1i 3Lr1t1v discretien, and that it would not take audit exeeptinik 174 a lUaEr th.)_ e,larging CA' annual leave in such an instance ir the faiiu t ceatee, rebject to the limitation that all time neceseary to eeeeplete the travel by PCA which is in excess of the time 'within t.eti& tee traieleeei td!lee eeee r.3qui2nd t carieJlete the travel if ordered te perferinil etre ted be charetel to annual leave, r :::eave without pa, s eper.:ex.etee: 4. We conclude that 7,11tre eoule eeee te te to legal objection either to charging a traveeee alekhortate t.4 taw/A by IKel. .111:te to exceed cost by common carrier sel b ariu4 1. 103 , e' ale) t ime liffee'ence bete/tee Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8 App'roved For Release 200'1/08 Clos.-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8 SECRET ATTACHMENT TO FINANCE DIVISION NOTICE N. 896 Page 2 travel time by the common maintaining him in a duty limitation set out lamed administration with the A of the most advantageous Office properly could as the difference between the authorized travel time by was authorized to travel b common carrier. If there OD, this particular subject 1956, frau this Office to subject matter, you may be 4rrier and the travel time by POA, or to -talus for this period, agein witain the ely abova. TO the ends of uniformity c47 ;ay and the securing to our employees epensatiou, we suggest that the Oomptroller2s aish an tgency policy of eat chsrgir1,6 travel time by Gammon carlrierand the 'OA to Liw annual leave of .i traveler who POA at a cost not to exceed cost by ppeara to be a differencerin conclusAons betweea this memorandum aqd that (f!,r 20 June he Comotroller and dealing with a oalated guided by this memorandumi 25X1A9a Office cf GaaraI Counsel S ,E; Approved For Release 2001/08124 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8