LIQUIDATION OF OVERPAYMENT OF TERMINAL LEAVE - STAFF AGENT (Sanitized)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP60-00442R000100090035-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 5
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 23, 2002
• Sequence Number: 35
• Publication Date: January 5, 1954
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2002/05/08: CIA-RDP60-00442R000100090035-7
iatant tr oUer
by the proposed di
Staff'
25X1A9A
''v assumc- t< ,t
r- t h e c , ti. - r a the , . i e.
of collection :ill not be s i .?;;
We a t~1e to pconcur ~ in the
per /%ut ~ e to
i e. ~Y5, ~1
posed iFch d i horeto3~. S ON i' sz o 1 to ,
rd gpostions raise in ; zr.`apb 2 Of the reference.
in a Pgityoua. 70 taxpayer compelled tc ref
' rate l ved i unh zaane' D1z 4i lose' f i
be is pre iWed vu req, r i s. ` t s.
G "i+ ' t . Qt m d v until Mscq uLt yevo x aL ti,
allowed reeoup a tax .;it Fm lw..p 4i M
tiosn ir,
standard deduct
As is apparent, the
towe of XIMPOIlpt bid q qv
tbore is a dearth of case law 0111
Or be v o L. Supre C i'r r
016 M 4 1 3 U 'e
Approved For Release 2002/05/08: CIA-RDP60-00442R000100090035-7
 Approved For Release 2002/05/08 : CIA-RDP60-00442R000100090035-7
by o cia s of the 1nte
*ay t thca $1
e ert to nth c
it ru'.c. .R
lsd. of ritg4
tin w- 4+
Id be a rop :' io
10 December
e: is . , _.up .'" % t vh Were
25X1A9A
r+
ret a the restrictions %
b*ft t ties 1 e exister of the probes to
uca-wUcaUm of the sit cam of rt t test. To this e
rovems Service of tiu c s xde to which
lefi,Al swwtloa ex e t vbere itii is obtained
fw4ti of this A x ,,, we do not believe that it ai
uaftr e jP* w v that vc x dirret * related to
f * U a w e d } =' to f s t rs tax cL
as t3w e _..' of the - e_, vbteh , indice
~ uts Lg is , sad r zi b t - saw! h otht t L '..: L .u t at' ic+ o
OGC/GHK:cst
Distribution:
Orig & 1 - Addressee
,'1 - Leave Problems
1 - GHK
1 - OGC, 317 1I 25X1A6A
1 - Chrono
E V s in V14 0h d.Lf is .lt7 may arise , `hesc )"_islu s vL& e?e
UtItz, of tr' r tl:rv of the pr tem az~c wis-Wd to 91-VO
Approved For Release 2002/05/0w:CIA-RDP60-00442R000100090035-7
 App
Wroir' ;fu-4
(SENDER WILL CIRCLE CL w (CATION TOP AND BOTTOM)
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
TO
INITIALS
DATE
1
P~Ir. 25X1A9
Room 711 0. BIng,
2
3
4
5
FROM
INITIALS
DATE
1
Asst. Comptroller
2
3
APPROVAL INFORMATION 1 SIGNATURE
ACTION DIRECT REPLY 1 RETURN
0 COMMENT PREPARATION OF REPLY P1 DISPATCH
CONCURRENCE I RECOMMENDATION I1 FILE
Remarks :
CON E
25X1
 ,er""?"R? F?RM rw. e'Approved For Release 20 /05 `. 0 A RDP60-00442R000100090035-7
Security Informnt i IWO
Office Memorandum ? UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
25X1A9A Attn:
FROM : Assistant Comptroller
-- Room 1711 J. Bldg.
SUBJECT; Liquidation of Overpayment of Terminal Leave -- Staff Agent
25X1A9A
1. Subject employee received an erroneous lump sum leave
payment in January 1952 in the amount of $1,651.81. To adjust this
error now requires (a) collection of the overpayment, (b) adjust-
ment in subject's 1953 and/or 1954 income tax statement to compen-
sate for the excess taxes paid by the employee in 1952 because of
the overpayment, (c) restoration of employee's annual leave after
refund of overpayment is received.
2. Attached hereto is a proposed dispatch o
subject. We would appreciate receiving your concurrence on as
dispatch or your opinion and advice on the following points:
a. Paragraph 1 of the dispatch authorizes the employee
to repay the indebtedness over a 12 months' period.
Do you perceive any legal objections to this
arrangement?
b. Paragraph 2 of the dispatch provides that the Agency
will give the employee statements of "net" salary
paid in 1953 and 19?4 which would include reduction
of the amount refunded during those years from the
gross amount paid. This technique has been used
before in similar cases. Do you perceive any legal
objection to this practice?
c. Paragraph 3 of the dispatch provides for restoration
of the employee's leave, but points out that due to
limitations respecting the amount of leave carry-
over, that he will forfeit 44 hours of annual leave
as of the end of 1952 and any amount accrued as of
the end of 1953 which is in excess of the normal
carry-over limitations. Your advice is requested as
to whether or not persons in a cover status are re-
quired to forfeit leave accrued in excess of statutory
limitations, or whether such leave may continue to
accrue and be held in escrow for such employees,
e, 'Ifrrty t
25X1
Approved For Release 2002/05/08: CIA-Rb'bt-00442R000100090035-7
 Approved For Release 2OOfty ($hAEf 1 Q42R000100090035-7
without regard to normal limitations, until they
return to an overt employment status? If it is de-
termined that such leave may be held in escrow
instead of forfeited, we have the further problem of
determining the length of time which the employee
will be allowed after his return to an overt status,
in which to use such excess accumulated leave.
3. We would appreciate your prompt action on this in order
We are
that a suitable dispatch may be released to this employee.
also interested in your reply to the above queries in order that
we may use the legal precedent established in this case in handling
other similar cases.
Secur'
25X1A9A
I A-F Cf'60-00442R000100090035-7