(UNTITLED)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP65B00383R000100280034-6
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date:
February 17, 2004
Sequence Number:
34
Case Number:
Publication Date:
August 9, 1963
Content Type:
TELEGRAM
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 120.23 KB |
Body:
h0 COMING TENG A M For ReJ p6A)' rV 16&-k
`- P
L
H
SAL
BTF
EUR
10
IDAC
P
USIA
INR
AEC
WHB
R14R
CONFIDENTIAL
8Xc01002663 -''
Control: 8204
Rec'd: August 9; 1963
8:59 P.M.
NO: 82, August. 9, 6 P.M. (SECTION TWO 0
FROM: Rangoon
TO: Secretary of State
by the maximum number in-the shortest time and that it was my
.impression we certainly hoped Communist China would adhere and C>/~ that the procedure adopted was specifically designed to permit
the largest number of signatories without raising the question/
of recognition. I then referred again to US position as seto'k//
forth circular 263. German Ambassador then attempted convince gA,
we that we could make plain to Burmese difference between non- .
recognition Communist or Nationalist China and nonrecognition
East Germany. I observed that Burmese would see issues quite
.differently and that -Burmese., perhaps more than any other nation,
fully understood and sympathized with procedures developed for
permitting maximum numbers to adhere without raising question of
recognition. I expressed view Burmese would not.raise h-is
1question
taken the position that we hoped the treaty would be adhered to
ac: -fsE-
c E-cM1
PRIORITY
ACTION DEPARTMENT 82, INFORMATION PRIORITY BONN 1, PRIORITY
LONDON 3.^C/a
.3 replied our note would consist of references made in two
Secretary's easy
quoted circular Senate Foreign RelationsnCcmmitteehj/,UT. nextMonday. He inquired whether our note would not make some
reference with.respect to attitude Burmese Government should
take in event East Germany endeavors register with it notification
that it had adhered to treaty..I replied we had no instructions
t to that effect but that it seemed to me that it would be very
awkward for the US to take any position-raising a question as
to whether East Germany could adhere as we'had from the outset OS'
REPRODUCTION FROM THIS COPY IS
CONFIDENTIAL PROHIBITED UNLESS "UNCLASSIFIED"
Approved For Release 2004/03/11 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000100280034-6
Approved For Release 2004/03/11 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000100280034-6
CONFIDED" .'IA?,
st 92 6 P.M., From Rangoon (SECTION TWO OF TWO)
~:..., d would not consider their policy re non=recogn i . ^.
E st Germany affected in any way by adherence of latter to
? a ty , e -van though Burma also adhered. He agreed with latter
;upp:_-=d that perhaps would do if our note' limited to
Xese itat on US views this subject. He asked to see what. we
; Ei d Burmese. .1 agreed to send him copy of our note.
I dcr, ? t know whether she was really unhappy about our position
or ..y making the maximum effort. We understand British note
will P:~,, along . lines we contemplate and makes-no reference to
issued raised paragraph (4) German note.
.3se rdvilaee
S CHNEE
`EMC / 4
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/03/11 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000100280034-6