OPINIONS OF THE OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNCIL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY VOLUME XIII 1960

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
158
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 21, 2005
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 1, 1960
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6.pdf8.99 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 OPINIONS of the OFFICE OF GFNERAL COUNSEL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Volume XIII (1960) The volumes in this series contain in chronological order notes, memoranda, and opinions of law (published and unpublished) of the Office of Strategic Services, Strategic Services t'nit, Central Intelligence Group, and the Central Intelligence Agency. They have been compiled for the use of the Office of General Counsel and are known as the Opinions of the General Counsel. Citations should include the designation "OGC" and volume and page numbers as in the following example: 13 OGC 37. 5 daneeea7 1960 25X1A9A ooc/sgrge(.) 25X1A2D1 1. car memmraaad~em of 89 DDIC r 1.959 regt*strd us advim of this Office as to which of the 0 are aeattitled to file joint 2 5X 1 A 2 D 1 zetmrns and vbat pwooml - q tioaa aaeqr be cladaeed. 2. Insaa Aah as all of the II were acarssideszt alssr:s ftlat 2 5X 1 A 2 D 1 for part Of :~m Of thm Code of 19%), F___ rue __ mint ruba" (I villia t be 25X1 A9A am&- to the a joint rsttan for 1,966 um m rime:.. big wit. viii not arrive in the tbtitod States ver Oil after 1 Js n*ry 1960- Qt the bMIS of the ink provided it is+ea, tbot all of u air I _j 2 5X 1 A 2 D will be eligible to tale joint retkwns in 1961 on 'pair 1960 in?oare. 3 P.ah way tww a psrtoaal iooesoQtion for bisreif aaad another eaa tion for his wife without rd to the no - adftat alien status of saeh during peat at the yams. - YLe 0 =7 tab* pexavnst saoaap1101100s for Saab dapeaden6 dhi1.d Provifte that the ,M lad vas a resident of the Tbitsd States at rams time. drain the tax yew. Distribution: Orig. & 1 - Addressee Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 25X1A9A 25X1A2D1 25X1A2D1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057AO00200030001-6 5 January 1960 MEMORANDUM FOR: The Record SUBJECT: Procedure for Filing a Will in Arlington County 1. Under the law of Virginia, probate Jurisdiction is in the Circuit Court of a county or in the Corporation Court of a city such as Alexandria. The Clerk or Deputy Clerk of the Court may act except in cases of persons presumed dead. Appeal lies from the Clerk to the Court of Right (Code of Virginia, Title 64, as 72, 73 and 74). venue is: (a) in the residence of the decedent, (b) if none, where real estate is situated, (c) if none, where the decedent died or where he has an estate (Title 64, Be 72). 2. Where an Arlington Co ty decedent is involved, the will may be presented to and probat forms obtained from the office of the Clerk of the Court, Room 230, Arlington County Courthouse. The two persons who are particularly responsible for such matters are Mrs. Long and Miss White. The courthouse is open between the hours of 8 to 5, Monday through Friday. 25X1A9A Assistant General Counsel Distribution: Orig - OGC Subject ~~- OGC Chrono 1 - ll Chrono 25X1 OGCcpodi 25X1A9A 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 8 J=uwy 1960 25X1A9A O 36. f9be.quilk0low weemestsd an as follows AS i Ow ft a iAns ad i'sio gi and psr' t stata, it =or be ss&A that msst, so flat as possible, obseo i the miss of etviliaal . This is aqr isat fbr the OW*ft state in W& r that it aw aria as !"eQPeat of aislas' statas., as ti.n as give 4 i to !be.t+rWiaUs by the fios s.. . ! eiar is franc Cass (Vat" 8tatse 0 kv a a. court, 6R v.a. Vff) vrotts 1 as thtlas~sa etiril.'rlar' ? all ~*m Us mod" ssois amid so, eaa.eat, or ft Heir iWas pt +ftbat, ...? _tlgs#a fhe ;+~~es tip is vow awry! *a% the ?i i um of alas of i lea am troy- fit tarsi b. its a to his pel,.oerae. sus s +a tt+e prarti.. YiU aria rimes s, ia., ie. fths uM w aaat:. ls, we w &M roars isssstty. Ileitis ialr art Lad iyllrf : h ;tr at dOr*ia1i 3 to Mat aiM ii aa~3atiaa~a3ii1 . a rMyr~ a !oath a 4y a b*e 4 hei r fO~IA~#a~ Mati. ftw~'V it ^arrro be anl& NOW ~IAa i al r, tao ~r~r is WILAdIft 44" ! `scat is to Ow among*** fto iat t6ht?wit bow lob= ttusk -P - at ^ a + iaa at ak bd* t for.. a ftmal pour that the o8 4^raibo . s goo" it @q%w e by the r~rwa`rrt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 "Indeed, the &oviet delegation to that conference exin eased'the view that the effect of Article 2 of the Charter of the United Rations had already brought the regulation of colonial and civil wars within the purview of international Iaw." These quotations really starate only that while the terse of the Geneva convention, Article 3 prevent only &==my execution and permit punishment for airy reason after trial the writers cowed feel that in the case of insurrection international lax goes somewhat farther than the expression contained in Article 3. 25X1A9A Distribution: Orig. and 1 - Addressee 1 - Subject 1 - Signer '`1 - Chrono OGC/CFB/mmw (8 January 1960) . i1 11 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 vac 6o0036 11 January 1960 X cOMNDUM FOR: Chief, FE Division 25X1 A9PATrSFTxos s SUBJECT: 25X1A8A Motor Vehicle Accident, 25X1A9A Question of Personal Liability for Repairs 25X1 A6C 1. I dated 27 Sovember 1959 to advice as to whether provisions of paragraph 4(b)(3) Of may be applied to an 25X1A6C accident occurring on i0 September 1959. IF war prOMulgrated as 25X1 A6 25X1 A6Cof 2 October 1959. 0 dated 9 October 1959 reports action taken 25X1A6Aby the Chief of Station, Q in this case. The correctness of this action is also in doubt. 2. The wee occurred when to whom the 25X1 A9A quasi-personal vehicle had been assigned, drove it off the adds of a road and collided with a tree. Damages amounted approximately to $492.40. The evidence appears to be in conflict as to the circumstances lending to the accident, but the investigating officer found 0 25X1 A "guilty of negligent driving and therefore responsible for the resultant damage to the Government vehicle." I has been directed by the 25X1 A9 Chief of Station to pay these coats of repair. 25X1A6C 3. should not be' applied in this ease because it did not exist as an Agency regulatAm at time this accident occurred. 25X1 A6CT controlling regulation is 8ia09 the monetary amount involved is lass than $1000.00, paragraph 7(b) of this regulation author- ises the Chief of Station to take final action sub3tct to the right of appeal therefrom to the Director through the Headquarters Board of Survey. A series of cases considered the Headquarters Board of Survey prior to the publication of considered and involving authorised 25X1 A6 personal use of quasi-personal vehicles resulted in either (a) non. assessment of any pecuniary liability if the facts of the case were considered to amount to ordinary negligence or (b) assessment of full pecuniary liability if the facts were considered to amount to gross negligence. 4. Since these two alternatives are open for consideration in the present case and since the money amount places authority with the Chief of Station for making a finding relative to pecuniary liability, it is fi Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 SUBJECTS Motor Vehicle Accident, Question of Personal Liability for Repairs 25X1A9A recommended that the evidence in the case should now be reviewed by the Chief of 8tstioSt in order to make a determination on thL- degree of negligence involved- The cane lusion of the investigating officer ties t he "finds Oguilty of negligent drivin is not an adequate basis for the Chief of Station to direct to Pay full &a-, of the damages. The Chief of Station himself should make the otft iajt finding, and it is advisable that be be explicit in his conclusion that he finds the negl.igance involved either "ordinary" (with resulting non-nssessssme t of pecuniary liability) or "gross" (with resulting atsse^es- pecuniary liability for cost of repairs) 5. To assist the Chief of Station in making this decision, he should use the following definitions t a. Ordinary negligence means m Moderate deviation from the prudent, reasonable standard of care and judgment that the cir- cunstanees sensibly demand. b. Gross negligence means a flagrant, wanton, or extreme, deviation from the prudent, reasonable standard of care and Judguent that the circumstances sensibly demand. 5. Since the possibility of taking disciplinary action is dieatiact from the assessment or non-asseast nt of Pecuniary liability, cognizant supervisory officials may take or refrain from taking action of this sort as is believed appropriate under the circumstances. 25X1A9A Assistant Gensl Counsel cell Chairman, 8qs Board of Survey Distribution: Orig & 1 - Addressee - Chairman, SBS 1 - OGC Subject y~:?~.G-} - OGC Chrono iX - Chrono 25X1A9A 25X1A9 25X1A9 OGC 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A0002~W~30001-6 aGC/B-9822 AMtM FM t ter. Houston BUB s GEHA Tax M=n tion Problem 1. The various prorisivtM pertinent to this problem are: a. The D. C. Charitable Corporations Statute provides: "Any three or more persona of full. age, citizens of the United States, a majority of wham shall be citizens of the District, who desire to associate tbemselves for benevolent, charitable, educational, literary, musical, scientific, religious, or missionry purposees including societies formed for mutual impravemnt or for the prowotion Of the arts, may" etc. b. The provision of the Internal, Revenue Code at 19% corresponding to the 1939 Provision under which GEHA is exar is Section 501(c)(i0), which provident "(1-0) Voluntary eUlc"ea' beneficiary associations providing for tthe ~ Pac r nt of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to the aembers of such association or their dependents or their designated beneficiaries, if -- "(A) edaission to membership in such association is U. i ted to iadlvidu`ls who we afiaers or easpIWO&s of the United States. Uovertseent, and" etc. folLc>. t The original MA charter prescribes objectives as "Mi ? Tb Partioular business and objects of said corpors"on shalt be an eep3 ses' beneficiary association providing fast 'WM p*oncat of a cident and hospital benefits to members or their dependents." Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 d. The, amended charter: "Tbe particular Vurpoees and objects off' the said cox'oratien shall be to etrtgage in benevolent, educational. and scientific activities and for the mutual impswvement of its aemberre. " e. The provision of the Internal Revenue Code which sub- staztially corresponds to the D. C. Charitable Corporations Statute, Section 501(c)(3), provides: "(3) Corporations, MA OW r oo ty cheat, fuels or foundation, organized and operated exalusiv 1y for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, no part or the not earnings of which imams to the benefit of arty private shareholder or individual, no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda,, or otherwise att gptitr g, to influence legislation, and which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office." 2. Internal Revenue bn,~~. tad and it may be that they will 25X1 A9Ani0t disturb our situation. however, informally advises be thinks Revenue will have to some adverse action, for the reason that the amenled charter does not provide for an organization which could be exempt under Section 501(c)(10), and although the charter might qualify for enemption under Section 501(o)(3), GM activities in fact do not. If and when Revenue rules against us perharps we could amend the charter once more. But we may then be found with additional difficulties. For eicample, although the D. C. Sgerintendent of Corporations has been helpful and has accepted both our original certificate of i corporation and the amendment, it seems quite likely that the charitable corporations statute really is not designed for purposes such ae GEHA and in fact we should not be permitted to incorporate under it, Secondly, even if we are able to amend our charter to omit the specific langua4p to which 25X1A9A I objects, namely, "benevolent, educational and scientific activities" the remaining language "for the mutual improvement of its members" might be considered as failing to qualify under Section 501(c)(3)- 3. Perhaps the ultimate corrective action would be to abandon the corporate form of GERA and convert to an unincorporated association of CIA employees. This, of course, would require liquidation of the corporation, including disposal of its assets and further would require ci - 2 - Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 ne?vti*tions With tho Civil Service Coami,ssion so as not to etrianger health benafita available under the weir Act for GERA members. On this point I am aching in the Act wbicb Would preclude us from proceeding in this msonar, but of cou ee it Would be necfsesay that the Civil Service Caaadaaion agree on that point. 25X1A9A v6%ajar Distributions Orig. A 1 - 1.1 1. - BEL C brow 3. - C)u ono 1 O Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A0002000309901jr6 OGC 60-0006(a) IKtt s Comptroller Djrlprs Designation of Residence for Pa-poses of Leave Folloving Overseas Assign *ent ' 25X1 A9A RBA it endue to the General Counsel from the Comptroller, dated 4 January 1960, wanes subject 1. We have yoar mrmarandum of 4 Jaau 1960, in which you note 25X1 difficulties with pars sph 7e of in connection with the above subject. We agt'ee that the wording of this provision should be changed in order that it may are clearly d,ralinerate the standards by which approval will be granted fair requests fOr changes in designated places of residence. It is also oiZE' feeling that the expression "legiticte and bona fide hors" is difficult to define and therefore adds to the confusion. If we can be of assistance in drafting new language for this provision, we should be happy to do so. 2. With respect to the specific request contained in the referenced dispatch, and transmitted with your c orsneful, we feel, that it is clear that the present regulatory provision contemplates changes in designated places of residence only if based on circuustances Which have changed since the pries desigmttion. Further, we perceive, within the meaning of the regulation, no "undue hardship" which would be alleviated by the requested +ehange, nor has it been suggested that the Individual is "compelled by necessity to change steak residence." Under these circum- stances, and based on the justification contained in the referenced dispatch, we feel that a change of designated residence for home leave pte-poses would, in this instance, be contrary to the regulation. Dispatch same subject 25X1A6C Distributions Orig. and 1 - Addressee 1 - Sdb ject l ..r Signer Chrono OGC/HRC/rm (12 January 1960) LAWRENCE R. Fi0U 1T General Counsel 25X1 C4E kk Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057 00200030001-6 OGC/B-9829 lk Jam my 1960 ELM F'Ms We Houston s ai c'T : GS IA-CIA Meeting of January 15 25X1 A9A , , u-- to ruin h a e own wing "'or Friday, which is scheduled for 2:00 in the Director's Conference Room. - As I Understand it, he wants aunt from GM and the Agency on two propositions, one of which would follow from the other: as MA to elect a is stationed overseas will not be allowed program other than the G MA program, be Civil Service literature on the Qovsr* snt-wide program will not be furnished overseas. 2. The Act provides that =W employee meW enroll in an approved health benefits plan and that a "transfer cC enrollment from one health benefits plan described in Section Is. to another such plan may be made by an eveloyre or annuitant at such tines and under such conditions as ??W be prescribed by regulatiow of the Coaslcn W The d . raft CSC regulations submitted weeks ago bays S. similar provision. when 25X1 A9 asel I met with CRC ~+epj~esentatires ld , r. 5X1 A9A advised that we would probably require caw people not to enroll in aR- p other than the QRHA plan. Althaggh poesibltiy neither we Door Civil Service Commitesion as a Matter of laer could derpr one of ow eMpl fees the opportunity to elect the 4ovarad:ent.+vIft program if be so desires, I would think there is no reason VIXr we could not use adminis.. trative measures to do so sad 25X1 A9A e as a practical. approach, namely, overseas sWLopfass would be reqMired a ass oondition Of assigizmnt," to enroll only in the MA plan. + 3. Bays the agreement, the meeting as I understand it, is designed mainly to be iafOarmative and to bring both the Board sad the Aglerecy reprsentatives VP to date on progress. Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 4. I gather developments unrder the BeeJ.th Act are substantially as follme3 a. QZW plans to negotiate with II to iu rove its 25X1A5A1 contrast, that is, now that a portion set premiums will be paid by the Government, more benefits will be sought with no iaarea" in plum paid by the eWlayve. 25X1A9A save the Civil Service Commission wants to deal with us on our new plan., rather than our existing plan, and he is directing hie efforts to this and, However, it should be possible to abandon this approach and first qualify our existing plan, leaving to the future negotiation of an approved plan. b. In early Dec a ber, CSC addressed a letter to GIZA (presumably also to all other interested parties) trans- mitting a Report of Progress and draft CSC regulations. This was followed by a memorandum of Minimum Standards for Employer Organizations and Epplcayeee Organizations Health P leans, January 5, 1960. Several dates and deadlines, pertinent to aRBA, were set forth. i. Draft regulations were submitted on December 4 and written comment requested by December 14. GEHA, without OCC or CIA participation, submitted comments on December 14. Draft regulations are to be submitted to the Commissioners by January 15 for tentative approval and published in the Federal Register "in the form of proposed rule-meking" by February 1 and as approved regulations in final form by March 15. ii. In October a CSC letter went to GERA and other employee organizations inviting them to submit, by December 31, prime facie evidence of eligibility. GEHA replied in November and on December 16 the CSC advised GERA that the CSC had made a finding that GEHA qualifies as an employee organisation under the Act. The CSC further indicated that it is hoped to approve the GTLIA plan (and those of all other employee or nizations), or advise that the plan is not approved, by March 1. For this purpose, GERA is to submit, by February 15, the constitution and by-laws (emended as necessary), the contract and all riders and ondorsoments, "the official requirements for enrollees the health plan," a etateeseant from GEFRA that is Lwrf ally engaged in the business of mpplyin6 health benefits "with citations to appropriate statutes," a copy of 0 last annual report, a breakdown of premium charges and a PiemorardLn Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 of Agnmumt (CSC A to be prepared by CSC) that the Pis gill continua in effect until November 1* & ad v1i]. be reamed azwn*lly, azz t]*t GERA viii. edvIn C'8C dWuWx in the aonstitutiozs a by-1avs. 25X1 A9A is collecting this materisl. 25X1A9A OGC/Rmsjar Distribtitbicnt Orig. & 1 - Addressee 5X1 1 1 L-1 = Beat Assistant General Coimeel -3 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 5X1A9A 1. Returned herewith are your messaorsnduin of 12 January 1960 Its attached claim with our endorsement on the claim. 2. By informal agreement between this Office and the Claims Board, claims payable on the basis of the Agency 'a legal liability are not required to be processed through the Board. Our approval of the claim represents a determination that such liability exists. Consequently, the claim rosy be paid without further review. 3. E4ey we express our thanks for the clear and concise manner in which this claim and your covering memorandums were presented. 25X1A9A O Orig & 1 - Addressee 1 - Subject 1 - Signer /1 - Chrono Approved For Release 2005/12/14: fA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 OGC/B-9736(a) 18 January 1960 MINDR Af UM FOR : Chief,, Finance Division 6UBJBwbwwUt vhic* pare -4 adviewf, wnex.1ly' peart+ot"erMa! at 3n~ Interva1a, aM 1 sis Is by fii 60ai not wititatt tlofft i or positim" M soma in nostioe or an atf ia. to rahioh co 4.tao is attaebel" vitltia the nr'n4 n a at Nctiaa~ 62. acne to coop. de-S. 381., 26 C. am. 501, 503? See ig COO. Oent. 3a2 aaad the atr~aea deidaiew ti~+nas 299 MA 6! ~ !boss iCareeetMP 0R'. Sinoe the exs itii $ we with u mm of that fr eer is arAMeioot to owr ooze dual co O-aatim ae.i tetiao , as *13)-, With r of to the Dogs, vie t1M . ant we, aaast sobsi$s stsO840Y the 0o~Iprtx'o11a' Genius With respwt to aaf,iioe7, tatirtttiiat, too-bsint can , mat Im rtrticu3ar canoe at the oaMUMarer* t a tae is oopsidnyd as minstAvo of the aattsz. On on fir, the meanie at ampr cow of go* aleaaeta aifficiaaat tof~~S +i-~ ~ ? the su2,a dated in cam Oxit at coop* Gent. 5(] ! Q a? T. In viav of the aba'i, we the! 3mm a the C dentiIi1 OWAOSPaera>wt 80mumpt to ceder f in exsitaNpeeeeant ecaaaaist +ct With the ?10?. we aboaia be bmw to VVOT 4e - m u t w o s is the &OMM at s itaeblm i s to *SWAM patrol at the air " ` the sort raft. you eabboa-Ld temp in SW t the! the dad" bans ("t+ee, Mvtsaae7, et..) used is a w c ntae"t Wou * not be OnOX0234me In aQ ahattwrr duapaaai; the of the awl pattmzu with tywNes 3asia~tioas W003* be. 8. to ffl~ 04 lit - 4 at he an ~ >S* VW SOW% *30 rrttiaa _ at *. retire& a of peyraaear6 meow We parasras military offiew. V.psatea- that if the rMOOM MMiltttcs aboom 1s tolloea &VV is, *ewe+e. p 1~lee the ranld e;- also to patt pephMots MAW the 00910 % eonitursst t m) a tiartel '' of tuts woui* ieeM into p1w, pe' dI MW bet l,udf~rt+detl net i rSti o of inch situnum? Amos these tea ax t bathes sel!'irtee win as a rep_ or rasa we, the 'kick TStIx+sost tai eif ,, 04 nbether the parson bait been lest as the rettral list. Of etoarrS , $ manew codwat colic tisacs help is trig e+essa+d in be aww" at sit this Office srs be 6W1 to crewcut. 25X1A9A Office of Qaeer *l 0areMe1 1-LVI gner 1-81 1 - snb~sat O"lr 1- Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 25X1A13FF Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: 61A-kDP67-01057 1000200030001-6 GGC/B-99f 39 23 March 19 0 25X1A9A RSD/aP SUBJTXfl New York Motor Vehicle Regulations - Transit of Foreign Registered Vehicles 1. I have reviewed the letter from Arnold W. Wises Counsels New York Bureau at Motor Vehicleas the Now York Vehicle and Traffic Lax and the International. Treaty on rood traffic in connection with the problem of transit of foreign registered motor vehicles of employees returning from oversaa,s. 2. While the position at the Bureau of Motor Vehicles may be unreasonable insofar as it interprets Sew York law to prohibit transit through New York of foreign registered vehicles and vehicles carrying U. 6. Forces pletoss it is aQr opinion that the Bureau's counsel has stated the law correctly. Section 51 of the Nov York Vehicle and Traffic Law is the only State statute pertinent to this problem. It has been interpreted at least once in the Now York courts and in that case the word "residence" in the statute was interpreted to mean "domiciles" that ins legal residence or a person's per" ent place at abode. (Shube v. Greendonnsrs 1936, 271 NY' 189, 2 A.1.2d 536.) It is clear that neither military personnel nor civilian eaVloyees of the Governwat are domiciled in the countries in which thej we stationed while serving the Government. Therefore, while their U. S. Forces or foreign motor vehicle registrations are valid while they are residing in foreign countries,, they are no longer valid for operation at a motor vehicle on the bighvsys of Now York State after the employees have given up their orsry residences in the foreign countries. 3. I sm not as certain as Ni. Wise seems to be that the 2nteruttiooeGl Treaty gives recognition to a registration only when it bas been procured in the state of permanent residence of the ewnar of the vehicle. Article 1 of the Treaty provides that "each Contracting State agrees to the use of its road., for international traffic under the conditicas set out to this Convention." Article $ provides that "internettoemrl traffic memos any traffic vhi& crosses at least one froatisri . . ." Article 18 Provides "In order to be entitled to the benefits at this Conventions a motor vehicle shall be registered by a Contracting State or subdivision thereof in the manner prescribed by its legislation." In addition, Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Arty 38 rsquirea that a registration certit'icate contain ter p"MUOUt place of residency* of the epplicaut. ? Soto the ~. ? . U 8. 7C roar plate. and foreign plate. issued to U. S. tiavert?t employees in foreign caesntries we issued in a =WOW prescribed by the Legislation or otba r Vve1 ning leer of those countries. In the ab+en0* Of other rostrictlve language in the Treaty, it would seem therefore that such plates armst be box red until the vehicle resaheee the remit place of abode cc its O..r? If this is so, the foreign registrstiom von" be valid for transit tbrou& NOV Yarn States since the Treaty tames precedence over Otate Iwo he Regardless of suz opinion CC the inter ta'tion and t ~1tt effect at the TT ty, I do oat think that vs should attAMt to point Leith the New York lbtce vehicle Ceaeoissiansr at tbia time. For cow thing, the statue of U. S. Forces registrations under the Treaty is far extremely uncertain and amsrs aVehicles among returning outn ss sr Owners of fete:iga registered lores?e it, braver, is the practical matter that arguing paints at lsae Mill be tins consuming, possibly unsucce s sail. and probably umaeoessary. I would oug0est that a reply to W. Wises letter be pre- pared on the brsia of the practical problems presented and the fine co- opsrettic given by all other states. It can be pointed out that it is itapossibls its MM yes for a person to procure a motor vehicle rogis- tratioo in his base state until, the vehicle is nted in the state for inspeattOn. If all states VUe to tame the posit set forth in it. tries ? s letter the result would be that returning a )1ayOe$ would have to stop at eatah state Um and obtain a local motor vehicle registration. Such a procedure would ct comma be absurd. It can be stated that return- ing O"Plave"* While not domiciled in the foreign countries in which they were stationed, imre actil residents at those countries and their motor vehicle registrations were validly issued in accordance with the lava of the countries at their ectu al. residences. It recess unlikely that the Hew York legislature intended to prohibit the transit of such validly registered actor Vehicles. 50 I as convinced that a polite Letter seeking the assistance and cooperation of the pew York Commissioner of Motor Vehicles will result in a moor. grao~t and satiatactory solution of our problem than `could an attsspt to settle the matter on the basis at Legal arg>Mnt especially in view of the fiat that we are likely to loos the argument at Leesst insofar as U. S. Farces registration. we concerned. 25X1A9A I I Assistant Qenerel Counsel Orig. & 1 - Addrese841 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 OGC/Jr 1 ,iar Distributions Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 """ I U ~1-1 L- hoct -O's43O 23 March 1960 )SCR DIM FOR THE RECORD SUaTX T: Home Leave 1. An article on home leave requirements appeared Support Bulletin #17, dated February 1960. Its on page 2 of text follows: s. "One of the Prerequisites to the granting an employee must have sufficient seet~lated of to is that annual h. leave leave credit to carry him in a his credt rn+ pay status for 30 calendar days at the time wing home leave is begun. (See FB 20-645, Paragraph Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays are not charged accrued leave, 22 days of actual accumulated leave Is, for against ses, considered the equivalent of 30 calendar day , practical purposes, s. "In writing travel orders which grant home leave, head always checks the employee's leave record to ensure that he h quarters sufficient leave to satisfy the requirements mentioned above. come to our attention, however, that in a few cases it has employees taken annual leave at their posts, after recei Prohone have orders, which reduced their accumulated leave balance ance eto less thane the 22 days required to make them eligible for home leave benefits. In such cases these employees have been tared to bear the home leave portion of their travel as a of avoiding such hardx+hi s all personal expense. In the interest have at least 22 p s are reminded that they must days accumulated leave to their credit at the time they depart from their post on a trip involving home leave to be eligible for reimbursement for home leave travel." in order 2. It will be immed4ately apparent that, of the entire article, only the first sentence is legally sound. Taking the points as they appear in the article: (a) The so-called 22-day leave requix ant does not exist. The number of leave days required varies with the number of weekends and holidays in the 30-calendar-day period. As few as 18 days might suffice for a carefully planned leave over the Christmas d Finance Division has had formal requests as to the holidays. propriety days of authorizing home leave for individuals with 19 or 20 The statement in the Support Bulletin article will undoubtedly baring . new inquiries. Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 (b) I am unable to locate anyone who knows of an instance in which an employee was required to bear hose leave travel expenses because of having less than 22 days, Perish forbid. (c) With respect to annual leave taken after the orders have been cut, I have held informally that leave taken at the post after the individual had cleared the post would be treated by this Office the we as GM other leave en route and the fact that such leave reduced the employee's accrual below the point which would sustain 30 calendar days of leave would not of itself disqualify him for the benefit. 3. In discussions with I 25X1A9A indicated that the incorrect emen in the article were very mialeading and that in view of the wide circulation given the Support Bulletin a clarification was in order. 1 _j in whose office the article origi- 25X1A9A nated, advised me that he felt the article would have no practical effect and therefore a correction would not be necessary. I intend to leave the matter at that. 25X1A9A Office of General Counsel. Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 24 March 1960 gORAMD(B4 FORS Director of Security ..CT s itemorar due of Conversation on 21 March I had a cordial telephone can true: a (pho- 25X9A eetic), not otherwise identified except as an mp]#gee of the can Council an Education. He stated that he had called to inquire what the legl authority was for the Central Intelligence Agency to contact and interrogate a citizen of a foreign country g0 had coos to this country as an exchange student under Department of State auspices. I could not avoid the thought that he had a specific instance in mind, although he did not say so. I answered essentially as follows a. Basic legal authorities for the type of thing to which I supposed he was referring were to be found in the national security Act of 1947. b. From time to time the National Security Council issued directives to the Agate with respect to aocarWlishment of specific tasks. c. The Agency maintained representatives in certain major cities as well as in Washington to receive members of the public generally, to answer casual inquiries, and to accept infor- mation which sight be of interest. d. On occasion, the Agency, through the above-wentioned repre- sectatives and others, found it desirable to consult on its OGC own initiative with various experts and with other people who might have information of value in solving a particular problem. 25X1 A9A OGC:ff :amc:jem Orig & 1 - Addressee 1-Subject I - Signer /1 - Chrono FOIAB Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Q ro .c~"brR~ele se'20i4 : CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 COC 60-0375(a) 24 March 1960 p is z Assistsast Director for Operations JwrI Pyblicstioe of Csash VA%terial in ERs lleso~reiaduat from the office of OCOSTal Coeeasel dated 1 Jenuatrl 1958, subject: 25X1A7B 25X1A7B i 25X1A7 1. V. have your arsrsoanandwt of 16 Barth x964 on the above subject Zusatiag aw vista as to the destrsbility at restricting im tszial Trott Cseeh press serrviceas, ne and paw wspapears, in the jo,.u a tl.$ in w at the s lion of CseahOs1O *kia to sedDes tP wriht Coetvaution. 2. In the ueferrsaoed ve indicated that press agencrY wnsaiasie>tes rsd,Asd to ?rlting for general aoosas i?a without reser- t on of rights eoul* be distribuW fresl3. Ow sease applies to newspapers d other psriodioals. As to printed saterial the rights to which have .=reserved in prgpsr fae7ee, said as to broadcast satert*l, the c'ri&t ,stns of *ieth ogti t usually be ascertained, the situation continues to one of tedwleal iafria?asent upon s calculated risk. 3. As indicated in the 7Me3V amide dispatch stumb;ed t* your with MQrM*M, this 7 has boos, oopgrright agrt IMJ, the t w of Iddsah a" to soave respects NO" striogeot then me of the gd 1 rtaal Co Bright Coaraa co, and this sgaNeset has been -served carefully aetd is still binding. In view of this, it is difficult pe eeiane * pcastiea 3. si tfit see to us in the participation of oechoslorwatiet is 'ire asatlti epes^aat. V. therefore do not zacoe some We ere sglein c~si t is tide . g- 11M 161 in crtbar 25X1 A7 bless and as 7 u+e Wtdah would bear or the bwdling of scats Ma8e Umbs to ask* in t 1W i roe tech as veil as otbsar Ustrer3sl. C. 25X1A9A c: 3su I.g & 1. - Addressee I - Subject ?~- 1 - signer /1 - cbrono Office of Gemmel ?oaasel Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 KWOr"l Ill FQR3 Inspector General SU CT s Nonfeasance, Misfeasance, and l+Es-Iteasa-ace Distinguished. 1. The purpose of this mee~orenriun is to distinguish the legal terms nonfeasance, misfeasance and malfeasance. Although the agreement is by no manna universal there are generally accepted legal usages for the terms in question. 2. Nonfeasance is the nonperformance of now act which ought to be performed, failure to perform a required duty at all, or total neglect of duty. Refusal by Members of a county council to make an appropriation for the expenses of the county superintw dent of schools is nonfeasance since it is a failure to perform a required duty. State Y. McRoberts, 207 Ind. 293, 192 R.E. 428 (1934)- 3- Misfeasance is the improper performance of some act which a man may lawfully do. The action of county commissioners in approving for pepr- aent, without inquiry, fictitious and fraudulent claims made up by a dis- honest clerk constitutes misfeasance in office. The county commissioners improperly performed an authorized act, approving claims for payment. Laraore v. State, 180 Nd. 347s 24 A. 2d, 2% (1942). 4. Malfeasance is the doing of an act which a person ought not to do at all or the unjust performance of some act which he had no right to do or which he had contracted not to do. Where a Town Superintendent of Highways appropriated for his own personal use Township moneys, such conduct constituted malfeasance in office. The officer committed an act for which he had no authority. Application of Wilcox, 278 App. Div. 572, 105 N.Y.S. 2d 631. (1951). 5? Conduct which comes within any of these three definitions may result in either civil or criminal liability or both. Civil liability, however, is more likely to result from nonfeasance than frasm malfeasance. The failure of a public official to act (nonfeasance) is more likely to injure an individual and provoke a civil suit than it is to cause harm to the general welfare. On the other hand, the doing of a prohibited act (m l.feausance) is more likely to injure the public generally and result in criminal prosecution. The improper performance of an authorized act (misfeasance) standv- between the other two in this respect and frequently provokes both civil and criminal action against the offending official. 6. Unfortunately, for the sake of clarity and general understanding, the definitions as they are given above are not always followed. Misfeasance is often used in the sense of malfeasance. Malfeasance is frequently used Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 AnrsCA671 57q~0~000030001-6 jOtertupt$ or interferes with the performance of official duties. SQwrver, strictly dafinsd,, n tiasarrae msaims the oaiesian of an act Bch a person ,ught to-do; slrtrasanae is the raper doing of an aft tdsich a person sit ]swfu1]7 doj and nalfeasaace is the doing of an act which a person wgbt not to do at all. JW S. WAR= Deputy General. Cauasel OW: RBH= antic Distributions 5X1 Orig. & 1 - Address 1 - Subject- 1 - Signer f i - chrono Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 L UA i.' x 1 Li !' Al ^ ^iL Chief, Contract Administration Brancb/PD 1 April 1960 AssLatast General Counsel Applicability of Renegotiation Act of 1951 to Procurements by this Agency 1. A letter from the dated 16 March 1960 raises the question of t applicability of the Renegotiation Act of l131 to procurements by this Agency. As I advised you in- formally yesterday, this Act does not pertain to our Agency and, accordingly, this contractor should not report our contracts as being subject to renegotiation. You will find a more elaborate discussion on this subject in Volume 2 of the CCH Government Con- tracts Reporter eosencing at paragraph 26,000. 2. This contractor appears to be unsure as to whether the form of contracting (task order vs. purchase order) has anything to do with the applicability of the Renegotiation Act. It does not. If the Act applied, it would apply to all contracts regard- less of form, but. as stated above, the Act and the Executive Orders implementing the Act do not apply to this Agency. Distribution: Orig & 1 - Addressee 1 - OGC Subj OGC Chrono 1 - ~hrono OGC/Nq (31 Mar 60) 25X1A9A 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 1 April 1960 25X9A5 As I uenUewed to you in jW letter or 2e march.. the dual ec pensation problem is ? etarglicsted an.. Vit i going into detail I s3ai1 give io the bad* picture with r sleet to 1 pssrtieentsr situation. the sbata tss plane U ttatieaars an retired military woomel with r .pet both to aaq 'e awl reasived for sorrieass pertoarl wd, and to "bold;isrs a aiviliss ofttae or pvsitt .'" Ehaaw %M present state or the Jtrr, as i as you a nd osr^visea for us ant inter- sittentlp, or are panda on a f baasis, you are Mt canotdoreed, as ns t'via a "rralassy-. In s 4itteaa, sinus Y M are an i>adeepsmlent cautrscter, perftwol" a 1y advisaasryr f' stiae-, you same not awsiftred as bolding as drat at positie. Ebaasfdasr'l:tg the a above, oar len pl staff ttieelae ss m so I Bari to I arhalol bar* your ou"Reu the advisolly iaah~eatitlttwet eeaaateoar+e at 1 oant~tral relatrionship vih no. I treat this taws* move at thty s. Planesw to" tr" to drop me a xts a it o er' s arts.. Ta the nsreaatiese Y ft "a expect to hear tqt duet re"esetotivss t the ees+v aoeiaraat is rssdt. os.o~~t. C. P. "ban X51, Mr 4T Ddr"t" OOC:JW:J4m (3/30/60) bistribuil aas: OrIg b 1 - Addr saw DDCI (v/basie) l -Signer CONCUR: I - 1 April 1960 tab (Attars: 25X1A99i$ea) Sheffield Edwards I 00C (xv ,tar'u C, Director of Security lip, Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 STAT Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Next 7 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A00002Pp30001-6 '/..' OQC/s-99970? T y 7 April 1960 I A`i'r t I444 25X1A8A 25X1A9A U. s. Income Tax 25X1A9A on Salary from Foreign Government 25X1A9A 1. a contract agent, is a United Staten resident, #AT alien. but a c. t Dior. In addition to his salary from CIA, be receives a salary from a foreii r. government ror tie services as 25X1 Pr 5X1 A9 You have asked whether e forc:i~,n: government salary is subject to U. S. income tax. 2. U. S. resident aliens are taxed on all of their income from u::atever source received and without regard to their place of actual residence. Under Section 911 of the Internal Lievenue Code citizens ref the United States are exempt from tax on income from personal services performed abroad if they meet certain qualifications as to residence in foreii,n countries. This exeaption, however, is not available to resident aliens. section 693 of the Internal Revenue Code exempts income of aliens received for services an employees of foreign governmante if certain additional conditions are met. It is probable that Subject would not qualify under two of the additional conditions, but it is not necessary Lo consider them inasmuch as we have been advised by a representative of tie Internal Revenue :ierviee that this exemption is available to a resident alien only if he gives up hie permenent residence status. 25X1A9A 3? aunt poly a U. S. income tax on all of his income regardless of source and is not entitled to the above cited exemptions of the Internal Revenue Code. This opinion has been confirmed b: the Chief of Technical RulinZ;z, InternationAl Operations Division, internal Revenue service. Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 25X1 A8A. 25X1A9A Assistant General Cat:nse:!1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Uac 6D-( *79(s) 11 April 1960 ~t TCII air*~ at P*nwmw]L 25X1A9A Fitt at0 Nola Cabo 25X1A6A = 8o-t0d 18 flash 1966 25X1 A6C l,. Ve Mrs. disoessed this case in detail with the Chief, I 25X1 A6 tom, 0: - is turn hes verified his unlsrstmdiag of the sitnatdoa vitb wiross wire is the donee 225 1 9,/4 at the cases to wastua. 8. fee !yeses as rports to as we tlwse. II whose wire 2 5X 1 A 9A is t h e & * a m , is a w s a l t h i r - - M t 1. who is kaaen as so avid stamp and alb cols se seed nehmto" y as a point of oarocttct for 22 X1 A9A I IN I. lroenee+er, is rat sea eepla-ee or the 5 q mind his Wu. are doussats and ls~aa tree to timer 96g4k la tle~e lit less, on a seatal best, divrs tb gifts at imported 2 5X 1 A 9 foods, psis foot amt of his vw pochsts d a u see vh3oh nearly equsls that 25X1 A6 of the was 1* qpwUm. The colas are rap Wted to be an rxparessicm of appredwUCw for ibs dicks at food.. It is ems Informal maderrtarntirg that yaw NOW sts that the ODIM be sO]4 sad the proceeds paid o to aisc.11sasomr receipts Was bessd an the bsliet that the cooins. were given is return f mitts peed for br our wwwwwt. While we woux not object to y'am' a hods anew these psrticulsr ei 'Matsnees the sxe am a of gifts i s * to be at such a person 1 attire that the retentiou by s wife at tbs sodas ISO* f a apt a bee me1et as reemm-m- Mad by 2 5X 1 A 9 the Chid of S#t#,oa, it in r f ae 4 dispatch and eonewrred 25X1 A6 In by Ow Assletswt as the Dla Ps wovOA not appmr to be iaperoper end accoardia j this Onion waald >sae so lspl d6jeetion to such retention. This is to be oou.trewd ss a preae&wt, bends based an this peculiar factor 41 sitnsCiael. go pap= ~ we rettiuned berevith. OOC2OEPtjem Orig & 1 - Addressee 1 - Subject 125X1 A6C ~i - Chrono _ ' ~ STAT Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Next 3 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 OGC 60-0484(a 13 April 1960 0d will not approve the retroactive ppraIetrt. i4-tea that FirAanca Diviaion 25X1A9A 25X1A9A 1. We have your memorandum of h -APfIl 1960 and its attartaent referring to an ant piraator (tata~lligeace) 00 18 travel order eigi by the Deputy of 1 Uarah 1959. 1'he backarin= March 2959+ approving an increase of per diet i 2. It is a settled and long establl h 3? Poor your convenience we are attaahiag a runt oylaton of this ce in a related case. It eontsias a p=" inciple stated above. w"sexpaMed LIy exposition of e V04p tb W* is no autl ity to SOCUMC, authoritadj eorrcl,a_ etui . In short, increase the amount, as this Vonid be a 0m rate may not be changed retroactively. the case at hands 41 6 may rind prior to the date of the not be Paid #0 higher r701te for any 25X1A9A March 1959. ?P>?ropr3ate aaendaerat to the travel order, alreay elapsed, Le traveler has a fixed ' tratreZ status leal right to th c other clerical errors. ql' -w-A things as typographical and (rithiaa sut (n'lated thvugtr the rate of per dicta, is diaycretion&ry aaRIM) an to tine 4- ave orWfmraedp exempt to reform the order to bring it into eontoraai MA&VRGY with t tY igia~r], intent of the iU Bing authority--that is toe . err previotaua ors, with re - -~rr&vr` a_T,o 6TArMaa, regulations, spent to tr l s eA ~,ts tihl elEt t~orGha w b "rule or lav that a travel sw.~...t,~'!*"'"1Y so as to InersMe or di*ini~ch dueoe. ..~ _ 25X1A9A Office of General Counsel Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 FOIAB5 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Next 4 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 29 April 1960 IO' Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 pRAD" FOR: Mr. Warner S3JRCT: General Accounting Office Disallowance of Charge for Purchase of Bottled Drinking Water by Resident Agency 25X1A6A RVEMCE: y due from Resident Agent,, to Chief, 25X1A6A Fiscal Division, dated 18 Decowber~1959, subject: Request for Exception to Comptroller General's Decision, Vol. IT., page 698 Resident Agent for bottled drinking water are a necessity and that the vouchers should be resubadtted. 1. General Accounting Office auditors have disallowed vo uehers sub- 25X1 A Bitted by the I Resident Agent for the purchase of bottled drinking water. The office of the II Resident Agent is located in an office 25X1 A building where there are no drinking fountains and all the tenants purchase bottled drinking voter. Application of the rule of necessity to the fast situation presented in the referenced saetoraodtsa suggests to us that under the rationale of 21 Coup. Dea. 739 (1915) funds expended by the I 25X1A 2. The C~ General., and the Comptroller of the Treasury before his, have con siatent3y held that the expesrlfture of Goerrraa6 funds for bottled drinking water is appropriate only when a necessity exists. The decision to which the Resident Agent has requested an ezaeption, ,25X1 A ~ 17 Coup. Gen. 698 (1938 typical of the decisions which have held that,, a necessity from the standpoint of the Ga vern - n-1 eziats only ben the water otherwise available is not potable, that is, not safe for drinking. 3. We believe the present case oars vithin the role expressed in equipped with a central water cooling s0rstm Mbioh s~plied distilled or special water to all of the offices. She Comptroller of the Treasury pointed out that the Ooveretiment office woes not bring furnished a special service but one rendered in colon to all, the te,ments. should, be regarded as a ash and ri-t2al nsabls where the buiXIM vas , I 21 Co,. mDec. 739 (1915). Shat decision held that toes ahargsd by the lessor at an office buildding in which a Oovernemet office was bested Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Mplo'eas and their business guests to obtain drinking water from the rest- r_ faun. ervesury apparently recognised, it is tmreasonable to require Gov+erne,ent po situations is that in this case each office purchases drinking water ydividually rather than poring an additional charge to the lessor for ,aisl water supplied through a central system. In both cases there is no ,that available source of drinking water. As the Comptroller of the jj would seat to make the purchase of bottled drinking taster a necessity ,!thin the orsatcaing of 21 Cosy. Dec. T39 (1915). The only difference in the y,. building in rich the CIA office is located has no drinking fountains all of the tenants in the building purchase bottled drinking water. k. As is generally true of office buildings in the city of X1 A6A 25X1A9'A ce of General Counsel :RBH: lean Cl - Subject - -~11 - Chra*ao 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200004C&'-'a s 5-s 4 May 1960 WrA A>tt'IRtN PM. Director of Security Purchase of Electronic ui at and ~~oasible- Conflict ?~~ 25X1A9A of interest involvi an4 I 25X1A5A Corporation STAB 1. Your e,astorandum of 29 April 1960 rer4uestc4 the opinion of this Office o whether or not a conflict of interest problem was Vowed because ,who formerly hold a consultant contract with 25X1A9 this Agency. is now an employee of the with vhr= 25X1A5A desire to outer contractual relations involving a subject with which became familiar in his consultant status. 25X1 A9 2. In considering this problem, we have reviewed Agency Regula- tioA and the pertinent statute authorities on this subject. .1e have also investigated the conflict of interest regulations ,t other agencies and legislation currently pending in Congressional e. saittees. It is our conclusion that no conflict of interest exists in this case and, accordingly, it would be legally proper for the Agency to enter 25X1A5A1 into negotiations with the for an electronic badge system is furtherance of the objsctives o Pro ct I 25X1A2D1 of your off ice has exp lain sd the work -,L 25X1 A9 under his consultant contract. while it appears that he 25X1A9 devoted same tine to consideration of the technical problem* involved In an electronic badge system, the proposal submit tend by the 25X1A9 Corporation was not based on ass ;". que or special knowledge procured 25X1A5A1 by that company from Ttsee and three; other corporations were invited to submit proposals and all race iveos 25X1 A9A sacs fraw . The an proposal of the equivalent amount of technical information and guid- ?thicb appears to 25X1A5A1 represent a more promising solution than the proposals of the other three companies, was developed principally other employees of that 25X1A5A1 cospaay stud. it the work is performed by the will be carried out by a division which is separate and 25X1A9A that component in which is now employed. 4s had and will have no connection with the negotiation of a contract 25X1A9A With the Oowsr rent on behalf of tbet 25X1A5A1 4. The foregoing are among the circumstances which lead us to the coaalusioa that the normal negotiation of an Agency contract by the Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 -,;U& .C"Tc Purchase of @lsctratte llquipse at and possible Caatlict of 25X1A9A Iatsr*at toeeolvLA9 1- 1 and 25X1A5A1 25X1A5A1 Corporation stay be conducted without concern that either the letter or the spirit of the conflict of interest law, regulations or proposed legislation will be violated. 25X1A9A a r-ssistant General Counsel CC. UIy/PD Oz PS Distribution: Orig g 1 - Addrdssee 1 - 0GC Sub j mil, - 0GC Chrono I - OGCCirc 1 - 0 Chrono 25X1A9A OGC 1(4 May 60) 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 4 May 1960 MEPSORANUUM FUR: The Record UnJECT: CIA-WA Relations in connection with Interagency Procurement 1. Recently I have discussed with General Counsel for the National !security Agency (NSA), two problems in the logistics support field. In both instances I have found him very I reported the foregoing to as a matter of possible interest and requested that if any questions of appropriation or procure- ment law involving this Agency were brought to his attention, he should 25X9A8 cooperative and he suggested that he would be pleased to call at my office at a mutually agreeable date so that we could have a more extensive dis- cussion of interagency matters. The problems which have arisen heretofore are as follows: a. I was recently asked by 01,/PD 25X1A! whether NSA had authority comparable to that possessed by the National Bureau of Standards (see 15 Uz,C 273-276) to take surplus property from other agencies without reimbursement therefor, or whether normal GSSA ;,rocedures apply to NSA. I advised me that NSA had no special 25X9A authority, such as cited above, which would make it unnecessary to go through the normal G:,A surplus property disposal procedures. A further factual investigation seems to indicate that we can avoid the necessity of a transfer with reimbursement under the GaA procedures by treating the problem as one which involves a long-term loan of equipment. is investigating further with 051. It 25X1A appears at present that the contemplated transfer involves E:;:~ 2 employed in a program which has heretofore been conduct. by but, under N.-,C directive, is now being carried on by NSA. No further action is required until develops additional factual data. 25X1A b. The other problem involves procurement by NSA of cryptographic items which, by M,'-,C directive. are to be obtained by all agencies solely from NSA. I have been asked by OI,/PD what constitutes a valid obligation of our funds in connection with such procurement. After some legal re- search, I have reached a conclusion that the obligation will be effected by the acceptance by NSA of a CIA purchase order, even though NSA does not make a contract with a commercial source for the procurement of Government-wide requirements until a subsequent fiscal year. I am pre- paring a separate and detailed opinion on this matter. Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 SUBJECT: CIA-NSA Relations is connection with Interagency Procure"at contact wo for assistance. I r.q estod that he not raise this issue within his own Agenay as I did not want to create a problem where one sight not now exist in the minds of people at NSA. 25X1A9A~ Assistant Genera Counsel cc s C/PD/OL Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 14 May 60) 25X1 A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 WC 60-0493(4) 5 May 1960 XOMAMM s diet, Administrative jt&rf Office of 120 unications 25X1A9A 25X1A9A 25X1A6A ttorae of Rous.hold Puree. is FOIAB5 OGC 1. Vs bA'v* 7OW asmaantndsn of 6 April 1960 referring to t px opoccd ibipseut of bourehold effects at With rettoroaiea to the sio $ of I-WVTA p 5 and 7 of R 22-1000, you ea whether moss of the "20b" - _.....,....... nu~~~ Q s eaCT in moss n I~l7ex eas but lees than the "Table I Allo anceE sa siaaultsuseoasiy sta* his r+sorstnintg household orfeatar, which, taken tN,th.r with the t shtpPd, do not erased the over-all amount allowed in Table I. Por the fo1UW we think the amasser t4 in the affirmative. 25X1 A 9A The .13+apit rsutristioa as .b is 4%-A in tt:a 72 of fret "e+onte aporary starsge STAT Wm aft bla Iftm the ro" viftt or voluaos shipped to OWWOONS tb** 740 '~sb3o _ I'~ arllaysmos ~~t Of volume list+e~! In TazbL mm2A t 't partial shi~snts ; empl~ses are' tbw are dam to posts Vber. furnished WW%W$ WO Tahm la psPnWIA" by the ~9arernoateati. ($e. pars rspb 53.) the "um tMbo paro9riaian in wT8 asarts that all"" is 11 wishes ship to umfureished Quarters more than tftrlafrs Is denied the statutory benefit. b` to maw his Hems If the Table letvs It the4~~ +sb1e a lirme2 makes a (or t*U) Glad the W'088 aslit aft ~, U Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 is diveeted of his right to be rai.baaraed for a otorsago of his r e aainiehg effects. This would ordinarily not be learned by the lea until aftor he had reucbed his new poet and was so far away from his goods in storage that there was little he could do about the whole matter. In our opinion, requiring th,w caloyee to take such a risk is unconaclonable. Another unfortunate result of this provision is that the auploy e VtIO exceeds the Table II ailownnee, though barred f ran storing the balance at Goveraa nt expense, in neverthealeca nutho rized to ship it to his de atinatiorl at Govern.-sent cxp*nae, which is more :rx?rnuLye to the Government than the storage would bav, been. He - us must elect between (a) etorit ; at his own tense, or (b) ippin , to his new poet things which h does not went, or cannot use, and which the A 'ercy presses bly does not wiaa. to ship. 2. It ie the pri.s ry function of a4win1.etrative regulations to fill in tse ite ta3.].u s?ar:aaoseary to the imEpl station of statutory objectives. Under :such as found in section 4 of the Central Int.alligsnce A ency Act, ryot si,J,r-r~, t?..e scope of regulatory authority is broad ind*ed. Zh' .rthe- :?ae, rtn-Lxlatione, roast be written In haroony not only with the express ~rmi:s ins*: o? the statute under wb1 cit they are iaoued, but also with. the tiro oL!ecti a of the statutes. They wAy nut operate to negate the statute and thu n autrate t ha :ill of Corneas. to the rases at haizc, Um statute eoetr.: ?>oait.:ve lcrFAl right on the a ployet and plece,u a r ate on the atancy ',, confer t ho bent rtt - that is, the 4tor at Gover ont expense ar LoL:::.a`bo1d e.,'Leats ;o cannot use at his prospective past in an i xrgency arw. :; a?, s tertetit with what we have said aabo e, the Agency y by regulations ~Lcc r:: w ~tiebl~a limits: on individuals as to time, ejanner, placwr, gaunt, ?tc, , ~,. L,c~:-.ag , but it caeanot i* prss restrictions WhIeh havo the effect ii ? ?: r Ie3:iyl ;; the statutory bone fit to a largo clazz of eiployeee. ', e.'ney 1 ulation mate reanuomblc standards of household P i ;z 20 Table I, and then, aa* to storoze, denies appl Icatfon t':. .: zs C:?~L~.IIk'Clb to parsons who exce;td the Uiited sahipemsntu aut orisrad to furs-UL=i1 d qua?rteru (under Table II) . In fact, the rc -ulattion kas no bract prorijiott for storage at Goverment expeime of the effocte of p+ rsons ri:i t sau!'urzisbed quarters in a rgency areas. We have had occasion X'rricu;;ly to object to a coaparnble omission from FR 45-1050, the aee~;~tor or II on this subject. In our memorandum to Chief, ^mpoy t.asttcan Division. f}"Y i atics, dater! 2 July 1959, cub ject--Isla ? osz;: . , ,rl4iao of Eland F: wa stated; .regulation sally not eet di.';fles ent standard& of entitlement rh.1,ch artificially e d tzslra*a:.onably dLtie rL la ate betuecn various coteV,ories of caployee8. F c1r iu tanca, forcer paragraph 11 of 1,5_1)5O provided :or utorage of effects at Gower *e:sev expense r :~r "1 ployei e ,>,vi re to Y'ar'n Ihied quarters in a rz.eney areas but t rear there ?oin to un.: ,r.rsiicsh:cis quarters in the :see=n au?eas. cinr sona~ly dl cr-inatee aGain~tt the latter claws, who may Lr. no ies"t zi e oJ t, e benefit than the i'oraer. " Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 25X1 4. For Lhe re as fur n is in 4,. `p~Ff0RWe~e,`t`itc STAT 'tors are DOt Vrovided stars, and t wrti3rb statute, ao the the e rests ictiond 14le grounds mat his hoezs ? t id by the ti- ta adad t quoted to hAo IrVad by 'Pa g, e prapodad d m la ~boy~ aamraot tst~l. ~' r' ` FY OVIDIOU t Until i'ir:eal c 'd e-tion and j- UtUm d*14tttM the ftob4actxoemb]Ie tics of that yu"xeil?at autjt orttlr Pot "Ua household tua~ata xith the storMW rineated~' thss oraay s is regulation, and MW of his h h sw&4t ht Batt s"01:'ted by t ~~P to .,"mnot "'I at t de etination any ga tea' vi#2sta 1 oaaa- Etta, Vhiaeh the ro R Yidsd by the reCulsttcxmed et Qpv ut aka 6 cc: Chief, Fiklao Dtr#acZOr o:- Logiuttca Cuiaf' 25X1A8A 25X1 A9A" 4f`fl OZ- general coum.., 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A00020003000 5 mw 19W OaC/S-38(a) STAT STA Thane is hereby established an eq%ui1ixation aiovance intcu ed to c ite for the s cost of lives at the post (or area) of duty outside the continental, dted States as c red to Weshingtvn, D. C. 'lhio atiowe ce shall be ciuted on the basis of staticticel data raiat1.ng to the cost of Uvin ; cr: the local econtx y." 25X1A8A g CT : Calm for Painburemmat for reign Tents Fuld Submitted by 25X1A9A 1. is claimed re iaebcaesent for foareign teased 2 5X 1 A 9A dryd i +art duties paid on the p ace of a refri arretor in the c ow try of bis aanai . rinsaft Divisiaai returned the claim to O'rith 25X1 A8A the request that it be forwar4led to the Office of General G 1 for review. The gcasstiaa is father taxes ,end duties of this kind are intanded to be relmbm-sed veer the provisions of II and ST, ac whether r the et aliratiaa ftuawance provided in 0 ST, is desigmd to eorr such its. 25X1 A6 2. 0 is a staff event e.signed to = der ur.otticiel 25X1 A9 cavor. On 21. 3Wy 1,959 be purchased a refrigerator an tbO open merest for $4&.13. A Oovernwnt a 1oyee uiOw official sor could have purebave 3 the an= ref rig~erst fr is the saw wxwee for 4M-ft- M20 .10.,3.,2 difference in price represents in port duties Md local taxes Plus a ID dipl -tic discount. II acknowledges that the diploaaatic 25X1 A9A discount 0,30.42) is covered IV his equalization s .ce. He bate claimed $179.90 as the portion of the differs representing import duties and 10=1 ta=p. 3. Tile pertinent portions of the Meulatioua that rwast be constr?ered Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 a Of CL;. trbo :aeit9 ro3 c t~ not havo been 2'@ :ee i+~:S C l 2@'a Vou Wt fired to pAy except for the of ~ 1 ef%t ext*tUSed tt U.S. GoNerr stim a*a al a in the ,ar my be :'etmknsrg*d t tepee." for c~, 4(2) AGOUC7 b az aoecu-jtyteW Ccr me1ntten oe of their Cowan, > art d i? ' or. t , tht uvuld use by, x )t ~ ~~ who ~ not tei~tburd t be rtiim tbarefor ot,ber sQUxee, may 2imitstt bed or to t1w the tar xi,-~c: t M Yee %Vroft of the Chief of ltion or the +b2efless of the types quantities kzm its to of per- itsW. H a 4 $? be r"U'"ioas cited W*ye mint be _ It whar tax o Sz{port Out-Y i's smb~ura=bl e jr, ~R ie ~estn not r the ~i1ar bene'f'it is Le egAaestj iQa aUX 'pvidec4, irk OOV%fted on t2 buds of statistical data tzatic i a a Of living of the col Ieconcew. W the of coat Odift Y ib vh ~ tho ~ the PrIOft which amt be paid for f snort Wader 'ici.el a pay amb t ftly on the Purcham or uVer'si of o 5' synch 'serf old items, 'Wadi ~'aa are ~ ~.t3~ar. ~s rrr which tt~ a here, he VSQY to e notice of the tdu abpa to d t the fact that e V LO we u r official 'gtt xe in tJzis ar, It would be ibtar .f cal ~d tso mad duties, no nntf hOw ~ 1l t m ~t bad the 14Y ben wider official ah c~oal.A have been Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 5. The c ttrolli : regulations t:nte t data road In the oniy vay in yr+,lch t h e y ea v not irk coi i2tet. 2v it t , that ttu and 4utie6 Vill be :end under t * pr( teicxaa of ST T ^er the ;aroi crty which the :: xu:y sdzi pa to *at eV A n arr' r +..2rt he m u hli.tth Sits blue there. TaaDeese and duties pelC 01 the t rc'.r aso of code for the merintoerince of himmIf and his idly aft a- orriri1 ir, the cow-try of movi r_t are cons3.6ere6 { :. the B+Gtti i ;' of the I-q11 P t1o tt1 ,make &ld cur not be rein txra* rc+:r : atg;l r, it is the (121a . rx of this Qtfire that Z zsrra ,-t; c it1t ed to : trab: s t for loc 1 tsars stet s dut1ees ,.r the it s t`r igerator in II. 25X1 A6A 25X1A9A -sai utwtt Ge scr . C'ou:cz91 C Jew istribution ":rrir. . ?;. 1 - Addressee 1.'D 1 - TU;.1 Chrono 1 - 1 - East Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Next 3 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 arms store his privtts1y-owned automobile to 25X1A9A at his owe sos passe. (c) Tacacv~el os+ders tbs. iwxt treosi+err P'CS wsq- wtho riser 2 5X 1 A 9 trattsfsr of the priv$te17-owned automobile from gases' it happ.na to be to his next post and he wssyy receive xefaI - -- -at for the cost thereat up to the aonstrvwtivs cost of a'btpt+revt from 0 to that next post. If the porivtte]7-oweed automobile Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 of a privately-owned automobile isnl 25X1A6 m 0 is ~ is urge: t,rders to transfer 11:8 to we turthsr that 25X1 A his cover os anisatiaa in pnrahibits the i @Ortation oar possess'= 25X1 A o~ aoatob tam actl at GorrersaeoR expense to his past or mi'x'-' 25X1A et I aad At Se has aoasp]et his full tour 1. we essaderstand from ya r -05- 1 i that privately. 25X1 A 2. We can find so euttwarity, ststutol7 or atbervtes, for adwueae return of a pr3rate -oansct automobile to an auipt ice's rasi&nce at tare time of appoiatsest or transfer exaapt VhMV an swavency arises (PL no, A.(1) (p)) . eia also am find no wtI rity for Pownsnt bp- the aov*ri ent of (a) tlrader Regautioa if authorised in his curriut traml, oft err asen+i+ed it me rsaarT, he OW ship his psiv*ts],y -ovned axxarobl le from I to s:o otter pl aae, aon?temporoxy etoz*gs for a privately-ow sd autasobilo. possibilities, Uhe store, seas to be lisittid to them: inalu~ling the eontineeutsl. lhtited Stets wa veosive r m- to As a practiesl matters this aonetruative asst 25X1A6A sight volt equa or *zmeed the Cost at direst s114pser t frcas 25X1 A6A to the eoattns tsl Mited States. 8t?a'a4P or disposition ,e privately-w Den wtamobile at its deati t-ioo is eatissly the respocstbillt]r of buregowt up to the caostrratiYS cast of shipment fzVt Approved For Releas / c14CIA-RDP67-01 057A000200030001 -6 STAT STAT vas s-a boss silipp.d to t ho 3 on Qdtod States and bs VMS trecar r Ls to the aooti~abai Oiitsd Btst~es, be a be s.i a en& tort the differ os, it Oq, between the aaaa- 25X1 A6A sta' etiwr cost at 4btpmt from lI to 0 ani the 7 i X 1 A R A Laos or rraa I I to tat oontsa -i anted opeaiflM in 1b~aierl i cart be Valved n=or sub- to) at the .e re perssi.&l . epealtis QMWAWG to yew eimnlioer i'a]1owi (s) lls11 -111 tea' sdwsws a lips t aoatsls a JAI doss uat .~ctwial to pesrs#~--aia.d wSbOWDbi3as. (b) ice. (e) S.. p R @ obv.t. (4) we 40 sot . sa w vi apibt fl that p dVWtely-awned snto.obU.s West be ioavdod in the tars "f wnitarre end house- WA sad passomal atfeets" In wAmmatieets (C) and (D) of ?sameu 4(1) of Itlbua D w llo. 25X1A9A As+sistaat Geomml Counsel 25X 25X1A9A OOCzCFB: Jon 1-Sipper 1 - Chrauo Oeia & 1 - ASbr 1- Subs Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 STAT 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 OGC (0-0596(a) pstabli -1 %, at on Addtttcs*1 W.11 Auditor Pbeitlezt on the Aueit st+att for the P spasa of ?fre tiag can dal Audit of the Credit Iheloe (a) I1 n0ae~4 froati the Dirrotcr of Per rl to the Depttlp Dire cto ($i pert ), dated 81 l errch 1960, a jct ? E$tabliasssnt of Additiatel A t*tltor Position (b) lnoatd= free tine CceWtaroUer to V w tel. Counsel, dated 95 Aprri1 1964, saw subject 1. The Coerg~erallsr, in reflarown (a), states that a Questleo has been raisr_ as to it iaairabilitt era. larlilpt of the Credit ibstoa reisbvreing M A seq at 00 olss1` a gelislent of a 06-7 to o ieetiu* with the odparat at a WU AS*wW aadite r for the pwpae of Darfcreisg an Mewl audit or the Ajuapr's credit slot. 2. As yet here, tide sitvstiew introatrt the wipaaaeot of eWlcpree+s $ 00 Credit ft 1 A u O n a r e i a b t a adds be s t s i s pawltsr to our AgewW and hives from logo tio0oddestiass. The naarnal credit union hires its WOladaes Neft Ow meet" and U w" *Wlap m bs ue no eawectiae With tadtvid0s1 Gee is ly ar isatien dtich wpports the particular credit odes. The Veasarl Credit duets Aet in arblittos to pa'uvidiad for a bomrd It Air+seters, arlem and a dram *etee =aloes dim for a Supsr- a rriaesyr C m tttw str11 ofte arras craw to be, aado qunterly 4d eaMd onitt+s at the badct. !hs sear d Credit union tap/ call in outside Ittilaett to Ps11011 tl awltits atd say, papr for thou from it =too k*? 'tea M 't for his is owAalned in the Credit Union Act, Vbictt "Mew that the Weed of direrstours, snood OUMW under, curl -Provide for Iwatiaat at *lofted and aarftta` assistance rsW st..d bt the $ Srvt MY CasrKtlaae." We believe, tb&V*fiw*, that our Credit Uwan is 1tet ems' the Act to VW fart tiist.v.r onattia swrive~t are required V its -iwt CoarrtttsW wt after snoh ssrrviess are rendered d irsctly we parrfes si %W w A oepfi aarpUrm an a reimbursable Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 at 111, LL-LL-L6 I %I I I Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 ya srr Wt in a posittaa to at"* obat JO," of oaapalt~srsos is do the audit, ~d_ tart arospooribil if~r t~ ?saistoe as t pots! 10 ,t,ppl tbMeft", that a Q3'll 31!'.1 to "qutwed toswitly so tar on the Bupor~iior~r Consittow Is QoaOSO'erer~;. '1'M+ ~- ilrspsrvt#ae'r am silo 8st dos ad this point ram the ?.&o%1 Crodtt in Ei but vouLQ r be pr1 btt.d fsa obtatsim sir toes at -. A. a Matter of iufO eats -x the C~eaise les at the Sypncris ~r^atttai is a 5er of the Auiit 8tat"P) odiriees tafoa uy that. in Us ootad,a, p-i y and that, as a sat1 at tact, ttrs an dit listen aoi1* be fit" f i MeatIMS, Vanua" the ossi asset of at least a d8.9 for swami lu l t.wassed its, at OW Cr*dtt itetea, with the owl Case 1,11b at U r aia8 t a "a-" b! S T,=t5 fl muee ISO - s ar w wrt*r,aai a .tt ttimUcss required of the ri - Comm" bi !r ft&"l credit Mo. Let. s. oar combo ioe is %bat prow ding the oudtt is the r nibilit a. edit Union ttult threw its ti srvia~ort Casnittoa GrA the Credit mss shouu2d yay the cost tbwaof. Ms do net an OW basic for avpIadttwQ it tr{lalal f ue 15 fear all Cr MW P&tt of this most. Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 ,,LMOkAIV i)U M 2'C )t(: k tnance 'Division Chief, (D h L Branch Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000ZQ38M(M0876 a a d.pendent son arrived separ y departed II September 5. 1958,and proceeded to their home in 25X1A6 atcago, arriving on 14 September 1958. Prior to their departure from the United States. had exchanged the one-way tickets 25X1, provided for him and his dependents by the Processing Branch for round-trip tickets. The return portion of the tickets was used in connection with the travel claimed on the voucher at hand. I was 25X1 transferred PCS Washington around 15 June 1959 and the travel of his dependents was reportedly approved by an amendment to that travel order dated 10 July 1959. You pose the following questions. ,S.pendents from Q to Washington, 1). u. , commene g September 1958. 0 was assigned PC's to I and he and his 25X1 .Ue arrived there initially around the first of August 1958. itis tel on 22 August 1958. tits wife and son 2. Voucher No. Z172 claims reimbursement for travel of ,...atia acs related to each. 25X1A6 Travel Claims for Dependents 1. iti' e have your memorandum of 15 March 1960 on the above t with which you submit three travel vouchers submitted sketching by 25X1A9 '.i a shall treat these individually. the a. From the foregoing, is 0 entitled to reimbursement for the travel of his depeucienta based on a travel order amended ten months subsequent to their arrival in the United States' Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 b. le I titled to reimbursement for the travel of his on who remained at the PC5 point approximately two weeks and the travel of his wife who remained at the 't',:5 point approximately one mouth 25X1A9A 3, eaeevtiit *rdar 10100, acr Wk d 2C) .hate 1949p, ~aaa the Dtreotao~r Of CTA to pargr aUvossaw q f stasis to tban P maw takr ow Sear"My of oft %* in emoSM e e vdth the ra muttAaae par art%wl is 'i ttiv Order 1 11. aad Xeee"atgsertbaasaeeaaaela~ further re *iatsptas as be #AY tar merry to ettectmtre the Varpoma of t b* Order. ACamLa faauiatian II aftftftft A jg ?q 'f-ttsa 6eetion *'$me & "too ?r to * of ~'SM situ (Oaa"eesat Civilieees, Paretgea Areas) # in par&~ I and p *.e io vsregt.* 3 as fol Iwo*' riQ :serrierc aazi' s 41 t O0aeN Q -lcge" eM staff 5 la. " (rrniaarommil amt). !law tiarr-fie re rota ( the parley, of root or gremtan sae got fie is aeotfaw 2'2.22 of the tenderiss M IatiMS.. rMt eeettt provi&m to pert ?. . . 30 06U ""r poor to the 4W1gW*er? aanat 00 1117 ana - Q U t os i j e r & We altar h i s w e e on 4 y ." It is tamer pro ri9a4 that "`asaeers am a .cage. Is a1sd4e at the tit +.o NbIgh he is tsum r z, , or bee mt ye onteted on dwa so the result of male" trestumt, the ervcfAve date at t ter, ether tbas the dills Of "Am um on amb, aka01fl ra. " As to indii*ted. by the r. tlata,io ad has boom coneietaently liet by the, De rartaeet of state aaa- this a p- , "eotz'smae as 4wW * am* ropmuVa iz to Waft at 2,'s onrre nit a eael t. S &d a rspaae tto in for wm to ruut1. Mrly fttW*M eat r'sfi on tba ACwxW Tine SM dtSM&IMM sts . ? It wag aectOL vq am a Duna that his al de for re# ?eeaeM tar t xr* y Lodging V GS not dtmal Nsd as a apassttaamX1e Item* bat Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 use %+ p iv Bit l e 0 1/'F4t: L'" -I$ $ 7 0 O fad gf uu:.*. Th*t eteat:e p?0V141$ s n l,i+cahi.Lit7e at t -Sun+ or't*ed ftfuuticar awat almarl7 1MLCt' d at px; ,-*w I of each cat * scev.rei Field 1au . It to the sat ISLOe of t1do ea>t''ttee % bat a wane ary Ocatmot with atvi ssitwc r rpaveaftstive WM14 not aafifiae to wart the r+r attceeasett of r* 0rt;irg ttrr duty. Alm n to the d z*t, t1* t of the foard , It to also '+e contact that repeating IV for mW &W Crier to eettle tree.!, a tta4t bte oa's Gwatindtc Co Oxt+ststsd low* ra,.;,i ~ti4o *ot t t regaireaaeatt.% of the St-sbwt S.dad*ttsa. Saab r#rrti !.x in would be little 4Ltt t than 1 %W vtWck to most ofteat ractel U4AM etrr'iv%l to t.1 4latit4at latety storing it for him while he ahopped it ueaong other cccaponenta , k y recalls Conversations vith u.r d u -I of in which each said that d~evelopaxert of the equipment , ~: .1 t be picked by some other element of the qerncy if riot by T: D. 25X1A9A 25X1A9A 25X1A9A Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 (niter ~ ]~st 1 tb, is CIO way of being ewe of wben or bow Ube egai nt go l4koEly toot this Mew- 4 when the T: D it c1 rted t in June of 1956. fte two men previously Visible for the vt ilt had ,#M tboir Jobs Z,T 1 =3 these who r" lac" ttte knew rw th,zt t of ? I t Wsm dis end being aperi,mental end bo,em a ccu1c) lo" looked 111oe amtlt to soaeoxre was not faraat3j at with it. It a wobable thawas disoeretd for this ressoen I r r evert the euit 25X1A9A 0qpmv come to pick it up in Werch 1959. 25X1 A9A 5.1 -1 4 1i30e to be reiaabLweed for the value of hie tat equip== YM he seined whether the . uc is lisble for its loss: sod Hart roil m rse bin. no only amity under which the ACy cam: pey p~cb 28. .lath to the , ini.tt3'ativ~e ad3us nt seetlon of the Tarts C1.air jet,* UM p672. That Matiau P des that the bend of a federal agency ^I ssttla ae QL1ae fbr mmmy d=WS of $2,500.00 or less for Lorne of 1Captrty eaursd bW the n*9118"" car yr r4ftl acct of any a loyee of the n1Q APP bm 'IMWV3*LVIW own, POP r f t ~t ast"M os v am w y of ! OtsSr WAtua . ote watt: hs s i atissrt abd is cif With the !rats. on a rsl the court P was tiwt st#,1t~t tbs New Yost ~ ~ ?s` the ~ s j vith this t~ of attu- mw erta %$ to M to fba awa* Feuer b as1a for iiaa3-un r tt a at 4M s 1s'fewiV awh sf brook or ace !a?1lidcoutmet or t ~ ar Oman ad ~ fisriot. 3kv ia to ~ef-Letr r nraxtes tbst baoaMe~ lent b 1-cssa is ~-.w VIVAMW K t' q is s 044000 Of amiss Use in a suit to toss s - ,/ r amt al o be rare" to prt+st s srtisi. vttb OW Suivt41*i saft"Ors Y" a4bt wish to ,wks. "0 the opssair on vim" to the iaasL, by pUabiui it in .aTwe,l - U as lal so 33 Ap rii -, a dfaraat sstioe for 4 or adlgrtf, tt w - lut . of your lr al property swM not t. Ib ow Rtabeaw , srM, is ' Lsh the 0141013,061 smaeow" La the t*dsieL sots At-A& M 9 be law is ar i as ban ~ *b ho had me" ft &u*Jecte p ~ Mat its that 00 ~ ~ W% be ~ bsva also. the court Pd" died bia M"oeb" aud that ON ''e In tMe VWWUS aarratu. V an &*tUm owe bros&t & *Unitas=t of Tice .aopr1*t Alsk an l aa has takes out Os 11 Mrttsle, it is GdAbalr that the his that %big ease des vitfita tho sale hest mists 3s the rl1. deDawrrt mW be protested by It th1q a is ? tts#h -l Vartstl a. to the ant 4md *& now t ? Ow k ai the Quite s w this rule vertu be to adult that r UU si 1. bias" bad boas usie #a aartp par tattoo bleb, $ !1oL', v.514 f"Is IA a ssit !tor Mal. W. Zn M"WY , W. "INIPW eM the CUM* =IBM bed the r1 ht to rM " 6 mi l 3q qj me r ato w tt ms !s the "lie doeain r prav~lded eorII ta~lissts4 the a . sad ate. tbgr also had the ri t to pub- eeapt. CAN the so*sak U wage o9Aerr3 - rledg+rd ae1 each ad its taws, out Of Est, the 4" sot distort the ovmrssl tontw mss. Newswas Mir. 8isSrr bat as rl t to rte, and the CRZa ? CO to P611 MP a r ite at the speor me a by o ttiap bw srf rho griggs" es to Whist iw flier as orWaai titU by youm br v Mw of On asdow theeartes by rel+3aals an action slzt be the ~arts~ttstJaeur .eta *ift #reo* r wait wftW be soma , sboelt Visa, testaia to pw*w the setter lydpsUr, to eossalt perivet. as bm h s rtwete vith dt~ see". Mt' seer.., we Mut am" mtsraga A^ Ow Ow we sea" !ar perpearatio of t1N 0"0. A be 1r'oa -t ei to fh it9aswrlara ?Ls 3ari"Sat ea in ukUft Mr. 4bw arr eaw" -. Aft" "O fliLustasr the jwedlotls is %421 tiro was tMos4. Au altoaraeetiw %* for the TRW= to tie rj$ t ,psisf ' a" his . fiatton, 25X1A9A Mg?tl-= l - AosttoDCI 25X1AA9A .0 "not" C&A"al I fl" t - DOCZ ?-33-= Lien 3 1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057Ap0Q2~0002VX01-6 I I $i uMM FOR: Mr. John S. Warner O. x,'(,?r t Technical Adultery and Nstuaralizetion 1. oection 316(x)(3) of the D migration and Jletior lity Act states: '"lie person, except as othervise provided in this title shall be naturalised unless such petitioner during all the periods referred to in tlxis cun.n:ction has been and still is a person of good moral chtr-? 2. Section 244(x) allows the Attorney General in his discretion to eu wporxd yw t:ion with respect to a deportable alien who mmerts one of several, sets of Qiteria. A co=on criterion for each set is that during the period of time qp riste to the category the slieem "bas been and is a parson of VW rmora.l ,,c ttor. ,.ctioa 101(f)(2) states: Tor the purposes of this set, no person shall be regarded a au, or :ound to be, a person of good saoual character xtio, durtug the period i.or witch good moral eberacter is recognized to be established, is, ,;,r ka:: one oho, durinE such period has committed adultery." Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 etir,n iol(i) does not define good moral character but c ec at aq " preeluxsi.ve etuaiiamli-, ac an aid in J ne, detararintie to the and of GTevater Uniformity. ?w : t:inc .rds apply squally to section 244(a i and section 3l6(c) (as well as OUrs in Ohtch the tea is used), by the terms of sce"ti on 101(r) . The leadin , we on the point with wbich vex m" t deal is specifically a ruling on oaction M. I believe that it follow i fro i the abovo that it La also applicawle to wetion 311, and this vvtz elceer1j indicated In the opinion of that case, wt.ieh ewll is cuss belov. . &Yhe precise question with which we have to deal Is whether an sflen, obt a a Mexican c a l order i v rce and subsequently rice; in good "ra ttl~, or r%. a person of Good : era1 ch master within the r:'.c:aning of that ter ey cct ::~ i _ in aectioxr l01(f)(2) of the I=igrmtion and Nationality Act. The leading cese:e on this subject is Dickhoff Y. :.'uau; hn esuy, 142 FP i>.(D. E..D.N.Y. 19 ). Thin to to t' knowledge the only case which %tc,; a Jariows analysis of the particular problem of technical adultery. Be- "2t, .L ' t:) fairly ccsrtpa~ehetisive b 7prosch I rue attaciain^; a : u11 text of that >te'tirr, .., t'ne opinion doalinG with the gsauation at hand. i`i:e holding in thac i:~o;,~. cs:? : rasa that an alie t who obtained a 4 xican ::ail order divorce semi married in C i faith waca statutorily eligible for nuspensic:n r~. ;t ?~,,?; Uncie?r section 21:~s(et}( }. r'or the reaso , I we".ntioned in parugrapt= y ", L:_i~ La, in effect, n bo1dini that within the i;ouuiug of the terti e*. IV ,': 't-o.. ;tatute, Dickt:oif vat. of k;'noct .~ornl cilitracter t lterlil:ritctnuling u e '~':icxi (;ultcry iiup1Icit 1r, iiic -?surital .4tatuu. fxu;!d.r the btaterent in Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 ,t r pinion in that case (at page 538)t "Neverthalesa, we cannot have one :A w cation of tho same statutory provision the naturalisation is involved, another when deportation is involved." Apart from those cases oomsnted On in tp o Dickbotf opinion, I find the following =was in point. b. Petition of Greu].ieh, 117 A 2d 316 37 B.J. super. 371 (1955). This asc ;.eld that where the petitioner was naarrla& in 1,938 in reliance on an invalid Wjcaiz ::aai1 order divorce which heel been obtained by her spouse in 1935 and bard lr,ir,Ni in such sarriage relationship for over 17 years, the petitioner's coa- t xa,6 not tantamount to adultery proscribed in the standard of rroral3ty estab- :i by nection 1O1(f)(2). c. Petition of Dawilva, l4o F Sapp 596 (D.C.B.J. 1956). This case in a terse opinion, that the marriage of the petitioner subsequent to the ~curesaant of a Mexican mail order divorce, was bigmaoua and adulterous and that wwvqucutly the petitioner was not entitled to naturalisation. In the Da5ilve eyinion there is no attempt to distinguish between technical adultery and actual edultary within the meaning of the statute, nor does it appear that the quasftion d. A related case is In Re liayall., 154 Fed Sup 556 (D. C. $. D. Pa 195T). y, trice case the petitioner was divorced in Great Britain and subsequently married :r ram ylvnuia the person named in the divorce decree as correspondant with wpcct to the grounds for the divorce, which were adultery. IX PammylvamU acre is a positive personal incapacity placed on a party to such a divorce action Lich proscribes marriage to a person with whose he or she has committed the crime if adultery. Notwithstanding this, the U. S. District Court for the 3astern li+trict of Pennsylvania held that this was not determinative of vhetbw he sub- eeQuent Living with the second husband rendered her moral character good or bad ithin the meaning of section 316(a), and the court made a positive finding that sc rev, and had been a person of good moral character. a. I am unable to find any appellate cases in point. 4. You will note that on page 538 of the Dickhoff opinion there is mention it tour prior cases on the question of whether the commission of technical eft1tery precludes good moral character. Two ware stated to have been in the "ttrmative on this question and two in the negstive. With respect to the two stated to have been is the negative, I do not think this is quite so. With lwpeat to the petitions of FO and lM, 137 F Stgrp 782, this case turned on the lretion of whether acts co' vatted before the Iaveigrittioi: and Nationality Asst e+ Passed could be considered in this question. There was no question with "Gat to the validity of a divorce or subeequsut rermarriabe, and, In feet, Ure was no question of "technical adultery" at all. As to the petition of *m's, 142 F Supp T49, this we a situation in which the hiviband obtained a *dean divorce sf r filing his aatu 'ligation petition. Where was evidenoa lit a Oeretrieious relationship ezistari lam before the divorce and that that Wationsi ip bed produced three children. There wasn't anything technical about %U. 9'he two otlmw cases f7rom the Southern District of Now York, said to h t14 that technical adultery was not a statutory bar to a firrstimg of good moral Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2Q05/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Oft 10 a as! MA lhwft*We I eat most" to o, Irat on am here. 1?, POOO% the IMASM OR ar lusty acrd gmd m a,1 meter, ftr* n ium. .g Ps 4"5, atata the lblloningt t 01110 190 %M NOW * tiii 4til ie sitawtiGns iusoitrft 'teehnioal adult' where j ,IVNQNNIW Loos fa ?ood faith or harit am. 011; on as 3 r Vaik JIM a dIN g. s ea is .tai+u basis ewr a long period of tiers. s+~~'rlasa lapdtmd by as existing iapediaent. or iOl*'Ms if iM esrteao#ed hll eseoM a iap bmeft that his first 1rl fi/ *s still iw @#A that the first a rriagr ass mtertiinated, tie rip pw~alttei aid adultery, MA +uaaaat alms the shelter of a 1,11 Ina ftmpft validity at ttte aeooad msrriages. And one ruling br01 ft" a" seek IM net DWI by a sbbsequeft mma pro tuna (ri bODRitaw) aatwiawtt at ' first mnersap. "00 wt NOOSUMS RVAM*S*m eiae On a party has .st 'ed into sssr#gp is good lbths Opstzrs at MW ltpif1 t. q W prier lanr such a pasaos me swat alNle$S 1 with lass of pod a3wecter. In its earliest rum after tlrt vi'tre fll~e date of the 1952 Act, the Boerd of Mesigration Applta tasiad to *& we to the latter of the statute and found that good felt h slow AM net am"* the peLialp.mt i* an adulterous association, W A3"8 it hot been Ica fur t sd by a ,Wriage. In Dic off Y. aorsw7 this lass ims esa efu fly zysocasi l and the court found that the i Let ass net fated to penalise 'tscahaioal adultery' resulting tte^t a ave ll itl " /S 25X1A9A p t r ~ ldN tali+erU On i*V*Ud tfs=ican divorce. There- is not ~ ro ent Office of Generyal Couuael 0oC sl'C zre Orig. & 1 - Addressee 1 - Sum~ect 1 - Signer J,- Chrono Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 ONAWIN ill D"I ter Directs? (support) onm Cost at o fta"t of wr"ts 32 August l9W 25X1A9A 8 Jr 7960 lls tdus to Dsp %y Ddt (& port) em pls+esbor at , Saetes subject 1. VIP hsme Dos COMMA the mooed senor ie vhiah ooatainae a ww"dati+as the 7o S 1 of the Dermot at $ll~i.1T, nsaouosb1r SW to t7 of I I to moo, at the 25X1 A9A to of woY oat' iS3s as his e D sn With respect to the shiPsift Of to baasshe" efiaste.. 2. Dt vettia Mss asst Assay ati+oe no. mh1ch you issued 25X1 *T I l960, eu@W4 far Sall ea ess the prineiy1e that the Mtoeiwstrt em Moran toe o0it0ttion as a result of saesawls reliance on M saeaa t i t s at its o f f i c e r s a mg strop becefits provided by tit. 'axis ew Msrs to fall *3s1rly within this priasiple. Also, as you M, the atssseiittf aatbaaorit3~ee Mated to this A sect' in the Central Ast r s Ibiah the au rit1 ss delm ted to the Is/S SaeaiLelb7~e lbor the molutios of a rdiawy a 1' "- re po lies with dish arty aO WN111 seat aDttsay eight be confronted. 25X1 A9A. !o %WgMmff SiMS C3 is burned on his ^ienm0er- Wim at b* s tttmpeetSttmt eatitineats ad oaeio ueat shit by 15 am" of tZaoee et itL^ruts, the =stet of autharit4y to reiuburse !hl yore tlrrtrl that perossrtbed Is wk oared by his reliams on the erroneous WomIl sacs in the satiaos at those AWW ett'iai al s vith ,decm be dealt. tuams at tun %Vwo oases the eoaeess east to hies is asst related to the peculiar ~ s it is the belief of this c ,es that there is l W the dw" it Vol" ser^t that then U so ibesis for psynsat the 25X1A9A Ott ?wfo'$ r~LSv It . ? I`Add=siee, l+slbj.ct, 1$igner, 1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 E_ ~dilr f? w X1162 OR t of mwmwu;"- 25X1A9A 2X1 A9 i s a k 09 d4&4~. Yaw FOIAB5 FS in O"tl= as to WS,&t UUQW&WOO wt b7 VWJW 3. Apra UL &to" 21W w t i to LUdt by Salve" and T A I M o f #* r! t1~aLtza'~er . ...... Ali, Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 19 ment 196W W. fxVmm# Bi t et Offtow tug tit mw be ddow 64 fkm on v1Mwttw Vw% to t zZ, to tie vow not Ltmat MW t~dtt Bt WS "a 40 .tamer Pmt in st OGC OW Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 e is =W 4 aA3pp" f as e u p to ttr is 1~1r NUMMA" MUM 4c twMi aame Oou=4d1 Boo" 4OWUM a 3o ammu ve In ter o iW. Zn aw Offtum Pt . Is aat Tw it -2-1r to tie ramie is w MF to 4w Ames at Wwarnimt . rat 3 1$M u ftr ShAPNOW at i of M 106=00 iarone et 11,01,01OPMf+o - in SmOrGamw arr#saI * I#t ad' .e'Ere - a3idp lsaa t aac rtt *A* f w -8 IN alaaMO~~ ftr at~. 4Mt aiaii U GOVWA&U" i.u_ Vasa ad webm 11 A ast t* Vii. Z mili *1110 SM t ltad.'& for go at iIM4ta wt In emc~ at 7 asr Ow afire of tai alas dift t t is %rlobt bs mom" tw as 9406 at Sm" .a. TIM soi at so bqr ?ham" .than .deers M l fua aai at lld "tun as is a"-t at 09 00" h SW . Oaks" wit Tae a oar yrt at an Z* rMloft wr via ow s it is 'a qoxdm at tbu MUM >0 # 1r' at ONO" tZt~n~o~r No a it rm MI&V tar to nun Ift v doh at t1r K suA mw to Aimw IAl+ms mviiiw 1wlSlra Us bird if a SM aw aoaewrs VQWt iII low 4 s. s it !p aae. mix" I" UAW me recauttimm Mr ao~ fps 'Mrt+a~eC sls+owt of adateh oiM a* iet !o fir elrArs as ~~ t~ td-1~s "14" at *waft tmdal- as 41924"0 ia?s Mat Ml +i! il! Ovwro~xt ampow pia monew to a poet oar 25X1A9A AmetW6 6 p.I I I it Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 000 6o.j (a) 22 AWWAt 1960 25X1A9A 25X1A8A I Probibitiba C ts1asd to Beotiio k51 of Title S8 U. B. Code A ,not 701%Iy 0101 Jiaf~s and t raw Uftm - e or 20 1960 to Ottioe at PISOUGIft g Cs1,?~ an man TIM& 28 U. a. code 1. :etticm at Title 23 of t1w V. S. Code, Mosat i JWe 95, #8 (6$ Mat. 908, sets raft thatt "As ' mice or J s sr the satharit7 of the tldited States +1o meopw to the VmotUm dim is goofy at s. hIgh . " You ba ae La9drea_ a. As to sd*tbear " .ae Of Saar" x+ ers 004 to V. 8., auto acct tvrritoriax Via, and U. *aet a Federal Judge or 3vsties ems vit'hos-t "avantn the statkam be a VU-laser at a tOW014P Ur rLrIM having its only ammam abroad t and ~ as par taws only lawyers ~tltted to j Yicm in fmm4p eam2triesM 2. As a tom' of baeltzromwS - -AA d t , . pp s out tbMt this JAW trhiah IN the raa Per"nout uneaset "? . . that it ah.ll not be 1rr Zu1 for OW Judo &MmWtad ands the se.thcn ta- at the hatted States, to exm4d*o the IM or -Too -mat, of aattmrrl or Ott*VMW Or t* be And ed its the preatim of Ow ho. ibiiti pW%M this t, or MALU be dammed smUIW of a high 4" (2 Stmt. 788) MIS IAO$ U&Zly sa- ated bw the Gast s as 3, I 14 wIll P i be aofyttf law reference the 3udiaia37? (36 S#+at. Ila) the prmpeadi+s or "Wlq t Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 sl ewr attar' him beau adtba~t tt'a? fteUm 40. >da~rsr~a w of ImSLAISUw h1at017 aoattadard in law. Aopaat 348, ft* rr, arst Madam, *MMIMIl. Cs2~r with "awd to tics "emus "" y aarsa0 *am WWW.' we q sit $1 Gamma, tllaaeafasrrt, Ilea 'ae woo" f*CM r to MGM aad%t*d 0199V MOMMIN art the i'last drat 0441M as aar1 ? attssaq Lns, tiizv h the Noun% tiaaatto man ainfaarrtsatd N b+ iuslarW to 08 taea '' ..tios CC ULU" _'ie fWIWW& Wt" NOW in gyg"v IS aarSerar PL is arias aro sraaassws is ams.arssam,~ to SIB thaku to tl*t the plstatloS, at IM is eft 2tadti to 'mar loearrlart at Vg" is a.rsrt brit is a U" m :man to s1 ust U p& s*rlaat aat asalas l., V* parapsaesdtiaa at 140" 3ar sts arrt s %V MU& lewd 01 111 1 r isms -' MHUImt. VOINW, it is &A earaatrras tlar-t it Ito be ecolva t tree the 140a Gavle" saslaast. 30 he Sol 1110 CbISt In the INS* st be (IM) U16 311, IT L. a. a** in Is tl s. d ad auli o-sow asarstad In 18Lt (ief+asred to altaw.), ad ada"aar lames p"4 btt 00 a, t ad'llaisia two. bras In OWt n odtsid. satti~rit s larass tlils With the adliat t.La, statadt ' be +a~eldsaert parlos~a of Oaar~+aaar In ad3 11h1s class of !MM bass to psrsrarat. sKiedarM{~ ant iaal~s city is the di. sir r at offisisl dsrttoew and to go"arr di.oipliam in tha ywhli-a saanrias." ? tbars *OWN=% as this laur -u ,radii in $10 4010 CCi .h . (1908) 15M F. t"LS, it IS IFAMIS ft Van xi t to aostraat b.2a tgs to "MW adtlssn; bit wlea a- adtisaa becomes It soar i at Caa sso, alt right to c ct wiibh his I I Is, 1W ftwo It. I (u. a. CdO. seIt. 1901, P. 2308), Illim d h'n. 'i!e ps+0[Mrfsdan of Im bars bow bald a rtdbt at wblath Oft EW aat be aw" rd br 2alist iauo but oar 1 W "am at "wt. In parr" QWUMP 719- A. 333, 18 L. lt. 366. lob,, ad+tst a 2arlq'M beaNss a lbdrrs1 , the laar %V aanr. 84. 3 T23 (0. d. Gash. at. mm, p.~, trot ds ha the eitt to on his acrd w his p KNOW- we l ps oAlLiltaaaa it srsrlariettsar of liberv are isge'1wtt~aO11 ad perepiar -. Tsq am the Uwe ands to VMS* ma ""O era : the S W I T " m as as. ataos to the arsi mma 4=V- --- 2=!NjmfMI 4. Twain to tsar aprait tam.,, w woo" @Wt sc. 1!e ps+ l ildtios In ?sstlaaa 4V4 alai st as w at lair Is sort 1ladtsd to Vie aft" Ittatarrt Omits oatt 'Ias. a ?~'~ 1G5 L41 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 WL-UTIrl -1 'fic $ m flaw ate os liras raq~r+epsett ~eyd 1V bpd ~ ttbstai resee'e1~ti+~t et t cer its ,lts~ e+ of the 44um of aw Y m1 Joettae or judge r b o ~p~es la * M p a w ties of 1 .' , we WA tM f w a $ ttme as' jut" to aWMe is dare prretioe of lswr MMdm@ im the roe'1d f s24 be In w as of the Aft-WO b. With F st to raw MMM sirswotiw, it is elsrar r-t i o ivity se s esauee' at a dip 3wr ftr %Mtli csxrrtttoW tbt tae of Ltr ad t h" tiee1& plat as iad#rLioat lwrlsea' tbe JP d lbdl,'U m-- re t lis+ed, to to tb* enanrkr to tiro first ~eot3oa. cr It ties sbeeo, It voo1d bs posaiDY,, for is 1-ederel ~e CC $ sere COMM (altbor - it be irgi i th" IM ethtw1 sbordss+ds at eaar of tlws rv14 pematit it) to bwe so Intrerast M a osaT sae Or M*acl Iw tue 1111i1,e tag doss dastsioos in w tl tted ftabe** It s rage the also,, two awr bprpotbetic,al judge WA iced be Mooting two wester st t pop= disdpUis. in the public Novice r rt aft bm* be= wa atatae*. S IG11ED 25X1A9A Aealstemt Geeesal Comsat IIOC%:pbc KatzibutIcmi Oarig b 1 - Add m 1 - 9roect - (~ A 1. ____ 1cirev2au l - frame .~-------~? 1-L~1 1 - Pita1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 OOC 60-U45 000 7=9 Assia snt thief, Develagomm Projects Division, DID/P oil Housing AZ.' ss for Pe reonnei Assig ed to Domestic Site 1, By yOur ssara~~sndu0 Owl-4740 you have set forth the prdble of ON she its U 1md high rectal costs that trill be incurred by personnel 'Sol to be auignsd to a dossstie field ia+stallation. You inquire as 3s011t7 of ps asst of a boutiog albywame (a) to civilian peroonnel iA to be asaigmsd to the boas, and (b) a suttplensnta1 housing or cost- - allgamme to silitsry psrsomiel detailed to this Agency for work IM bsss. PralWosry diseassions vi th rep&'esentsti vse of the Air Foree 1 ruing the omen]. pa'ob]lm have not hew fruitful. Agency statutory jjtiss, hastiner, prov14s cut ity for soft pyres. It. *1101- s0^-ensatlrat or afannses aMy net be paid to federal m'" =lass spsatfts stat"twy is provided to allow for r Ao.ipt of au* sUowmm pays nts by the individual (5 U C 70) and FOIAB5 Est all . (5 WC 69) &amb MUMMY svided 1Mag1- OGC 1.6`, Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP67-01057A000200030001-6 FOIAB5 OGC 4. :-ectiona 901(1) and 901(2) of the foreign Service Act, referenced If section 4(b) of P.L. 81-110 set forth above, and the regulations of the Arsident issued in Executive Order 10011, restrict the granting of housing, ysporerv lodging, and cost-of-living allowances to Government personnel on 0eig-n duty. No authorization has b+ provided, nor rates established, pay ant of such allovances to personnel stationed in the United Staters. .he granting of allowances by the Director in general confos cane With the mndard s and rates established by the Secretary of btate is t lerefore wthorized in accordance with the clear warding of &.0. 10100, underscored kovc. 5. Thu legal authority for payment of cost-of-living or housing silovancos to military personnel by CIA is not subject, basically, to any Ufferc.nt considerations from those necessary to the determination of tern of the allowances to civilian personnel. Freedoe from the restric- :ions on the payment of extra allowances set forth in i USC 70, is con- tained in our organic statute at section 4(b). 6. In Johnston v. United States, 175 F 2d 612, at 618, the court Llscu:;sc(l the question of appropriate legal authorization for the pey>vent :f extra allowances to military personnel. Although not necessary to the !ocicion reached in that action, the court stated in psasif: . . . It is true that the ai2.itary pay of an officer may be :X i i:Ly- inadequate when he it called upon to discharge the duties o " e, civilian office requirir great expenditures,, and it is of courtie true that in such situations he should receive the additional n"?ovanceu appurtenant to the civilian office. But we find that C