COSTS RELATIVE TO A NEW SATELLITE PROGRAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP63-00313A000500140039-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 29, 2004
Sequence Number: 
39
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 17, 1963
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP63-00313A000500140039-0.pdf132.68 KB
Body: 
SEC El Approveor Release 2004/1'2/15: CIA-RDP63-OOM 3A000500140039-0 ,.~.. 25X1 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Science and Technology SUBJECT : Costs Relative to a New Satellite Program 1. Based upon a recent Itek proposal for the M-2 camera system, we have deduced a series of figures which will provide us with a base line in arriving at estimated development costs for a new satellite camera system. We have also employed the cost figures outlined by the BJ/M-2 committee regarding vehicle. and launch costs in establishing the dollars associated with an operational program. Since we have built our ballpark from information gleaned from the-M-2 proposal, we are cautious to suggest that the figures cited herein will only buy an M-2 or comparable system. Should a more exotic system be desired, specific contractor estimates should be solicited. 2. As is evident from Attachment 1, the cost involved in the development y system will re- quire an outlay of Attachment 2 reflects the cost involved in a single aunch of an opera- tional system. 3. There are several qualifications which should be taken into account in considering the overall costs of a satellite program. In the first instance, with the return of Atlas missiles from our overseas launch sites, we may be able to considerably reduce the.cost as shown here by ear- marking the returning Atlases to our program with minimal refurbishing costs. Secondly, although we have submitted figures for the Thorad (TAT) booster, we feel that with the employment of the MK-8 dual recovery buckets, the possibility of a successful orbit is reduced and we are prone to lean towards the Atlas booster as a safety factor.. Additionally, we have not considered film procurement and processing costs and have assumed we would continue to employ the-same contrac- tor now used in the CORONA/MURAL/J Pro ram The er Atlas launch is possibly high by however, in view of the severa e y airil- opea items to -De employed in the program the potential overage might provide some funding flexibility. 25X1 25X1 RDP6f -00313A000500140039-9 SECR cation and tests. Operational systems could be delivered one per month thereafter. If development is commenced by November 1963 permitting first launch in February 1965, 4. We estimate the development of the camera system and recovery system such as the M-2 can be accomplished within 12 months followed by three months of system qualifi- 25X1 will be re uired this Fiscal Year with 25X1 an additional necessary in FY 1965 and in FY 1966 to complete the launch 25X1 of a ten-system program. Copy 1. & 2 - DD/S&T ' ApproveAPor Release 2004/12/15: CIA-RDP63- 13A000500140039-0 .3 AD/OSA 4 - DAD/OSA -5 - D/TECH/OSA ..--6 D/TECH/OSA .7 & B - PS/OSA 9 RB/OSA Acting Assistant Director (Special Activities) P63-0031 3AO00500140039-0 . 25X1\ 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/12/15 : CIA-RDP63-00313A000500140039-0 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/12/15 : CIA-RDP63-00313A000500140039-0