THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND OUR IMMIGRATION POLICY EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. WILLIAM F. RYAN

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP66B00403R000100080017-3
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 16, 2016
• Document Release Date: December 16, 2004
• Sequence Number: 17
• Publication Date: August 18, 1964
• Content Type: OPEN

196.E
Approved For Release 20051Q1/0 C P6 0100080017-3
CONGRESSIONAL , EC~ ~~'f~
cafeteria employees, who know him as
"Cobby." The touch was in evidence in the
great piece he sent from the Pacific jungles
on V-E Day which reminded celebrating
Americans that the war was not over for
young Yanks trying to dodge Japanese bombs
and bullets.
His unfaltering romance with the Cleve-
land Indians and his unfailing dislike for the
Yankee ownership are topics with which he
has entertained "Plain Dealing" readers since
away back when.
His aversion for showboaters in any sport
and for the phoniness of the wrestling pro-
fession certify a personal integrity that has
made him the confidant of a host of admirers
and friends.
On this newspaper, "Cobby" will be long
remembered for a multiplicity of talents but
mostly for his flawless prose, a commodity
with which the profession of sports writing
is not overly endowed:
A perfectionist, he likes to write about
perfection. A pro, he speaks the language of
pros. Of the great, he writes with the au-
thority of being one of them.
Equitable Revision of Our Outmoded Im-
migration Policy Is Imperative
EXTENSION -OF REMARKS
present immigration laws. This bill is
known as H.R. 7700 and I myself have
instroduced a bill that is practically
identical to it, H.R. 8883.
These bills, and many others of like
nature, would, fundamentally, along
with other revisions and reforms, elimi-
nate the present inequitable discrimina-
tory overall quota system and set up a
new method, with no great increase, of
quota allocations without regard to na-
tional origins; they would insure that
an individual with special talents that
could be used here would not be faced
with inordinate delay in admittance be-
cause of his birthplace and they would
halt the existing hardships on separated
families from Italy or Greece or other
countries who must now most often ex-
perience agonizing postponements of
family unity while large quotas for Eng-
land and Ireland remain unused.
Mr. Speaker, I most earnestly hope this
Congress will not adjourn without taking
action on these pending revisions in our
immigration laws that will demonstrate,
both to ourselves and the world, that we
are really serious in desiring to eradi-
cate discrimination based on race and
national origin.
At this point I would like to include
the testimony I recently presented to the
and
R
. ,
a..,... -- - migration in support of H.
OF MASSACHUSETTS my own bill, H.R. 8883, and any other United States; rather, the proposed legisla-
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES bills that would achieve the equitable tion would eliminate, mostly over a period
of 5
Thursday, August 6, 1964 objective we commonly seek. years, by pooling and redistribution, our
present discriminatory system of national
Mr. boasted basic standards Mr. Spea c, the The testimony follows: quotas and thereby alleviate the backlogs of
boasted basic by which we STATEMENT OF HON. HAROLD D. DONOHUE, those countries having the highest number
PRESENTED BEFORE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY of applicants.
his stre claim to measure a man are SUBCOMMITTEE ON IMMIGRATION IN SUPPORT Under the new gouts system that would
Americans
his Strength, his integrity of character, or H.R. 8883, H.R. 7700, AND SIMILAR BILLS be achieved by this proposed legislation no
his conscientious industry, and his per- Mr, Chairman and members of the sub- country would be entitled to more than 10
birth ambition. In theory his place of committee, may I express the very deepest percent of the entire annual allocation
birth has nothing to do with the kind of appreciation, on behalf of untold thousands whereas under current law three nations are
person he may be. of naturalized Americans, prospective Ameri- granted almost two-thirds of all quota
However and unfortunately, our cur- can citizens, a great number of my colleagues numbers. Another provison would estab-
rent immigration laws openly contradict and myself, to you for the conduct of these lish an immigration board to review nat-
this theory. Under present laws, it is, hearings on proposed legislation to revise uralization policy and to recommend fair
for instance, clearly intimated that the our current immigration laws, which is one and just use of unallocated quota numbers.
of the most vitally important legislative Further than that, by the adoption of
Italian people are abellt one-thirteenth subjects that today challenges our moral con- these legislative proposals before you, close
as acceptable for prospective American science and legislative prudence. It is my relatives of American citizens and resident
citizenship as the English and that the most earnest hope that very promptly upon aliens who have been on waiting lists for a
Greek people are about 200 times less de- the conclusion of these hearings committee heartbreaking length of time and those who
sirable for American admittance than initiative will be exercised to expedite con- could contribute the most, because of spe-
the English. There is similar discrimi- gressional action, before' any adjournment cial skills, to the progress of the United
'nation against many other nationalities takes place, an this pending legislation. States, would be granted highest priority re-
As one who has consistently advocated and gardless of their place of birth. The adop-
under the present system. supported continuing improvements in and tion of this provision alone would save
Beyond the objective injustices pro- expansion of our immigration laws through- countless expenditures of Federal money, as
jected under our current immigration out my service in the House I wish to thank well as the time and energy of Federal legis- `
regulations and restrictions I think it is you for this opportunity to submit testimony lators and agencies in the processing of pri-
very practical, in our own self-interest, in favor of H.R. 7700 and, of course, my own vate bills for the relief of extreme and un-
o H.R. 8883, which is practically identical usual hardship immigration cases that come
quoted point ant the national adverse origins effect quota the method anti- to it. Let me emphasize right now that a before this committee by the thousands every
q particular measure or author is not the im- year.
has on the prestige of the United States portant thing in this matter. Our chief con- Mr. Cand committee members,
abroad and the operation of successful cern is to urge your approval of whatever none of Chairman i should forget that this great
foreign policy. bill or vehicle you deem best designed to Nation was itself founded almost altogerhat
I earnestly feel that the great ma- remove and correct the obvious injustices Immigrants. Certainly in sta advancing our
jority of out citizens desire to have our that have been too long projected by the world ertainly i and inspiration adership immigration laws brought more realisti- outmoded provisions of our present immi- position in these of world ledays we can speak more
Lally into line with the traditional chat- gration laws and regulations. perilous Even cursory convincingly for freedom everywhere when
examination of our present we have done our legislative utmost to give
acter and disposition prove the American laws reveals their obviously unfair and un- freedom, real sanctuary, real family
people in order der t to prova e we truly uly mean popular discrimination against the majority real real freedom, real oto qualified i family
the inspiring phrase we so often use- of the nations of the world. This persistent munity, and igrants who wish opportunity r begin a new alif id tm-life "All men are created equal." discrimination has increasingly weakened unant Our wish to national in a history reminds us co.
Mr. Speaker, there is now pending be- our position and our overtures of world lead-: that these are the kind of people in whose
fore the Congress a bill, actually the first ersh1p and has unwittingly delivered into behalf the original American tradition of
bill o u.r late and beloved President skillful anti-American hands an effective asylum was established and whose immigra-
John instrument for Communist propaganda tion to these shores has enriched our coun-
to Kennedy sent to Congress, designed against the United States as the proclaimed try from its earliest days right up to thi-
to remove the bias, the prejudice, the hope and asylum of the poor and persecuted, very hour.
discrimination, and the injustices of our the tired and the homeless.
As a glaring example of discrimination a
very heavy priority is given to immigrant
applicants of the countries of Great Britain,
Ireland, and Germany, yet there were more
than 41,000 unused numbers in the last Brit-
ish quota. On the other hand countries
like Israel, India, China and many others
are permitted only 100 immigrants into the
United States per year.
A brief review of the situation in other
countries in southern and eastern Europe
demonstrates similar and even greater dis-
crimination. For example, Italy's yearly
quota of 5,666 must by some supposed mirac-
ulous process attempt to cover well over 250,-
000 applicants. Greece has been granted a
quota of 308 to process a backlog of over
100,000 qualified applicants. Poland is per-
mitted only 6,488 persons per year to some-
how be allocated among more than 60,000
annual applicants.
I feel certain that you and the great ma-
jority of Americans would judge this situa-
tion to be intolerable and it is, indeed, a
matter which has seriously hurt the prestige
of the United States, both at home and
abroad.
Along with other deficiencies this out-
dated, outmoded, unjust and discriminatory
quota system is the substantive evil the leg-
islation before you is designed to correct and
whose adoption will, I believe, effect such
correction.
Briefly reviewing the provisions of my bill
and the other measures before you we ob-
serve that their enactment would not result
in any great increase in the total number
+, e
Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000'r00080017-3
 A439g
Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000100080017-3
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - APPENDIX
Mr. Chairman and committee members, in They should stop because they are bound
his immigration legislation recommenda- to poison and distort the Presidential cam-
tions-to Congress our late and-beloved Presi- paign and, from the standpoint of the civil
dent John F. Kennedy stated-'bur invest- rights leaders, contribute to bringing about
ment In new citizens has always been a valu- what they least want.
able source of our strength." With this The view of the Negro dissident activist
sentiment and In his valiant spirit let us is that, because the demonstrations "got us
pursue this proven investment and I most this far," they should continue.
earnestly hope that, in your wisdom and The view of the Rev. Martin Luther King,
judgment, you will feel warranted in ex- Jr., Roy Wilkins, Philip Randolph, and the
pediting your recommendation_ of Congres- other Negro leaders, who have devoted their
atonal enactment of this legislation, whole lives to the cause of their race, is that,
since the mass demonstrations have accom-
Why a Moratorium on Demonstrations?
EXTENSION OF REMARKS
OF
HON. ABRAHAM J. MULTER
OF NEW YORK
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. MULTER. Mr. Speaker, I com-
mend to the attention of our colleagues
the following thoughtful article by Mr.
Roscoe Drummond which appeared in
the New' York Herald Tribune of Au-
gust 10, 1964.
Mr. Drummond rightfully argues that
it is time for demonstrations. on behalf
of civil rights to stop, as the only pur-
:pose t iey now serve is to shield violence
and crime. He applauds responsible
Negro leaders like the Reverend Martin
:Luther King, Roy Wilkins, and Philip
Randolph, for, their action to stop these
demonstrations.
The. article follows :
CIVIL RIGHTS AND WRONGS: WHY A
MORATO- RIUM ON DEMONSTRATIONS?
(By Roscoe Drummond)
WASEINGTON-=After American Negro citi-
zens have borne so much so long-lynchings,
brutalities, massive indignity, and almost
total denial of their- rights of citizenship, it
Is not ,easy for the Negro leaders to say any
to expect to be instantly heeded. "Be calm,
be quiet., wait-and see."
After mass demonstrations have proved so
useful in the past, it takes maturity and
courage and wisdom on the part of the Ne-
@Ta leaders to sheathe the weapon and to ask
their followers to do the same.
No wonder one dissident Negro activist
shouts: "The only way we. got this far is
because, of our demonstrations."
But this "stay-in-the-streets" plea is pro-
foundly wrong and the principal Negro lead-
ers are as prodoundly right in urging a mor-
atorium on all. "mass marches, mass picket-
iig, and mass demonstrations" as when they
ailed for mass demonstrations more than a
ear ago and utilized the famous "freedom
larch" in Washington so responsibly and
effectively.
They should stop because mass picketing
nd. mats demonstrations are not helping the
ivil rights cause one whit and are hurting
is civil rights cause periously.
They should stop these mass demonstra-
iOns-however understandable, however
ieful in the past-because they are be-
ettIng violence (as in Harlem, Rochester,
lid Jersey City) and are becoming the
Y.deld for crime which can do nothing but
lienate support which the cause of the civil
ights enforcement crucially needs.
They should stop because the over-riding
eed today is to nourish law obsservance, in-
luchng the observance of the new Civil
fights Act, which can never be _nourished by
w violation.
plashed the central objective of putting the
rights of Negro citizens into law, they should
be abandoned until and unless the law is
tried and found wanting.
I believe that the Martin Luther Kings
,
the Wilkinses and the Randolphs are pro-
foundly right, because equal rights for all
citizens is today the law of the land and that
on the day President Johnson signed the
hct of Congress the Government of the
United States took the issue out of the streets
and put it into the courts.
The central need now is to give the new
law the fullest, the most faithful and the
most patient opportunity to be applied.
Civil disobedience is a proper and power-
ful instrument of mass protest to correct a
grave injustice. No one used disobedience
more effectively than Mahatma Ghandi, but
Where would India be today If he had con-
tinued to use It against his own government
after it had succeeded in gaining his na-
tion's independence from the British?
A very distinguished American Negro, who
has long been in the midst of the fight for
equal rights, former Ambassador Carl T.
Rowan, now director of the U.S. Information
Agency, did not put it too candidly when
h
o said recently:
"The hour has come when bold, uncom-
promising efforts must be made to free the
civil rights movement from the taint of street
rioters. * * * There is a crying, almost
desperate, need for us,to guard that move-
ment jealously against inroads by those
Whose desire is to create chaos."
Equal rights, which is now imbedded in
the law of the land, cannot be furthered-
either in the North or in the South, either
for Negro citizens or for white citizens-by
civil wrongs.
August 18
"damages America in the eyes of the
world * * * deprives us of able immi-
grants who contributions we need * * *
inflicts needless personal cruelty on large
numbers of American citizens and resi-
dents. And it does not work."
I strongly urge all my colleagues to
read, the following letter:
KENNEDY ASSAILS VISA BAN; ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL ADVOCATES ENII TO NATIONAL ORIGINS
SYSTEM
To the EDITOR: In a letter to the editor
published August 10, William A. Turner de-
plores the pending administration bill to
eliminate the national '-origins system from
our Immigration laws. Mr. Turner says he
believes the present system is satisfactory
and that in 36 years as a Foreign Service
officer of the State Department he has never
heard foreigners criticize the national origins
provision of our immigration laws.
It is my firm conviction that this national
origins system pauses our Nation great harm
both at home and abroad, and that it should
be eradicated from our law.
This national origins system was conceived
in a spirit of mistrust of certain racial groups,
in southern and eastern Europe and else-
where. Its original stated purpose was bald
discrimination-to preserve what was be-
lieved to be the racial and ethnic composition
of our population in 1924.
This system is a blot on our relations with
other countries. It violates our basic na-
tional philosophy because it judges individu-
als not on their worth, but solely on their
place of Mirth-or even where their ancestors
happen to be born. I know from my own
experiences abroad how deeply this system
hurts us. I have been asked how a country
which professes that all men are equal could
permit a system which treated immigrants so
unequ.E1iy. It is a difficult criticism to
answer.
UNFILLED NEEDS
This system fails to fulfill our own needs
at home. An unskilled laborer from a north-
ern European country can come here with-
out delay or difficulty. But a particularly
well-qualified scientist, or engineer-or
chef-from one of a number of other coun-
The Attorney General and
Immigration Policy
EXTENSION OF REMARKS
HON. WILLIAM F. RYAN
OF NEW YORK
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday, August 18, 1964
Mr. RYAN of New York. Mr. Speaker,
with the passage of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, and the antipoverty bill, this
Congress has brought our society closer
to to the goal of equality. As part of this
all important effort, the immigration law
should be revised now. I have intro-
duced H.R. 7740, which would do so.
Our present immigration laws based on
the 1920 census and the quota system
are grossly inequitable and inconsistent
with our fundamental principles. The
Attorney General, Robert F, Kennedy,
has stated the case for the passage of the
administration's immigration bill, which
I have cosponsored, in a letter to the New
York Times published on August 14,
1964, The Attorney General points out
that the present immigration system
and many others like them. Yet all want to
come here, all are needed, and all are wanted.
The time has come for us to insist that the
quota system be replaced by the merit sys-
tem.
This system inflicts cruel and unnecessary
hardship on the families of many American
citizens and resident aliens. Again and
again they are deprived of the chance to
bring brothers and sisters or other close
relatives to this country because quotas in
their native countries are oversubscribed.
The national origins quota system makes it
easier for a man to bring a maid to this
country than to bring his mother; a system
which can so distort human values must be
revised.
Finally--and ironically-the national ori-
gins system d9es not even achieve its own
purposes. It assigns an overwhelming num-
ber of quota visas to the countries of north-
ern and western Europe-which do not use
them all. For example, out of about 83,000
numbers assigned annually to the British
Isles, only about 32,000 visas are used.
The 51,000 unused numbers cannot be re-
assigned; they are lost. Meanwhile, the
quotas of many other countries are over-
subscribed with the names of thousands of
eligible immigrants eager to come to this
country. Thus the ratio of immigration
Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000100080017-3
 j 964 "Approved For ReltMa?ffl
sought by the national origins system is not
maintained, nor can it be.
SPECIAL LAWS
Further, the pressures which result from
this system have forced Congress to enact
special laws from time to time in recent
years authorizing visas for people waiting
in oversubscribed countries. The result is
a further departure from the ratio which
the national origins system was designed
to continue.
This system damages America in the eyes
of the world, It deprives us of able immi-
grants whose contributions we need. It in-
flicts needless personal cruelty on large num-
bers of American citizens and residents. And
it doesn't work. Certainly, no plainer or
more compelling arguments could be made
for changing this system.
The administration's pending immigra-
tion bill seeks to change that system and
establish a system that works in the na-
tional interest. It would increase the
amount of authorized immigration by only a
fraction-from 157,000 to 165,000. But it
would, at the same time, gradually eliminate
the present system and provide us with the
flexibility necessary to deal with problems
of fairness and of foreign policy.
Both major parties and four successive
Presidents have urged a revision of the im-
migration laws. President Kennedy recom-
mended this legislation to Congress and
President Jo)inson has firmly endorsed it.
Every American should support the change.
ROBERT KENNEDY,
Attorney General.
WASHINGTON, August 11, 1964.
Housing Act of 1964
SPEECH
OF
HON. HAROLD D. DONOHUE
OF MASSACHUSETTS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, August 13, 1964
The House in Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union had under
consideration the bill (H.R. 12175) to extend
and amend laws relating to housing, urban
renewal, and community facilities, and for
other purposes.
Mr. DONOHUE. Mr. Chairman, be-
cause the evidence and expert testimony
clearly show that slum clearance, urban
renewal, housing for the elderly, low-cost
public housing and similar programs are
still urgently needed in almost every sec-
tion of. this country, I consider it,a legis-
lative obligation to urge support and
prompt enactment of this bill, H.R. 12175,
designed to extend and amend the pres-
ent laws relating to housing, urban re-
newal, community facilities and other
purposes.
The distinguished chairman of the
House subcommittee and his associate
members have worked long and hard to
bring a reasonable. omnibus housing bill
before this House and, with noticeable
bipartisan effort, I think it is apparent
their common.. patriotic objective has
been achieved in this measure. Ad-
mittedly many of the provisions are com-
plex but the distinguished subcommittee
chairman has patiently and exhaustively
attempted to explain them all to this
body. There is probably no greater chal-
lenge to any of our committees than the
RJM, ff W- JTo04A8080017-3
subject of housing and we are fortunate
indeed to have the benefit of such a
knowledgeable and conscientious com-
mittee chairman with a most diligent
committee membership.
As an example of their conscientious-
ness and diligence they have made an
heroic effort in this measure to provide,
against past criticism, that in no in-
stance should peopled be uprooted by ur-
ban renewal or any other governmental
program unless such action was ap-
proved at the local level and unless ade-
quate provision was made for the re-
housing of the affected people in good,
sanitary and wholesome accommodations
of either a public or private nature. One
of the most practical provisions of this
measure is that authorizing a program
for some 3 years of graduate training of
city planners. The record of .past dis-
appointments in what appeared to be
promising housing or renewal programs
emphasizes the need for advance plan-
ning based on realistic knowledge and
awareness of the technical and human
relations problems likely to be encoun-
tered.
Most of the funds recommended in
this measure would provide for urban re-
newal grants and an addition of some
35,000 units of public housing.
Other noteworthy features include
funds for direct housing loans for the
elderly and appropriations to begin an
imperatively needed program of low-rent
housing for migrant workers.
A further and most wholesome provi-
sion is designed to initiate a program
of low-interest loans for improving al-
ready renewed areas.
Another most important innovation in
this measure is that which emphasizes
the role of code enforcement in urban
renewal objectives. This provision is
designed to place more responsibility, on
local authorities so that after a period of
3 years they cannot qualify for any fur-
ther urban renewal assistance unless
they have an adequate code enforcement
impact at the local level. It seems clear
that had this idea been carried out over
the past years we very likely would not
have such widespread slum and blight
areas presently and unfortunately exist-
ing in so many cities throughout this
great country.
Also within the provisions of this
measure a single low-income person
would be made eligible for public hous-
ing and individual handicapped persons
would be given eligibility for the pur-
chase or rental of FHA housing for low
or moderate income families.
Mr. Chairman, the record shows that
in general, the program has been well
administered and it has been excep
tionally free from misuse of funds or
authority.
Mr. Chairman, this housing bill is cer-
tainly a relatively modest one. It surely
seems essential for the continuation of
programs that are vital to our efforts
and our obligations to encourage better
housing in better surroundings for all of
our people. Because it is clearly in ac-
cord with our national traditions, be-
cause it is designed to prudently meet a
foundation national need and because it
is obviously intended to promote the
A4399
health, the safety, and the happiness of
all our citizens, I urge that it be promptly
enacted.
LAWS RELATIVE TO THE PRINTING OF
DOCUMENTS
Either House may order the printing of a
document not already provided for by law,
but only when the same shall be accompa-
nied by an estimate from the Public Printer
as to the probable cost thereof. Any execu-
tive department, bureau, board or independ-
ent office of the Government submitting re-
ports or documents in response to inquiries
from Congress shall submit therewith an
estimate of the probable cost of printing the
usual number. Nothing in this section re-
lating to estimates shall apply to reports or
documents not exceeding 50 pages (U.S.
Code, title 44, sec. 140, p. 1938).
Resolutions for printing extra copies, when
presented to either House, shall be referred
immediately to the Committee on House
Administration of the House of Representa-
tives or the Committee on Rules and Admin-
istration of the Senate, who, in making their
report, shall give the probable cost of the
proposed printing upon the estimate of the
Public Printer, and no extra copies shall be
printed before such committee has reported
(U.S. Code, title 44, sec. 133, p. 1937).
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS FOR SALE
Additional copies of Government publica-
tions are offered for sale to the public by the
Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C., at cost
thereof as determined by the Public Printer
plus 50 percent: Provided, That a discount of
not to exceed 25 percent may be allowed to
authorized bookdealers and quantity pur-
chasers, but such printing shall not inter-
fere with the prompt execution of work for
the Government. The Superintendent of
Documents shall prescribe the terms and
conditions under which he may authorize
the resale , of Government,, publications by
bookdealers, and he may designate any Gov-
ernment officer his agent for the sale of Gov-
ernment publications under such regulations
as shall be agreed upon by the Superintend-
ent of Documents and the head of the re-
spective department or establishment of the
Government (U.S. Code, title 44, sec. 72a,
Supp. 2).
RECORD OFFICE AT, THE CAPITOL
An office for the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD,
with Mr. Raymond F. Noyes in charge, is lo-
cated in room H-112, House wing, where or-
ders will be received for subscriptions to the
RECORD at $1.50 per month or for single
copies at 1 cent for eight pages (minimum
charge of 3 cents). Also, orders from Mem-
bers of Congress to purchase reprints from
the RECORD should be processed through this
office.
CONGRESSIONAL DIRECTORY
The Public Printer, under the direction of
the Joint Committee on Printing, may print
for sale, at a price sufficient to reimburse the
expenses of such printing, the current Con-
gressional Directory. No sale shall be made
on credit (U.S. Code, title 44, sec. 150, p.
1939).
PRINTING OF CONGRESSIONAL RECORD
EXTRACTS
It shall be lawful for the Public Printer
to print and deliver upon the order of any
Senator, Representative, or Delegate, extracts
from the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, the person
ordering the same paying the cost thereof
(U.S. Code, title 44, sec. 185, p. 1942).
Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000100080017-3
 Approved For CQNGRESSIONAL I -RDPP6 6004038000100080017-,3
IN WASHINGTON
yll, Birch E., Ind_______
al;:, J. Glenn, Md________
:nnett, Wallace F., Utah__
yrd, Harry Flood, Va----- The Shoreham
yrd, Robert C., W. Va_____
annon, Howard W., Nev__
arlson, Frank, Kans------ Sheraton-Park
ase, Clifford P., N.J-------
i:rksen, Everett M., Ill____
odd, Thomas J., Conn____
ruin, Sam J., Jr., N.C_____
ong, Hiram L., Hawaii ---- b519 Uppingham
St., Chevy Chase,
Md.
ild:water, Barry, Ariz _____
ire:, Albert, Tenn________
st, Philip A., Mich______
,rtke, Vance, Ind_______-
.yden, Carl, Ariz ---------
ckenlooper, Bourke B., 5611 Cedar Park-
ohnston, Olin D., S.C_____
ordan, B. Everett, N.C____
ordan, Len B., Idaho_____
ong, Edward V., Mo______
ong, Russell B., La-------
Morton, Thruston B., Ky__
ose, Frank E., Utah------
Mundt, Karl E., S. Dak---- 122 Schotts
Court NE.
uskie, Edmund S., Maine-
Nelson, Gaylord, Wis------
Neuberger, Maurine B.,
Oreg.
astore, John 0., R.1______
earson, James B., Kans=__
Pell, Claiborne, R.1-------- 3425 Prospect St.
Prouty, Winston L., Vt-___
Proxmire, William, Wis-___
Randolph, Jennings, W. Va_4608 Reservoir Rd.
Ribicoff, Abraham A., Conn_
Robertson, A. Willis, Va-_-
Russell, Richard B., Ga____
Salinger, Pierre, Calif______
Saltonstall, Leverett, Mass-2320 Tracy P1.
Scott, Hugh, Pa_______-___
Simpson, Milward L., W'yo_
Smathers, George A., Fla---
Smith, Margaret Chase
(Mrs.), Maine.
Sparkman, John, Ala------ 4928 Indian Lane
Stennis, John, Miss __-____
Symington, Stuart, Me ----
Talmadge, Herman E., Ga__
Thurmond, Strom, S.C_____
Tower, John G., Tex_______
Walters, Herbert S., Tenn__
Williams, Harrison A., Jr.,
N.J.
Williams, John J., Del_____
Yarborough, Ralph, Tex-__
Young, Milton R.. N. Dak__Quebec House So.
Young, Stephen M., Ohio__
OFFICERS OF THE SENATE
Secretary-Felton M. Johnston.
Sergeant at Arms-Joseph C. Duke.
Chief Clerk-Emery L. Frazier.
Secretary for the Majority-Francis R. Valeo.
Secretary for the Minority-J. Mark Trice.
Chaplain-Rev. Frederick Brown Harris, D.D.
STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE SENATE
Committee on Aeronautical and Space
Sciences
Messrs. Anderson (chairman), Russell,
Magnuson, Symington, Stennis, Young of
Ohio, Dodd, Cannon, Holland, Edmondson,
Mrs. Smith, Messrs. Case, Hickenlooper,
Curtis, and Keating.
Committee an Agriculture and Forestry
Messrs. Ellender (chairman), Johnston,
Holland, Eastland. Talmadge, Jordan of
North Carolina, McCarthy, Mrs. Neuberger,
Messrs. McGovern, Edmondson, Walters,
Aiken, Young of North Dakota, Hickenlooper,
Cooper, Boggs, and Mechem.
Committee on Appropriations
Messrs. Hayden (chairman), Russell, Ellen-
der, Hill, McClellan, Robertson, Magnuson,
Holland, Stennis, Pastore, Monroney, Bible,
Byrd of West Virginia, McGee, Humphrey,
Mansfield, Bartlett, Proxmire, Saltonstall,
Young of North Dakota, Mundt, Mrs. Smith,
Messrs. Kuchel, Hruska, Ailott, Cotton, and
Case.
Committee on Armed Services
Messrs. Russell (chairman), Stennis, Byrd
of Virginia, Symington, Jackson, Ervin,
Thurmond, Cannon, Byrd of West Virginia,
Young of Ohio, Inouye, McIntyre, Saltonstall,
Mrs. Smith, Messrs. Beall, Goldwater, and
Case.
Committee on Banking and Currency
Messrs. Robertson (chairman), Sparkman,
Douglas, Clark, Proxmire, Williams of New
Jersey, Muskie, Long of Missouri, Mrs. Neu-
berger, Messrs. McIntyre, Bennett, Tower,
Javits, Simpson, and Dominick.
Committee on Commerce
Messrs. Magnuson (chairman), Pastore,
Monroney, Thurmond, Lausche, Yarborough,
Bartlett, Hartke, McGee, Hart, Cannon,
Brewster, Cotton, Morton, Scott, Prouty, and
Beall.
Committee on the District of Columbia
Messrs. Bible (chairman), Morse, Hartke,
McIntyre, Beall, Prouty. and Dominick.
Committee on Finance
Messrs. Byrd of Virginia (chairman), Long
of Louisiana, Smathers, Anderson, Douglas,
Gore, Talmadge, McCarthy, Hartke, Ful-
bright, Ribicoff, Williams of Delaware, Carl-
son, Bennett, Curtis, Morton, and Dirksen.
Committee on Foreign Relations
Messrs. Fulbright (chairman), Sparkman,
Humphrey, Mansfield, Morse, Long of Loui-
siana, Gore, Lausche, Church, Symington,
Dodd, Smathers, Hickenlooper, Aiken, Carl-
son, Williams of Delaware, and Mundt.
Committee on Government Operations
Messrs. McClellan (chairman), Jackson,
Ervin, Humphrey, Gruening, Muskie, Pell,
Ribicoff, Brewster, Salinger, Mundt, Curtis,
Javits, Miller, and Pearson.
Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs
Messrs. Jackson (chairman), Anderson,
Bible, Church, Gruening, Moss, Burdick,
Hayden, McGovern, Nelson, Walters, Kuchel,
Allott, Jordan of Idaho, Simpson, Mechem,
and Dominick.
Committee on the Judiciary
Messrs. Eastland (chairman), Johnston,
McClellan, Ervin, Dodd, Hart, Long of Mis-
souri, Kennedy, Bayh, Burdick, Dirksen,
Hruska, Keating, Fong, and Scott.
Committee on Labor and Public Welfare
Messrs. Hill (chairman), McNamara, Morse,
Yarborough, Clark, Randolph, Williams of
New Jersey, Pell, Kennedy, Metcalf, Gold-
water, Javits, Prouty, Tower, and Jordan of
Idaho.
Committee on Post Office and Civil Service
Messrs. Johnston (chairman), Monroney,
Yarborough, Randolph, McGee, Brewster,
Carlson, Fong, and Boggs.
Committee on Public Works
Messrs. McNamara (chairman), Randolph,
Young of Ohio, Muskie, Gruening, Moss,
Metcalf, Jordan of North Carolina, Inouye,
Bayh, Nelson, Salinger, Cooper, Fong, Boggs,
Miller, and Pearson.
Committee on Rules and Administration
Messrs. Jordan of North Carolina (chair-
man), Hayden, Cannon, Pell, Clark, Byrd of
West Virginia, Curtis, Cooper, and Scott.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Mr. Chief Justice Warren, of California, Hotel
Sheraton-Park, Washington, D.C.
Mr. Justice Black, of Alabama, 619 S. Lee St.,
Alexandria, Va.
Mr. Justice Douglas, of Washington, 4852
Hutchins Pl.
Mr. Justice Clark, of Texas, 2101 Connecticut
Ave.
Mr. Justice Harlan, of New York, 1677 31st St.
Mr. Justice Brennan, of New Jersey, 3037
Dumbarton Ave.
Mr. Justice Stewart, of Ohio, 5136 Palisade
Lane.
Mr. Justice White, of Colorado, 2209 Hamp-
shire Rd., McLean, Va.
Mr. Justice Goldberg, of Illinois, 2811 Albe-
marle St.
OFFICERS OF THE SUPREME COURT
Clerk-John F. Davis, 4704 River Rd.
Deputy Clerk-Edmund P. Cullinan, 4823
Reservoir Rd.
Marshal-T. Perry Lippitt. 6004 Corbin Rd.
Reporter-Henry Putzel, Jr., 3703 33d St.
Librarian-Helen Newman, 126 3d St. SE.
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL CIRCUITS
JUSTICES ASSIGNED
TERRITORY EMBRACED
District of Columbia judicial circuit: Mr.
Chief Justice Warren. District of Columbia.
First judicial circuit: Mr. Justice Goldberg.
Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Puerto Rico, Rhode Island.
Second judicial circuit: Mr. Justice Harlan.
Connecticut, New York, Vermont.
Third judicial circuit: Mr. Justice Brennan.
Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virgin
Islands.
Fourth judicial circuit: Mr. Chief Justice
Warren. Maryland, North Carolina, South
Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia.
Fifth judicial circuit: Mr. Justice Black.
Alabama, Canal Zone, Florida, Georgia,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas.
Sixth judicial circuit: Mr. Justice Stewart.
Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee.
Seventh judicial circuit: Mi. Justice Clark.
Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin.
Eighth judicial circuit: Mr. Justice White.
Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Ne-
braska, North Dakota, South Dakota.
Ninth judicial circuit: Mr. Justice Douglas.
Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, Hawaii.
Tenth judicial circuit: Mr. Justice White.
Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Utah, Wyoming.
Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000100080017-3