USSR: ABOUT TO ENTER THE AUTOMOTIVE AGE?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
30
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 13, 2004
Sequence Number: 
112
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 1, 1966
Content Type: 
IR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5.pdf1.73 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/05/05: CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Copy No. 121 CIA/RR ER 66-13 JULY 1966 INTELLIGENCE REPORT USSR: ABOUT TO ENTER THE AUTOMOTIVE AGE? NOT TO BE IU PROLIUCED IN Wh(DLE OF IN PART WITHOUT THE OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Appro For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R0001002401*12-5 NOTICE This report has been Ioz,ne-i to !.he recipient by the Central In t ell er ems, When i t has served its purpose it should O L' destroyed or returned to the: CIA Librarian Central Intelligence Agency Washington 25, D. C. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 CONTENTS Page Summary ................................................ 1 .................................. I. Plans and Feasibility 3 II. The Automobile in Soviet Society ........................ 7 III. Automobiles on the Road, 1966-75 ...................... 11 IV. Primary Investment ................................... 13 V. Secondary Investment ................................. 15 A. Introduction ....................................... 15 B. Ferrous Metals Requirements ........................ 16 C. Machine Tools ..................................... 17 D. Tires ........ 17 ..................................... . E. Gasoline .......................................... 18 VI. Tertiary Investment ................................... 19 A. USSR ............................................ 19 1. Introduction .................................... 19 2. Highways ....................................... 19 3. Service Stations and Garages ...................... 20 4. Social Considerations ............................ 23 B. The Experience of the United States and Western Europe 23 1. The United States ............................... 23 2. Western Europe ................................. 24 APPENDIX Page Estimated Costs of Buildings and Equipment of the Fiat Plant ... 29 TABLES Page 1. Estimated Production of Automobiles in the USSR, 1966-75 ... 3 2. Production and Stock of Automobiles in Selected Countries, 1964 7 ............................................... Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Page 3. Estimated Stock of Automobiles in the USSR, 1966-75 ....... 11 4. Estimated Number of Newly Produced Automobiles Avail- able for Private Use in the USSR, 1966-75 ................ 11 5. Soviet, Italian, Western European, and US Participation in the Estimated Costs of the Fiat Plant to be Constructed in the USSR ......................................... 14 6. Production of Selected Ferrous Metals and the Share Re- quired for Production of Automobiles in the USSR, 1965, 1970, and 1975 ...................................... 16 7. Length of Highways in the USSR and the United States, 1940, 1950, and 1960-64 .............................. 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. USSR: Estimated Construction Time Schedule of Fiat Plant (chart) ............................. 4 Figure 2. Models of Soviet Automobiles (photographs) ........ 8 Figure 3. USSR: Construction of Surfaced Highways, 1959-64 and 1966-70 Average (chart) .................. 21 Figure 4. Hypothetical Relationship Between Stock of Auto- mobiles and Supporting Investment (chart) ...... 25 Figure 5. United States and Western Europe: Comparative Indexes of Automobile Stock and Highway Ex- penditures, 1910-20 and 1955-64 (chart) ......... 26 Figure 6. United States: Annual Production and Stock of Automobiles and Highway Expenditures, 1922- 64 (chart) .................................. 27 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B0-0369R000100240112-5 USSR: ABOUT TO ENTER THE AUTOMOTIVE AGE? SUMMARY The widely publicized Soviet decision to boost production of auto- mobiles* brings the USSR one step nearer the automotive age. How- ever, announced plans are not so grandiose as to require a significant alteration in traditional Soviet economic priorities, and would leave military and space programs unimpaired. Even with the usual slip- page in Soviet construction plans, output of automobiles probably could accelerate to 460,000 by 1970 and to 1.1 million by 1975. This would provide the Soviet Union with an automobile stock roughly equal to that of the United States in 1917, and, on a per capita basis, about 5 percent of the current US inventory. Perspective can be gained by projecting Soviet per capita availabilities to 1975 and com- paring them with the inventories that already exist in Western Euro- pean countries; in each case, the Soviet expectation is a small fraction of the realized Western level. Essentially, the new Soviet program is designed to produce auto- mobiles for the bureaucratic and managerial elite, not for the average citizen. By the early 1970's, perhaps half of the automobiles produced will be available for public purchase, rather than for government use. It seems certain that, within the next decade at least, the Soviet leader- ship not only has no plans to mass produce automobiles in imitation of the West, but would strenuously resist internal pressure to do so. Although the USSR may some day join the circle of nations that pro- vide automobiles for the average citizen, that day is not now in sight. Direct investment needed to fill the present Soviet program will be about $1.2 billion,** of which $800 million is planned for the construc- tion of a Fiat automobile plant in the USSR. The French firm of Renault may play a role in reconstructing the present Moskvich plant; other facilities will be expanded by the USSR itself. Through 1970, * The term automobile as used throughout this report refers to passenger automobiles; the term motor vehicles includes not only automobiles but also trucks and buses. ** Expressed in current US dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 the investment will represent less than 1/z of 1 percent of all Soviet investment in industry and 4 to 5 percent of machine building invest- ment. Even these data overstate the burden, for repayment on the Fiat contract will stretch well into the 1970's. Indirect investment required for the supporting facilities for the production of steel, gasoline, and tires has not been fully calculated, but appears to be on the order of $400 million-substantially less than the direct investment. So-called tertiary investment-in highways, gasoline stations and service facilities, motels, and the like-also needs to be added to the bill. An examination of Soviet plans for highway development during the next five years reveals that these call for only a modest increase over the previous five years-about 20 percent in terms of kilometers, or an expenditure of about $1.2 billion a year. Road density in the USSR by 1975 will be considerably below that of most Western Euro- pean countries and the United States. Furthermore, Western experi- ence demonstrates that for several decades after a country begins the acceleration of automobile production, the tempo of supporting in- vestments increases only slowly. Not until there is a large, widely distributed stock of automobiles does a rapid acceleration take place. Some amelioration in the Spartan level of service and maintenance facilities will be needed. At present, there are only eight gasoline stations and eight garages in Moscow. If the Soviet regime increases the number of such facilities at the same rate as in the past, the cost by 1975 would be about $175 million. The lack of adequate main- tenance facilities is reflected in the fact that approximately one-fifth of the automobiles in the Soviet motor inventory are normally out of service, awaiting repairs. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 1. Plans and Feasibility For production of automobiles, the Soviet five-year plan (1966-70) implies an average annual rate of increase of 28 to 32 percent in contrast to the rate of 7.7 percent achieved during the past five years (1961-65). For the first time, a Soviet plan calls for a greater output of automobiles than trucks, as shown in the following tabulation. Production (Thousand Units) 1965 1970 Plan Automobiles .............................. 201.2 700 to 800 Trucks ................................... 379.6 600 to 650 Buses .................................... 35.6 60 Total .................................. 616.4 1,360 to 1,510 Although the USSR appears ready to commit more investment to the automobile branch of the motor vehicle industry, it seems unlikely that the 1970 goal of 700,000 to 800,000 automobiles will be reached before 1972 (see Table 1). The plant to be built in the USSR by the Fiat company will be capable of producing 600,000 automobiles a year when operating at capacity and will be the single most important source of increased production of automobiles. (For the schedule of the Fiat plant, see the chart, Figure 1.) Other significant output increases could come from a planned modernization of the Moskvich automobile plant in Moscow, from a new automobile plant at Izhevsk that is to begin Table 1 Estimated Production of Automobiles in the USSR ? 1966-75 MODEL 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 Volga .............. 56 58 60 63 66 70 75 80 85 90 Moskvich .......... 74 83 88 90 100 120 140 160 180 200 Zaporozhets ......... 48 57 67 76 84 90 95 100 100 100 Izhevsk ............ 0 8 30 50 80 100 100 100 100 100 Fiat ............... 0 0 0 5 100 250 400 500 600 600 GAZ 69b ........... 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 Total' .. ........ 210 230 270 310 460 660 840 970 1,100 1,100 ' Based on a study of the past performance of the Soviet automobile industry, the current five-year plan for the industry, recent press announcements, and a study of the individual automobile plants. Data are rounded to two significant digits. Because of rounding, com- ponents may not add to the totals shown. 'A jeep type of vehicle. Including production of 100 ZIL-111's and 200 Chaika's per year. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Figure 1 USSR ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TIME SCHEDULE OF FIAT PLANT Initial Production and Checkout Excavation and Foundation Preparation, Utilities Clearing, Drainage, Access Roads Design, Planning, Engineering Site Selection, Preliminary Survey Road Paving Regular Ik Full Capacity Finish Grading Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP 9B00369R0 1002 011 -5 production of the Moskvich 408 later this year, an rom the planned modernization of the Gor'kiy motor vehicle plant. There are several reasons for estimating that the USSR will not achieve its 1970 goal for automobile production. It is well docu- mented that Western builders experience long delays when working in the Soviet bureaucratic and technical environment. The Fiat plant is not expected to be completed until mid-1969 and will probably not be producing at capacity until 1974. In addition, the modernization and expansion of present automobile plants and the start of produc- tion at Izhevsk is not likely to move with the speed necessary to achieve the 1970 goal-Soviet planners have always been slow in starting new production. Finally, extensive renovation of the Moskvich plant will cause protracted disruptions in production. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 II. The Automobile in Soviet Society The USSR has only a toehold in the automotive age. Steady in- creases in Soviet automobile production in the last decade boosted output to 201,200 units in 1965, but judged in relation to demand in the USSR as well as production in other industrially advanced coun- tries, such a level of output is minuscule. The production and inven- tory of automobiles in the USSR in comparison to other selected coun- tries is shown in Table 2. (For models of Soviet automobiles, see Figure 2.) The small size of the automobile industry in the USSR is clearly the result of calculated neglect by Soviet policymakers, both under Stalin and later under Khrushchev. Indeed, Khrushchev was fond of pointing out that the mass production and distribution of automo- biles was a "weakness" of capitalism which the USSR had no inten- tion of emulating. Instead, he advocated the establishment of rental- car services in the major cities-a policy that has worked very poorly in the few cases where it has been tried. Khrushchev's attitude undoubtedly stemmed in large part from a conviction that the USSR could not afford to provide its people with automobiles if it was to meet priority commitments in the develop- ment of heavy industry, military weaponry, and space technology. Noneconomic explanations for this neglect were probably equally im- Table 2 Production and Stock of Automobiles in Selected Countries 1964 Production Stock of Automobiles ' Automobiles per Million Population Argentina ......... 114,617 800,000 36,400 Australia .......... 340,614 2,599,000 234,000 Belgium .......... 327,899 201,000 21,400 Canada ........... 560,678 5,122,000 265,000 France ........... 1,390,312 7,960,000 164,000 Italy ............. 1,028,930 4,632,000 90,600 Japan ............ 579,660 1,672,000 17,300 South Africa ...... 143,373 1,023,000 58,500 Spain ............ 119,000 652,000 20,800 Sweden .......... 160,106 1,666,000 217,000 United Kingdom ... 1,867,640 8,436,000 156,000 United States ..... 7,745,492 71,950,000 375,000 USSR ............ 185,200 919,000 4,000 West Germany .... 2,650,183 8,100,000 144,000 'Based on automobile registrations, except for Soviet data, which are estimated. ' Based on midyear population. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 0 D E L SA ve%QMALA QM QWkfi 69B00369R000100240112-5 Largest car availab=le to t'he public; a':tcail price S6,00C Pill", KVICH 408- Popular model of the ,kvich line; retail pr F'if;Lre 2 'g:?R(',7HFTS- Smai F est and most unpoF i, ,:ir car; rercil price bour A :~ r_omparub l e fo the Moskvich 41C 8; likely ch air?e foli the Fiat nl's ci models produced in hmftedi quantities Approved `o`l~P,44Aie Ob" 0 ' ~ldAtftb 9-866AM 1'00240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000 00'J491 2-5 portant to Khrushchev-for example, the problems of po itica control and the potential dangers of sociological changes that have been con- sidered anathema to the Communist leadership. Kosygin's views on the automobile are not revolutionary but suggest some catering to the bureaucratic elite and to the aspirations of Soviet consumers in the upper middle class. This does not mean a program that will lead to an automobile for every Soviet family. Kosygin's speech to a meeting of the State Planning Committee on 19 March 1965 is the most complete statement thus far issued from Moscow on the reasons behind the plan to boost automobile production: You know how staunchly the idea was imposed that there was no necessity in our country to develop the production of passenger automobiles on a large scale. Let all people ride only in buses, so to speak. Everything has been done to deprive even the leaders of big enterprises and economic organizations of the right to use passenger cars. Is this correct? The result has been that many leaders have been compelled to use trucks unlawfully for their official rides. An apparent saving was made on transport costs, but in fact damage was inflicted on our economy. The plans thus far released by the Soviet leader appear to confirm the viewpoint implicit in this quotation. In 1965 there were 4,350 automobiles per million population; it is estimated that there will be about 7,000 by 1970 and about 17,000 by 1975. The Soviet inventory in 1975 would be about equal to that in the United States in 1917. On a per capita basis of comparison, this 1975 Soviet achievement would be about 5 percent of current US inventory levels. The re- stricted nature of the automobile plan can also be seen from the fact that, at present, Italy, with a per capita gross national product (GNP) of less than $1,200, provides one automobile for every 10 persons. In comparison, by 1975 the USSR, even with a projected per capita GNP of $1,900, will provide only one car for every 60 persons. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Ill. Automobiles on the Road, 1966-75 At present, the Soviet inventory of automobiles, publicly and pri- vately owned, is estimated to be about 1 million automobiles (see Table 3). By 1970, the inventory probably will be 1.7 million. De- spite the planned increase in numbers of automobiles by 1975, few Soviet citizens will have their own. A large share of total produc- tion per year will continue to go for official use-that is, publicly owned cars operated by administrative personnel, factory managers, the military, and taxi services (see Table 4). Approximately one- fifth of the inventory is normally out of service, awaiting repairs. Table 3 Estimated Stock of Automobiles in the USSR' 1966-75 Starting inventory . 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,700 2,100 2,500 3,100 3,700 Production ...... 210 230 270 310 460 660 840 970 1,100 1,100 Exports" ........ 47 54 63 72 110 150 190 220 250 260 Imports ` 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Scrappage' ...... 80 87 94 100 110 130 160 200 250 290 Year-end inventory 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,700 2,100 2,500 3,100 3,700 4,200 ' Data are rounded to two significant digits. Because of rounding, components may not agree with the totals shown. b Assumed to be constant at 23 percent of production-the same level as 1961-64. Assumed to be constant at 2,000 units. 'Assumed to be constant at 8 percent of the starting inventory. Table 4 Estimated Number of Newly Produced Automobiles Available for Private Use in the USSR' 1966-75 Production ......... 210 230 270 310 460 660 840 970 1,100 1,100 Exports" ........... 47 54 63 72 110 150 190 220 250 260 Imports ` ........... 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Official and commercial use .............. 77 87 100 120 160 200 230 240 240 210 Private used ........ 84 95 110 130 200 310 410 510 610 660 ' Data are rounded to two significant digits. Because of rounding, components may not agree with the totals shown. " Assumed to be constant at 23 percent of production-the same level as 1961-64. `Assumed to be constant at 2,000 units. d For 1966-69, the number of automobiles available is assumed to be constant at 52 percent of the figure arrived at when exports and imports are netted out of production. After 1969 the percent of net production increases by 4 percentage points per year, reflecting a larger share of automobiles available to the public. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 IV. Primary Investment If the USSR is to produce 1.1 million automobiles annually by 1975 (see Table 1), approximately $1.2 billion will have to be invested in plant buildings, equipment, and direct manufacturing support facili- ties. The following tabulation presents estimates of the investment needed to modernize and increase the output of the existing plants as well as to build the two new plants proposed by Soviet planners: Production (Thousand Units) Investment Required Plant 1966 1975 (Million US $ ) Gor'kiy ................................. 56.0 90 44 MZMA .................................. 74.0 200 190 Zaporozh'ye ............................. 48.0 100 78 Izhevsk (to be built) ..................... 0.1 100 130 Fiat` (to be built) ....................... 0 600 800 Total ....................................................... 1,242 ' Tol'yatti, formerly Stavropol', on the Volga. Approximately $900 million of the $1.2 billion total investment will have to be spent prior to 1970 if the estimated levels of production are to be attained by 1975. The $900 million is about 0.5 percent of expected total Soviet investment in industry and 4 to 5 percent of total investment in machine building for 1966-70. The USSR is ca- pable of allocating this small share of total new investment funds to the automobile industry without resorting to any significant shifts in present investment allocation plans, including those for the military or space program. The financial burden on the USSR is eased by the extended repayment terms of the Fiat agreement-terms of nine years following completion date. Most of the total investment of $1.2 billion needed by 1975 will go into the proposed Fiat plant. An official of a large US automobile company estimates that the total cost of direct manufacturing equip- ment and buildings in such a plant would be $522 million. With sup- porting facilities, the total cost would probably be within the range of the $700 million to $800 million estimated by Fiat. Although the details of the project have not yet been finally settled, a breakdown of estimated costs of the Fiat plant and the degree of Italian, Western European, and US participation is shown in Table 5 (for the costs of specific parts of the plant, see the Appendix). The total cost to the USSR of a fully operating automobile plant to produce 600,000 cars per year will exceed $800 million. Training Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 expenses will be considerable for the 30,000 to 40,000 employees needed to operate the facility. Unless the major new plant is erected in a large city, dwellings, schools, and other facilities will have to be built. In addition, smaller investments will be required in industries supplying raw materials and semimanufactured goods directly to the automobile industry as well as in those industries supplying goods and services to automobile users. The details of other Soviet plans to modernize and expand existing plants and to construct other new plants for the automobile industry have not yet been fully disclosed. Renault of France may sign an agreement to enlarge the dilapidated and outmoded Moskvich plant. Expanding this plant to a capacity of 200,000 automobiles per year would be tantamount to building a new plant and would cost ap- proximately $190 million. Renault might follow its previous practice in dealing with Communist countries and reduce costs by supplying used equipment from its French plants. In addition, the USSR is preparing to start production of Moskvich automobiles in Izhevsk in the western Urals. This plant will require an additional investment of about $130 million before the proposed capacity of 100,000 units can be reached. The USSR probably 'will also increase automobile production in its Gor'kiy and Zaporozli'ye facilities by a total of about 86,000 units per year between 1966 and 1975, requiring about $122 million more in new investment. Soviet, Italian, Western European, and US Participation in the Estimated Costs of the Fiat Plant to be Constructed in the USSR Building (all to be supplied by the USSR) .............................. 167 Machinery and equipment 355 ............................................ Supplied by Fiat from Italian, Western European, and US sources ....... 255 Supplied by the USSR ........................................... 100? Other supporting facilities e ......................................... 278 Supplied by Fiat ................................................ 65 Supplied by the USSR ............................................ 213 Total cost of Fiat plant .............................................. 800 Total supplied by the USSR ...................................... 480 Total supplied by non-Soviet sources . ............................. 320 Italy ............................................ 195 to 235' Other Western European ......................... 40 to 90 United States ................. .................. 30 to 50 Some commentators have suggested that the USSR would supply no equipment. It is most unlikely, however, that the USSR, with the world's largest machine tool industry, would not participate in equipping such a plant. h Other supporting facilities include costs of external transportation connections; Fiat-supplied training, engineering, plant layout, and powerplant; and plants for paint, gaskets, nuts, bolts, radiators, and other assorted hardware. `Midpoint of the range. 'Including an engineering fee of $65 million. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 V. Secondary Investment A. INTRODUCTION The production of from 7 million to 9 million automobiles annually in the United States affects virtually every branch of US industry. One out of every seven wage earners is connected with some phase of the automobile world. One out of every six businesses in the United States depends on the manufacture, distribution and servicing, or use of motor vehicles. Automobile, truck, and bus production in the United States in 1963 accounted for the following shares of various materials: Percent of Material Domestic Production Domestically consumed steel .................................... 23 Cold rolled sheet and strip ...................................... 46 Gray iron castings ....... ..................................... 19 Malleable castings ............................................. 57 Natural rubber ................................................ 65 Synthetic rubber .............................................. 60 Nickel ....................................................... 14 Zinc ......................................................... 35 The automotive support industries-fuel, accessories, and the like- have grown rapidly in the United States and now almost equal one- half of the value of retail sales of new automobiles, as shown in the following tabulation: Million US $ Automobiles .................................................... 46,000 Tires, batteries, and accessories .................................. . . 2,900 Gasoline, repair, and maintenance .................................. 20,000 Total ......... ........ ......................... ............... 88,900 In the USSR, in contrast, automobile production has little impact on industrial production. In 1959, total production of motor vehicles (automobiles, trucks, and buses) used less than 4 percent of the gross value of the output of ferrous metals. The share of inputs consumed by the motor vehicle industry in 1959 is shown in the following tabulation: Percent of Material Gross Output Ferrous metals .................................................. 3.4 Nonferrous metals ................................................ 3.8 Metal products (nuts, bolts, and the like) ........................... 3.8 Glass .......................................................... 1.6 Bearings ........................................................ 11.1 Tools and instruments ............................................ 1.2 Electrotechnical (generators, electric motors, batteries, and the like) .... 1.0 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 B. FERROUS METALS REQUIREMENTS In view of planned increases in iron and steel production, auto- mobile production will not significantly increase its claim on total Soviet output of ferrous metals through 1975 (see Table 6). The Soviet metallurgical industry, however, will have some problems in producing steel products according to specifications in all the required shapes and grades. The metallurgical industry must supply the auto- motive industry with substantially increased quantities of cold rolled sheet, bars, pipe and tubing, various shapes or profiles, plates, cold finished bars, and tubes. Production of Selected Ferrous Metals and the Share Required for Production of Automobiles in the USSR' 1965, 1970, and 1975 Share. Share Share Ferrous Required Ferrous Required Ferrous Required. Metal for Metal for Metal for Pro- Auto- Pro- Auto- Pro- Auto- duction mobile duction mobile duction mobile (Million Pro- (Million Pro- (Million Pro- Metric duction Metric duction Metric duction Tons) (Percent) Tons) (Percent) Tons) (Percent) Castings .......... 16.5 0.2 24 0.4 31 0.8 Gray iron and mal- leable ........ 12.6 0.2 17 0.4 22 0.8 Steel ........... 3.8 0.02 6 0.03 9 0.05 Rolled steel ....... 70.9 0.3 97b 0.5 125 0.9 Cold rolled sheet ... 3.6 3.3 7 4.5 12 6.7 'Excluding production of spare parts. Because of rounding, components may not add to the totals shown. Midpoint of the range of 95 million to 99 million tons. The USSR has encountered particular difficulty in expanding the output of cold finished steel products. Soviet production of 3.6 mil- lion tons* of cold rolled sheet in 1965 was far less than the target figure of 6.5 million tons. Because of the lag in the production of cold rolled steel, the USSR has been negotiating since mid-1965 with manufacturers of metallurgical equipment in several Western countries to buy a cold rolled sheet plant. One possible transaction, estimated at about $190 million,** calls for the annual production of 600,000 to 800,000 tons of cold rolled steel-enough steel for 1 million auto- mobiles and several million washing machines and refrigerators. Such a plant would increase Soviet production of cold rolled steel by 17 to * Tonnages are given in metric tons. ** Including the cost of equipment to roll tin plate and galvanized sheet and estimated building costs. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B003?9R000100240112-5 22 percent. The USSR has manufactured several continuous cold rolling mills, but the mills are much less advanced technologically than those available in the industrial West. The USSR recognizes that Western builders could supply a technologically superior cold rolling mill at less cost and with less delay than could Soviet industry. C. MACHINE TOOLS The need of the Soviet automobile industry for dependable high- performance specialized machinery is a key reason why the USSR has turned to the industrial West to equip its new plant. Soviet machine tool builders have always emphasized long production runs of gen- eral-purpose machine tools that are often used instead of more expen- sive specialized machine tools in Soviet industry. Consequently, the USSR has inadequate capacity for manufacturing complex, specialized, and highly precise machine tools. In addition, the USSR recognizes the absolute cost and quality advantages that the industrial West has in the production of automotive machine tools. The USSR, however, can be expected to produce domestically most of the required equip- ment of a nonspecialized nature for its expanding automobile industry. As more automobiles are produced, specialized machinery will be needed for continuing new investment, replacement, and automotive support industries, and, therefore, it will become more profitable for the USSR to produce domestically more of the specialized equipment required by its automobile industry. Thus expanded automobile out- put probably will have a greater effect on the Soviet machine tool industry after 1970. D. TIRES The new five-year plan for tire production in the USSR calls for a production increase by 1970 roughly equivalent to the increase achieved in the seven-year period 1959-65. Output of tires (26.4 million in 1965) is scheduled to rise to between 38 million and 40 million by 1970. Automobile tires will probably account for a grow- ing percentage of total tire output-the estimated production for 1966 and 1970 compared with 1960 follows: 1960 ....................... .................... 2.2 1966 ............................................ 4.0 1970 ............................................ 7.0 At least four new Soviet tire plants are to be built in 1966-70, and a number of existing plants are to be expanded. The capacities of the new plants will be on the order of 2 million to 3 million tires each, although at least some of these plants will not reach full operation until after 1970. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 The increase in tire plant capacity will cost about $40 million. Ad- ditional supporting investment in carbon black, tire cord, and synthetic rubber production could boost total investment $100 million more for 1966-70. E. GASOLINE The additional requirements for motor gasoline through 1975 will place no special burden on the petroleum industry, which by :1975 may be outproducing the United States in crude oil. The industry, however, will have to emphasize more the production of gasoline in the higher octane ranges-72 octane and above. At present, the USSR produces about 5 million tons per year of such gasoline----17 percent of the total gasoline yield. If the production of crude oil continues to grow through 1975 at the rate planned for the next five years, as much as 75 million tons of motor gasoline may be produced in 1975, of which about 37 million tons could be of high octane. By contrast, the additional automobiles that are to be on the road in 1975 (excluding trucks and buses) will need only about 4 million tons per year of high-octane gasoline. One refinery with a capacity of 12 million tons could produce the required 4 million tons if oriented toward that goal. Such a refinery might cost between $290 million and $360 million, of which no more than $100 million would be assigned to provide the facilities required to produce the high-octane gasoline. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 VI. Tertiary Investment 1. Introduction The USSR will almost certainly have no desire and little need to duplicate in the foreseeable future the heavy tertiary investments that have been fostered by the automobile in Western Europe and the United States. Plans thus far released for the period through 1970 indicate that Moscow has felt under no compulsion to accelerate basic highway construction, much less construction of service stations and motels. Soviet planners have long believed that a well-developed railroad system best suited the USSR's needs for hauling freight. Al- most all large industrial plants in the USSR are served by railroad sidings that provide door-to-door rail service. Trucks have been used in the USSR primarily for short-haul intracity shipments, and no change in this pattern is discernible. 2. Highways As a result of the emphasis on railroads and the vast size of the country, only a rudimentary highway network exists in the USSR. Of 1,340,000 kilometers of roads in 1964, only about 350,000 kilometers, or about one-fourth, was surfaced in any way, and less than 120,000 kilometers, about 9 percent, was paved with concrete or asphalt. The length of paved roads in the USSR about equals the paved highway system in the state of Michigan. The historic backwardness of the Soviet highway system is illustrated in Table 7, which compares the length of Soviet and US highways for selected years. During 1960-64 about 20,100 kilometers of surfaced highways, including 10,600 kilometers of paved highways, were built annually in the USSR. By contrast, the United States built over 32,000 kilo- meters of major (Federally-aided) highways in 1964. As shown in Figure 3, Soviet highway construction has not ac- celerated in recent years, and no dramatic changes are expected in the expansion of the Soviet highway network during 1966-70. The new five-year plan (1966-70) calls for the construction of 63,000 kilo- meters of paved roads, an increase of about 20 percent over the length of roads constructed in the five-year period 1960-64. There will be some increased emphasis on construction and reconstruction of badly Approved For Release 2004/05/05: CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Table 7 Length of Highways in the USSR and the United States 1940, 1950, and 1960-64 Thousand Kilometers Percent Percent Total ? Total Paved Surfaced Total Surfaced Surfaced 1940 ........ 1,531 143 7 9 4,855 2,200 45 1950 ........ 1,550 177 19 11 5,322 3,121 59 1960 ........ 1,368 271 77 20 5,707 4,147 73 1961 ........ 1,336 290 87 22 5,750 4,165 72 1962 ........ 1,336 311 97 23 5,794 4,260 74 1963 ........ 1,332 330 108 25 5,826 4,334 74 1964 ........ 1,340 352 118 26 5,864 4,394 75 ` Public roads under jurisdiction of highway departments. b Rural, state, municipal, and county roads. Including gravel surfaced roads. 'The reduction in the total is due to decreased importance of some dirt roads. needed rural (farm-to-market and railhead) roads. Some important intercity highways will be completed or improved during 1966-70, including the Moscow-Bryansk-Kiev highway, the Moscow-Tambov- Volgograd highway, and the Moscow-Kuybyshev-Ufa highway. Most of Central Siberia and the Far East, except for short stretches in the vicinity of, the major population centers, will remain completely with- out a system of paved roads. Despite the secondary importance of highways in the USSR,. the vastness of the country, combined with the past neglect of the high- way system, means that significant investment allocations are required even for a fairly minimal expansion effort. This conclusion is sup- ported by the following estimates of the annual cost of new construc- tion in the USSR for 1966-70: Annual Cost (Million US $ ) Paved ........................................ 840 Other hard surfaced highways .................... 400 Total ....... .............................. 1,240 By contrast the United States awarded $5.04 billion in contracts for new highway construction in 1965, and contracts for 1966 will total approximately $6 billion. 3. Service Stations and Garages Automotive service facilities in the USSR are woefully inadequate, nor is there any indication that the regime intends to improve this situation in the immediate years ahead. In Moscow there are eight Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 z o a A ,o .0 a 0. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 gasoline stations and eight garages, only three of which service all makes of Soviet automobiles. In Leningrad there are three gasoline stations and only one garage. Outside the major cities, service sta- tions and garages are even harder to find, as shown in the tabula- tion below: Route Distance (Kilometers) Gasoline Stations Garages Moscow-Minsk ........................... 705 5 1 Moscow-Leningrad ........................ 724 5 2 Moscow-Khar'kov ......................... 734 7 2 Moscow-Gor'kiy .......................... 995 3 0 Khar'kov-Kiev ............................ 478 3 1 Moscow-Kalinin .......................... 161 0 0 In contrast to the 211,000 gasoline stations in the United States, which perform necessary economic functions, especially with respect to maintenance and repair, the total number of stations in the USSR in 1963 was 1,500 to 1,600. If the present ratio of automobiles to filling stations is maintained, during 1966-75 the USSR would have to build additional filling stations,* as indicated in the following tabulation: Number Equipment Cost Total Cost 1966-70 ............... 1,300 6,500 22,100 1971-75 ............... 4,800 24,000 81,600 Total ............... 6,100 30,500 103,700 The USSR has not announced any plans for expanding repair facili- ties, but some indication that the plans are quite modest in scope was suggested by a recent news item in a Moscow newspaper which stated that during the next five years two service facilities, each capable of handling 12,000 vehicles annually, will be built. In addition, an unspecified number of other repair facilities will be built, with a total capacity of only 72,000 vehicles annually. The following tabulation gives estimates of the additional number of garages likely to be built in the next 10 years": Number Equipment Cost Total Cost 1966-70 ............... 430 4,300 15,000 1971-75 ............... 1,600 16,000 56,000 Total ................ 2,030 20,300 71,000 * Estimated from the ratio of automobiles in use (844,100) to service stations (between 1,500 and 1,600) in 1963. "Estimated Estimated from the ratio (1 to 3) of garages to service stations in the USSR in 1962. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 4. Social Considerations Apart from these strictly economic considerations there are other reasons for expecting the Soviet regime to move cautiously in encourag- ing investments that would promote the expanded use of automobiles beyond the city limits. For example, the USSR is one of the most security conscious nations in the world and the movements of its citizens are carefully monitored through a system of police registra- tions. The regime probably would not be willing to accept the eco- nomic and political costs of expanding such a system to manage the major increase in mobility that would certainly follow an unrestricted expansion of the facilities for long-distance travel. No matter how appealing the prospect of suburban and rural living is to the Soviet urbanite, presently confined to an inadequate city apartment, the regime may be expected to resist a proliferation of private rural hous- ing as both costly and poorly suited to the Soviet conception of the social needs of its citizens. B. THE EXPERIENCE OF THE UNITED STATES AND WESTERN EUROPE 1. The United States The Soviet planner, even though intellectually committed to in- creasing the importance of the automobile in the USSR, must look with considerable trepidation at data that show how the US economy was revamped by mass production and use of the automobile. After the United States took to wheels, there was a vast inner migration which led to modern multilaned highways, vast suburbs, and more and more consumer durables. To support 82 million motor vehicles (69 million automobiles and 13 million trucks and buses) in 1963, the United States had the following: Number Sales (Billion US $ ) Automotive wholesalers . ......................... 22,883 6.7 Franchised automobile dealers ..................... 33,349 37.4 Automotive repair ............................... 114,459 3.6 Gasoline service stations .......................... 211,473 17.7 A wholesale distributor of automobile parts-from tires to engine blocks. It should be borne in mind, however, that the enormous investment in superhighways and sprawling suburbs in the United States today was not a feature of the US automotive history during 1910-20-the time period most analogous to the present Soviet position (Phase A in Figure 4). The mass-production age of automobiles began in the United States in about 1910 (181,000 automobiles were produced during that year). By 1912 the stock of automobiles totaled close to Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 a million, about the same as the Soviet inventory today. By 1917 the US stock had grown to 4.7 million automobiles; the USSR probably will need 10 more years to increase its inventory by this amount. In the 1910-20 period the US stock of automobiles increased annually by an average of 33 percent, but total highway expenditures and the total length of surfaced highways increased much more slowly (see Figure 5). Total expenditures on roads increased 9 percent annually and the length of surfaced highways 6 percent. Highway construction in the United States has long received an impetus from the growing requirements for both passenger and freight traffic. The early urban car owner in the United States was anxious to drive into the countryside, and the farmer pressed for farm-to- market roads. But it was not until about 1946 that the United States, having a stock of nearly 30 million automobiles and having been re- leased from the pressures of war and depression, substantially acceler- ated tertiary investment and entered the Phase C of the automobile age, as described in Figure 4. The long-run relationship between the stock of automobiles and highway expenditures in the United States is shown in Figure 6. More specifically, not until 25 years after the United States had left Phase A-the phase that the USSR is just now entering-did the US automotive age finally induce greater increases in service facilities, superhighways, modern motels, supermarkets, shopping plazas, and the mass migration to the suburbs. Although the dispersal of the population from the central city has been underway in the United States since the turn of the century, the major trend toward suburban development has taken place since World War II. In the last decade, more than three-quarters of the new dwelling units, measured by value or number, in the major metropolitan areas were constructed outside the central cities. 2. Western Europe Western :Europe, which had only a motorbike toehold in the auto- motive age in the early 1950's, has in recent years become a full mem- ber with all attendant pleasures and problems. Both production and stock have increased rapidly, as shown in the tabulation below: Million Automobiles Production Stock 1950 ................................... 1.1 6.0 1962 ................................... 6.7 27.8 1964 ................................... 7.0 35.1 The annual rate of growth of the stock of automobiles in Western Europe has averaged 13 percent from 1950 through 1964, a higher Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 C 1 0 0 o U) D z 1 0 } 0 o ~?~ >v 1 /, U O 0 c >1 > u c W w c W N D O U a) ~' J N O 3 0 0 E 7 1 co t N ` _ '~ O ?7 E 1 O a. c o Z Z; b a N ~- Z C 0) O) a. J 1 U O O -O m Q Z rn 0 > O U) a) 1 V~ c N U 1 J V Lf) Q) LU CL >0 1 V)i O O CL LL. Q u E O aZ Z 1 V Lu O 1 N 1 CL Lr- } , u; ^ - 0 U o c E 1 Lu v -0 c m~7- rn .L 0 U C N 1 3 1 Z - 0) 0 Z> ~" N 1 Lu ? = a 1 W - -8 o 0 (2) u C -C Z N m 0 O 1 U o o W J J O O -0 a v. V 0? E 0 1 G) U) C O i Lu G N c = 1 O O O ~ O~ 0 1 L 0- L E 1 Q 1 CL. Lu 1 LU _ - s 1 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Figure 5 UNITED STATES AND WESTERN EUROPE: COMPARATIVE INDEXES OF AUTOMOBILE STOCK AND HIGHWAY EXPENDITURES 1,000 900 800 700 100 PERCENT 500 - 1910-20 and 1955-64 UNITED STATES 1910 = 100 AUTOMOBILE STOCK 1910 458,377 units -? 1920 8,131,52.2 units !EE I I i TOTAL HIGHWAY EXPENDITURES 1910 $ 275 million 1920 $ 633 million LENGTH OF SURFACED HIGHWAYS 1910 328,000 kilometers 1920 594,000 kilometers AUTOMOBILE STOCK 1955 11.8 million units 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 to Approved For Relea a 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 z p N Approved For Release-2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 growth rate than GNP, which rose at an average annual rate of about 9 percent (in current terms). In the past decade Western Europe has devoted, as shown in the tabulation below, an increasing share of its resources to the develop- ment of roads and highways. Total Highway Expenditures (Billion US $) Percent of GNP 1956 ...... .......... ............ 2.0 0.8 1964 .............................. 6.3 1.4 1970 .............................. 9.7 2.0 ' Estimated by the International Road Federation. Yet, despite the rapid increase in highway expenditures in Western Europe and the present existence of about 5 million kilometers of roads, the present highway system is considered inadequate for the traffic it must bear. The turnpike or thruway is virtually unknown in Europe outside Germany. In France in 1964 there were only 348 kilometers of such superhighways. The heavy investments in bypasses, free- ways, and beltways are yet to be borne by most of the countries of Western Europe. As shown above, Western European highway ex- penditures as a share of GNP have increased but are still significantly lower than in the United States.* Western European experience indicates, as does US experience, that a widespread increase in automobile ownership eventually induces large amounts of other tertiary investments. Much of this invest- ment-restaurants, motels, service stations, and shopping centers- caters to the increased mobility given the population by the auto- mobile. Much of the investment in public works-cloverleafs, turn- pikes, and freeways-is required when the density of automobile traffic threatens to destroy the very mobility that the automobile has introduced. The United States today is becoming increasingly aware of the major investments and revamping of cities and countrysides that are needed to live with the automobile. Western Europe is well into the automobile age, entering Phase C (see Figures 4 and 5), but has not yet completely faced up to the heavy investments needed to live with the automobile. Ultimately the Soviet economy may have to pay the costs-the super- highways and underground parking-of enjoying the convenience of the automobile. Western experience, however, shows that it will be decades before the automotive expansion forces the Soviet economy to cater to the induced investment engendered by the automobile rather than the preferences of the hierarchy. * By contrast? highway expenditures in the United States for the past decade have con- sistently been about 2.2 percent of GNP. Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 :. CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5 in c, c1 t- I-( X0 I - 'i 1M-1 co c M n V) r-1 co in '-i C O C Ci Do ? : . . 0 ?~ ao 6 ? m ? O 0 Cd cd p .a cd " En ct p IHiii ? w 0 t o o a ? a a b0 :.o bn G~>?da&mbb~? roc Up y CJ C ? 04 ro A C'S ?. bin 49 , P.( cn C cn? q w .WEI In 1; n 0 ea p y .N .N O v q U U N U bD w pyp u> t q .4; i g O pN "-' Q a '~ ~ ti ._ 3 RI n ~ fi p n _ 0 w ?a ? Q) -w - >b :o :o '4 . M O y O H W' 04 6 9 z 8 O 'AA 0e. .0 b~t -. ~ .A Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000100240112-5