RED SUB PERIL HELD RISING AT FAST PACE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP64B00346R000100170069-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 10, 2003
Sequence Number: 
69
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 4, 1962
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP64B00346R000100170069-2.pdf132.65 KB
Body: 
146 AS NG' 41 PQ~i11 d. fw170069-2 ~e c ising At Fast Pace ?Idmil al s, Spec cb Urging Sys if t Action Censored By John G. Norris $tAff b. ePor:er In its Bearings to date. the Stennis Committee has efiec- tively brought out the pros and cons of "muzzling" mili- tary officers on foreign pol- icy, but another Pentagon cen- sorship, issue has been left unt ou chest. Not long ago a ranking Navy ! admiral submitted for De fense Department clearance a .speech in wh ich he, planned to give warning of a danger which causes him great con-, cern. It stressed the prime hn- portance of launching a ma- jor program imediately to counter the rapidly mounting' Soviet m i s s i l e submarine threat. A stepup in effort now (could check the threat, he said, while delay may produce real trouble. i On objection of the Defenses Department Comptroller's DC- flee, he was told to tone down the speech. His views were I said to conflict with official policy and the budget. The facts indicate that there is nmcli cause for the act- ~miral's concert, although the: issue is broader than this. The Defense Department I will .not release such figures but it can be stated authorita- Itively that U. S. intelligence estimates that the Soviet Union now has about 30 sile submarines, about 10 of them nuclear powered. Not in Polaris Class None are comparable with the six U. S. Polaris subs now in commission, which;. carry 16 1200-mile-range mis-1 siles that can be fired from below the sea. The Russian silg sub Beet inciudes both j Ib~ t~s~~fia~ `c~air - a?r~rea= Red Sub Peril Held Rising at Rapid Rate ing missiles like the 500-mile American Regulis subs. They carry a maximum of three missiles each which have a maximum range of 350 miles, and must surface to fire. It is doubtful that they can match the Polaris' relia- bility and "invisibility" rec- ord to date. The Polaris craft have had all 16 of their missiles ready to fire on 15 minutes notice 95 per cent of the time on station, and 15 out 16 mis- siles ready 99.9 per cent of the time. As yet no Polaris has been detected, as far as the Navy can tell. But the total U.S.S.R. mis- sile sub fleet now is conceded to be bigger than was con- sidered likely only a short time ago, and there is little doubt that the Red Navy is expending great effort to match the Polaris and further expand its undersea missile fleet. !How big an antisubmarine effort the United States should mount to meet this threat is a matter of dispute both with- in the Navy and thee Defense Department. Great strides have been made in submarine defense in recent years as a result of a gradually increased level of effort. The present ASW forces are equipped to make a good showing against the Ru sian forces today, al- though Navy chiefs cannot guarantee that' the Unite. States would, not suffer seri- ous casualties if the 30 Soviet missiles should launch an at- tack. Some of the present short- comings of ; the Russian subs are not as important as may seem. Their missiles do not need long range to blast American coastal cities, and while surface firing increases their chance of detection, the craft should. be able to get their shots off first. On the other hand, geogra- phy and America's world-wide allies present Russia with a more difficult submarine at- tack problem than that faced by -U. S. Polaris craft. Over- seas air bases and surveil- ' ance.nets provide the means of detecting Red subs as they emerge from the straits and narrow waters limiting Rus- sian egress to the open sea. Another aspect of the prob- lem 'Involves attacks on U. ,S. ' warships and supply vessels in limited war. During the Korean War, Red China had no submarines. Today, the Chinese Communist Navy has 25 to 30 Soviet-type subs. Mos- cow also alas furnished sub- marines to Indonesia, Egypt and some to European satel- lites. In case of another Korea, i Soviet submarines could cov- ertly attack U. S. ships with little fear of discovery. No Soviet subs have been given. to Cuba, although re= centiy . Soviet merchantmen have been towing patrol craft and subchasers to Cuba for delivery to Castro's navy. The real threat of Com- munist submarine power, how- ever, lies ahead, when Russia gets many nuclear-powered missile and torpedo attack subs. Much of the present American ASW defense, which can cope with conventional submarines, may then become obsolete. ASW chiefs would like to see a greater development effort on nuclear-powered surface ships and planes, with the unlimited endurance to match the A-propelled subs. They .also talk of the need of main- taining a permanent antisub- marine barrier force as well as a host of other costly development programs. The decision as to how much money should be de- voted to meeting the subma- rine threat is a complicated problem. Some Pentagon of- ficials argue with much plausibility that only the Chief of Naval Operations or Secretary of Defense can properly conclude how much should be allocated for va- rious Navy and. overall de- fense needs so as to maintain balance armed forces. But, in the past, Congress and the people have insisted on settling vital arms ques- tions that are disputed by the experts. Past Defense chiefs have tried, without suc- cess, to "muzzle" the advo- cates of bigger bomber forces, greater air defense and larger armies. . Approved For Release 2004/01/15 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000100170069-2