COMPARATIVE FILM PROCESSING STUDY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP61S00750A000200070045-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 12, 2001
Sequence Number: 
45
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 13, 1957
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP61S00750A000200070045-2.pdf109.17 KB
Body: 
Approved For Releasd _IAF76S00750A000200070045-2 TCS-1415-57 Copy ,: r Hof 5 13 May 1957 MEMORANDUM FOR: Project Director SUBJECT: Comparative Film Processing Study 1. Attached hereto for your information is the study completed by HTAUTOMAT which had been provoked in part by cable some three weeks ago commenting on the relative quality of Eastman . 4 summary of these findings is as follows: a. Materials field processed in general are of slightly big or gun y as tar as the image is concerned. b. The materials processed at Eastman are of slightly higher quality as far as chemical aspects are concerned, i. e.. better washing, less residual thins- sulphate, etc., and as a result our archival properties of materials processed at Eastman are superior although it is difficult to say exactly in terms of years how much superior. 3. 15 .TAUTQMAT has included herein also recommendations e correction of certain shortcomings in field processing as revealed by their study. Colonel Macia has already indicated his 'willingness to sit down with us to examine specific suggestions for the improvement of field processing 25X1A Accardinaly. the recommendations re errs to wi tes and, course of the next ten days, serve as the basis for a discussion a. Approved For Release 2001/08/09: CIA-RDP61S.00750A000200070045-2 Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP61SO075OA000200070045-2 4. It seems to me that the important conclusion derived from study is not that we should concentrate processing one place or the other but rather that we can gain some, satisfaction in the Ear that we do have a reasonably high grade capability to process required without loss of those characteristics so eves With the improvements readily possible in handlin we should be in even better shape. 5. Lot we call your attention to the caveat which HTAUTOMAT has expressed throughout their study, namely, a recognition that within the time available to them and still limited sampling (though xtensive than in the preliminary study) they do not claim that 6. Unless you suggest otherwise. I will forward this study to for his examination (and naturally others in Operations a ass ess res` u ceertainly for the time being it should not go outside of that precinct. JAMES 0. REB Intelligence Requirements Officer TCS-1414-57 cy I &Z-Project Director w/watt 3-Chief, HTA 4-file 5-chrono Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP61SO075OA000200070045-2