DEAR SENATOR MCCARTHY:

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 12, 2004
Sequence Number: 
38
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 11, 1962
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7.pdf217.87 KB
Body: 
? DRAFT TAM/mfb Approved For llSan62 ase 2004/03/25 : CIA-RDP64B00346R 00400040038-7 Dear Senator McCarthy: During our very pleasant visit on Tuesday, the 9th, you raised the question of an incident that arose in 1956 with certain scientists at the California Institute of Technology. I briefly explained my position and so that you may be fully informed, yesterday I arranged for the delivery to you of a copy of the proceedings before the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy held in connection with my confirmation hearings in July 1958. I can acid nothing to my statements made at that time, although I would be happy to again review this matter with you or any one else who so desires. With respect to the second question you asked, that of a contract between the United States Air Force and the Kaiser-Frazer Company which was consummated when I was Under Secretary of the Air Force, 1950 and :1951, I am attaching a copy of public hearings before the Preparedness Subcommittee #1 of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate. These hearings were held for several days starting June 2nd, 1953 as a result of a persq'kial request by me to the late Senator Styles Bridges. Approved For Release 2004/03/25 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7 Approved For Release 2004/03/25 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7 Here again there is little, if anything, I can add to my sworn testimony. Quite naturally I would be glad to discuss this subject with you or others should you desire. 'kith reference to this mornings.' article by Mr. Drew Pearson in which he alleges that my shipbuilding operations were t inordinately profitb].e, this matter too was reviewed by a Committee of the Congress in 1946. Therefore I am attaching a transcript of the public hearing of the House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee held for the purpose of investigating Maritime Commissions' merchant shipbuilding program. I have marked the section relating to my personal testimony. Although the subject is very old inasmuch as ship-building operations under my direction were discontinued in 1945 and records are not available to me, my testimony given under oath was complete and to my knowledge aae. , Our shipbu ding operations were adequatery financed through subscribed stock, subordinated stock holders' loans, and bank loans for A L L - 41 which the stockholders were responsible. The earned fees were substantial because of the vast volume, howevet, non-reimbursable expenses, negotiation and corporate incd a taxes reduced the profit to a very modest figure when one conside rs`>the scope of the operation. As the testimony indicates the entire undertaking was Approved For Release 2004/03/25 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7 Approved For Release 2004/03/25 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7 handled iri'~,,exact accordance with United States exit Commission policy and ckntractual procedures. retrospect I feel the building of this vast yard (the second largest i the United States), the assembly and training of an organization in cxc ss of 40, 000 men. and women and the production of some 475 ships of ~rious types in record time was really one of A4 tt.. #' e satisfying ac+ ralisrnents of my life., Dyad weight tonnage produced .ten- th t yar American flag tonnage in act- operation today. With respect to th. Kaiser contract for tt-ansportation of bauxite for the Kaiser Aluminui . Company referred to in the Ato 3c..Ene.rgy Cb i assion confirm tion hearings and also in Mr. Drew Pearson's article, the circumstances were this: Some six years after I left the Air Force, Kaiser uminum called upon the shipping industry to submit competitive bid for this engagement. My Aluminum were most meticulous in determining that this dertaking they held none in any Company of mine. The executive of Kaiser interests with Kaiser, I held no stock in any Compapof theirs, and most attractive to the Aluminum Company. I had no joint proposals, and the proposal submitted by my, C any proved to be Company and a number of other major shippir' interests submitted was made with the shipping company which;.' could best serve -3- Approved For Release 2004/03/25: CIA-RDP64B00346RO Approved For Release 2004/03/25 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7 interests of their stockholders and that no conflict of interest was involved, and the same considerations were foremost in my mind. Most sincerely, John A. McCune Director Most Sincerely, John A. McCone Most Sincerely, John A. McCone Director Approved For Release 2004/03/25 : CIA-RDP64B00346R000400040038-7 SEN R WILL CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM e >F 64 00 46040 01 CENTRAL\INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICIAI ROUTING SLIP TO NAME AND ADD SS DATE INITIALS 1 2 3 4 5 6 ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMME DATION COMMENT FILE RETURN CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE Remarks : "Ile FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SEIEIDER ONE NO. H FROM: NAME, ADDRESS AND P DATE / ~ A qAM 0 FORM NO. 237 Use previous editions 2-61