WE LOSE GROUND TO REDS FROM CUBA TO ZANZIBAR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP66B00403R000200170122-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 3, 2005
Sequence Number: 
122
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 3, 1964
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP66B00403R000200170122-5.pdf344.54 KB
Body: 
Approved For Releas"005/01/27 : CIA-RDP66B00403R0002Qi 170122-5 196.4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - APPENDIX . I pledge myself to carry on, in my fumbling way, and however I can, his noble dedicated and sacred work. My idol is not dead. JOSEPH B. GREGG, Sunrise Junior High School, Fort Lauderdale, Fla. Resolution by the Mississippi Legislature Urging Defeat of the Civil Rights Bill EXTENSION OF REMARKS HON. WILLIAM M. COLMER OF MISSISSIPPI - IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Saturday, February 8, 1964 Mr. OOLMER. Mr. Speaker, recog- nizing that the passage of the civil rights bill would cause terrifying dam- age to race relations and to our form of government, the Mississippi Legislature has. adopted a concurrent resolution urging the defeat of the bill now before the House. On behalf of my colleagues, the gen- tlemen from Mississippi [Mr. WHITTEN, Mr. ABERNETHY, Mr. WINSTEAD, and Mr. WILLIAMS], I include the concurrent resolution and commend it to the Mem- bers: HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 3 Concurrent resolution memorializing the Congress of the United States to defeat the civil rights bill now before that body for consideration Whereas we have witnessed in our time a gradual erosion of States rights and an ever-increasing degree of Federal control over affairs specifically reserved to the States by the Constitution; and Whereas there is a clear and unmistakable trend toward further centralization of power in the Federal Government and an ever- increasing restriction on the rights and af- fairs of our citizens that may be conducted outside the scope of Federal intervention and control; and Whereas we view this trend as a very definite danger to the existence and per- petuation of the American way of life as we have known it since the founding of our country; and Whereas we are of the firm conviction that this danger is not confined to any one section or area of our Nation, but that it is inimical to the rights and privileges of the majority of our citizens in every sec- tion of our Nation and in every area of life: economic, social, moral, or religious; and Whereas we regard the so-called civil rights bill now before Congress as the most in- iquitous effort ever proposed to thwart the right and choice of the individual, or the majority, to the pursuit of happiness without Federal control; and Whereas we believe that the passage of this bill further invading the rights of the States to govern themselves and solve their own problems would do Irreparable damage to-the already critical race relations, would widen the breach already brought about by efforts to force a social merger of incompatible ele- ments of society, and would give untold impetus to the strife and turmoil that has torn our Nation asunder; and Whereas we regard education and an effort to resolve our own problems on a local level A615 as more effective in arriving at a solution moved into the Communist orbit and Algeria than Federal compulsion, and we further and Morocco are edging that way. With deny the need of any action by Congress to Cuba the first Soviet base in the Western further restrain and control local affairs by Hemisphere, Panama has now broken with Federal statute; and the United States and there is increasing Whereas we regard this issue of such im- Communist-induced trouble in Bolivia, Vene- portance that we earnestly call upon the zuela, British Guiana and Brazil. legislatures of other States throughout our Adverse events are, in fact, shadowing Nation to join us in this expression of our American policy in at least a dozen court- will to the President, the National Congress, tries in the world, partly under Soviet Com- the Justice Department, and any and all munist pressure and partly under Chinese other persons or agencies concerned, and to Communist pressure. It is hard to recall a call upon them to recognize and respect the period when so many pressures were felt in rights of States to local self-government, so many different places, and with so little and to again turn their energies and efforts prospect of an adequate American response. to the problems of unifying our Nation and Our inability to respond is in some ways erformi th f i r p ng e unct ons of government as ala ming. The old ways are no longer effec- defined in our Constitution: Now, therefore, tive. Attorney General Kennedy learned in be it Indonesia that the existence of American aid Resolved by the Mississippi House of Rep- or the threat of its termination would have resentatives (the Senate concurring therein), little, If any, effect on President Sukarno's That this body does hereby memorialize the determination to crush the new British- Congress of the United States to defeat the oriented nation of Malaysia. so-called civil rights bill now before that body and to refrain from such infringement upon States rights as would result from the passage of this act; and be it further Resolved, That copies'of this resolution be sent to our Senators and Representatives, to the National Congress, to the press, to. the legislatures of other States, and to any other appropriate person or agency. . Adopted by the house of representatives January 14, 1964. WALTER SILLERS, Speaker of the House of Representatives. Adopted by the senate January 23, 1964. CARROLL GARTIN, President of the Selzate We Lose Ground to Reds From Cuba to Zanzibar EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. STEVEN B. DEROUNIAN OF NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Saturday, February 8, 1964 Mr. DEROUNIAN. Mr. Speaker, the present Democratic administration came to office on the pledge that it would "re- store America's lost prestige and in- fluence." This is one of the many prom- ises it has failed to carry out. In yesterday's Evening Star, Richard Wilson enumerates what is lacking in our foreign policy and proves beyond a doubt that our prestige is almost non- existent throughout the world: FOREIGN NATIONALISM STUMPS - UNITED STATES-AMERICA CONTINUES TO LOSE GROUND TO REDS FROM CUBA TO ZANZIBAR (By Richard Wilson) U.S. officials, as well as the public, have become so inured to crisis that they have difficulty recognizing the basically ad- verse trend of world events at this time. There are signs, however, that inside the Johnson administration, as well as outside of it, a grave view is being taken of the present drift. This Is much more than just a drift; in some areas of the world it seems a flowing tide. In southeast Asia there is a rapid deterioration of the Western position, rang- ing from Vietnam and Cambodia to Indo- nesia, Burma, and Laos. Ghana and Zanzibar, in Africa, have Many American lives and many hundreds of millions of dollars, as well as.the American military genius, have moved the problem in Vietnam no nearer to a foreseeable solution. All the goodwill in the world has helped us little in Ghana. Threatening events in East Africa might as well have been taking place on the moon; In fact, we might have known more about them if they had. The picture does not look too bad until it Is studied as a whole and then it is seen that the Communist position in terms of world politics is far advanced over what it was 4 years ago. It is much easier to define what is wrong than to supply any kind of remedy. One thing that is wrong is that we have never been able to carry through a policy which identifies our interests with the rising na- tionalist interests in many countries in the world. We do not know how to deal with the . rising tide of nationalism whether it is In France, Cuba or Panama. Governments rise to power on a wave of hostility to the United States, or soon thereafter develop this hos- tility either genuinely or as a bargaining position. This cannot be explained away as merely Communist-induced and a part of the Com- munist world revolution. The nationalist feeling runs deep and often needs no Com- munist stimulus, as, for example, in Cuba and Panama. But we never seem to be on the side of the nationalist in time to prevent a prior alinement with the Communists. This may merely be in the nature of things. We stand for stability while the Communists stand for revolution, We only know that in the past 4 years the nationalist problem has not gone away but has become more varied and widespread. Every now and then we get a new taste of it: the rioting in Panama, an unexpected coup in Vietnam, a military coup in some Latin American country. For a time we have quiet on the more exposed frontiers of the world. Then our traffic into Berlin is stopped or a plane is shot down. Next it may be a renewed Chinese Com- munist drive into India or Uganda may turn into a one-party Soviet-alined state, or In- donesia may go the way of Cambodia. We may have a lull in the cold war with Russia, but an objective assessment of events should be convincing to President Johnson that his major problem is to arrest the con- tracting influence of the United States in world affairs. The Democratic administration came to office on the pledge that it would restore America's lost prestige and influence. It has not yet done so. We have lost ground since 1960 from Cuba to. Zanzibar. Approved For Release 2005/01/27 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200170122-5 A616 Approved For Release 2005/01/27 CIA-RDP66B00403R000200170122-5 CONGRESS[ONAL RECORD - APPINDIX February Enforcement in Hotels and Cafes EXTENSION CF REMARKS or HON. THOMAS C. ABERNETHY OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Saturday, February 8, 1964 Mr. ABERNETHY. Mr. Speaker, in view of the fact that the House now has under consideration the so-called civil rights bill, I think it most appropriate that the views of Mr. David Lawrence, which appeared in ,he press of yester- day, be included in the RECORD. The column of Mr. Lawrence follows: ENFORCEMENT IN HOTELS AND CAFES-MOUN- TAIN or LEGAL HEADA(".HES EXPECTED IN DEAL- ING WITH PROPOSED EIGHTS LAW (By David Lawrence) It looks now as if enactment of a civil rights law prohibiting racial discriminaton in hotels, motels, and eating places may prove to be a boomerang. It could hasten the day when the legislation itself will become a dead letter due to an inability on the part of the Federal Government, even with all Its re- sources, to carry out an effective enforce- ment operation. Under existing constitutional law. there Is no sanction for the legislation. But the hope of its sponsors is that the Supreme Court will reverse all earlier decisions and bow to the advocates of integration. Attempts to enfor?,e even constitutional laws sometimes have resulted in bitter feel- ing, rather than an srntable adjustment of differences. The Nation's experience with the liquor prohibition lams is a case In point. In fact, after a dozen years of frustration over the problem of enforcement, another amend- ment to the Constitt tion turned this whole issue back to the States. Already the effort to desegregate public schools is backfiring. The boycotts and dis- turbances in the North are more numerous than in the South, and are often char- acterized by violence. A New York City newspaper reported ,he other day that the Negro boycott of the public schools there "was in disregard for the law." and that It did more "to alienate black and white, and alienate them when they are young so they can carry it with them forever, than any- thing that has happened in this city in 25 years." Some progress toward adjustment of racial disputes has been rrade in various parts of the country, but the may be adversely af- fected when the public accommodations rules become known to the public and when the problem of enforcement Is more widely discussed than it is today. One business- man writes of this p'r'ospect as follows: "Many large hotels and restaurants are now integrated, but reserve the right not to serve guests for dozens of reasons: Women in shorts or beachwear, men without jacket or tie, men or woven who are loud, dis- orderly. or drunk, etc. Under Federal law, how could such a dining room refuse to serve a drunken Negro and not be subject to litigation? Asid: from the trouble and expense of going into court. bow could the hotel prove the Neg?o's rejection was due to disorderly conduct or excessive drinking if the plaintiff claims discriminaton?" Motels often do not rent to travelers with local license tags oa their cars, or without luggage, or if they are in any way suspicious. This will provide excuses for discrimination. Undoubtedly word will get around in various communities that certain hotels, motels, and eating places actually do discriminate racially, and only white persons will be wel- come. tobody will advertise such a fact, bux: it will )e spread by word of mouth. The )roblem often Is really not one in- volving any antiracial feeling on the part of the mctei owner himself, but he discovers frequer tly that he can get more business b:r discrimination than by nondiscrimination. The rublic accommodations law has been urged es a way to overcome these defects, but the prohibitton experience argues the other way-teat the businesses which comply with the lav may find themselves at a disadvan- tage w ule their competitors use subterfuges to den- their facilities to those they do not choose to serve. In the prohibition era, moreover, it toot a vast krmy of Federal agents and large legli staffs to carry out an enforcement program involving customer relations. But bootleg- ging fi )uriehed and speakeasies were estat- lished to sell liquor in deflance of the lax and ti e Constitution. Some persons were jailed. but a far greater number defied tie law. The big debate on the public accommods - tions ~~ection will come in the Senate, but all Incications now are that the legislation will be enacted into law before summer. This means that the enforcement problem will he before the country soon thereafter, and a Mea iwhlle, the school-integration prop- Y'He stated also, "when I went to Washing- lem is reaching Its most acute stage because ton for consultation in the late fall of 1962, neighs erhood schools will no longer be pr.)- Edwin Martin, the then Assistant Secretary tested from invasion by those who live out- side the neighborhood. Efforts now are be- of State for Latin American Affairs, stepped ing it ado to produce a racial balance by In. We here In the State Department will iransl orting students from all parts of a city ordinate Lansing Collins, who reported to or cot my in order to integrate a larger and take rare of any discussions about Panama larger number of Negroes with whites. with the CIA ourselves. Further, you are Thi:. is encouraging enrollments in private not to have discussions with Members of bitter e. In some northern areas there is Congress on the Hili,' Martin directed." bitter leer among white citizens who cannot Farland met President Kennedy at San afford to send their children to private Salvador last March. Integration. and who resent the enforcement of "president Kennedy did not know about Martin's directive," Farland continued, "and Theoretically, the Supreme Court neter in Martin's presence he crossed up Martin orders d integration as such. but merely c e- on the congressional angle. claret that segregation in public education Is "The President told me to see inquiring court t decision not e. There has been no high congressional leaders on my next trip home. cision on whether, under the Cl.- eI had nothing but courtesy, understanding, atltutlon, the States can retain their right and so far as I know, approval from Presi to rec u)re children living in a certain neigh- dent Kennedy personally and directly." borheod to attend schools In the diatri.)te Farland described the CIA as "underzeal- geogr aphically prescribed. our in knowing what was happening in Muzzling Our Panama $xpert EXTENSION OF REMARKS or Ht)N. STEVEN B. DEROUNIAN Or NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE113 Saturday, February 8, 1964 M '. DEROUNIAN. Mr. Speaker, shocking though it is that we still have a vacancy in our Ambassadorship to Pan una since last August, it Is un"3e- lievf ble that the former Ambassador, the Honorable Joseph S. Farland, was eomletely neglected by Secretary of State Rusk and the other do-gooders in the State Department upon his re- turf from Panama. H Ivry J. Taylor, in the Palm Beach Sun-Sentinel of February 3, graphically portrays this deliberate snub of someDne whc might have helped forestall our pre: ent crisis: Ous EXPERT ON PANAMA WAS MUZZLED (By Henry J. Taylor) What really happened to Ambassado:? to Pan una Joseph S. Farland should explain much about what confronts President John- son. Farland is an ex-FBI agent, counterintel- ligence expert, chief of mission for three and a half years in Panama, acclaimed as one of the most successfull ambassadors we have ever had in Latin America. Secretary of State Dean Rusk told the House Foreign Affairs Committee January 15 he was taken by surprise by events in Panama. The committee asked whether his Depart- ment had fully consulted the Ambassador. "Oh. yes, Mr. Farland has been completely debriefed." Rusk testified. Farland has stated publicly he was asked nothing. He said Rusk apparently relied on a sub- ordinate, Lansing Collins, who reported to him after engaging Farland In "a short, and largely irrelevant conversation," that is all. "When I arrived home In August," Farland said, "and the State Department circulated its customary notice to appropriate agencies listing returned ambassadors available for consultation, a man in the White House went to work. "His name is Dalph Dunley. On whose authority he acted I do not know. But Dun- ley telephoned the various agencies, includ- Panama and overzealous In building a CIA empire In the zone." "The station Chief had exposed himself as a prominent figure in the high social world." Farland stated. "They simply did not know what was going on. I spelled this out re- peatedly to both the State Department and CIA's Washington headquarters in terms of Isthmus and American security. Neither acted. It took me nearly a year to get the station Chief removed." The Positive Approach for Conservatives EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. BRUCE ALGER OF TEXAS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Friday, February 7, 1964 Mr, ALDER. Mr. Speaker, a favorite trick of the radical-liberals is to advo- cate all sorts of projects that strike at the very root of our freedoms and then charge those who oppose such attacks on liberty as being negative. It is time for conservatives to point out that the positive approach to the issues of our time is to preserve this Re- Approved For Release 2005/01/27 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200170122-5