IN DRAFTING REPLY TO CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP64B00346R000200080004-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 3, 2002
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 4, 1962
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP64B00346R000200080004-2.pdf40.32 KB
Body: 
Approved For Re WJ9 1,2[1 1A pf? B00346R000200080004-2 ASSISTANT SECRETARY September 4, 1962 IN DRAFTING REPLY TO CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRIES Following are a half-dozen common complaints about our letters to Members of Congress: -- Not getting to the main point that is disturbing the Member of Congress or constituent, but instead giving a partial or vague reply. -- Stilted language, or indications or expertise not shared by'the incoming letter. -- Not expressing regret when a reply is long overdue. -- Failure to acknowledge that a Congressional letter was addressed to the Secretary. -- Ascribing views to the Assistant Secretary rather than the Department. -- No style, color or lasting imprint. The best way to sum up what is being sought is this statement by Joseph Pulitzer for the guidance of his newspapers: 111 must see that my readers get the truth; but that is not enough. I must put it before them briefly so that they will read it, clearly so that they will understand it, forcibly so that they will appreciate it,? picturesquely so that they will remember it, and, above all, accurately...." Thanks very much. Frederick G. Dutton Assistant Secretary for Congressional Relations State Dept. review completed Approved For Release 2002/08/21 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000200080004-2