DRAFT REGULATION - 'TRAVEL ITINERARIES AND NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 13, 2004
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 16, 1964
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1.pdf322.26 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/10/27: CIA-RDP67-00134R200040012-1 SECRET 16 April 1964 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Draft Regulation - "Travel Itineraries and Notification of Changes" 1. This memorandum is an effort to organize my views on the draft regulation' and the objections that have been raised to it. In the course of our survey of personnel security we noted supervisory deficiencies as the main flaw. An aspect of this was lack of uniformity in awareness of the supposed whereabouts of an employee who was absent from duty. We were most struck by a lack of uniform policy re return travel from overseas by an indirect route. Our finding and recommendation regarding this indirect travel follows: IG Finding The employee returning from. overseas upon completing his tour often takes annual leave and returns to Headquarters by an indirect route. There is nothing that can be done to stop this practice, nor would we want to. The fact remains, however, that the Agency is out of touch with the employee over a period of some time--often several weeks. We found appreciable variation among the policies of the various Operating Division with regard to control pf private travel of returnees. The returnee of most concern is the one who is recalled for cause before completing his tour and is allowed to return by a circuitous route. IG Recommendation That uniform procedures be established and followed for controlling private foreign travel upon returning from. overseas assignment--to include a requirement that employees report in by telephone immediately ppon returning to the States. 2. Our recommendation was limited to return travel by an indirect route. The proposed regulation addresses itself to all travel. It goes well beyond the Inspector General's recommendation, but I don't think we should find fault with it on that score. I believe a regulation sucYas this is needed. I have set forth below the points that I think y'ould be covered, together with comment as to what is already in the regulations. I stress that my comments re the regulations are not necessarily complete. There might be points squirreled away in the regs that I have missed. SECRET Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1 Approved" For Rele 2004/10/27: CIA-RDP67-00134R00Q2 0040012-1 Management should know the whereabouts of employees who are on leave. Comment: This originally appeared in the draft but has been eliminated, presumably by someone in the DD/P. This deletion from the original draft puzzles me. The requirement already appears in existing regulations, as is shown by the following quotations: "Chiefs of Station or Base are responsible for ensuring that supervisors keep informed of the whereabouts of their employees who are on leave." "Each employee shall keep his supervisor informed of hi.* whereabouts while on leave." The employee should submit an itinerary when leaving his duty point of origin. Comment: This requirement already appears in the regulations. "Supervisors shall obtain the itineraries and dates of travel of employees under their jurisdiction." The employee's destination dut point should be notified of his ETA. Comment: I don't find anything on this in the regulations although I would think that it would be there. The traveller should notify appropriate authorities of significant changes in his itinerary affecting his ETA. Comment: There already is something in the regulations that approaches this requirement. "Employees shall inform their supervisors of any significant changes in their itineraries or dates of travel" 1 -1 Travellers should be told with whom they should communicate, and how, in event of emergency or significant change in itinerary affecting ETA. Comment: I find nothing in the regulations on this point.''- The employee should report his arrival at his destination duty point, either in person or by telephone. Comment: Reportedly there is resistance within the DD/P to this rqquirement. I have little sympathy for the DD/P objection. I agree that such a step could not prevent a defection, but I believe we could be held remiss in failing to establish at least the very minimum sort of a safeguard. 25X1 ET Approved For Release 2004/10/27 CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1 'Approved For R ase 2004/10/27: CIA-RDP67-00134RQW200040012-1 ErE Action to be taken by appropriate authorities at the destination duty point if the employee fails to report on schedule. Comment: I find nothing in the regulations on this point. 3. 1 suspect that the reviewers of 0 draft balk most at its sheer length. I do too. has broken his draft down into three dategories of travel: rom headquarters to the field, (2) from the field to headquarters, and (3) field to field. It by combining the three, refering merely to "duty point of origin" and "destination duty point." 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1 UNCLASSIFIED COT ENTIAL SECRET CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE o"QTIAL.S 2 ? s 4 3 4 5 6 ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION COMMENT FILE RETURN CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE Remarks : % FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER Va4m: NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. DATE ~~ I FIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET FORMINO. 9 pr ; uprd ease - - 000200040012-1 * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1961 0-587282 000200040012-1 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1 Next 6 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1 Approved Fo lease 2004/10/27 ClA=RDP67-0013#RQ0020O040612- 1 . Please review the attached proposals and let u.s ha is your Ii ecutive Dig-ector-Comptroller - 1 a n Joba 3903 [1r. Jan`--GIiT Deputy Director for Science and Tech:iolo :r - Dep'-ity Director for Plans 3 Deputy Director for Intelligence -.1 -nspector General - 1 -Y-Gene-,al Counsel - 1 Direct-or of Personnel (info) - i Spec _al Support Assistant to the, D'DS' (Info) - ? a e ; OfE and ,ew o Provide for otifieation of Employees Whereabouts concurrence or cossn nts within five workdays. response to a regye st from the Insrector General-. Any o sticks may be. referred to Approved' For Release 2004/10/27 : ,CIA-RDP67-00134R00020004001'2-1 ,25.X1 A eal ~FarLFeals~44 q UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL ? r-, SECRET CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INITIALS Speck Assistant to the D-puty Director for Support- - 2 3 4 5 6 ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION COMMENT FILE RETURN CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE Remarks : Re Proposed Reins s I I We have "viewed the attached draft and hav one revision + suggest. We prop*** that the ,: offi ee of ecurit ' should - include +d is plarslls r in the listing of components to be notified, to follow the I~,l es of ersexte rl. have also taken ante of the objections raised by the Associate General I sel in his memorandum 23 March 19 : we believe the mints raised therein are valid and should be take Ift*ft acconat A6 final drafts FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER ROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. DATE UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET h 25X1 FORM NO. /(~ Use previous editions (40) 2-61 237 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE :1961 0-587282 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1 Next 8 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP67-00134R000200040012-1