DETAILED COMMENTS ON COLLECTION PAPER

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP61S00750A000100060003-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: T
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 23, 2016
• Document Release Date: August 21, 2013
• Sequence Number: 3
• Publication Date: December 20, 1951
• Content Type: REPORT

Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/21 : CIA-RDP61500750A000100060003-0
I AJE.,OLUIIILII,
SUBJECT:
SECURITY INFORMATIO#
C...1 NO.
20 December 1551
a on Collection Paper
0/00 Section
Page 6, aPh 2: The IPC vas appro7ed by the IAC at the end
of July. t we use this fact rather than saying "the /PC was
organised in r?"
Pacagrph 6: DCX did not instruct
IA.C, surely.
and the preceding
I wonder
paragraph
if the current intelligence" in this
is not misleading?
4 venit some
operations
50X1
bee rigaraeraph
Pig* Shouldn't we either explaln or not mention the
fact that
40% of the 5,000 reports received yearly
seminated?
are
not die-
50X1
Page 16 ParagraRh 2: Whose is
this?
50X1
pasr$ Shouldn't we
omit the
fact that 50% of these
reports merely servea to give SO the political
picture? Does this mean
that they were virtually useless? If noto shouldn't
tributed to the State Department?
they have been dis-
Page 17, parwaph 11 Does this mean that
50X1
Or is
this a
50X1
omission?
0/0 Section
: Awkward writing.
; The percentages of coverage are uncle ? is
the p items (0111.411 is probably intended) or, as
stated, of rest" (i.e., of 50% of 17,000)?
Raragraph_2: 7he trained manpower problem is common
ces and. might be pulled out of this report. The (Pea
a
on
Tna ccr.RFT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/21 : CIA-RDP61500750A000100060003-0
4110. IL r% r-arrT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/21 : CIA-RDP61500750A000100060003-0
SECURITY -INFORMATION
ha
Lh
has only
ere of
view was
e casing re s" of the
be too glowingly sold. I have the impr
e suxveys from an intellisenee point of
ut
results mom.
Lue,' "of
gon of nubjec
to be dangerous. Seine
Is
ently
" "of value,"
as oed in the pare-
ted intensively, this is
however, might be both
prOblea of source protection and
deservs More expanded treatment;
n with law enforcement etc.?
According to statisticscurrent inteUigeuce
ens (delayed three wefts or Pore) is relatively
also takes centralizatiob translating
problem a little too much for granted.
The "efficiency" of 'DD exploitation is widely
que3tiL w ocuenion of FDD's NSCID probably should not sound quite
as discouraged. I would check the statue of the proposed ircn bef4ve
accepting the last sentence in this paragraOh.
paragraph t Don't they Man other LAC age-nci
Training Office o do with requirements on FDD?
TOP SECRET
-2-
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/21 : CIA-RDP61500750A000100060003-0
50X1
50X1
50X1
50X1
50X1
50X1
50X1
50X1
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/21 : CIA-RDP61500750A000100060003-0
ur
SECURITY INFORMATION?
PSsle sfa7Taisraph SONO (perhaps soot
collation approach.
Page 16, line 3: There is a certain peev
prioxtty.
parasraOh 2:
persfraph 3: is not "contemplated" but
* * * * * * * * * * *
helpful to se
a. IMexini
b. Procurement of foreign publications;
c. Exploitation;
d. Vsnsiation.
It vould probably be helpful if captions vi
throughout the paper.
libe
?due
UseP 20R
Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved for Rei /21 E :I 08 A-RDP61S00750AnnninnnAnnryz_n
Tea?S14/-Cci
50X1