(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP62-01094R000100050007-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 16, 2000
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP62-01094R000100050007-6.pdf170.65 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/04/11 : CIA-RDP62-01094R000100050007-6 H TAB Approved For Release 2000/04/11 : CIA-RDP62-01094R000100050007-6 Approved For Release 2000/04/11 : CIA-RDP62-01094R000100050007-6 FOIAb3b1 FOIAb3b1 RECOMMENDATION A. "Employees in the Office of Operations should be more closely associated with intelligence production activities. The DD/I should require the following action: 25X1A "1. Attachment A of Agency Regulation _ dated 15 December 1955 be revised by placing 00 under the Intelligence Production Career Service of the DD/I;" 25X1 A 00 COMM: We do not agree that CIA Regulation should be revised in order to place the Office of Operations under the Intelli- gence Production Career Service of the DD/I. The original decision to exclude 00 from the IPCS was not reached at. the insistence of the AD/0, but rather due to a mutual recognition of the fact that the "substantive" DD/I offices had much in common with each other and that 00 and OCR did not fit into this pattern. In paragraph 5,, page 26, the survey states that the IPCS is concerned with, "planning for the most effective use of personnel which come under IPCS Board activities". This board, with its 25X9A2 present membership, supervises the careers of some M persons., Q5X9A2 difficult task. If' 00 and OCR come under the IPCS, it would then be responsible for an additional i classified personnel and 250 foreign nationals (for whom 00 must do scene planning). It would not only be difficult, but practically impossible, for one board to have 25X9A2 sufficiently close personal contact with, or knowledge of, acme W persons to supervise their careers and to plan adequately for their futures. 25X9A2 25X9Pg ,is Office has approximately= classified employees and =foreign nationals engaged in many diverse types of collection activities. Moreover, and Contact Division have extensive field operations unlike anything else in the DD/I area. Obviously, some of our personnel are doing work similar to that performed by some IPCS personnel, but for the most part our activities are very different from those of the IPCS offices and our personnel requirements are seldom similar. Moreover, more of our personnel rotate or transfer to the DD/P than they do to other offices of the DD/I. It is rec4x needed that 00 not become part of the IPCS. 25X1A8a "2. The AD/O delete the special career designations of the three Divisions nd 40/C) and assign Intelligence Production or Support Career Designations in accordance with the backgrounds, qualifications and desires of the personnel involved;" Approved For Release 2000/0 P62-01094R000100050007-6 Approved For Reuse 2000/04/11 :''DI 4?RDP62-01O94R000100050007-6 00 CCt42ENT: We most emphatically disagree with this Recommendation. Personnel, management is basically a command function. Our personnel look to their Branch and Division Chiefs, and ultimately to the ADO, for their future development, training, promotion, reassignment, etc. We believe that 00 personnel are proud of their career designation and that the vast majority would prefer to keep it. If the recoamnen- dation of the survey team were approved, the 00 Career Designation would be abandoned and a large number of our people would acquire (involuntarily) the "I" designation. Presumably,, engineers, radio maintenance personnel,, code monitors and teletypists would have a CCMKO designation; training liaison officers, an OTR designation; administrative personnel, some kind of a DD/S designation; etc. Under these conditions, four or five non-00 Career Service Boards would be responsible for making recommendations to the chiefs of their respective Career Services in regard to all 00 personnel. At a minimum this would mean that 00 personnel would lose the benefits of close personal contact with, and advice from, their supervisors, so necessary to good personnel mangement. Carried to extremes, this might prohibit the ADO from taking action in regard to the training, promotion, reassignment or rotation to domestic or overseas stations of his personnel without the concurrence of some other career service board and the approval of the chief of some other career service. This would obviously create an impossible situation. We repeat, personnel management is a command function. The recommendation. of the Inspector General would seriously impair, if not destroy, this function and would make it extremely difficult for the AD/O to carry out his mission. We strongly urge disapproval of this Recommendation. "3. The 00 Career Service Board come within the charter of the Intelligence Production Career Service (IPCS) Board;" 00 CENT: This Recommendation is identical with that under paragraph 1, above and disapproval is recommended. '14? The ADO become a voting member of the IPCS Board; and" 00 CCNT: The A,D/O would automatically become a voting member of the IPCS Board if the Office of Operations came under this Board. Disapproval is recommended. Approved For Release 2000/04/1,asg:kl-RDP62-01094R000100050007-6 Approved For Release 2000/04/11 fLA-RDP62-01094R000100050007-6 "5. The DAD), O or a senior officer become a voting member of the IPCS Executive Committee." 00 CClMENT: The DAD/O would automatically become a voting member of the IIPCS Executive Committee if this Office came under the IPCS Board. It might be noted., however, that the present arrangemeht whereby the DAD/O and a representative from OCR monitor the meetings of the Executive Committee has worked in a most satisfactory manner. Disapproval is recommended. Approved For Release 2000/04/11 : Ct -RDP62-01094R000100050007-6