EDITING AND REVIEW OF IM-253

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP67-00059A000400110003-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 22, 2005
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 21, 1949
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP67-00059A000400110003-2.pdf91.65 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005103A9 bP *-00059AO00400110003-2 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 21 December 1949 ?ub? eea of 1M-253 1, Considerable confusion developed between t/ssc and 1i/ 'ub over the editing and reevi of intelligence emorandum 253 on 12 December 1949. In accordance with standard operating procevdure, 0/hib reviewed and edited the D/ draft submission of 1&253 and took the revised version to D/Ec for consultation anc negotiation. D/Fub allotted, three hours for conference on the paper, a period of time which is considered more than adequate for negotiating a final draft of a fivee?.page s crar&?um. d)/Se representatives declared themselves unable to disco ;, the draft revision with /Pub in the time available. After some dele'y? the matter was referred by D/ to Df t`3R: who decided that in order to, met the deadline of the requester the unrevised C/ draft would have to be printed and sent forward, 2,; In the interest of avoiding such situations in the future and in order to c clOar what kind of changes f/d sought to make in the 0/: draft submission of I -253x, the two versions have been drawn up in parallel columns and attached to this .memorandum. In comparing the two versions, it must be borne in mind that the U/Fub draft revision was pxe- pared in the expectation that Dlk;o and 1/Pub rep sentt tivoe would go over it together and that any errors in fact or distortions of emphasis would be corrected during that ccnsl?tetion.. B/Pub regards its draft revision of 11.?253 as representative of the level of presentation to which CC' production should be brought before ,0/Pub# i exercise of Its review function under j~D/aus? approves its publicat cn and dissemiination. In order to make possible increaser: cooper &tra between D/ std 0/Pub in the production of future intelligence 0/Pub scold weleom$ a discussion of this draft revision. R. J, SMITH Copy tot DADJaLL D/1 c with att. rile Approved For Release 2005/03/15 CIA-RQP67-00059A000400110003-2