STAFF STUDY #16, 'U.S. POLICIES ON ENFORCEMENT OF CONTROLS'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP63-00084A000100160007-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 14, 1998
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
STUDY
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP63-00084A000100160007-2.pdf206.62 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100160007-2 Staff Study #16, "U.S. Policias on Enforcement of Controls" Anal si Probiemsand D',,iUciencies of enforcement (pages 10-16) ino..nrnirng The section of the staff study bearing the above title makes the fol- lowing principal points: (a) Multilateral problems and deficiencies: (1) Negotiating diffi_c..lties and delays have been experienced (p. 10) (2) Lack of PC enthusiasm for an enforcement program: (a) Principally due to prevailing political climate in r,urope (p. 10-11). This the most important factor and likely to represent an increasing problem as hope for coexistence grows. (p.10-11) (b) Other causes for lack of e_.thusiasm: (p. 11) (1) Fear of unevenness of "sacrifice" among PCs (2) Emphasis on trade promotion (3) Confidential nature of controls in some countries (4) Understaffin enforcement entities and inadequate indoctrination (5) Reluctance to discuss mutual problems with U.S. (6) Inadequate intelligence. (3) Non-uniformity of controls among POs (p. 11) (1i.) Inadequate legal bases for controls (p. 11) (a) Inadequate sanctions to deter violators (p. 11) (5) The China differential is the most active and troublememe enforcement problem. (p. 12) (a.) "There has been little evidence" that the PCs have refrained from exp.rting to the European Bloc under circumstances where "it was likely" the goods would Approved For k-W*Y 60+10 ' tFA-R3P63-00084A000100160007-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100160007-2 (a) Multilateral proble:~s and deficiencies %cont) (r) The China differential (cont) (b) "The quantity and value of knotan diversions to China via the European Bloc Europe and Western countries have been significant." (p. 12) (c) Most IL/III ad China 6pecial List items no longer re- quire licensing,except to 6hina (direct ?). IC/DV applies only to Munitions, AE and IL/I and II. TAC applies only to Munitions, AE and IL/I. These have facilitated diversions to China. (p. 12) (d) The China differential problem is the only one of the five above that is "serious". (p. 12) Regarding it, its nature plus the PC reluctance to any extension of controls, makes it "most doubtful" that China enforcement could be tightened. But our future course of action depends on outcome of over-all review of policy. (p. 12) (1) - (Li.) Regarding items (1) - (fit) , above, "true can only point out PC deficiencies as they occur and press for the small modifications required to effect imprevements.(p.12) Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100160007-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084A000100160007-2 (b) Unilateral problems of U.S.: (p. 13-16) (1) U.S. in role of international policeman, especially re non-US goods: (a) U.S. has been active, but our activity has been received by PCs with mixed feelings and our ability to take ef- fective action has varied from country to country. Our admin. action is"at best only tolerated", especially when local laws have not been violated. (p. 13) (b) Ouery whether the expenditure of good will in this pressure for en'orcement J s made "wisely or w astefully". (p.14) (c) Re non-US origin goods, the most serious U.S. problems come from embarrassment of friendly countries when we expose inadequacies. (p. 14) Our future problem is to be ore diplomatic in bringing pressure to persuade our friends toward self-improvement. (p. 14) (2) frdj Re US origin goods: (under controls) (a) Jij Problem of U.S. item incorporated into another end product, and problem of control of latter. (p. 14) (b) Wt PD-810 (mentioned, but no discussion) (p. 14) (c) Jjj Objections to U.S. Foreign S3,rvice investigations as infringement of local soveri.egnty or violation local commercial espionage laws (p. 14--.15) 0) U.S. controls over non-IL goods: (a) Must distinguish between Po:=Itive List and GRO, the latter being harder to justify when seeking international cooperation but not to be ignored due U.S. political reasons.(Conclusion: GRO items are a problem and less Approved For Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100160007-2 Possible Future 9.e rses of Action (p. 16-20) The section of the s t off study bearing the above title makes the fol- lowing principal points: (a) "Unlikely that more than routine procedural modifications can be effected in existing controls (without some drastic change in overall control policy)." (p. 16) ithout a further downward revision or a basic change in the differe tial levels, few PCs will be willing to adopt more rigid enforcement measures. (1) Extensive negotiations with PCs would only antagonize and dissipate goddwill "required for more im,:ortant problems not only in the econ. def. field but also in broader area of .6/vv policy." (p. 16) (b) What to do about U.S. export controls (assuming need for excons continues indefinitely and little chance obtain much tighter or broader international control?) (1) U.S. excon can be improved. Present program represents compromises due to: 16) (a) administrative limitations; lack appropriately trained investigative personnel for operations abroad, etc. (p.17) (2) Improvements in U.S. excon program could be accomplished by: (a) using additional especially trained personnel abroad to supplement FSO's (b) cope with TAC inadequacies by instituting system of U.S.-approved f o warders who have signed agreements not to accept instruction- to liver (p. 17) (c) Require destination control n tices on all B/L and in- voices (p. 18) -- Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100160007-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100160007-2 (c) Advantages of tighter U.S. enforcement vs disadvantages Pro: Con: increased security and additional foreign criticism less risk of diversion probable complaints from Congressional aT.-proval exporters (maybe) increased costs of operating controls (d) Advantages of present level of enforcement : policies and procedures known arnci accepted by foreign govts, Congress, trade, and public; they are reasonably efficient as a reasonable cost. (1) "On balance it probably would be preferable to maintain the s tdtus quo in U. S. enforcement policy pendin, some major change in our overall economic defense policy." (p. 16) (e) We can also continue our efforts to enlist non-PC cooperation and participation in enforcement. 11,.18) (1) This requires additional study of those countries. (p. 18) (f) We should improve intelligence collection and ulLLssemination (p.19) (1) Not the business of Foreign ,service to collect covertly. "An expanded effort on the part of the Intel, collection agencies in the field of Ltvl trade would undoubtedly bring forth an increased volume of information." (p. 19) (g) We should improve collaboration between U.3. element abroad (p. 19) (h) We should encourage cooperation and multilateral exchanges of informa- tion in handling of illegal :/4v transactions (p. 19) (1) Support use of COCOM forum, and expand on interchange among technical and enforcement experts of PCs. (p. 19) other PCs and deemphasize U.S. (p. 19-20) Encourage Approved For Release 2000/08/23 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100160007-2