CONTRIBUTIONS TO POWER POSITIONS PROJECT AND ORR REVIEW OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SURVEY ON CIA CAREER SERVICE, JAN. 1960

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP63-00314R000100010087-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
11
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 9, 2001
Sequence Number: 
87
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 24, 1960
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP63-00314R000100010087-7.pdf750.02 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/0 DP63-00314ROOPI;Q,Q 24 March 1,960 This meeting was held for the purpose of discussing geographic elements of national power and to select those which were signifioa-ut in helping to assess relative 'Free World" vs. Sino-So ict Bloc power positions. A list of eleven elements considered to be basic and p, og "apbi c was presented as a discussion tart. Many of the items were but after prolonged discussion it was decided that elements such a,- climate, natural resources and their development, population, transportation and comunication, stages of cultural, economic, and technological development were geo, ttphic only in so far as any space-location aspects of them were concerned. These elements in so far as their power relationships were concerned could be beat handled by specialists in those fields, even though the Leo pher does recognize their significance and inter-relationship:. A few of the elements on the list were deteined to be truly geographic and as such could legitimately be handled by the GRA. Rc n-nuclear attack is not foreseen aIt this time on either the "Free World" or the Sine-Soviet Bloc. The elements that remained as being appropriate for our evaluation were arranged in two o s 1, i tion1 size, shape and boundaries Under this caption the effects of location, size and spe, which all have space-location fentur+es, as well as the geographic nature,, and implication, of the natural boundaries will be c:iscussed. Approved For Release 2001/08/10 : CIA-RDP63-00314R000100010087-7 Approved For Release 2001/08/10 CI= P63-00314R000100010087-7 SUgJECT: Review of the Inspector General's Survey of the CIA Career Service at the newly pr do in detail, the survey does suggest that it would it : lvs itself in recruitment ; selection, training, assess advsncnt of personnel to Carry or, the work of to : e u1. also suggested that in addition to policy formulation, guidance- an-d direction to career h pe:ified relationship with tLc 1 and this Office of Training -- it weuld have w -thorn. the DC1 for the direct i ntewticn of a career develop* If these functions &,-A powers were rated tc such a board, d, otherwise interfere in the line c p=r-- of these responsibilities as they relate to the accomplishment organisational missions- . Line officials would be quite reluct n relinquish the respod ibilities for selection of professional people needed to Support their organization's intelligence mission. In the responsibility they have for getting the intelligence job dons leads them to the career development of capable individuals in their c?sr neat Fc- d functional units does not take into full conaideratio is of identifiable needs. The one thing that the line cos uid of over-all need of the Agency for qualified generalists, who have broad experience gained f'?ro n a variety of assigmen look upon a fulfi rat of this latter need It has generally been established that there are s is a tendency to of mane wc't 1 major nee: Meer development program. The one would be to develop people to per or i Approved For Release 2001/08/10 : CIA-RDP63-00314R000100010087-7 Approved For Release 2001/08/10 : CIA-RDP63-00314R000100010087-7 ST JECT : C Review of the inspector General's Survey of the CIA Carter S -rv'ice the specialized intelligence production futions in the Agency. -,s#i. the other would be to train hR. nt and capable people + o fill key positions of a generalist t 'pe . This office 'eels that- Career Development Board cannot sc cnpl.i.ssh the first development as well as the line cot, and should d type through tie development t.f policy to be existing line organizational units. 4. Before an real judgment ca i t* mode of the survey report, clarification ass to be made of the intelligence officer and key Agen,ry position a&tegoriess. If these unique types of work could be defined by identifying specific jobs in the Agency, not in the loose term: used (such as "col.iectorss "analysts", and "interpreters of information"), it would help to id: just what is, meant by the need for personnel to fill A cency 5? 1. to recruit aim, and "sign i atel ligenc :, of getting experience to fill t positions do" not take into consideration the fact that perm 1 good Agency intelligence functions are equally qualified to develop into key Agency personnel. It wakes little sense to ezen : professssionall competent econ snisets, gee =r.,, .ers . scientists, and historians from such positions in favor of a body o? by already Approved For Release 2001/08/10 : CIA-RDP63-00314R000100010087-7 Approved For Release 2001/08/ TDP63-00314R000100010087-7 Inspector General's Survey of the CIA ave been brought -d to a speecifie inte1li- ion and then trained., assigneed, and moved along to key :tzar professionally y eeteent Intelligence spec?ialistn e involved in the sai.n stress of national intelligence then the s -called "intelligence officer" cadre. 6. The conclusions react-ad as to who is and. who is not am e officer" is certainly contrary to the experience$ 0"5' "specialists" -- including economists, historians, poli .ical scientists, geograph ,, and scientists -- who have. been work for any years. That the authors of the repo, in intelligence as n the specir.II criests reflects a profound ignaarance o the- es of the Agency, 'who they are, what they do, and -- __ he=w they are regarded in relation to he teelligeence process- Ton this ,group of speoialitts W3 non-careerists Who should not be vi ,led with true careerists vould bp eprive them of career development possibilities cnr side their i of specialization, for which many of them are qualified. It S in the Agcy to the so-called Officer" group. We feel that it, would be justifiglale to predict the hasty departure of the mt orityT of or professional ranks if this kind of personnel policy were adored. The economic and geogra ie %r.lys';e Approved For Release 2001/08/10'RDP63-003148000100010087-7 11, Approved For Release 2001/08-/~ql RDP63-00314R000100010087-7 :L U - TV. R Reviev or the Inspector Gener Ca eeer Service in tR, with few ezeerticsns, think of _ 1 Office has repeated in any disc tified in this ig ed that, no academic course of tra+ in't..r is