THE COVER-UP - A NEW MORALITY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 16, 2004
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 15, 1964
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3.pdf719.61 KB
Body: 
1964 Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE mined until the flood water leaves, and the loss may be worse than we think. She said the administration's first. concern is for the sewer and water systems because of their vital relationship to health. A wire has been sent by the city notifying Senator MIKE MANSFIELD of the estimate, MANSFIELD and Edward A. McDermott, Di- rector of the Office of Emergency Planning, Washington, D.C., are coming to. Great Falls Sunday to inspect the conditions here and in the entire flood area. MANSFIELD said in a telegram today that McDermott has provided some specific in- formation about Small Business Administra- tion loan assistance. He said that while Public Law 875 does not provide for direct as- sistance to individual disaster victims, disas- ter loan assistance, at interest not to exceed 3 percent with up to 20 years to pay, is avail- able through the SBA. The assistance is available for repair or re- placement of disaster damaged commercial or residential structures and the loan authority extends to contents and inventory as well as structures. Individual needs for clothing, replacement of lost furnishings and similar needs are taken care of through the emergency relief and rehabilitation programs of the American Red Cross, he said. While businesses are not eligible for as- sistance under Public Law 875, SBA disaster loan assistance is available to individuals, business concerns, including corporations, partnerships, cooperatives, and churches, charitable institutions and other nonprofit organizations. MANSFIELD said further, concerning flood problems in Glacier County, that county roads and bridges damaged or destroyed in the floods are eligible for repair or replace- ment under provisions of Public Law 875. Bureau of Public Roads engineers are making damage surveys for the OEP to determine the extent of damage and eligible work. He said Glacier County commissioners should work through the Montana disaster agency headed by Gen. Richard C. Kendall, adjutant general and State disaster coordinator, in applying for Public Law 875 assistance. [From the Great Falls Tribune, June 13, 1964] COUNTY LOSS HIGH IN LAND, EQUIPMENT Cascade County farmlands were damaged to an estimated $2,195,000 by this week's floods and the county suffered an additional $2,087,500 in damage to farm buildings and equipment, Doug Smith, executive di- rector of the Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Service, Bozeman, said Fri- day at a flood relief and rehabilitation co- ordination meeting called by Gov. Tim Bab- cock. The meeting was presided over by Creath Tooley, Everett, Wash., regional director of the Office of Emergency Planning, coordinat- ing agency for disaster assistance furnished by the Federal Goverment. Smith said the county farm equipment and facilities loss estimates include 400 miles of fencing, 200 miles of main ditch work, 2,000 irrigation structures, 40 pumps, $200,000 worth of rip rap, 10 stock reser- voirs, 150 buildings, 500 head of cattle, and weed control of an estimated $640,000 value. Smith said farmers will get help through temporary grazing on retired land, conser. vation reserve land, short-term feed grain disaster donations from the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Agricultural Market- ing Service which supplies food for farmers, loans from the Farmers Home Administra- tion, and loans from the Rural Electrification Administration. The soil conservation dis- trict will provide technical assistance. In land leveling, pasture planning, and additional personnel in cases directed by the OEP, he said. CONSERVATION HIGHLIGHTS, 1963- AID BY SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE TO NORTH DAKOTA Mr. BURDICK. Mr. President, the. help furnished by the Soil Conservation Service in North Dakota means a lot to the farmers and ranchers of my State. More than 36,000 farmers and ranchers now are cooperators with North Dakota's 71 soil conservation districts which blan- ket the State. More than 25,000 of them have developed basic conservation plans for 171/2 million acres of land. In total, 67 of the 71 soil conservation districts in the State have updated their plans of operations to include broader conservation programs and have signed modernized working arrangement with the Department of Agriculture. This is a great cooperative effort between the Department of Agriculture and these lo- cal units of government organized un- der State law. There has come to my attention a di- gest of the 1963 annual report of the Soil Conservation Service. It sets forth nu- merous facts about the scope of work, ac- complishments, and conservation needs in a form that can be read in only a few minutes of time. It carries the following statement from Mr. D. A. Williams, Ad- ministrator of the Soil Conservation Service: A dynamic program of soil and water con- servation is going forward throughout the United States. It is a voluntary program of the people aided by local, State,- and Federal Govern- ments. Its emphasis is on meeting the needs of the entire population for land and water uses while improving the economy and livability of rural America. The progress reported here stems from or- ganized local effort and leadership coupled with the vision and skills of technically trained people. This partnership recognizes the funda- mental truth that only the people who own and control the land can really do conserva- tion work. The rest of us are privileged to help. We are proud of that partnership and -that progress. Mr. President, I believe that other Sen- ators would have use for the facts set forth in this Conservation Highlights, 1963, issued on January 1, 1964. There- fore, I ask unanimous consent that it be printed at this point in the RECORD. There being no objection, the digest was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: CONSERVATION HIGHLIGHTS 1963-DIGEST OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOIL CONSERVA- TION SERVICE NEW HORIZONS The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) en- larged its service to urban as well as rural people in fiscal year 1963. The Food and Agriculture Act of 1962 resulted in new tasks for SOS in rural recrea- tion, resource conservation and development projects, watershed development, and crop- land conversion. SCS made 1 million acres of soil surveys for immediate use in rural-urban planning. It provided information on soil and water use in urban fringe areas. 13309 SCS helped plan watershed projects to include recreation and wildlife development, water supply, and other purposes along with flood prevention. Sixty percent of new proj- ects authorized in 1983 are multipurpose. SOS helped soil conservation districts, re- vise their programs in relation to broadened horizons in conservation. The Secretary of Agriculture signed new working agreements with 500 districts with modernized programs. RURAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT Watershed projects, rural recreation, and all resource conservation contribute directly to rural areas development. Forty percent of small watershed projects approved for operations in fiscal 1963 are in counties designated for assistance by the Area Redevelopment Administration. To date, watershed projects have provided more than 6,200 man-years of construction work in rural communities. SCS provided technical assistance to 2,008 county and area rural areas development committees and to 2,785 technical action panels in fiscal 1963. RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS In response to the Food and Agriculture Act of 1962, the Secretary of Agriculture di- rected U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) agencies to assist local communities with new-type resource conservation and de- velopment projects. These projects will be locally initiated and sponsored within approved areas of several adjoining counties or watersheds. They will concentrate all USDA programs for the con- servation and coordinated development of land, water, and related resources to improve local economic conditions.. SCS is, responsible for USDA leadership and will provide technical assistance in planning projects and installing resource conservation and development measures. In fiscal 1963, local organizations sub- mitted applications for 16 projects covering 22 million acres. The Secretary approved the Lincoln Hills area in southern Indiana as the first project. RURAL RECREATION The Secretary of Agriculture assigned to SCS leadership for USDA's activities in devel- oping income-producing outdoor recreation on non-Federal rural land. Through assistance to soil conservation districts and small watershed projects, SOS helped farmers and ranchers convert land to outdoor recreation uses for pay. In fiscal 1963 more than 9,800 district co- operators established one or more income- producing recreation enterprises. Of these, 945 adopted recreation as a primary source of income on 238,000 acres of land. Of 473 small watershed projects author- ized by June 30, 17 included recreation and 48 included fish and wildlife as a purpose. SERVICES TO URBAN FRINGE AREAS SCS increased soil survey work and ?con- sultive assistance to urban fringe areas in response to requests from officials needing information to guide land use planning and development. It made soil surveys in 20 urban fringe areas under formal cost-sharing agreements with cities and towns and did special map- ping work in at least 50 others. . GREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION PROGRAM In the 383 counties designated for the Great Plains conservation program, SCS as- sisted farmers and ranchers prepare complete land use and conservation plans as a basis for 2,852 new cost-sharing contracts with USDA. The plans cover 5,051,330 acres and provide for conversion of 191,828 acres of cropland to other uses. Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3 13310 Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE This Is an increase over 1962 of 16 per- cent in number of contracts and 2 percent in acres. CONSERVATION PROGRE3S,FISCAL YEAS 1963 Programs and plans Boll cone rvatlon districts: Soil conservation dis- tricts (net increase): Number ---.....-_ Acres-..-........ Farms and ranches In districts: Number-.. Land in farms and ranches: Acres ..__-- Cooperators: Number-..-_.____ Acres----____----?! Basic conservation I)IRns: Acres ------------- Land owners and oper- ators assisted: Num- ber------------------ Land owners and oper- ators applying prac- tices: Number .--___ Droop project plans prepared: Number........... Acres------------- Landowners in groups: Number -____....-... Boll surveys: Acres _-__ Great Plains Conserva- tion program: Contracts signed: Number -.......... Acres-------------- Contraets completed: Number_....-__... Acres -------------- Plannedcropland con- version: Acres....... 13 is, 077, 327 24,433 6, 276, 222 114,785 39, 765,836 105,460 37,277,683 1,041, 526 665, 829 2,478 1,141, 579 11,075 68,324,168 2,812 5,051,330 989 1,418,681 191,926 Agricultural conservation program: Cost-sharing referrals received: Number... Cost-sharing referrals servtce:d Number-__ 387,594 3n,619 On June 30, S08 was providing technical assistance to 2,942 soil conservation districts containing 1,718,856.998 acres in the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. These districts include 97 percent of the farms and 93 percent of the land in farms. Twenty-four States and the two Caribbean territories are completely covered by districts. Most districts are in the process of updat- ing their programs as a basis for new mem- orandums of understanding with USDA pro- viding for broadened assistance "in soil conservation, watershed protection, flood prevention, farm. forestry. and rural areas development." CONSERVATION PRACTICES APPLIED SOS helped 665,829 landowners and oper- ators apply one or more soil and water con- servation practices. Cooperators installed conservation crop- ping systems on 22,909.087 acres, an increase of 30 percent over the previous year. They practiced contour farming on 6,104,602 acres, an increase of 27 percent. Water conservation through improved ir- rigation practices also Increased sharply. Farmers leveled 811,125 acres of land and applied irrigation water according to con- servation standards on 2.408,550 acres. Farmers and ranchers following conserva- tion plans seeded 2.893,429 acres of pasture and range, planted 375,132 acres of trees, and developed wildlife habitat on 220,257 acres. They also built 40,657 miles of terraces, 3,310 miles of diversions, and 63,886 ponds. SOIL SI7RVETS 808 completed field mapping 68,324,153 acres of soil surveys In fiscal 1963. compared to 85,040,992 acres In 1982. A total of 785,235,012 acres has soil sur- veys in sufficient detail for use In conserva- tion planning of farms, ranches, watersheds, and other uses. This is about three-fourths of the land in farms (and half the total land area) in soil conservation districts. Twenty-eight soil surveys were published during the year, and the maps and texts for 162 surveys are in various stages of prepara- tion for publication. The use of soil surveys by both public and private agencies and by Individuals continues to increase. Nonagricultural users-espe- cially State, city, and town planning groups- are requesting more soils information ap- plicable to urban and suburban areas. 808 is cooperating with the Bureau of Land Management in three pilot surveys on extensive rangelands In the West. WATERSHED PROJECTS Eighty-eight new -email watershed projects were approved for operations and 121 were authorized for planning in fiscal 1963, the largest number In any year since the pro- gram started. By the end of the year, 48 States and Puerto Rico had submitted 1.936 applica- tion for Federal assistance covering 138.3 million acres. On June 30, a total of 890 watersheds had been authorized for planning. Of these, 473 were approved for operations. In addition, SCS prepared work plans for 11 subwatersheds covering 874,000 acres in the 11 major river basins authorized for flood control work. Construction work In all types of water- shed activity during fiscal 1983 completed 379 floodwater retarding structures. 757 grade stal?illzation structures, 580 silt and debris basins, 348 miles of stream-channel Improvement, and 12 miles of floodways. RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS Soil (enervation Sercie participated with other Federal and State agencies In surveys of 25 major river basins In decal 1963. These surveys aim to develop omtmprehen- sive plans for the coordinated and orderly development, management. and use of the water and related land resources of the basins. June 15 INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE During fiscal 1663 SCS completed a tenta- tive work plan for a watershed project In Tunisia under contract with the Agency for International Development (AID). SOS also contracted with AID to provide technical services to the Government of Al- geria in rural rehabilitation and soil con- servation. During the year SOS made available to AID 12 professional conservationists for short assignments In 8 countries. SOS assisted with training In the United States of 330 foreign nationals from 60 coun- tries. CONSERVATION NEEDS INVENTORY Results of a National Inventory of Soil and Water Conservation Needs, begun in 1957, were published In August 1962 as USDA Sta- tistical Bulletin 317. All agencies of USDA concerned with land and water resources cooperated in the in- ventory under the leadership of SCS. State and local representatives of USDA and other interested agencies participated in all coun- ties. The Inventory revealed that nearly two- thirds of all non-Federal rural land needs conservation treatment of some kind and 5,358 small watersheds need community-type projects for flood prevention and water man- agement. (See table.) - Conservation needs Non-Federal rural land need- ing treatment: Cropland ---------------- Erosion hazard -._..-...... 161,592,000 Excess water -------------- 59, 925, 000 Unfavorable soil ----------- 36, 463,000 Adverse climate ----------- 14,111,000 Pasture and range........... Establishment of plant cover-------------------- 72,380,000 Improvement of plant cover -------------------- 107, 570, 000 Protection of plant cover-- 184,847,000 Forest and woodland -.--.... Establishment of timber stand ___________________ 69,656, 000 Improvement of timber stand ------------------- 160,260,000 Erosion control---_-__-.-.. 12,4N, 000 Other land ------------------ Total area needing treat- 2,942 1,718,956,M 8,613,001 1,050,990,909 1,979,151 634, 928, 801 1,472,660 465, 341,029 27, 636 21, 078, 804 202,601 785,235, 012 12,393 28,4A 161 1,604 2,293,088 861,398 Farms and ranches: Contour farming acres-.. 6,104,603 Conservation cropping systems -------- acres-- 22,909,067 Cover cropping---do---- 4,984,775 Crop residue use--do---- 18, 499,453 Strip cropping systems ages.. 667,305 Seeding pasture and range ----------- acres. . 2,683,420 Tree ph rating---------do_--- 375,132 Wildlife development acres__ 220,267 Irrigation land leveling acres.- 511,125 Irrigation water man agement_ -_ --acres--.. 2,408, 550 Terracing--------miles.. 40,567 Diversion construction relies _- 3,310 Pond construction: Number ------------ -- 63,886 Watershed projects: Floodwater retarding structures: Number- - 379 Grade stabilization: structures: Number _ 767 Silt and debris basins: Number ------------- W Stream channel Im- provement..... miles _ 846 Fioodways------- do--.- 12 39,204, 454 131,704,734 23,850,064 93,898,863 19,043,818 49,122, 866 10,717,076 3,019,422 7,587,890 8,600,236 1,213,203 92,458 1,262,237 2,679 7, 901 16,085 1,429 110 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS The Boll Conservation Service assisted 1,041.1126 landowners and operators plan and apply soil and water conservation practices in fiscal 1983. During the year. so:1 conservation districts added 114,785 cooperators with 39,785.836 acres of land. SCS helped them prepare 105,468 basic conservation plans on 37,- 277.563 acres. ment-------------------- Small watersheds needing projects for- Flood prevention ------------ Erosion control -------------- Drdnage-------------------- Irrigation-___-___---?.------ Total number needing pro- jects for I or more purposes- 6, 364 4,661 3,93,7 2,625 THE COVER-UP-A NEW MORALITY Mr. DOMINICK. Mr. President, I bring to the attention of the Senate one matter which I think is particularly im- portant. This deals directly with the struggle between the legislative and ex- ecutive departments, in connection with actions of the executive department. As Senators well know, on many occasions there have been investigations of what happens in various departments, includ- ing the Billie Sol Estes case, the Otepka case, and a number of others. It now appears that in almost every Instance in which some employee of one Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3 1964 Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE 13311 of the executive departments gives Con- gress information leading to an investi- gation and the revelation of dealings which, to say the least, are not ?proper, that person is punished by his depart- ment; and the person who has not done anything about it, and has resisted.in many instances the bringing of evidence from other departments to Congress, gets a promotion or goes free from criticism. I have before me two newspaper arti- cles which comment on this situation. One is from the Rocky Mountain News of June 7, 1964. The article is entitled "Federal Wheels Grind Slowly in Bi- zarre Security Case." This pertains to the Otepka case. The other article is from the Washing- ton Star. It is entitled "The Coverup- A New Morality-Record Shows Federal Officials Who Expose Shady Deals Get Bounced." Because I think this is of such impor- tance, I ask unanimous consent that these articles be printed at this point in the RECORD. There being no objection, the articles were ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: [From the Rocky Mountain News, June 7, 1964] FEDERAL WHEELS GRIND SLOWLY IN BAZARRE SECURITY CASE (By Richard H. Boyce) WASHINGTON, June 6.-Every workday morning Otto F. Otepka, a $16,900-a-year Government employee, goes to the State De- partment, and every afternoon he goes home. During the 8 hours in between, Otepka does nothing but read the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. Otepka Is Chief of the State Department Security Evaluation Division. But he is not permitted to do the work he is paid for. He gets no important Department mail. In an entire year he has had only two Depart- ment phone calls. Fellow workers snub him. He's not invited to office luncheons or De- partment social affairs. , It's a lonely life for Otepka, 49 and rug- gedly handsome. He thinks his office is bugged. He doesn't trust his desk telephone. He won't let his private briefcase out of his sight, even takes it to the washroom with him. He reads the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD be- cause his superiors told him to-after they filed charges against him that can cost him his job. Reading the RECORD is supposed to keep Otekpa busy until a hearing is held on his ouster. He has been doing "mostly noth- ing" for a year, now-a hearing date still hasn't been set, TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS' SERVICE Otepka has been in Government service for 28 years, moving up all the time-until last year, His troubles started after he testified in November 1961 and March 1962 before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee. As a long time security expert, Otepka told the Senators that some new State Department appointees were being given rush-job secu- rity clearances. The committee at the time was investigat- ing Fidel Castro's rise to power and his links with communism. Otepka had something critical to say about that, too, in connec- tion with high State officials and State De- partment security practices. Early in 1963 Otepka was called back to the committee. Some of his earlier testi- mony differed from statements made by other Department Officials. To prove he was right, Otepka gave Committee Counsel Jay 3lourwine three confidential documents. This was all right, Otepka said, because Sourwine had security clearance. Besides, Otepka insists, the documents didn't en- danger national security. But the Department said Otepka violated a 1948 order by President Truman forbidding unauthorized disclosure of executive depart- ment files. Otepka concedes this, but points to a 1948 law which says "the, right of any member of the classified civil service to fur- nish information to any Member of Congress shall not be denied." Otepka also leans on a 1958 joint congres- sional resolution saying "any person in Gov- ernment service should put loyalty to.coun- try above loyalty * * * to any Government department." Nevertheless the State Department said Otepka's acts were insubordination, and on June 27, 1963, charged him with conduct un- becoming an officer. AID RECANTS To get evidence to back up the charge, Otepka's phone was tapped. Later John F. Reilly, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Security, and Elmer D. Hill, Chief of the Technical Services Division, were fired be- cause they lied to the committee, saying they knew nothing of the wiretap. David Belisle, Reilly's special assistant, told the committee he knew nothing of it, then recanted and said he knew of it but didn't do it. He was transferred to other work outside the Security Section. Besides the wiretap, Otepka's trash baskets were sifted, his typewriter ribbon deciphered, and his torn carbon papers pieced together. One night his office safe was "burglarized." Someone drilled it open and photostated pa- pers in it. Twelve file cabinets and two safes in Otepka's office were then impounded by the Department. Otepka was turned out of of- five, given a cubbyhole, and told to read the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, to determine Con- gressmen's attitudes toward the security program-obviously a makework assignment. Seven members of his staff have been re- assigned to other work, and Otepka charges this was because they openly declared they would testify for him. Raymond Loughton, Francis Gardner, Ed- win Burkhardt, John R. Norpel, Jr., Harry Hite, and Howard J. Shea-all experienced in security work-were transferred to the De- partment's Latin American Affairs Section "to review highfg sensitive security cases." They have privately told friends they are doing no worthwhile work. ACCEPTS DEMOTION Billy N. Hughes was persuaded to accept demotion to an investigator position created in Memphis, Tenn. Only 11 security evaluators remained in Otepka's section. To fill the? vacancy, field investigators were brought in. Otepka be- lieves they are not experienced in handling the complicated evaluation system he worked out. Otepka demands that he be_ reinstated. Under Department regulations he is entitled to a hearing before another Department em- ployee. Otepka wants an outsider to hear the case. A decision has been hanging since Otepka filed his demand on January 20. - [From the Washington Evening Star] THE COVERUP: A NEW MORALITY-RECORD SHOWS FEDERAL OFFICIALS WHO EXPOSE SHADY DEALS GET BOUNCED (By Richard Wilson) The handwriting on the wall has been written large here: Don't buck the system. This truth is freshly proved by a Government distinguished service award to an obscure official named Horace D. Godfrey. Mr. God- frey is the Administrator of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service under Agriculture Secretary Freeman. It is charged in the House of Representa- tives that Mr. Godfrey was given this award although in his branch of the Federal serv- ice "obviously a coverup was attempted in the entire Billie Sol Estes case." The evi- dence in the Billie Sol Estes investigation showed, it is charged, incredible confusion, mismanagement, lack of records, duplication, and "woeful lack of management and knowl- edge of what was going on in the Estes case." Mr. Freeman so values Mr. Godfrey today, however, that he confers upon him the high- est - accolade of his Department as an ex- ample to others. But. what the man who testified and sup- plied records to show that the bigtime Texas promoter now under prison sentence for fraud was shown favoritism in Mr. Free- man's Department as early as November 1961? This man, N. Battle Hales, has been denied an automatic in-grade promotion which would ordinarily have come to him in the course of his Federal service. Thus the accuser languishes and the accused flour- ishes, although the record seems clear that Billie Sol enjoyed a favored position in - the Department of Agriculture. Mr. Freeman has no monopoly on this technique. One Jerry Jackis, who revealed to Congress the use of foreign aid funds in Cambodia for a Communist-sponsored hos- pital, was fired while the State Department official who- made a record against him was promoted. Otto Otepka, State Department security official, who committed the unforgivable sin of peaching on his superiors and telling Con- gress what is wrong with the intetnal secu- rity system in the State Department, is in limbo. But William J. Crockett, Deputy Un- der Secretary, who was in charge of the Otepka matter for Secretary Rusk, is up for promotion to career minister, a better job. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is looking into this because the record shows wiretapping, general harassment, and at- tempts to degrade Mr. Otepka after he helped the- Senate Internal Security Committee to expose some of the weaknesses of the State Department security system. . It is worth noting also that Gen. Curtis LeMay has been given an extension, at least until after the election, of his tenure as Air Chief of Staff. General LeMay protested against the multimillion-dollar award- of the TFX contract for what he thought- was a second best fighter plane to be used by both the Navy and Ajr Force. The Navy com- mander, Admiral Anderson, who also object- ed openly before Congress, has long since vanished from the Washington scene. But General LeMay was pointedly given only a 1-year reappointment, instead of the usual 2, and this has now been extended. But it looks as if General LeMay's service is rapidly coming to a close. The pattern set in these several cases is shocking. The lesson taught to Federal of- ficials is that if they see mismanagement, wrongdoing, or bad judgmentthey would be wise to keep their mouths shut if they wish to maintain or improve their job status. Their worst sin would be to tell their story, to Congress, although it is the clear and-im- perative responsibility of Congress to inquire into the operation of Federal executive de- partments funded solely by the votes of Con- gress. Congress controls absolutely the ap- propriation of money to operate the Federal Government and of taxation to provide these funds. This is its exclusive power, and Con- gress has the right to know how the funds are spent. Some kind of a new morality seems to _ have gotten lodged in official Washington, It is the morality of blind loyalty to superior ` authority and complete obeisance to the word Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3 Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE June 15 from on high. It is the morality of coverup in the Billie Sol Estes case and whitewash In the Baker case. And It Is not a very healthy atmosphere for the prudent conduct of the public's business. SALVATION ARMY DOES BATTLE Mr. BARTLETT. Mr. President, as- sistance to Alaska in its great disaster has flowed from many organizations and In- dividuals. Alaskans will long remember March 27 and Its aftermath, but I be- lieve as the years go by the good done by these private individuals and associa- tions will live longest in their memories. One of the organizations which has contributed so much is the Salvation Army. Most of us Ill the United States in one way or another probably have had associations with this great organization. However. I do not believe many of us know in detail the good deeds performed by the Salvation Army in behalf of those caught In personal losses and tragedies. I believe, therefore, a report which I have just received telling how the Salvation Army went about its job after the Alaska earthquake and subsequent tidal waves will be of particular interest. I ask unanimous consent that the article may be printed in the REtbRD at this point. There being no objection, the article was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: ALASKA EARTHQUAMI AND TmAL WAVrs Almost before the earth bad stopped shak- ing on that memorable Good Friday after- noon, March 27, 1684, the Salvation Army was here, there, and everywhere giving needed help. As the days became weeks, this service continued in all of the stricken areas, sup- plies being distributed and money provided with no strings attached, an example of people helping people that Alaskans will never forget. The end is not in all ht. Damage wrought by the tidal waves pro,,ed most disastrous in some areas and was followed by still further property damage from unprecedented high tides- Homes were destroyed and businesses wiped out with tragic, losses that will re- quire assistance for m?mnths to come. In the beginning, when it became ap- parent there had been a major disaster, Maj. Forrest. Mosely, division secretary, quickly marshaled forces and all possible reserves: committees and volunteers were quickly or- ganiaeci to perform a variety of needed serv- ices. In the early mi:iutes, it was-a search and rescue job; then came the stupendous task of clearing the names of missing persons and notifying the next of kin. The Army was asked to take over the task of processing the thousands of inquiries pouring into civil defe ass headquarters. In- quiries Included everything from missing persons to requests fcr housing. The divi- sionral headquarters building at Eighth and Barrow became a communications center, with scores of runners. Investigators, and secretarial assistants locating missing per- sons and compiling lifts of former residents of the hard-hit Turnagain area. Services of the MARS (U.S. Army Com- munications) and SAt: (Strategic Air Com- mand), RACES (Ham Radio Network con- slating of over 800 operators in Alaska), and three teletype operators from Fairbanks, were put at the disposal of the Salvation Army. The Air National Guard, PNA, and other airlines flew in large supplies of bed- ding, toys, food, and clothing from several States. CivilAir Patrii and military planes from ltimendorf and l+'ort Richardson made possible the quick distribution of supplies to all disaster areas. Other Salvationists organized a production line for preparing sandwiches, coffee, and other food, which was dispersed through 10 mobile canteens for Anchorage disaster workers, guards, and other "on duty" personnel. It proved to be an immediate morale builder forthe stricken to find that someone cared or was interested and shared in their grief with a kindly "God bless you." Total mobilization of all facilities, person- nel, and equipment was offered to the city and State Civil Defense. Five areas of serv- ice were agreed upon for immediate action: 1. Mass feeding: (a) social center; (b) mobile canteens. 2. Emergency housing. 3. Receiving and distributing clothing, 4. Processing inquiries and notifying next of kin. 5. Establishing offices and personnel in dis- aster area... An organization was effected with officers in charge of the above major divisions, as- sisted by other officers and volunteer work- ers. In the early hours the Salvation Army es- tablished sleeping accommodations In the Anchorage Post Office building. Food, water, and hot coffee were provided, and the home- less were accommodated in the hallways of the post office, with cots, mattresses, and blankets from the military and others, All telephones were out in Anchorage, and the only means of communication between Army workers was the use of radio station KENI. Each worker carried a transistor radio. The movement of canteens and prepare tion of food was constant. Army workers slept and worked in shifts, but sleep was limited to a few hours at a time. Sand- wiches were made at the rate of 1,000 an hour when the demand was greatest. The social center at Eighth and C became a depot for serving hot meals and distributing food, baby supplies, and household effects. The headquarters butding, Eighth and Barrow, was set up to distribute clothing and bedding and provide for special needs. A private detective agency volunteered Its services and "Hot Rod" club runners, as well as Explorer Scouts and other groups with cars, spent many hours tracking down miss- ing persons. utilizing all available leads. In- quiries pouring in from all points of the United States and from countries around the world were promptly processed by Mrs. Major Moseley and volunteers and replies re- turned at once. Many unusual requests came to the Army: Salvationists helped to remove a man who had barricaded himself in a hotel room. Three-elderly women were assisted from their home In a badly devastated area of Anchorage. Rating with the stork was a girl from the Army Booth Memorial Home who faced an additional emergency brought on by the earthquake. With transportation Impossible, Salvationists literally walked her to the Na- tive Hospital six blocks away just In time to beat the stork. On Sunday morning, the Salvation Army was asked to present an Easter service to the community via radio, since all churches were closed. The broadcast originated In Anchor- age and was received with gratifying reaction from many remote areas. Sorting and distributing clothing for all disaster areas required immediate coordina- tton. The divisional headquarters building was set up as the distribution center for An- chorage, under the direction of Mrs. Capt. William Lynch. Under the able leadership of Mrs. Lieuten- ant Colonel Rody, a warehouse was obtained for sorting, sizing, and packing clothing, bed- ding, and household furnishings. A produc- tion line, preparing for shipment to various parts of the State as needed, was set up. The machinery of assisting other commu- nities with cash and supplies was put into motion, Lieutenant Colonel Rody, divisional commander, made a complete survey of all outlying communities affected by the earth- quake and tidal waves and established offices in each stricken town, where Salvation Army personnel began working with local commit- tees In the tremendous job of assisting the homeless and helping small businesses to re- establish the economy of the communities. SEWARD Maj. Lester Holmes, service extension direc- tor, was sent almost immediately to Seward with a load of supplies. He set up a canteen in the State employment office, which be- 'came a 24-hour-a-day meeting center. Since the Alaska Railroad had been demolished, he obtained a truck for making regular trips to outlying areas cut off from sources of supply. Later, Mrs. N. V. Jensen came from Portland to take over his duties. Working with the Seward Disaster Com- mittee, she continued the canteen service and began plans for filling the greater needs of families and businesses. Of the 87 Seward homes destroyed, 60 were those of people in the low-income group; $18.000 was provided for immediate cash assistance in replacing personal effects. Medical bills for individual needs amounted to $5,250. In some cases, the Salvation Army paid rent and purchased necessities. Serious losses in the Seward hospital in- cluded destruction of kitchen and laundry equipment and the generator. An emergency generator was purchased and funds made available for replacement of other equipment. KODIAK Damage to Kodiak was so extreme that Lieutenant Colonel Rody estimates emer- gency help will be needed there for a year or more. Following the quake and wave disaster, Lt. Col. Max Kurtz. former Alaskan divisional commander, was sent from San Francisco to Kodiak, where he made a careful survey of the most urgent needs. He set up headquarters in the civil defense trailer at the request of the civil defense director. With the economy at a standstill because of lose of the boats and canneries, Lieutenant Colonel Kurtz aimed at quick repair of vital small businesses, dispersing funds to aug- ment what was available locally. A sawmill and boat repair shop were given immediate assistance with $7,510, and a cannery with $3,000. Twenty-seven families who had suffered to- tal losses received immediate cash grants to- taling $8,000. and $12,000 additional was set aside for emergency needs, which so far have helped 50 families. A total of 180 homes had been destroyed. As In other communities, the Salvation Army set up a service center for dispensing such necessities as baby food and diapers, de- tergents, bedding, rain gear, and clothing for children and adults. Now In charge at Kodiak are two Salvation- ists, Mr. and Mrs. Dave Thompson, who main- tain an office and coordinate the continuing needs of the islanders. At their request, the Anchorage headquarters sends needed sup- plies and funds. The most recent shipment consisted of 1,800 pounds of clothing, deter- gents, canteen supplies, bedding, and blan- kets which were part of a gift sent by Japa- nese businessmen. The total commitment to date for Kodiak is $24,000. VALDEZ Valdez suffered almost total devastation. Brig, and Mrs. Stanley Jackson of Prince Rupert arrived shortly after the quake and flood, setting up a headquarters office in the State highway building. An Army detach- ment from Fairbanks provided personnel to Approved For Release 2005/01/05 : CIA-RDP66B00403R000200200003-3