COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECORD OF DISCUSSION ON ITEM 1145 - CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORTATION OF LIQUIFIED GASES 23RD AND 30TH NOVEMBER, 1959.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP62-00647A000100020003-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 6, 1999
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 4, 1959
Content Type: 
MIN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP62-00647A000100020003-7.pdf110.72 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/26 : CIA-RDP62-0064,rDr000100020003- th December, 19591. COCOM Document 3711.45/1 COOi:LDIN.i.TING COi8IITTEE iECORD OF DISCUSSION ON ITEM 1145 - CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORTATION OF LIQUEFIED GASES 2 rd and 0th NovenAber, 125 Present: Belgium(Luxembourg), France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States. References: COCCI[ Does. Nos. 3700.2 and 5, 00001 Doc. No. 3711-00/1 and I.P. 1145/1. 1. The COLL~=TEE based its discussion on the proposals submitted by the United States and German Dele6.;~,tions. United States proposal 2. The UNITED STiiTES Delegation proposed that the cut-off figure of 500 gallons (1,893 litres) be changed to 250 gallons (946 litres) and that fluorine be added to the gases listed in this item. 3. No objections were raised to the addition of fluorine, but several delegations were unable to agree to the change in cut-off. The United States Delegation expressed a willingness to modify their proposal. so as to limit the cut-off change to liquefied fluorine only. To this end, they suggested that the item should retain its present cut-off, that fluorine should be added to the gases listed therein, and that a new sub-item should be added to cover containers of from 250 gallons up to 500 Gallons designed for the storage and/or transportation of liquid fluorine. The item thus redefined would read: "Containers, jacketed only, for the storage or transportation of liquefied gases, including mobile units as follows: (a) of 500 gallons capacity or over, designed for liquid nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, ozone, helium, argon and fluorine (b) of 250 gallons up to 500 gallons designed for the handling of liquid fluorine." 4. Delegations welcomed this modification and undertook to refer it to their Governments. German proposal 5. The GEJWJAN -0ele6aticn proposed that the words "vacuum insulated" be inserted before the word "containers" at the beginning of the definition. 6. All Delegations, except the UNITED STATES -Delegation, were prepared to accept the German proposal. 7. The GERM1N Delegation explained that their proposal aimed at exclu- ding containers which were not capable of storing liquefied gases over a long period. They were ready to study any other proposal which would achieve this Approved For Release 2000/0 DP62-00647A000100020003-7 Approved For ReleaW2000/08/26 : CIA-RDP62-00647600100020003-7 2 - COCOA'.' Document 3711,45/1 result. The UNITED ST.iTES Delegation pointed out that certain non-vacuum types were superior in so far as the storaZe of liquid Lases was concerned. They indicated that they were pursuing the question of whether it would be possible to establish a cut-off based on tLe teml)e;rature loss factor over a given time period with a view to separating the more important from the loss important types of such equipment, and also to determine if other equipment specifications could be related to such a loss factor. 8. The UNITED KINGDOM Delegation welcomed this tentative United States suggestion. They themselves were anxious to exclude the vast amount of civilian- type equipment used to transport ,.vases. 9. The F1tENCH Dele0;ationy although they favoured a simple formula not likely to give difficulty to the customs officials who applied the control system, were also ready to study a cut-_-;ff based on the temperature loss factor over a given time period. 10. On. the 30th N:jveriber, the BELGL I Delegation indicated that they were in favour of the German proposal. 11. CONCLUSION : The COi ITTEE noted that agreement had not been reached on Item 1145, and agreed to resume study of it during the second round of discussion. Approved For Release 2000/08/26 : CIA-RDP62-00647A000100020003-7