COMPARATIVE FILM PROCESSING STUDY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP61S00750A000200070075-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 12, 2001
Sequence Number: 
75
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 3, 1957
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP61S00750A000200070075-9.pdf100.31 KB
Body: 
25X1A C P, Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP6-1S00750A000200070075-9 May 1957 F.M.ORANDUM OR: Project Director SUBJECT: TC- Copy Comparative Comparative Film Processing Study 0-57 of 4 1. A couple of weeks ago m.ted b 25X1A cable evaluating film processed at Eastman o.i 25X1A I suggested to HTAUTOMAT that it would appear most appropriate and useful if they, as the experts, were to make a comparative study of film processing. I indicated that the important thing was not so much to learn who was the better at it as to uncover ways of improvement for it was in our overall interest to have high grade capabilities where we needed them with reasonable effort. Z. Attached hereto is a preliminary study with which HTAUTOMAT is not satisfied and which they would have preferred to not show you but acquiesced because I felt that you would find this interesting and useful. HTAUTOMAT was concerned that if given wide circulation this report would set off a aerie, of arguments which could be avoided by awaiting their final study. 3. My summary of the meaning of the display, which was prepared from random samples of materials processed at Eastman, is that the field has done very good work an that by and large the definition and contrast is better in those materials processed in the field. However, the very last page indicates a number of troubles in the handling of film which I feel should not be tolerated. I am confident from my discussions with Maxie that he will bend every effort to correct these shortcomings. 4. HTAUTOMAT is now making amuch deeper study which will be complete in a week or ten days and which will also include Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP61S00750A000200070075-9 25X1A Approved For Release 20R1Jcw09 , 40) 50A0Q0200070075-9 TC, 13 0-57 a report from the Bureau of Standards on chemical analysis of the film itself. 5. Meanwhile, in deference to the HTAUTOMAT view with which I agree, namely, that this is an inadequate baois for judgment I recommend that you hold this for your own information. The new study will be made available as soon as it is prepared. JAMES Q. REBER Intelligence Re quirements Officer Attachment Study JOR:cw I-Pioj Dir wiatt 2-14TA w/o att 3-file 4- chrono Approved For Release 2001/08/09 : CIA-RDP61S00750A000200070075-9 ILLEGIB