ANNUAL LEAVE
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date:
January 27, 2001
Sequence Number:
2
Case Number:
Publication Date:
August 14, 1956
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 161.85 KB |
Body:
?
Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8
ATTACHMENT TO
FIEANCE DIVISIOE 1:0TICE NO. 39(
OGC HAS REVIEWED.
I'vE,101,t',DUM FOR: Chief, al:Ida:XI iviun
SUBJTXT Annual Leave
REFERENCE Your menromtad4ii,. Dated elay 1956,
Subject: "A14tal Leave
14 Aet 1956
1. Your memorandum genera4ly posee the question of' whether a
traveier who is authorized to tietvel by privately owned aetomeb3.1e
(hereinafter referred to as 3.)0.4 "net to exceal cost by comet; eerrier"
should be charged annual leave in the auturt f the time which con?
stitutes the difference betweeni the actutl- travel time aid the time -
which would have been required lo travel by the desighatel) COMM
carrier. We are informed that 4 t geteneilly ha e been the practice within
the Agency to charge this amount oef tis the annual leeee of travelers
traveling under such an autherieeelea?
2. This practice apparently has preaeoded en the theory that the
maintenance of the traveler in 4 C UtY t AV:3 .fcr this differentiai.
represents an excess "cost" to tie gevaealent within the waning et
the phrase, "not to exceed cest.iby eemenen earrler", We have serieus
reservations as to the cor cti of thie imputation. While we can
conceive of instances in which Oda an ex' ad empb.esize EnteesLi,
cost might be intrelved, also we leen :orce V: o aa ta which it would
not. Additionally, the language enaer td erat ion, en terms , makes
no mention Of annual leave, but Oeeme rathee to treat an ether clearly
defined aubject and in a clearly under E, t
3. 'de have expressed ow seze a t ice ke reeare to the General
Accounting Office? are tal'errad Ly thtr..eiT.tee that 3 t considers the
chargine of annual leave la the tLwc f raeel autbc*rization of
this type to constitute a iatter c Jrn1i 3Lr1t1v discretien, and that
it would not take audit exeeptinik 174 a lUaEr th.)_ e,larging CA' annual leave
in such an instance ir the faiiu t ceatee, rebject to the limitation
that all time neceseary to eeeeplete the travel by PCA which is in excess
of the time 'within t.eti& tee traieleeei td!lee eeee r.3qui2nd t carieJlete
the travel if ordered te perferinil etre ted be charetel to annual
leave, r :::eave without pa, s eper.:ex.etee:
4. We conclude that 7,11tre eoule eeee te te to legal objection
either to charging a traveeee alekhortate t.4 taw/A by IKel. .111:te to exceed
cost by common carrier sel b ariu4 1. 103 , e' ale) t ime liffee'ence bete/tee
Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8
App'roved For Release 200'1/08 Clos.-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8
SECRET
ATTACHMENT TO
FINANCE DIVISION NOTICE N. 896
Page 2
travel time by the common
maintaining him in a duty
limitation set out lamed
administration with the A
of the most advantageous
Office properly could as
the difference between the
authorized travel time by
was authorized to travel b
common carrier. If there
OD, this particular subject
1956, frau this Office to
subject matter, you may be
4rrier and the travel time by POA, or to
-talus for this period, agein witain the
ely abova. TO the ends of uniformity c47
;ay and the securing to our employees
epensatiou, we suggest that the Oomptroller2s
aish an tgency policy of eat chsrgir1,6
travel time by Gammon carlrierand the
'OA to Liw annual leave of .i traveler who
POA at a cost not to exceed cost by
ppeara to be a differencerin conclusAons
betweea this memorandum aqd that (f!,r 20 June
he Comotroller and dealing with a oalated
guided by this memorandumi
25X1A9a
Office cf GaaraI Counsel
S ,E;
Approved For Release 2001/08124 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000300060002-8