REEXAMINATION OF CIA S REIMBURSEMENT PRACTICES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP61S00750A000200020029-5
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 14, 2016
• Document Release Date: August 21, 2002
• Sequence Number: 29
• Publication Date: May 17, 1955
• Content Type: MFR

F'DP0
Approved For Release 2002/09/03 : CIA-R 1 A000200020029-5
May 15 5
SUBJECT: Reexamination of CIA's Reimbursement Practices
1. Following a recent meeting with the State Department and
Bureau of the Budget. this office obtained the views Informally of R. & 1)
and the three military services. These informal views are as follows-,
ctions to the report as the R & D function is one
,tor while decisions on any funds involved belong
O NI (
muad):
Not interested in the report. From Captain Stuart
( I Budget) the report would not "impinge upon ONl
budget practices.:.
OIN (Lt. Col. Woods)
4 that second sentence of paragraph IZ dealing with
No objections to the submission of the report by
?RS program should not be taken as an indication or precident
settling future budget problems; no objections to the
sentence as confinett to the ER5 question. Although comment-
ing that Air Force accounting practices were adequate to
"break out" various program activities. there might be an
Air Force objection to providing such budget information
ailed for in paragraphs 10 and 11 (NIS) if Air
Force were in the future requested to do so.
Approved For Release 2002/09/03 : CIA-RDP61 SO075OA000200020029-5
CONFIDENTIAL
 Approved For Release 2002 0''I'A hmAhOO75OA000200020029-5
apart. In g
cceptable. G-2's only concern is with the second
2. The military comments can be summed up as no objections
to the report.. The questions raised by C-g and AFOIN on the seco
went report the second sentence of paragraph 12 is clearly confined as an
itb regard to the comment of Al OIN on implement
ication of an objection by AFOIN to providing budget information will ha
to be met and discussed fully with them at. the time the D C1 makes a request
upon the lAO or NIS committee for budget informal
25X1
Office of the 'rector
sentence of paragraph 12 ( $) that the sentence not be
construed as a precident for future handling of intelligence
activities.
he present method falls. In the context of the total reimburse-
to so written as to merely s zggest an alternative Method of budgeting
cc in paragraph 12 (ERS) raise no pr*bl*m as the referenced sen-
ive to the ERS situation and is not written as a possible solution
10 and 11 dealing with NIS, it can only be said
ith 0-2 and in particular. the NIS paragraph*
neat problems.
Planning and Coordination Staff
Pcs f DC
(17 May
Approved For Release 2002/09/0 DP61 S00750A000200020029-5