BLOODY ROAD TO POWER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 24, 2003
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 7, 1963
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0.pdf1.97 MB
Body: 
A6944 Approved FOOMMOS MAR MB"BDI? 00200170004-CVQVember 7 ua purpose if they can make it do so. If President: "Oh, you can't do that. The we ignore or take lightly the political conse- time. Agriculture Secretary Orville Freeman university has no control over the colleges. is said to have discovered through unofficial quences of trade with C i ommun st Russia, U l S nc e am will be Uncle Sucker again. it has h d appene so many, many times. Does o l d re p e have ug into public thinking It have to happen again?-Drovers Journal Official: "Never mind, air. I ve decided to oIl th Is. too. and they have discovered that. f Chicago) President: "Good. But hold off until they the surplus, (2) to get Some Red money, and Art Hoppe in England All of these are good capitalistic motives co L Lninx uxrord and Cambridge are safe. ? * ? But they do overlook all political They have that enduring quality of all Brit- EXTENSION OF REMARKS lab Institutions. Which endure, if you ask consequences of trade with the Communists, or me, because nobody can understand them and that is dangerous at best, disastrous well enough to abolish them. Including the at worst. HON. J. ARTHUR YOUNGER British. There is at l t f eas one armer we know who hasn't overlooked the political repercussions stemming from wheat sales to the Soviets. Such repercussions occurred amazingly right on his farm on Tuesday, October 1, 1963. That was the day that bread rationing was begun In Moscow. It was the day that Khru- shchev made a speech, and it was the day our farmer acquaintance decided to sell his soy- beans (not wheat), How all these things got linked together in a way that made our friend fighting mad is something every Amer- ican farmer should think about. First of all, the farmer called his local elevator and asked what it was paying for beans. The answer was $2.48 a bushel. The farmer said, "I'll be right in with a load, and pay my bill, too." In Moscow, U.S.S.R., about that time, Pre- mier Khrushchev told his people: "If we use bread economically, the resources we have will be sufficient for the normal supply of the population." This word, passed along like lightning to American grain traders, meant to them that U.S. wheat might not be needed at all. It scared them so much, in fact, that those contacted by our friend's country elevator withdrew all their bids on soybeans. By the time our friend got to his elevator, asked for instructions to dump, his elevator wasn't buying any beans at any price. Not one bushel could he sell them. From the time he left his farm to the time he got to town, his market had evaporated. "Why?" he demanded. "Khrushchev says he doesn't want our wheat," was the reply. And so, logically or Illogically, depending on how you view it, the supersenaitive soy- bean market momentarily went all to pieces. Our friend trucked his beans home, where he waited for the market to recover. He still wants to sell beans but is not one bit inclined to sell wheat to the Communists. "It's not that simple," he says. "If we sell them wheat in a regular manner, it would be all right. But every time we do something with those Communists, they make monkeys out of us. They made a monkey out of me on Tuesday. They're making monkeys out of our Government people right now. And the next thing you know, we won't be giving them permission to buy our grain. No, air. we will be begging them to buy it. And then they will make it look as if they did us a big favor if they take it. "Khrushchev planned the whole thing. He knew after four crop failures, he couldn't stand a fifth without buying free world grain. He did us the favor of signing a test ban treaty to soften us up. He dangled a wheat dollar In front of us and bo ht what d l . or CALSFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mr. YOUNGER. Mr. Speaker, one of our favorite columnists does get around the world and makes noteworthy obser- vations wherever he may be. I believe the readers of the RECORD will find his comments during a recent visit to England of interest and quite amusing : WILL OxrOaD LASE ITS FACULTIES? (By Arthur Hoppe) OXFORD, ENGLAND.-The Labor Party, which is favored to win next year's elections, Is vaguely thinking about abolishing Oxford and Cambridge as the peculiarly British institutions they are and making them into "more normal universities." Like "Oxford Normal" and "Cambridge Normal," I sup- pose- So naturally I hustled up here to see what was going to be abolished. And after a day's tour my sympathies lie with the Labor Party. Or at least with the Labor Party official who might have to come up here to abolish the place. I can see him now, a plain-talking Yorkshireman probably, as he marches Into the offices, say, of the president of Magdalen College. Official: "Nice college you've got here, sir. Bit of a shame to see old Magdalen go." President: "We pronounce It 'Mawdlin,' old boy. And the demies will be sorry to bear of your plans. We've got about 50 now, you know. All topnotch scholars." Official: "All studying bard in their class- rooms now that the Michaelmas term has started. eh?" President: "'Mikklemusa ' And we don't have classrooms. None of the colleges do, In- cluding All Souls. Which doesn't have any students either." Official: "Odd bit, that. Well, if you'll kindly call the presidents of the colleges together-" President: "You mean the 21 old colleges, probably; sorry, but only 4 have presidents. Two are run by masters, two by rectors, three by provosts, four by principals, one by a dean and five by wardens, Including Wadham (pro- nounced 'Waddum') which to run by the wahden of Waddum. Of course that does not include the three new foundations, five permanent private halls, five societies of women students and Nuffield College, which' was only founded in 1937 so we haven't fig- ured out yet what it is precisely." he needed first in Canada. Next, like a Offietal: "Now look here, sir; enough of smart buyer, he said he didn't want it any- that. We plan to abolish this here university way. Now, when he permits us to sell him and-" some wheat, well let him have It at a 20- President: "Oh, the university. You're in percent discount and pay for it like a new the wrong place, old boy. You'll want to car over 18 months. Khrushchev then will see the bedels" effectively have control of our farm markets, Official: "The beetles?" and grain dealers will dance at his command. -President: "Righto. The bedels of the Deal with the Communists? Not me," he Hebdomadal Council. I suppose you might said. say they run the university." What our friend was saying, in other Official: "Now we're getting somewhere. words, Is that Communists use economics ,Well hsre the beetles demolish the colleges as a political weapon. Every trade serves a and-" )From the San Francisco Chronicle, Oct. 29, 1963J WE AMEEICANs ARE UNQUESTIONABLE (By Arthur Hoppe) WILTON PARK, ENGLAND.-It's high time I got back to telling you what an international conference Is like. And you'd like It. It's a lovely life. We have breakfast at 8:30; read the news- papers; have tea; attend a 2-hour morning session; eat lunch; chat, stroll, or play ten- nis; have tea; attend a 2-hour afternoon session; eat dinner; attend a 2-hour evening session; and chat and drink until 11. It's not only pleasant, but stimulating. Because if you've never attended an international conference before, you've got a lot to learn. Like how to ask questions. Nothing's more important. You see, they send these truly brilliant experts down from London for each session-ministers, scien- tists, economists, and the like. The expert opens the session with an hour-long extem- poraneous address. And then the warden of Wilton Park, Dr. H. Koeppler, who is kind of our den mother, invites us to ask the expert questions. And while our warden is not only a highly Intelligent but very kindly man, he dearly loves us to ask questions. Or else. Unfortunately, when his eye lights sternly on me, the only question I can think of put- ting to the expert might be phrased: "What, Lord Curmudgeon, In hell were you talking about?" This would be very bad form. It's not so much the question. It's the way I put it. The proper method is to begin by telling the expert what you think. Or, more accurately, what a lot of other people think. Like: "There is a considerable body of opinion in East Peoria, Sir Jocelyn, as confirmed by 16 Gallup polls, a WCTU survey, and the entrails of a love-sick sheep, that ? ? ?" And so forth. And If you go on for at least 10 min- utes, you can then ask him what the hell he was talking about. Because nobody will be listening. Including the expert. Who will use his turn at the microphone, anyway, to make a point he forgot to make in his speech. Such as the Increased egg produc- tion in western Oxfordshire. Of course, how you ask your 10-minute question depends on your nationality. If you are Spanish, you must Include a defense of Spain's economic development. The Por- tuguese are different. They must include a defense of Portugal's colonial policy. The Italians just get emotional and never, ever mention statistics. The French are pre- cisely the same except they're very belliger- ent about it. The Germans, on the other hand, must do nothing but cite figures in their 10-minute questions. Which invariably take 20 minutes to ask, due to the length of German verbs and the requirement that any public statement in German must be sop- orific. As for the British, they don't care what they say as long as they phrase it properly. That leaves us Americans. Well, we just kind of bumble along, asking brief questions out of naive curiosity and usually uninten- Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0 X16956 Approved C6 4 e W (' QRXtRD 000200170004TPvember 7 of yellow tinge. In my office. I heard about others who had the same symptoms. I called ,the county health department. We've got an epidemic of yellow jaundice on our hands. I told them, AID the local doctors had been phoning to tell them the same thing. So they called idle State health officials, who, I gather, caIIed you" She drew out a map she had made of the town. At the site of each house where there was a patient sick with hepatitis she had made a cross with a red pencil. To Dr. Mosely, this was a first clue. On the eastern side of town, the crosses were thick; there were only scattered crosses else- where. This meant the disease was cen- tered in one part of town. It was unlikely, he felt, that the source of the epidemic was something the whole town was eating or drinking. Two weeks later, Dr. Mosely studied a larger, more complex version of the map the school nurse had given him. The red crosses at the site of each hepatitis case had been changed to black pins, and there were 129 of them stuck in the map-mostly still on the east side of town. But there were some pins scattered In the west and even outside of town. - During the preceding 2 weeks. Dr. Mosely had been to see everyone In town who was in any way associated with the epidemic- doctors, patients, nurses, the superintendent of schools. He bad gathered all the informa- tion he needed. "The fact that there have been no new cases reported for 3 whole days settles one thing in my mind," Dr. Mosely reported. "The sick people got hepatitis from a com- mon source-from one thing or place- probably not from each other." When an epidemic of hepatitis is spread from person to person, through close contact, the epi- demic lasts about 6 months. That's because the disease has an incubation period of about a month. In other words It takes a month for a person to get sick after he's been ex- posed. So the disease is spread out over a longer period than when everyone Is exposed to the germs simultaneously. In addition to the time factor, there were other clues. There was the age factor: the disease bad chosen as its victims mostly high-school youngsters and young adults. When germs are spread from person to per- son, most of the victims are young children who catch things easily. And there was also the geographic factor: the people who were sick outside of town were all children who came there to school and grownups who came to work. But most cases were actually in tpwn and on the east side, as the nurse's map told the doctor his first day on the job. All clues, therefore, pointed to the epi- demic coming from one source. To find that source, however, was a complicated problem. The water supply had been considered at first. But the town had only one large reser- voir for drinking water. When it was tested, it showed no trace of contamination. What's more, if the reservoir water had caused the epidemic, it would have been more scattered. As for food, there had been no common place where all the sick people had eaten. Most people ate at home, not in restaurants. Milk and canned foods were also investigated. But the sick people drank milk from all three dairies in town, not just one. And they had eaten no one canned or bottled food. The source of the epidemic, Dr. Mosely concluded, had to be a common gathering, such as the district wrestling meet which attracted the right age group, or the monthly basketball games. But not enough sick peo- ple had attended any of these functions. It suddenly occurred to Dr. Mosely that the sick people were at the age for going to the movies-and there was just one movie house in town. At this point, things began to move fast. Dr. Mosely called the sanitary engineer who was responsible for the local water sys- tem. The engineer and his assistant accom- panied the doctor to the theater. When Dr. Mosely sighted a water fountain, he asked the manager where the plumbing for It was. If there was a crass connection, a place where the fresh water and sewage pipes crossed, they might really be on their way to finding whatdunit. There was. Back In the office, Dr. Mosely asked the district engineer for an approved map of the sanitary and water supply systems. He studied It a few minutes, then let out a low whistle. He had considered the water supply as a possible epidemic source at the very begin- ning, but dropped the idea when he learned the whole town drank from one reservoir and most of the sickness was on one side of town. Now he saw that in the hills above the town were two springs he had never heard of. and from these springs ran a fresh water supply pipe no one had told him about-right Into the east side of town where the epidemic centered and where the movie theater was. Up above and parallel to the town was a pretty little stream near an underground spring which fed the pipeline to town. The municipal water system was privately owned and the previous summer the owner had gotten complaints from his customers on the other side of the hill that they didn't have enough water pressure In their faucets. So he simply ran a pipe from the little stream Into the main pipeline. If a surface stream is used for water supply, it should be chlorinated. But no one had been up to check on the spring for 5 years; it was no wonder that the spring house, which should have been watertight, was broken down and leaking. What's more, the man who owned the water system also owned a summer cabin right below another spring which was sup- posed to be cut off and opened only in emergencies such as fire. But he needed more water for his cabin. So he had opened the cutoff. The water from this spring, then, was also running into the main pipeline. And up the dirt road were houses which emptied their septic or sewage tanks right across an open field Into the spring. In January a man who lived In one of those houses had come down sick with hepatitis. A girl who lived in another house had gotten It in Feb- ruary. So their sickness had spread through the spring, through the wrongly opened cut- off, to the whole eastern side of town. An a result of this revelation, the pipeline was overhauled and brought up to proper health standards, and the source of the dis- ease eliminated. These are many other dramatic instances of the quick work done by the Center's dis- ease detectives. A team from the Communicable Disease Center and Baylor University, for example, rushed off to British Guiana shortly before Christmas last year to fight a polio epi- demic. By setting up mass immunization clinics and assisting in essential vaccine ad- ministration, the group scored a double suc- cess. Not only did they stamp out the epidemic, but they also did much to counter anti-American propaganda In British Guiana. And a year ago last summer. CDC's in- vestigators went to. St. Petersburg, Fla., to aid the local and State health authorities In controlling an epidemic of encephalitis in the Tampa Bay area. Scientists suspected a mosquito known as Culex nigripalpus, which was common in this area. After ex- haustive tests, It was found that this mos- quito was indeed carrying the virus of St. Louis encephalitis. This made possible a mosquito control program, specifically di- rocted toward the control of this particular species and eradication of the disease. Again, a mysterious ailment struck down 43 young school children in a small southern town. Psittacosis was suspected because the children's classrooms each contained a pair of parakeets. But the blood samples which were taken during the investigation by a team of Communicable Disease Center in- vestigators, proved the disease to be histo- plasmosis, a lung fungus disease which re- semble tuberculosis, and which is transmit- ted by pores which form in dust. Here, too, tracking down the cause of disease was the essential first step to its treatment and cure. The Communicable Disease Center is an arm of the Public Health Service, which is a vast enterprise geared to keep disease from happening and from spreading if it does appear. Its workers strive to keep as many people as possible in as good health as pos- sible, for as long as possible. Through such agencies as the Communica- ble Disease Center, and its fast-moving, fast- thinking detectives, the Public Health Service Is able to offer services that individ- ual doctors cannot. Contagious diseases can spread like brush fires unless there are skilled people on guard to find them, then stamp them out. Your medical FBI is your fam- ily's partner in a vast health enterprise whose mission Is simply stated-to advance The Lady Is for Burning: The Ski,en Deadly Sins of Madam Nhu EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. KATHARINE ST. GEORGE or NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mrs. ST. GEORGE. Mr. Speaker, the following article, appearing In the last issue of the National Review, is written by our former colleague, Clare Boothe Luce. . The article on Madam Nhu is one of the most interesting pieces on the lady to appear in our press. Mrs. Luce has done considerable research into the ques- tions she discusses. She has courage enough to state her views and she has Intelligence enough to back them up with reason and logic. She also unveils some of our own hypocrisy and the bet- ter-than-thou attitude of some in high places: THE LADY Is FOR BURNING: THE SEVEN DEADLY SnV8 or MADAM NHU (By Clare Boothe Luce) Madam Ngo Dinh Nhu, the First Lady of Vietnam, who recently left our shores, is beautiful, dynamic, courageous, intelligent. And even her worst enemies do not doubt her piety or virtue. A militant Catholic, mother of four, she is a devoted and fiercely loyal (if not subservient) wife. But what makes Madam Nhu important Is the great political power she wields in her country. For a moment, however brief, In history, some part of America's prestige if not-secu- rity, seems to lie In the pale pink palm of her exquisite little hand.- South Vietnam, although an underpopu- lated country (14 million), is the latest spot in America's 17-year-old struggle to contain communism. The United States is spending better than a million dollars a day there to help the Vietnamese fight a guerrilla war. Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0 A6958 Approve CtMi~ 41BA'9%Ii MR00020017000Z?vemTier booted out? For there can be little doubt that the big boot will have to be used, since MM-dam Nhu, among other things, is a fight- lug lady. Not long ago Madam Nhu said that Amer- icans are "Ivanhoes" who are perpetually In love with the underdog, but confused about who the underdog really is. She thinks the underdogs that the U.S. press corps In Viet- nam and the State Department are sobbing over are the Vietcong Communist provoca- teurs who have inflamed some Buddhist opinion. Madam Nhu believes she herself is the real underdog in the situation. Cer- tainly the china doll-sized stateswoman from South Vietnam has been taking enough punishment from the American press to smash her Into a tiny heap of porcelain scraps. Fortunately for her, and possibly for her country, Madam Nhu is not a china doll. Backhanded by the State Department, bullied and scratched at by reporters, lec- tured at by her own lecture audiences. Madam Nhu travels along singing her song. Chin up, eyes flashing, long delicate hands gesticulating gracefully and forcefully, she is still pretty solid on her 3-inch heels. The charge that Madam Nhu, her hus- band, her brothers-in-law President Ngo Dinh Diem and Archbishop Ngo Dinh Thuc. have "persecuted" South Vietnamese Bud- dhists Is certainly the toughest charge she has bad to meet. But meet it she did. And meet it she must, for her fellow Catholic President Kennedy does not Intend to face into the 1864 election campaign defending himself against accusations from the liberal left that he has supported a government just because it is Catholic. He can better afford to lose Vietnam than to have that calumny tied to him. THE CHARGE of FEV0CUTIuNN The fact L that the charge of religious persecution against the family is pretty 'recent. And i Indeed they are persecuting BuddFste this will mark the first time in democratic history that a small religious minority has successfully persecuted an over- whelming religious majority in a democracy. South V4ie-team Catholics number 1.5 million of the 14 million population. There are approximately 5.25 million Buddhists and the remainder of the population Is made up of Taoists, Confucianists, and members of other sects. Leas than one-third of the Cabinet members are Catholics; only 3 of the 19 generals, But Catholics are about half of the civil service and the Assembly. The season for this, given and accepted until a few months ago by Iii foreign observers in Vietnam, is that the Catholics under the French built an extensive parochial school system. over the years this system has turned out relatively well-educated graduates with a lively interest in Western democratic government. The Buddhists have not been able to compete with these educated Catholic Vietnamese In civil service examinations. Until last May, there was no evidence of great discontent with the Diem government by the Buddhist population. On the con- trary, thanks to the annual 8350 million economic and military aid, and with the help of 14,000 U.S. military "advisers," vic- tory, last spring, seemed near for the Diem government, and the people seemed to know it. . Then, in the space of 5 months the flaming ' deaths of six Buddhist bonzes. or priests, led to a aeries of public demonstra- tions which brought about the present polit- ical crisis in "which Madam Nhu herself Is also being badly burned. fOSCED TO "LOSE FACE" _ now did these deaths come about? Were the Buddhist priests dragged by force from their homes or temples by Catholics and put to the torch-as In the not so distant past in America. Negroes were torn from their home, or jails, and lynched or burned-by white Americans? Were the bonzes butch- Bred as were thousands of Mao Tse-tung's recalcitrant Chinese farmers? Were they tortured, beaten, brainwashed, shot, liqui- dated as millions of Russians, Poles. Hun- garians were by Stalin and Khrushchev? They were not. The saffron-robed monks were living unmolested by anyone in their own pagodas, when one by one they stole forth Into public squares, where they squatted In lotus pose. poured gasoline over themselves, applied the match. and com- mitted suicide. In America, If a Catholic priest were to burn himself to death In protest to the Gov- ernment's failure to provide free bus rides for parochial schoolchildren, or if a Prot- estant minister were to make of himself a living torch to express his opposition to the Supreme Court decision against prayer in public schools, we would consider them religious maniacs. And our Government would take stringent measures to prevent any repttion of such acts. This is precisely the view Madam Nhu has taken of the self- immolating bonzes. They are slaves, she said, "it not to others, at least to their own folly." And the government of President Diem has used the police force to prevent further emulations of such follies. What, then, was the particular gtlevance which led these Buddhists to encompass: their own cre- mation? Last May, the Buddhists of Hue were for- bidden to unfurl their flags. In honor of Buddha's 2507th birthday, above the flag of Vietnam. As in America. no flag in Vietnam may fly above the national flag. (In this land of many religions. separation of church and state Is. of necessity, the law of the nation.) Refusal by Diem's government to permit the Buddhists to fly their flag above the national flag caused the leaders of the Bud pagoda to lose face. In America. self-immolation is not thought to be a useful or particularly democratic way to protest grievances or discrimination. However, an Insult which might barely cause one American to punch another, could, say In Japan. lead to bars-kirl. A Japanese who loses face disembowels himself with a ritual sword. ofted aided by a friend or a relative. In India, for hundreds of years. widows threw themselves onto the funeral pyres of their husbands; if they did not, they lost face. Although suttee has been out- lawed for a century In India, In backward villages it is still occasionally practiced. HUMANA ATTUNED The Buddhist monks in Vietnam who in- cinerated themselves not only regained "face" f.:z the temple, but Nirvana or Para- dise and sainthood for themselves. For at .at three of the monks who were over age 70, this must have seemed a rather good deal. (Probably no American c"n understand the Asiatic concept of "face." This is per- haps forunate. In view of how much "face" the United States has lost in the Orient, we would have to burn Washington to recover it.) In our country. protestors sign petitions, picket, hire halls or rabblerouse. Recently our Negroes (a minority) have taken to sit-ins, sit-downs, mass denwnstratlons, handcuffing themselves together, until the police break them up. While we are on the subject of discrimina- tton, it may help us to think a little more charitably about President Diem's and Mad- am Nhu's alleged persecution of the Bud- dhista, if we remember that despite 4 years of mass Negro demonstrations in America, the President still has not found it con- venient to appoint a Negro to his Cabinet, to help elect a Negro Senator, or Governor, .or even a big city mayor. And yet Negroes represent 20 percent of our population, and time and again their vote decides presiden- tial elections. in America. It depends on wthat you can get away with. But not so in Vietnam. Not, anyway, on our money. In Vietnam you have to be perfect. Consequent to the Buddhist sacrifice s, there have been. since May, a half-don n demonstrations of Buddhists in the streets. In the attempt to keep order, the Vietnam police have encountered the same difficulties our police have encountered with unruly crowds of demonstrators in Alabama, Chi- cago. New York's Harlem, New Jersey. And In Vietnam as in America. some people got hurt. A bomb thrown by an unknown provocateur killed several people in Vietnam. U.S. Embassy officers expressed themselves as being "shocked and disgusted" at this occur- rence and at the police suppression of the Buddhist demonstrators. The State Department no doubt failed to inform our Embassy In Saigon that similar episodes were happening in Alabama, where four children were killed in a church bomb- tag, and In the wake, two boys were killed by police. Nor did they send out over the Voice of America to Vietnam a very clear account of riots and police methods used to quell Negro-white rioters In other parts of the country. And speaking of corruption in Vietnam, what about the Casa Nostra operation in America? An, well, In America, democracy isn't perfect. But in Vietnam It had better be-on our money. The last charge against Mme. Nhu and the Diem government is that their failure to be an Ideal democracy which their American critics carry about In their heads-will now make it Impossible to win the war against the Vietcong Communists. Is this true, or Is it false? Viata,atn has been at war for almost a decade. The South Vietnam population is suffering 5,000 casual- ties a year. Women and men, many of them Buddhists, have gone forth day after day, year after year, to meet and repulse their Communist enemies. A few months ago victory was In eight. If the United States gives firm support to Diem now, the crisis will pass and the war may still be won. If the .U.S. support Is withdrawn on the grounds that the United States can no longer sup- port the Diem government because 6 men- or 16-insist on making human torches of themselves, then South Vietnam will fall and the political vacuum left by the Ngo Dinh family will soon be filled by the "Yu- No-Hu" family: the Chinese Communists. is the history of the liberal press in :,hung- king and Havana going to repeat Itself? The evidence is that It Is. The Christian Science Monitor wrote last week: "The confusion (in American public opinion) stems from the fact that the United States does not wish to say, in so many words, that it Is working for a revolution in South Vietnam. But so long as the Ngo Dinh family remains unbending, that Is the fact" if Indeed, that is the fact, the adminis- tration will no doubt begin to boast along .about 1965 that It has- relieved tensions in Vietnam by negotiating peace with Ho Chi- minh, the Communist leader of that coun- try. And no doubt wheat and arms will then soon be sent to him, to strengthen "the Vietnamese Tito" against Red China. Poor Madam Nhu. The lady is sure for burning. Some Call It Murder Ed TENSION OF REMARKS or HON. ROBERT H. MICHEL or ILLINOIS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mr. MICHEL. Mr. Speaker, Tom Pugh, the Peoria-Journal Star's man In Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0 -1963 Approved For R pg G1Zf%X"f AL 1t 5B0A3U NEM0170004-0 ,4 .Whereas there are. others to follow with the details on how contracts are let and how payments for research are made, let us briefly consider, the subject in broad terms. Ours is a capitalistic society, and we feel very strongly that the capitalistic system is -responsible for our unquestioned strength. ? The profit motive must continue to operate, as it has so well in the past, to provide the incentive and the reward to those whose genius and labor contribute to the common good. We are spending more and more money for research every day, but the rules are chang- ing. The systems that are used to contract for research, or to repay research costs on independently produced items, are constantly being modified to meet new conditions, to improve them and to make them more re- sponsive to the needs and demands of the situation. The whole fabric of our society, the most successful yet devised by man we believe, is woven, of the warp of individual and col- lective integrity and the woof of conflicting interests justly compromised-of checks, and balances, and safeguards. .:Whereas the Communist theory is, "from each according to his abilities, to each ac- cording to his needs," we question who is to decide those abilities and those needs. We know that man is imperfect-he is im- provable, and capable of great sacrifice and achievement-but he should never be al- lowed too much uncontrolled power. As the old Romans put it "quis custodiet ipso cus- todies"-"whoshall guard the guards?" In the realm of payment for research for military applications, a similar system of justly compromised conflicts of interest-of checks and balances and" safeguards-needs also to apply. This system is still being per- fected. It is a complicated problem, and every legitimate interest must be justly served. I believe our present strength is ample evidence of past success. I have some" per- sonal knowledge of this since not too long ago I served in the Navy Bureau of Aeronau- tics as Assistant Chief for Research and De- .velopment. As fleet commander of the 7th Fleet re- cently, I was a consumer of our own prod- Ucts, and so my evaluation of necessity had some degree of objectivity. Now I am back on the producer side of the house, and as part of my catching up with ?what has gone on while I was happily em- ployed as an operator, I have .been re- freshing myself on developments in the field of -procurement. Inso' doing I. came across two qualifications which I thought might add substance to my rather general remarks on this subject. The Armed Services Procurement Regula- tion issued by the Department of'Defense, in" the revision issued on August 15 this year, has this to say about profits: "* * s low average profit rates on defense contracts overall are detrimental to the public in- terest. Effective national defense in a free enterprise economy requires that the best * * * 'capabilities be attracted to defense contracts." `Another portion of the regulation sets forth the` following' specific policy for re- search and development: "A 'fundamental mission of research and developmeni programs is to maintain scienti- fic and technolooeal supe'rio'rity requisite to promote and advance' the effectiveness of military operations. The accomplishment of this mission requires the broadest possible 'base pf contractor and subcontractor sources including the optimum use of manpower and 'reeoflrces. ` It is essential that the best tech- nical competence be located and fully uti- lized, The departments shall continually :search:' for 'and develop information '6n ig small business concerns) sources (includn competent to perform research` and develop- Of course these aren't the only considera- tions. The interest of the Government must be protected-that is profits should not be too high. And the interest of the consumer must be protected-that is performance must be assured. But within those obvious limita- tions, our free and competitive society must be served. As the Chief of Naval Material, I am vitally concerned with supporting the com- mendable philosophy embodied in those two quotations. It is certainly an honor and a pleasure to be with you here today. I wish you the greatest success in your What Does Vietnam Coup,Mean? EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. STEVEN B. DEROUNIAN OF NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday, November 6, 1963 Mr. DEROUNIAN. Mr. Speaker, there is great concern in the United States over the coup in Vietnam, which had the approval of President Kennedy. In yesterday's Washington Evening Star, William S. White gives us his anal- ysis of the seriousness of the situation, WILL THE Coup AID WAR ON REDS? (By William S. White) A long night of worry for the, future in South Vietnam has settled in for high Amer- ican. policymakers. .If any jubilation was initially felt here among junior officials at the destruction of the government of Ngo Dinh Diem-with which Washington had long been having trouble-nothing of that sort is anywhere discernible now. Instead, there is a morning-after mood. In part, this is produced by genuine regret at the assassination of a man our people would, in fact, have liked to see remain in power if only he would have 'got rid of his erratic brother, Ngo Dinh Nhu.. Ironically, American Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge had prepared a cable reporting that Mr. Diem seemed to be moving a bit more our way on the.very day the insurrection was mounted. In larger part, however, the air of concern is caused by these new fears: 1. That "super patriots" attached to the revolution of the 20 generals which deposed Mr. Diem may go on killing and thus further stain the new regime and raise: questions of its capacity to govern in decency. 2. That one or two among the generals might conceivably not be so reliably anti- Communist .as the great majority is, and so begin what above all else is to ,be feared. This is some under-the-cover negotiation with the Communist invaders of South Viet- nam so long fought off by the Diem govern- ment backed by 15,000 American troops. 3. That the new provisional, government of the generals, with. Nguyen Ngoc Tho as pro- visional President, might become politically ambitious rather than solely concerned with the war against the Communists. - TWO u.S HOPES -- - - Mixed with all this are two; strong An eri- can hopes. One is that there may now" be an end to the exploitation of religious differ- ences iii Vfetnam-no more talk of-"who is A6967 who' was, to blame for it-was endangering the war. In this connection, some comfort Is taken officially here in the fact that all three of the top Catholic generals joined in the uprising. The second American hope Is that the new regime wil be in no hurry to orderpopular elections. Washington is not'?interested in seeing a political campaign, with all its in- built divisiveness to a country at war, sweep over Vietnam. The United States would be quite content to see the new outfit maintaiii its provisional character-with power diffused among the generals. For Mr. Diem's fate established the inherent danger of having all power concentrated in one or two pairs of Nhu. WILL WAR EFFORT BE AIDED? `- ' But all this is mere prelude to the crucial question: Will the war against the'Commu- nists now be promoted or retarded? If it is promoted all, of course, will be well. If it becomes bogged down by disunity in Saigon, twin disaster will lie ahead. Any failure of the American military, effort there would not only lay all southeast, Asia open to creeping Communist aggression. It also would bankrupt a wise American strategy to halt such aggressions by limited commit- ments of our, -own forces, cooperating with full commitments of local forces. The alter- natives to this policy would be to submit to local aggressions or to face major war on the Korean scale-Or -beyond. .Moreover, a collapse in South Vietnam could quite simply, destroy the Kennedy administration. Careful and persistent in- quiries have convinced me, for one, that the United States neither ordered nor directly participated in the bloody Ouster of Mr. Diem. But nothing can alter the fact that Washington long had been deliberately shak- Ing his regime-not to smash it, but in the hope of thus forcing him to make accommo- dations with his Buddhist-led opposition to permit the war to go full tilt. Since America has helped, if indirectly, to push him down, the administration's responsibility will be frightful If the new. regime ever abandons the war on communism. J.F.K. on Price: Fixing EXTENSION OF OF HON. JOHN D. DINGELL OF MICHIGAN IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mr. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, pur- suant to permission granted, I insert into the Appendix of the CONGRESSIONAL REc- oee an editorial appearing in the Wash- ington (D.C.) Post of Tuesday, November 5, 1963, entitled. "J.F.K. on Price Fix- ing," in which President. Kennedy rather clearly pointed out the. probability of a Presidential veto for this most destruc- tive legislation. In view of the. President's comments it would ,appear well for the Congress to devote itself to :more fruitful and useful legislation . which will not wind up . a wreck on the rocks of a Presidential veto. The article follows: a Catholic and who is a Buddhist. Mr. Diem, J F K. ON PRICE FIXING himself a Christian, was endlessly accused he proponents of the so-called,. "duality of unduly repressive action agains't' the Stabilisation Act," bill Whicu' would dim- Suddl is#s. It.wat this charge that brought finish competition in retail trade through him down. ? Most of the generals of his staff- the Federal , enforcement of resale-price Christian as well as Buddhist-Became :con- agreements between. n?anufactp ers slid re- viriced that religious turmoil-no matter taiiers, derived little comfort from the e- Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0 A6968 Approv REST MlQ3,I pORIZ)IA-3QFICIRRM3R00020017O 4*mber 7 marks made by President Kennedy at his last press conference. When asked about his position on the bill which is opposed by all departments of the executive branch, the President replied: "I've never been for the quality stabiliza- tion bill. I have to look at the bill when It finally comes in the form it's In. I quite obviously can't comment on legislation be- fore it finally comes to the desk of the White House, but the administration witnesses have spoken my view." The President's reluctance to comment in greater detail was doubtless prompted by the fact that a number of leading members of his own party have been so foolhardy as to sponsor legislation which would infringe upon the right of the retailer to set prices at competitive levels. The bill would saddle the American consumers with an enormous burden. With a backlog of unfinished business that runs the gamut from the budget for the cur- rent fiscal year to tax reduction and civil rights legislation, Congress should not waste precious time on a bill which so clearly vio- lates the spirit of free enterprise and stands so small a chance of Presidential approval. Time will be saved and embarrassment avoid- ed if the Quality Stabilization Act is allowed to die stillborn. National Day of Fast and Prayer To Protest Soviet Anti-Semitism EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. LEONARD FARBSTEIN 07 NZW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mr. FARBSTEIN. Mr. Speaker, Rabbi Dr. Julius G. Neumann, chairman of the board of governors of the National In- formation Bureau of Jewish Life, Inc., of which I am honorary president, has Just concluded a one-man 3-day fast to dramatize to America the oppression, persecution, and tyranny of the Soviet Union toward Russia's 3 million Jews. An extension of Rabbi Neumann's pro- test is planned for Monday, November 25, when a national day of fast and prayer will be observed to protest Soviet anti-Semitism. Having made numerous and serious ef- forts to bring this situation to the atten- tion of the administration, and the American people, I am pleased to insert in the RECORD the statement made by Rabbi Neumann at the conclusion of his dramatic protest: NATIONAL DAY or PAST AND PRAYER To PaoT7sr 8ovnr ANrx-SzMrrlsM As pledged and in all accord with rab- binical teachings, I have concluded an in- dividual 3-day fast. I abstained from food and drink on Monday, October 28; Thursday, October 31 and Monday, November 4 as a pro- test against Soviet anti-Semitism and to dramatize to all Americans the tragic plight of Russian Jewry. For Americans of all faiths to know-that persons are being condemned to death and executed for minor economic offenses, charged with committing criminal acts if they sell matzohs, that kosher meat Is not available, that Yiddish books may not be printed, and that Jewish dead may not be buried in a Jewish cemetery; to learn-that In the Soviet Union synagogues are closed. prayer books and religious articles are un- available; Jewish instruction banned; Yid- dish theaters, books and culture prohibited; Jewish lay organizations barred; families separated and reunion thwarted; equal rights for Russian Jews openly denied, all this midst a violent anti-Jewish press campaign- to do nothing about this spiritual genocide is just as sinful as abetting such atrocities. At times, the Soviet Government has been shown to be cognizant of world public opinion. If the crescendo of International protest mounts, there to hope that some amelioration of the oppressive treatment and tyranny meted out to Russian Jews may be obtained. Therefore, after consultation with many religious and lay leaders of all faiths. I urge the last Monday in November to be net aside as a "National Day of Fast and Prayer" to protest vigorously the persecution of the Jewish minority by the Soviet Union. My congregation Zichron Moshe will join me in a 1-day 24-hour fast beginning at sundown, Sunday, November 24, and con- tinuing until sunset, Monday. November 25. On Sunday evening, a special prayer service will be held in the synagogue at 8 p.m. on behalf of the 3 million Russian Jews. Furthermore, the National Information Bureau for Jewish Life. Inc., of which I am chairman of the board of governors, has con- tacted 77 community leaders In various cities in our 50 States of the Union who we expect to participate in joining this 1-day fast for November 25 and arrange for special prayer services on the preceding Sunday evening in houses of worship of all faiths in their re- spective cities. The bureau in New York City and the surrounding metropolitan area are reaching more than 1.250 institutions of spiritual guidance to cooperate In this public demonstration of solidarity against Soviet discrimination. I trust that my humble one-man, 3-day fast will be transformed into a thunderous 8 million, 1-day fast which will reverberate to the very rooms of the Kremlin. Let 3 million Americans stand up and be counted as each a brother of 3 million Russian Jews. Will We Ever Wise Up? EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. GLENARD P. LIPSCOMB 07 CALIFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday, November 6, 1963 Mr. LIPSCOMB. Mr. Speaker, under leave to extend my remarks, I submit for inclusion in the RECORD an editorial en- titled "Will We Ever Wise Up?" from the Lusk (Wyo.) Herald. The editorial contains pertinent com- ment on the proposed sale of wheat to the U.S.S.R. which I believe will be of interest to Members of the House. WILL WE EVER WIsx Us'? We Americans just don't seem to be adept at playing the cold war game. Somehow the makeup of Americans is such that we can't deal with the Russians. Our usual error is that we think the Communists of Russia are honorable. Time and again this thinking has been proven erroneous, but we keep trying. Just take a look at the re- cent happenings. On the afternoon of October 9 President Kennedy said he would sell 4 million tons of wheat to the Soviets. The following morn- ing, as a display of gratitude, the Soviets prevented a convey of U.S. troops from using the autobahn to Berlin, despite the fact that America had in a treaty with Russia the right to use the autobahn. While the Soviets held up the American troops President Kennedy was entertaining Gromyko, Russia's Foreign Minister, in the White House. Then too, the wheat deal doesn't smell ex- actly good. In answer to our inquiry Sen- ator MILWABD SIMPSON reports the We of wheat to Russia Is in essence about a 50-50 credit cash deal. In other words Russia is going to, if the deal goes through, pay about half of the world market price (usually be- tween$1.75-81.80). American wheat farmers will get about $2.03 per bushel. Can you imagine charging anything to Russia when they already owe $11 billion to the United States? Doctors Opposed to Medicare but Take $2 Million in Public Funds EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. JOHN D. DINGELL OF MICHIGAN IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mr. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, pur- suant to permission granted I insert into the Appendix of the CONGRESSIONAL REC- ORD an article appearing in the Engine- men's Press on October 25, 1963 pointing out very well that West Virginia doctors, whose State and National medical asso- ciations are violently opposed to hos- pitalization for the aged under the social security program, are not in the least op- posed to socialized State and Federal funds, of which they collected more than $2 million last year for treating patients too poor to pay. One physician, I assume a stanch supporter of the AMA and its position, received $44,391 in socialized State and Federal funds for treatment of certain, West Virginians. Another doctor contrived to receive $40,596 worth of socialized State and Federal funds to confer, according to AMA, $49,596 worth of socialized medi- cine upon a number of other unfortunate West Virginians. It strikes me that there is brazen hypocrisy abroad in the land when the American Medical Association would engage In violent opposition to "social- ized medicine" and measures to respon- sibly meet the need of people of this country, and at the same time support other programs like Kerr-Mills, which is fully as socialized but which does not, according to recent findings of the Sen- ate Special Committee on Aging, do the job for the vast number of people 65 and over. The article follows: DOCTORS OPPOSED TO MEDICARE BUT TAKE $2 MILLION IN PUBLIC FUNDS CIiARI.EsroN, W. VA.-West Virginia doctors who with their counterparts In other States decry "socialized" medical care, collected more than $2 million in State and Federal funds last year for treating patients too poor to pay. One physician, the Charleston Gazette re- ported, received $44,391 in State payments- presumably in addition to the fees he re- ceived from noncharity patients. Another doctor managed to see enough charity pa- Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0 '1t 63 Approved For R Ra631MAL? M B5BOA OM0170004-0 A6967 Whereas there are others to follow with the details on ,how contracts are let and how payments for research are made, let us briefly .consider,the subject in broad terms. Ours is a capitalistic society, and we feel very strongly that the capitalistic system is responsible for our unquestioned strength. .The profit motive must continue to operate, .as it has so well in the past, to provide the incentive and the reward to those whose .genius and labor contribute to the common good. We are spending more and more money for research every day, but the rules are -chang- ing: The systems that are used to contract for research, or to repay research costs on independently produced items, are constantly -being modified to meet new conditions, to improve them and to make them more re- sponsive to the needs and demands of the situation. The whole fabric of our society, the most successful yet devised by man we believe, is woven of the warp of individual and col- lective integrity and the woof of conflicting interests justly compromised-of checks, and balances, and safeguards. Whereas the Communist theory is, "from ,each according to his abilities, to each ac- cording to his needs," we question who is to decide those abilities and those needs. We know that man is imperfect-he is im- provable, and capable of great sacrifice and achievement-but he should never be al- lowed too much uncontrolled power. As.the old Romans put it "quis custodiet ipso `cus- todies"-"who shall guard the guards?" In the realm of payment,for research for military applications, a similar system of justly compromised conflicts of interest-of checks and balances and safeguards-needs also to apply. This system is still being per- fected. It is a complicated problem, and every legitimate interest must be justly served. I believe our present strength is ample evidence of past success. I have some per- sonal knowledge of this since not too `long -ago I served in the Navy Bureau of Aeronau- ties as Assistant Chief for Research and De- "velopment. As fleet commander of the 7th Fleet re- cently, I was a consumer of our own prod- ucts,, and so my evaluation of necessityhad some degree of objectivity. Now I am back on the producer side of the house, and as part of my catching up with what has gone on while I was happily em- ployed as an operator, I have been re- freshing myself on developments in the field of procurement. In so doing I came across two qualifications which I thought' might add substance to my rather general remarks on this subject. The' Armed Services Procurement Regula- tion issued by the Department of Defense, in the revision issued on August 15 this year, has this to say about.proflts: "* * * low average profit rates on defense contracts overall are detrimental to the public- Effective national defense in a free enterprise economy requires that the "best *" * * capabilities be attracted to defense contracts." Another portion of the regulation sets forth the following specific policy for re- search and development; "A fundamental mission of research and development programs is to maintain scienti- hc and technological superiority requisite to promote :and advance the, effectiveness of military operations. The accomplishment of this mission requires the broadest possible base of contractor and?subcohtractor sources including the optimum use of manpower and resources. 'it is essential that the best te h- 'nical competence be" located and fully uti- lized. The departments shall continually 'search 3or and develop information' "on sources :(including small business concerns) competent to perform research and ?develop- meht.'* Of course these aren't the only considera- tions. The Interest of the Government?must be protected-that is profits should not be too high. And the, interest of the consumer must be protectedthat is performance must be assured. But within those obvious limita- tions, our free and competitive society must be served. As the Chief of Naval Material; I am vitally concerned with supporting the com- mendable philosophy embodied in those two quotations. It is certainly an honor and a pleasure to be with you here today. I wish you the greatest success in your endeavors here in the clinic. What Does ietn Coup Mean? EXTENS N OF REMARKS, HON. STEVEN B. DEROUNIAN OF NEW YORK. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday, November 6, 1963 Mr. DEROUNIAN. Mr. Speaker, there is great concern in the United States over the coup in Vietnam, which had the approval of President Kennedy. In yesterday's Washington Evening Star, William S. White gives us his anal- ysis of the seriousness of the. situation. WILL THE Coup AID WAR ON REDS? (By William S. White) A long night of worry for the future in South Vietnam has settled in for high Amer- ican policymakers. If any jubilation was initially felt. here among. junior officials at the destruction of the government of Ngo Dinh Diem-with which Washington had long been having trouble-nothing of that sort is. anywhere discernible now. . Instead, there is ,. a morning-after mood. In, part, this is.produced by genuine regret at the assassination of a man our people would, in .fact, have liked to see remain in power if only he would have got rid. of his erratic brother, Ngo Dinh Nhu. Ironically, American Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge had prepared a cable reporting that Mr. Diem seemed to be moving a bit more our way on the very day the insurrection was mounted. In larger part, however, the air of concern is caused. by these new fears: 1. That `.'super patriots" attached to the revolution of the 20 generals which deposed Mr. Diem may go on killing and thus further stain the new regime and raise questions .of its capacity to govern in decency. 2. That one or two among the generals might conceivably not be so reliably anti- Communist as the great majority is, and so begin what above all else is to be feared. This is some under-the-cover negotiation with the Communist Invaders of South Viet- nam so long fought off by the Diem govern- ment backed by 15,000. American troops. 3. That the new provisional government of the generals, with Nguyen Ngoc The as pro- visional President, might become politically ambitious rather than solely concerned with the war against the Communists. Two U.S. HOPES -" Mixed "with all this are' two strong Ameri- can hopes. One is that there may now bean end to the exploitation of religious differ- ences in' uietnam-no more talk of who Is a Catholic andwhp is.'aBuddhist.: 14r DiP,m, fF.I: ON PRICE FIXING himself'a Christian, was endlessly accused The proponents of the so-called "Quality of unduly repressive action against the Stabilization Act," 'a bill .which, would dim- Buddhists. It was this charge that brought finish competition in retail trade through him down " Most of the generals of his staff- the ?'ederal. enforcement. of resale-price Christian as. well as Buddhist---became con- agreements between, manufacturers ,and re- vinced that religious turmoil-no " matter tailers, 'derived little comfort from; tlie,~re- who'was to blame for it-was endangering the war. In this-connection, some comfort is taken officially' here in the fact that all three of the top Catholic generals joined in the uprising. ' . The second American hope is that the new regime wil be in no hurry to order popular elections. Washington is not interested in seeing a political campaign, with all its in- built divisiveness to a, country at war, sweep over Vietnam. The United,States would be quite content to see the new outfit maintain its provisional character=with power diffused among the generals. For Mr; Diem's fate established the Inherent danger of having all power concentrated in one or two pairs of hands as it was with Mr. Diem and Mr. Nhu. WILL WAR EFFORT BE AIDED? .But all this is mere prelude to the crucial question: 'Will the war against the Commu- nists now be promoted or retarded? If it is promoted all, of course, will be well. If it becomes bogged down by. disunity in Saigon, twin disaster will lie ahead. Any failure of,the.American military effort there would not only lay all southeast Asia open to creeping Communist `aggression. It also would bankrupt a wise American strategy to halt such aggressions by limited commit- ments of. our own forces cooperating with full commitments of local forces. The alter- natives to this policy would be to submit to local aggressions or to face major war on the Korean scale-or beyond. Moreover, a collapse in South Vietnam could quite simply, destroy the Kennedy administration. Careful and persistent in- quiries have convinced me, for one, that the United States neither ordered nor directly participated in the bloody ouster of Mr. Diem. But nothing can alter the fact that Washington long had been deliberately shak- ing his regime-not to smash it, but in the hope of thus forcing him to make accommo- dations with his Buddhist-led .opposition to permit the war to go full tilt.. Since America has helped, if indirectly, to push him down, the administration's responsibility will be frightful if the new regime ever abandons the IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mn DINGELL Mr; Speaker, pur- suant to permission granted, I insert into the Appendix of the'CoNGRESSIONAL REC- ORD an? editorial appearing in the Wash- Ington (D.C.) Post of Tuesday, November 5, 1963, entitled "J.F.K, on Price Fix- ing," In which President Kennedy rather clearly pointed out the, probability of a Presidential veto for this most destruc- tive legislation. ,In view of the President's comments it would, appear well for the Congress to .-dey4 a itself to more fruitful and useful .legislation which; will not wind ups. a wreck on the rocks of a Presidential veto. The article follows Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0 A6968 Approves'} REVAOML3 0ORDIA-R M3R00020017OcW mber 7 marks made by President Kennedy at his last press conference. When asked about his position on the bill which is opposed by all departments of the executive branch, the President, replied: "Fee never been for the quality stabiliza- tion bill. I have to look at the bill when It finally comes in the form it's in. r quite obviously can't comment on legislation be- fore It finally comes to the desk of the White Souse, but the administration witnesses have spoken my view." The President's reluctance to comment in greater detail was doubtless prompted by the fact that a number of leading members of his own party have been so foolhardy as to sponsor legislation which would infringe upon the right of the retailer to set prices at competitive levels. The bill woi id saddle the American consumers with an enormous burden. With a backlog of unfinished business that runs the gamut from the budget for the cur- rent fiscal year to tax reduction and civil rights legislation, Congress should not waste precious time on a bill which so clearly vio- lates the spirit of free enterprise and stands so small a chance of Presidential approval. Time will be saved and embarrassment avoid- ed if the Quality Stabilization Act is allowed to die stillborn. National Day of Fast and Prayer To Protest Soviet Anti-Semitism EXTENSION OF REMARKS Or HON. LEONARD FARBSTEIN or NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2'hursday, November 7, 1963 Mr. FARBSTEIN. Mr. Speaker, Rabbi Dr. Julius G. Neumann, chairman of the board of governors of the National In- formation Bureau of Jewish Life, Inc., of which I am honorary president, has just concluded a one-man 3-day fast to dramatize to America the oppression, persecution, and tyranny of the Soviet Union toward Russia's 3 million Jews. An extension of Rabbi Neumann's pro- test Is planned for Monday, November 25, when a national day of fast and prayer will be observed to protest Soviet anti-,Semltism. Having made numerous and serious ef- forts to bring this situation to the atten- tion of the administration and the American people, I am pleased to insert in the RECORD the statement made by Rabbi Neumann at the conclusion of his dramatic protest: NATIONAL DAY or FAST AND PRAYER To PROTEST aovn:r ANTS-$EMITIBM As pledged and in all accord with rab- binical teachings, I have concluded an In- dividual 3-day fast. I abstained from food and drink on Monday. October 28; Thursday, October 31 and Monday, November 4 as a pro- test against Soviet anti-Semitism and to dramatize to an Americans the tragic plight of Russian Jewry, Por Americans of all faiths to know-that persons are being condemned to death and executed for minor economic offenses, charged with committing criminal acts if they sett matzohs, that kosher meat is not available, that Yiddish books may not be printed, and that Jewish dead may not be buried in a Jewish cemetery; to learn-that In the Soviet Union synagogues are closed, prayer books and religious articles are un- available; Jewish Instruction banned; Yid- dish theaters, books and culture prohibited; Jewish lay organizations barred; fasnllies separated and reunion thwarted: equal rights for Russian Jews openly denied, all this midst a violent anti-Jewish press campaign- to do nothing about this spiritual genocide Is Just as sinful as abetting such atrocities. At times, the Soviet Government has been shown to be cognizant of world public opinion. If the crescendo of international protest mounts, there is hope that some amelioration of the oppressive treatment and tyranny meted out to Russian Jews may be obtained. Therefore, after consultation with many religious and lay leaders of all faiths, I urge the last Monday in November to be set aside as a "National Day of Fast and Prayer" to protest vigorously the persecution of the Jewish minority by the Soviet Union. My congregation Zichron Moshe will join me in a I-day 24-hour fast beginning at sundown, Sunday, November 24, and con- tinuing until sunset, Monday, November 25. On Sunday evening, a special prayer service will be held in the synagogue at 8 p.m. on behalf of the 3 million Russian Jews. Furthermore, the National Information Bureau for Jewish Life. Inc., of which I am chairman of the board of governors. has con- tacted 77 community leaders in various cities in our 50 States of the Union who we expect to participate In joining this 1-day fast for November 25 and arrange for special prayer services on the preceding Sunday evening in houses of worship of all faiths In their re- spective cities. The bureau in New York City and the surrounding metropolitan area are reaching more than 1,250 institutions of spiritual guidance to cooperate in this public demonstration of solidarity against Soviet discrimination. L trust that my humble one-man, 3-day fast will be transformed into a thunderous S million, i-day fast which will reverberate to the very rooms of the Kremlin. Let 3 million Americans stand up and be counted as each a brother of 3 million Russian Jews. Will We Ever Wise Up? EXTENSION OF REMARKS or HON. GLENARD P. LIPSCOMB or CALIFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday, November 6, 1963 Mr. LIPSCOMB. Mr. Speaker, under leave to extend my remarks, I submit for Inclusion in the RECORD an editorial en- titled "Will We Ever Wise Up?" from the Lusk (Wyo.) Herald. The editorial contains pertinent com- ment on the proposed sale of wheat to the U.S.S.R. which I believe will be of interest to Members of the House. WILL WE EvEs WIEE Up? We Americans just don't seem to be adept at playing the cold war game. Somehow the makeup of Americans is such that we can't deal with the Russians. Our usual error is that we think the Communists of Russia are honorable. Time and again this thinking has been proven erroneous, but we keep trying. Just take a look at the re- cent happenings. Oh the afternoon of October 9 President Kennedy said he would sell 4 million tons of wheat to the Soviets. The following morn- ing, as a display of gratitude, the Soviets prevented a convey of U.S. troops from using the autobahn to Berlin, despite the fact that America had in a treaty with Russia the right to use the autobahn. While the Soviets held up the American troops President Kennedy was entertaining Gromyko, Russia's Foreign Minister, in the White House. Then too, the wheat deal doesn't smell ex- actly good. In answer to our inquiry Sen- ator Mn,wASD SIMPSON reports the sale of wheat to Russia is in essence about a 50-50 credit cash deal. In other words Russia is going to, If the deal goes through, pay about half of the world market price (usually be- tween $1.75-41.80). American wheat farmers will get about $2.03 per bushel. Can you imagine charging anything to Russia when they already owe $11 billion to the United States? Doctors Opposed to Medicare but Take $2 Million in Public Funds EXTENSION OF REMARKS HON. JOHN D. DINGELL OF MICIII0AN IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, November 7, 1963 Mr. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, pur- suant to permission granted I insert into the Appendix of the CONGRESSIONAL REC- ORD an article appearing In the Engine- men's Press on October 25, 1963 pointing out very well that West Virginia doctors, whose State and National medical asso- ciations are violently opposed to hos- pitalization for the aged under the social security program, are not in the least op- posed to socialized State and Federal funds, of which they collected more than $2 million last year for treating patients too poor to pay. One physician, I assume a stanch supporter of the AMA and its position, received $44,391 in socialized State and Federal funds for treatment of certain West Virginians. Another doctor contrived to receive $40,596 worth of socialized State and Federal funds to confer, according to AMA, $49,596 worth of socialized medi- cine upon a number of other unfortunate West Virginians. It strikes me that there is brazen hypocrisy abroad in the land when the American Medical Association would engage in violent opposition to "social- ized medicine" and measures to respon- sibly meet the need of people of this country, and at the same time support other programs like Kerr-Mills, which is fully as socialized but which does not, according to recent findings of the Sen- ate Special Committee on Aging, do the job for the vast number of people 65 and over. The article follows: DOCTORS OPPOSm TO MEDICARE BVT TAKE $2 MILLION IN PUBLIC FIINDS CHAELEBTON, W. Va.-West Virginia doctors who with their counterparts in other States decry "socialized" medical care, collected more than $2 million In State and Federal funds last year for treating patients too poor to pay. One physician, the Charleston Gazette re- ported, received $44,391 in State payments- presumably in addition to the fees he re- ceived from noncharity patients. Another doctor managed to see enough charity pa- Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170004-0