INDEPENDENCE DAY OF VIETNAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170019-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 24, 2003
Sequence Number: 
19
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 24, 1963
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170019-4.pdf354.56 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170019-4 1963 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - APPENDIX in both Japan and the United States have de- veloped exchange agreements in these areas which are functioning smoothly, which are productive and which hold great promise for the future. In terms of numbers of sets and the per- centage of population covered by them, the United States and Japan are the two largest television nations in the World. I think it is entirely fitting that we should share our programs, our personnel, and our expertise. Moreover, the impact of these programs is bound to be wholly constructive. In the his- tory of Japanese-American relations perhaps no other exchange will, in the long run, con- tribute as much towards bringing about the mutual understanding and respect of our peoples. As I see it, the challenge of this confer- ence is to point the way toward overcoming the obstacles to a comparable. exchange in the educational television field. There are obvious reasons for these problems, and it is just as obvious that this conference will be helpful in solving them. One of the basic problems from the point of view of the United States is that educa- tional- television here is just getting or- ganized. It is plagued and frustrated by serious growing pains-lack of programing and lack of financial support, for example. These problems undoubtedly have partly ac- counted for the shortage of educational pro- graming suitable for export, and also for the lack of information on what is available. Other factors, perhaps, account for the same dilemma in Japan. But in both cases we know that educational television program- ing has been available for export, and also that no significant exchange of programing has taken place. The obstacles which have prevented this exchange will continue to do so unless they are identified and eliminated. Interestingly, both the Japanese study group and the American study group identified al- most exactly the same roadblocks. And in- terestingly also, in no case do any of these present any impediment to the exchange of commercial television between our two na- tions. To expedite the deliberations of this con- ference I have been asked to "list and de- scribe the obstacles, to exchange" and then to "make succinct recommendations that will be meaningful to the delegates * * * and to those able to act upon these recom- mendations." In my attempt to do so I hope that the distinguished delegates will not hesitate to criticize any suggestions I .might offer. Only through free and unin- hibited exchange of opinion are we likely to find the answers to the problems confronting us. 1. Both study groups suggest the estab- lishment of a permanent clearinghouse in each country whose function would be to focus on educational television exchange problems. The clearinghouses would be assigned the tasks of overcoming existing obstacles to educational television exchange in their respective countries and to promot- ing greater exchange. They would, for ex- ample, prepare a catalog of available edu- cational television programing, assist in the development of personnel exchange pro- grams,,and provide translation and research services; and they would, of course, main- tain close liaison with each other. Recommendation: This threshold recom- mendation appears eminently sound and I urge this Conference to agree in principle that each of the two nations establish such a clearinghouse. The organization and financing of the two agencies should rest, of course, entirely with the broadcasters of each country and not with this Conference. As a matter of information to both delega- tions, however, I recommend to the Ameri- can delegation that it request National Edu- cational Television to organize, staff, and operate, under its auspices, the U.S. clearing- house. 2. Both study groups also identified the following as serious problems: A. Lack of knowledge of educational tele- vision programs available in Japan for broadcast in the United States and vice versa; B. The complexity of custom regulations and brokerage arrangements; C. The complexity of copyright clearance procedures; D. The cost of dubbing and substituting; E. The lack of information on Japanese and American audience reaction, particu- larly school audiences; and F. The shortage of translations of papers bearing on technical and research problems. Recommendation: None of these prob- lems-as difficult as they may appear-is in- surmountable. They have all been faced and, generally speaking, satisfactorily solved by commercial broadcasters. It is recom- mended that they be surveyed in Japan and in the United States by groups commissioned by the respective clearinghouses. These groups should be composed of individuals representing both public and private organ- izations which have responsibilities in the specific problem areas. In the United States, for example, such organizations as the National Association of Broadcasters, the Television Program Export Association, the Customs Bureau, the several television pro- graming exporters, the National Educa- tion Association, educational foundations and other groups would, I am confident, be most willing to bring their experience and competence to bear upon the existing ob- stacles to a greater and more productive pro- gram exchange. Thank you for your considerate attention. Independence Day of Vietna> EXTENSION OF REMARKS HON. ADAM C. POWELL OF NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, October 24, 1963 Mr. POWELL. Mr. Speaker, on Oc- tober 26 the Republic of Vietnam will celebrate the ninth anniversary of her independence. On this auspicious occa- sion, we wish to take this opportunity to send warm felicitations to His Excel- lency, the President, Ngo Dinh Diem; and His Excellency the Vietnamese Am- bassador to the United States, Do Vang Ly. At the Geneva Conference in the sum- mer of 1954 Vietnam was partitioned along the 17th parallel. At that time, Western observers gave South Vietnam to salute them on the anniversary o~ almost no chance of withstanding they their country's independence, l_ challenge of Communist No th Vi t r e nam. I think it is worthwhile remembering this fact at a time when-our thoughts on South Vietnam are filled with doubts and apprehension. The situation that faced South Viet- nam after the Geneva Conference was filled with many difficulties. The years of war had destroyed almost all trans- portation and communication, and the econmy of the country had come to a virtual standstill. Political power was in the grip of the armed Cao Dal and Hoa Hao religious sects, the Binh Xuyen crime syndicate, and a number of other organized groups intent upon obstruct- ing the development of a strong govern- A6631 ment at Saigon. There was the national army, but the soldiers were demoralized by recent military defeat and the very loyalty of the army was uncertain. An- other major problem was the influx of more than 800,000 destitute refugees who had abandoned all they possessed in the north and fled southward from com- munism. On the credit side, South Viet- nam's- important assets were the firm leadership of Mr. Ngo Dinh Diem, the patriotism of the Vietnamese people, and the backing of the United States. The independence of South Vietnam was officially proclaimed on October 26, 1954, but this event did not really alter the anticipation of a Communist take- over. It was considered only a question of time before the unstable south fell into the clutches of the Communists of North Vietman. Mr. Speaker, it happens that South Vietnam will celerbate the ninth anniversary of its independence. It means that for almost a decade now the Government and people of South Vietnam have- been solving many of the problems that once threatened to de- stroy the country. Above all, it means that they have been successfully resist- ing the Communist attempts at aggres- sion and subversion. It has been a long and terrible struggle, with a heavy toll in ravaged crops, confiscated livestock, burned homes, misery and death. Since the Communists opened their all-out attack on South Vietnam, our country has increased both military and economic assistance and has repeatedly stated its determination to help the Vietnamese defend themselves. The United States sees the Communist at- tempt to conquer South Vietnam as a threat to our own security, because a Communist victory there might lead many people to believe that- communism is in fact the wave of the future. The defeat of South Vietnam would increase the difficulty of defending the rest of southeast Asia and place in jeopardy the independent development of all free As- ian countries. The people of South Vietnam and their government have fought bravely against Communist aggression and subversion, and they have shown the world again that it is possible to stand up to the forces of communism. There are few people in the world today who have had to fight so steadfastly to preserve their freedom and independence as those who live in South Vietnam. They deserve our H. M. Baggarly, Outstanding Editor, Writes of Current Problems in Our Democracy EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. RALPH YARBOROUGH OF TEXAS IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES Thursday, October 24, 1963 Mr. YARBOROUGH. Mr. President, H. M. Baggarly, famous Texas editor of Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170019-4 Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200170019-4 A6632 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - APPENDIX the Tulia Herald, has written a discern- perous working force. Business prosperity tag column discussing a facet of news and mass unemployment can't coexist. management which is most Interesting. prog business lea u. plagued with a far- away Mr. Beggarly, whose newspaper writings away look. They long for the day they can have won him numerous awards, and who turn labor out to pasture and replace it with perhaps is the most quoted member of machines. This is a reasonable reaction If his profession by other Texas editors, we prefer to look no farther than the end presents here a column deserving of the of our noses. But the only catch is this, most careful study. I ask unanimous with labor on relief, who is going to buy consent that the column entitled '"The what the merchant has to sell? We haven't Country Editor" by this distinguished, heard of many shopping booms where award-winning Texas newsman from laborers attempt to live off $25 a week un- employment checks. the Thursday, October 10,'1963, edition As much as we would like to have high of the Tulia Herald be printed in the sales and low overhead, such a situation can- Appendix of the RECORD. not be had. There being no objection, the column There Is also a connection. Indirect If not was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, direct, between high taxes and prosperity. as follows: That is to say that It the factors which brought about high taxes had been bypassed (By H. M. Baggarly) or evaded, not faced, then we might not be A vice president of the National Broad- enjoying the prosperity which Is ours today. casting Co? in our office recently, voiced For example, had the administrations of alarm and Almost cynicism as we discussed the past 30 years Ignored the agricultural the "managed news" which is dispensed by problem, refused to consider any kind of an the big dailies and their radio and TV voices. agricultural program, we might have saved But he believes the readers are as much to a few tax dollars, but In saving these tax blame as are publishers with axes to grind. dollars. what would have happened to the The public seldom if ever demands "both farmer? sides of the story" from a newspaper or As we have pointed out more than once, radio-TV network. It only demands the what counts Isn't our gross pay, our taxes, side It wants to hear, ammunition for its the size of our paycheck. It means nothing cause. - to compare the number of dollars we earned it is alarming to learn that most of the in 1933 with the number we earned in 1963. mall to news dispensing agencies Isn't a re- It means nothing to compare the taxes we quest for knowledge and information-it is paid in 1933 with those paid in 1963. a demand that news be withheld, that a com- The only thing that counts is the relative mentator be put off the air, that a columnist buying power of these dollars that are left be dropped from a paper. after taxes which we call our standard of Is this the American way? living. Is It American to demand that a radio The fact Is, the dollars we have left in dtation drop a religious broadcast of another 1963 are providing us the highest standard with? Is It American to demand that men of living any nation has enjoyed in the his- of the stature of Chet Huntley be dropped Cory of the world. And from an economic from a television network? Is itAmerican standpoint, that is the only thing that to threaten to withhold patronage from a counts. merchant in an effort to get that merchant But we'll always have those dear souls to withhold advertising from a news medium who want 1963 Income and 1933 taxes, who that carries columnists or commentators want what they call a dollar worth a dollar one doesn't like? and not 59 cents but they want that dollar $ a democracy, expression of opinion In the quantity that dollars are available in should never be curbed. As much as we 1963, not in 1933. We'll always have those would like to do something about the dis- precious souls who want their cake and eat semination of false Information and slanted it too. Who want to dance without paying news, still this Isn't advisable since in our the piper. efforts to dig out a few weeds, we will In- And a few of these souls would like to-have advertently dig up some of the flowers too. a price for their grain which only an effective Americans, must understand that this Government-farm program could guarantee. Sword Is two-edged. Things have a way but raise this grain in unlimited quantities. of backfiring. If we pass a law to dtserim- How any American could justify attempts irate against the Catholics, then that same in a democracy to deliberately discourage law may be used to discriminate against Prot- large numbers of our citizens from voting its next week. If we seek to ban an is difficult to understand. These efforts to Usipop1i1ar and minority religious sect to. preserve Government by minority smack of day, that precedent may be used to ban our medieval Europe when the prevailing phi- own religion tomorrow. The noose we weave losophy was that the masses are incapable of to bang out enemy may be used to hang our- governing themselves. They must instead selves. have the "sound and conservative" leader- If we demand Protestant religious exec- ship of the handful of uncommon men. class In our schools today, tomorrow the This philosophy sprang up in-this coun- required exercises may be Catholic. If we try from the very beginning. It was in -want a newspaper column deleted because America that politicians advocated that only we don't agree with its author, that same landowners be allowed to vote. It was in precedent may be used to delete our favorite America that a Dallas billionaire suggested column next time, that a man should be given not one but a Human nature never changes, whether a number of votes, the number to be deter- person is 8 or 90. The 8-year-old school boy mined by his wealth. (Since that man is a would like to have a 12-month vacation each member of the First Baptist Church In Dal year and no school. He would like to have ' las, we wonder why he doesn't advocate the all dessert and no vegetables. same principle In determining church policy. The young housewife would like to have For Instance. If a pastor was to be called. lots of time for club work and bridge parties Brother Hunt could have perhaps 100 votes, and a minimum of housework and dish while the dollar-a-Sunday student would washing. get only I vote. Or If the church wanted to The conservative businessman would like vote on integration of its membership, some- to have -good business, high profits, low thing Brother Hunt vigorously opposes, he wages to pay, and low taxes, could say "no" a hundred times instead of Man wants to have his cake and eat it too. Just once.) What he never seems to learn is that we can't It is admitted that some people are better divorce high business profits from a pros- qualified to cast a vote than others, but October 24 these qualifications are not necessarily based on whether or not one has paid a poll tax. We know political illiterates who never fail to pay a poll tax and vote. And we know intelligent citizens whose chief sin is In- ability to support a family of five on $60 a week. With grocery bills, doctors bills, hospital bills, and a hundred other bills all staring them in the face, they pass up that $3.50 poll tax which seems to be the only bill they can dodge. But with all its alleged drawbacks, we have yet to find a better way to govern our- selves than rule by the majority. Of course we seldom hear any complaint of so-called bloc voting unless the bloc votes against us. So It it that no- votes are "dirty" unless they aren't ours. H.R. 333, a Bill To Lift Antitrust Immunities From Labor Organizations OF HON. DAVE MARTIN OF NEEAASKA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, October 24, 1963 Mr. MARTIN of Nebraska. Mr. Speaker, I have been receiving a good deal of mail lately concerning H.R. 333, a bi l which amends the Sherman Act. Clayton Act, Norris-LaGuardia Act, and Taft-Hartley Act so as to lift antitrust immunities from labor organizations. By far the great majority of these let- ters have been in support of this bill. Yet I have received other letters which condemn this bill and similar attempts to curb union monopoly power. These letters reveal certain misconceptions about the nature and effect of my bill. First of all, my bill would not elimi- nate health and welfare benefits or pen- sion plans. International unions and brotherhoods could continue to admin- ister such plans, providing, of course, that these benefits could not be with- held as a lever to regain control of col- lective bargaining activities. If the large national and international unions did not see fit to continue these benefit and pension plans, they could be taken over and administered by the local unions on the basis of contributions re- ceived from local members. All benefit, pension, and strike funds must come ultimately from the local union member anyway, and if these contributions went no further than the local union, there is less likelihood that they would be di- verted to pay for marble palaces in Washington and black Cadillacs for union leaders. By the same token, sick leave pay, vacation pay, and overtime pay would not be eliminated. These and other is- sues would be negotiated by the unions with each individual company, neither having an unfair advantage in size or power over the other. It is further charged that H.R. 333 would destroy craft unions, replacing them by industrial unions. This is not true. The Landrum-Griffin Act specifi- cally states: It shall not be an unfair labor practice under subsections (a) and (b) of this section Approved For Release 2003/10/10 : CIA-RDP65B.00383R000200170019-4