BOLSTERING OUR SECURITY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP67-00318R000100780034-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 17, 2013
Sequence Number: 
34
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 3, 1961
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP67-00318R000100780034-6.pdf78.9 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/05717 :nClii-141DP67-00318R000100780034-6 t ALBANY (Ga.) HERALD Circ.: e. 19,377 S./ 19,078 Front Edit Other Page P. Page Date: filly 3 1969 olstering, Our Security Few Americans will envy the well- qualified General Maxwell DAkitstiO;is Presidential assignment of I the operations of the Central I telligence Agency. For the basic proble ? atta(ithing to his mission is not so mu whether the ClAiL 14,4olligence" on uba was faulty--71id it was that and re?but whether*e CIA should be aged in the business of helping to / military operations at all. Two fundamental ques, must be ? answered by General Taylo re the2 President can determine future; course as regards the inter tructure of his Admitistration. The f i of these ! has to do with the CIA miss t. Has it attempted to fill a vacuum in perations left by the State Department'? Has it, as a ? consequence, gone too fat beyond the assignment of gathering information, asFessing it and proceeded into the field oftlanning as well as pursuing major pOlicy operations? ? Next, who exercises control over the CIA when the President and the Security Cotincil have approved a delicate opera- tion involving the cloak-and-dagger agency's .participation? Should it be the President himself? The Cabinet? The ; NSC? Or should it be the Department of State, the President's ? fountainhead of poliq? I g ! Wa ally, General Taylor's investi- ill have to be completed before gton can learn if there is, in fact, any 'extensive lack of liaison be- tween the State Department and the CIA. But the circumstantial evidence of L the Cuban',dahe tends to Indicate that this 'Was a'Mittra example Of the natidn's left hand. not knowing what its right hand was doing. Was the CIA at fault? 44,r Ar5 The _?.t.gehaeurtilient? Was it both. Or was it the President solely? I3oldly, Mr. Kennedy has taken upon himself the full responsibility for the fiasco, and in the final analysis this is the Constitu- tional responsibility of the President of the United States. But that action, man- ful as it was, still does not resolve the .4 thorny questions of who did. what wrong' ? and why. A The point is, of course, that remedial action must be taken, and soon, if for7,' no reason other than the fact that the United States is so obviously entering a, period of a much tougher phase in the cold war. There will be more trouble in Cuba. The issue of Laos will not be easily resolved. And Soviet Premier Khrushchev has determined, as he told pundit Walter Lippman, to press the Ber- lin dispute to a showdown stage at an early date. These bleak, even grim, prosT? pects dictate the dcision that the Presi- dent must press hi operating procedures into a proper wor ing order, and SOM. To that end, 1e now has General Taylor at work, a has offered him the services of his m st trusted confidant, Attorney Generals Robert Kennedy, to speed the process. Let us hope that their inquiry is broad comprehensive and swift? and that it 411 lead to a? con- structive reorganization .within the Executive Department to bolster the na- ? tional security. Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/05/17: CIA-RDP67-00318R000100780034-6