NOTE ON THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN SOVIET BLOC WITH THE FREE WORLD

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP63-00084A000100190002-4
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 7
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 6, 2001
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: June 15, 1955
• Content Type: STUDY

Approved For Release 2001/08/27: CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002- ~A)e
OECD
CFE3:' CRAFTING GROUP
ECONOMIC DEFENSE POLICY REVIEW
Staff Study No. 19
Draft of June 15, 1955
Note on the Balance of Payments of the European
Soviet Bloc with the Free World
This draft of Staff Study No. 19, on the Balance of
Payments of the European Soviet Bloc with the E~:we World"., is trans-
mitted for your use in connection with the work of the CFA' Drafting
Group on Economic Defense Policy Review.
In compliance with the request of the Chairman of the
Drafting Group, the Executive Secretary,, EDACs, is providing repro-
duction and distribution facilities as a service to further the
wcrk of the CFEP Drafting Group.
Irving I. Kramer
Executive Secretary
Distributions
CFEE' Drafting Group
SEC ET
State, Treasury declassification & release instructions on file
Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002-4
 Approved For Release 2001/0$/7,?IA-RDP63-00084A000100190002-4
This document consists o
pages, .No,2ref 5 copies,
Series A.
CFEP DRAFTING GROUP
ECONOMIC DEFENSE POLICY REVIEW
Staff Study No, 19
(Draft of June 159 1955)
Note On The Balance Of Payments Of The European
Soviet Bloc With The Free World
This note is included to explain an apparently contradictory aspect
of East-West trade that has frequently been observed, Export surpluses of
consistently large value, incurred by the European Soviet bloc in its trade
with the free world (especially by the satellites), have appeared in Western
trade statistics at the same time that payments problems and bloc indebtedness
on clearing account with Western Europe have been increasing, This condition
can only be explained by reference to all the items affecting the use of
foreign exchange by bloc countries.
Some aspects of this problem are imperfectly understood as a result
of incomplete data, but in its major outlines the baance of payments may
be described and the unimown elements can be estimated although -with less
precision than might be desirable, Table 1 contains a su nary of the best
information and estimates currently a,iai.la'hle o Further detail on the methods
by which these figures were derived is available in EIC-P-59 "The B~alancs
of Payments of the Soviet Bloc with the Free World 1948-19539" 060
In its merchandise trade with the free world, the European bloc has
an export surplus only if trade is presented from the standpoint of the
free world countries (as it is in. their official statistic-s-), that is if
bloc exports are valued c,iofo free world ports and bloc imports fo
free world ports, If bloc exports are present?u:d at their estimated foo0b,
ya ~.,eCv y~v
Approved For Release 2001/Utf/2~'DIA-RDP63-00084A000100190002-4
 Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002-4
SEC `T
value in bloc ports a bloc import surplus appears, which is relatively
small in the years since 1.949 but quite large in 1948 and 1949.
A further bloc deficit is incurred in the shipping account, Although
the actual share of bloc ships and railroads in transporting East-West
trade is not known with precision, it is known that the bloc has a limited
merchant marine and is undoubtedly a net importer of shipping services.
The bloc9s deficit on shipping account Is estimated at $25 to $50 million
annually, and the overall balance for trade and shipping shows a bloc
deficit of over $100 million in 1948-49 and 70-90 million in 19511953.
In 1954 this deficit almost certainly increased,
From 1948 through 1952, the items included under capital movements
and transfers in Table 1 are sufficient to explain foreign exchange
acquisitions by the bloc which were large enough to cover all, or most,
of the trade and shipping deficits, In 1953, however, rich acquisitions had.
dwindled to ins .,gnificarice, and in 1954 they were probably no greater, The
largest capital transfera, while they lasted, were- the Finnish reparations
payments and the use of the Swedish credit of 194&s.l951, both acc ri:linra 'to
the USSR, Private remittances from the, US9 principally to sa tE:: lice
countries, are a continuing item, Offsetting the above were b'-
from 1950 to date in compensation for properties of f !,ee world c .nne
had been nationalized by the satellite governments (such payments are,
of courses far less than free world c 1la'ims )
Sales of gold to the free world, mainly by the USSF~ account
roughly $100 million annually in 1949-1952, and rose to $150 m l.lion
1953. The total. for 1954 i
ion, (These fig r s are
Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002-4
 Approved For Release 2001/08/27
estimates with perhaps the largest margin of error of any of the figures
presented in Table 1.) As capital transfers decreased in 1953 sales of
gold increased, but not by as large an amount.
There remain the transfers of foreign exchange holdings, a category
which does not have as large an effect on overall payments as the other
major categories because the Items are smaller and offset one another.
It should be noted that Continental Western European balances of the
bloc, consisting in large part of clearing accounts, have consistently
shown a net increase, i.e., bloc indebtedness has risen, on balance,
each year, Bloc holdings of dollar exchange were drawn down sharply in
1948, and were further decreased in later years until 1952 when little
more than necessary working balances remained, In 1953 a sizeable quantity
of US currency, at least some of which had been acquired through China,
was released, Changes in sterling balances and in bloc holdings of Swiss
francs were not included in Table 1 o~ :.r g to a lack of data, and the same
true of some clearing accounts, but it Is unlikely that the omitted
materials would significantly change the overall payments picture.
When all the above : terris are added t,oget er, a residual of rerr
and omissions is obtained that shows a net value for bloc forrtiei c ex 'L=xns e
earnings the use of which could not be accounted for. In 1941
value was about 50 million., and in 1950-53 it was $100 to
25 m,; ll ors o
There are a number of small omissions which have not been menu-
and the cumulative errors in all the esti-mates are potentially i^ rge0
In view of the direction of the residur.l values, it is nece s
mention one large omission. unrecoTded trade, Trade may be u. n_rrecorded,
Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002-4
 Approved For Release 2001/08/277S.E DP63-00084A000100190002-4
or be wrongly recorded in official statistics, for a variety of reasons and
unrecorded trade therefore cannot be identified with clandestine or
illegal trade. It is known that the 'bloc did acquire substantial illegal
imports during these years, and this helps to explain the overall balance
of known payments items as shown on Table la However, the use of the
residual item in Table 1 as an estimate of the value of illegal imports
should not be attempted in -view of the many uncertainties regarding the items
from which the residual was derived.,
One conclusion which could be drawn from these figures is that the
increases in bloc indebtedness on clearing account are not very large in
the overall payments picture, But this is only true of the payments of the
European bloc as a whole and not of individual countries, The satellite
countries, viewed separately, are in a much more restricted foreign exchange
position than the USSR, since they have no gold reserves and smaller
exportable surpluses and are more dependent on imports. Consequently, they
are under pressure to exploit all available sources of foreign exchange
including clearing accounts and in some cases private credits.
It might be inferred. from this data. that bloc countries could solve
their payments problems merely by ceasing to engage in illegal trade, But
from the bloc standpoint a payments problem arises largely because of the
demand for imports from the free world, and those imports which must be
acquired illegally _m at higher cost - are goods on which the bloc p1at?r;
higher, not lower, priority than on goods obtainable through normal
commercial channels,
Unquestionably the USSR ,could help to relieve payments problems of
the satellites by transfers to them of its free world foreign exchange
SE .irP
Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084A000100190002-4
 Approved For Release 2001/08t47, A-RDP63-00084A000100190002-4
earnings which could be augmented,, if necessary, by increased sales of
gold. This may have occurred,, although there is no clear evidence of it.
The USSR does not extend grants-in-aid, and if It were to transfer free
world exchange it would exact some sort, of quid pro quo which might be as
difficult for satellites to produce as their exports to the West.
Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002-4
 Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002-4
Table 1. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN SOVIET BLOCI WITH THE FREE WORLD 1948 - 1953
(In millions of US dollars) a
1951
nL2
IM
Exports" 7000A. (Bloc Ports)
1.392
1,302 10073 1,197
1.095
1,056
Imports, 7.0.8. (Free World Ports)
-1,480
-1,449 -i,o8o 1,239
-10145
-1,102
Balance of Trade
88
- 147 -
42
- 50
4
Shipping Receipts
51
40 35
50
40
35
Shipping Payments
- 88
- 78 - 64 -
93
- 67
- 61
Balance of Shipping
- 37
- 38 29 -
43
- 27
- 26
Balance of Trade and Shipping
- 125
- 185 - 36 -
85
- 77
- 72
Capital Movements and Transfers (let)
Finnish Reparations
85
76 34
54
45
0
Swedish Deliveries under 1946 Loan Agreement
11
12 15
29
35
0
Private Remittances from the United States
51
29 15
18
14
17
Csech Drawing on the International Monetary Fund
.6
Compensation Payments for Rationalized Properties
- 17
19
- 13
- 12
-
Balance of Capital Movements and Transfers
153
117 V
r2
rl
5
Changes in Gold and Foreign Exchange Holdings
Changes in US dollar balances
52
11 6
7
1
1
Changes in Continental European Balances
- 46
12 19
18
26
12
Changes in Other Balances
17 b
17 J
Changes in US Currency Holdings
10
Sales of Gold
0
100 PJ 97
100
86
147
Not change in Gold and Foreign Exchange Holdings
23
124 105 125
102
171
Errors and Omissions
51
- 56 - 117 - 122
- 106
- 104
SIGNS8 Minus sign (-) indicates an outflow of funds, no sign, which is in effect a plus sign, indicates a
source of funds. In the case of gold and foreign exchange holdings, no sign indicates sales of
gold by the Bloc, a reduction in foreign assets, or an increase in liabilities to foreign
countries; a minus sign indicates the opposite in each case.
a. Data for the most part were converted from original currency units to US dollar equivalents on
the basis of rates published by the International Monetary Fund.. Where these were not available,
rates based on information from the countries involved were used.
b. Argentina had a commercial surplus of $17 million with Rumania in 1948. This Rumanian debt was
repaid by a gold shipment in late 1950-
c. Data on the volume of gold sales in 1949 are tenuous.
Approved For Release 2001/08/27 : CIA-RDP63-00084AO00100190002-4