IT IS HIGH TIME THE UNITED STATES TOOK A CLEAR STAND FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
22
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 11, 2004
Sequence Number: 
43
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 10, 1967
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4.pdf3.98 MB
Body: 
- _ Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 August 10, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE industry is to furnish its proper share of these needs, prompt action is necessary and I join with my colleagues in urging that proper and prompt action be taken by the Secretary of Commerce. Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. President, I take second place to no man in my ad- miration of the excellent judgment, sound leadership, and expert knowledge of American housing needs and pro- grams possesed by the Senator from Alabama. When he speaks as he has today, he does it with good reason and logic. I agree with him and I am amazed at the facts he has laid before us. Improved housing for all citizens, as he has told as, has been a consistent pol- icy of the Senate and of the House for many, many years. But apparently, we have a department of Government, re- luctant to support the intent of the Con- gress. I have confidence in Secretary Trow- bridge, and though he is new in his pres- ent responsibilities, I hope that he will reject the advisory panel's recommenda- tions. Certainly, on the evidence the distin- guished Senator from Alabama has given us, the existing lumber standard should be withdrawn and the industry permitted to go ahead with its new and improved product. This would be a true public service. I hope the Secretary will permit the industry to do the job it is trying to ac- complish. Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, it has long been recognized that the present lumber standards are technically inade- quate and not in the public interest. As early as 1957 the southern pine industry petitioned the American Lumber Stand- ards Committee to revise the standards to relate lumber sizes to a specific mois- ture content. In 1964, after several years of careful study, the committee recom- mended to the Department of Commerce a set of standards endorsed by the major part of the lumber industry and many interested Government agencies. Still, we are operating under standards developed in 1925, which have become totally un- realistic because of changing practices in the industry. These outdated standards are an in- convenience to the industry and unfair to the consumer. Only a small minority of green lumber producers derive any bene- fit from the present standards. The standards now in effect are intended for dry lumber but are not related to any specific moisture content. Since lumber shrinks as it is seasoned, however, standards which do not take into ac- count the moisture content are really no standards at all. This was no problem before World War IT, because green lumber was surfaced to a larger size than dry lumber to com- pensate for shrinkage. Since the war, however, green lumber producers have been finishing their product to the same size as dry lumber and the shrinkage has been passed on to the consumer. The purpose and effect of the revised standards proposed by the American Lumber Standards Committee is to establish uniform standards upon which the consumer and the industry can rely. The Secretary of Commerce has the re- sponsibility and authority to withdraw the present inadequate standards with- out further legislative action. I strongly urge him to assume that responsibilty and exercise his authority promptly in order that revised standards, which will protect the public and promote the con- tinued development of the industry, may be adopted without Aurth: r delay. wd.1 ' IT IS HIGH TIME THE UNITED STATES TOOK A CLEAR STAND FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST Mr. GRUENING. Mr. President, in the aftermath of the swift and decisive vic- tory of Israel forces over the Arab armies, a number of facts have become crystal clear which had previously been obscured by the rhetoric of the Arab governments, by the material support provided by the Soviet Union to the Arab military forces, and by the confusing and uncertain policies of the United States. It is imperative that these facts not be swept under the rug and forgotten in the feeling of relief that now exists be- cause the shooting has ceased. Such feel- ing is entirely understandable in the light of the serious situation which would have confronted the United States had the roles of victor and vanquished been reversed and if the Arab armies now occupied Israel, and Soviet Russia in con- sequence would have dominated the Mid- dle East. Nevertheless, if a start is to be made in establishing a lasting peace in the Middle East, a frank appraisal of the underlying causes of the conflict is es- sential. Unless we face up to these factors, we must anticipate resumption of hos- tilities, with all the dangers that would entail for the world, in the next' 5 or 10 years, or even sooner. The roots of the conflict can be found, in my opinion, in the unremitting hos- tility of the Arab countries to the very existence of Israel and in their illusion that Israel can be destroyed by force of arms; in the Soviet Union's support of such illusion and its attempt to use the Middle East as a pawn in its cold war tactics; and in the mistaken policy of the United States that economic and mil- itary assistance to the Arab nations would somehow divert these countries from aggression. If these issues were not clear to the American people before, even though some of us in the Congress have over the years been pointing out the dangers of U.S. Middle East policies, it must be abundantly evident now that to return to the conditions and policies of our Government prior to May 1967 can only bring about renewed conflict. Be- cause of this, I would like to discuss today in some detail the root causes of the conflict as I see them and to suggest some possible alternative courses by our Government. Arab opposition to the very existence of Israel and its view that the United States is the principal culprit responsible for Israel's continued existence have been expressed in such hyperbole and in- vective that we have been inclined to discount such statements as expression of policy. But recent events have shown S 11275 that we cannot dismiss these statements so lightly or attribute them to domestic propaganda efforts at bolstering the flag- ging morale of peoples for whom the promises of a better life have not borne fruit-largely through their own short- comings and the ineptness of their lead- ers-and who now must be sustained by the ideas of a mystic "Arab unity" and the recapture of territory which they never rightfully possessed. It is now evi- dent that statements of Radio Cairo and of the Arab governments, as irrational as they sound to our ears, are indeed ex- pressions of policy. We must now rec- ognize that when the Arab leaders pro- claimed toward the end of May 1967, that "we feel confident that we can win and are ready now for a war with Israel," and that if war came "it will be total and the objective will be to destroy Is- rael," they had every intention to carry these threats into action. Indeed, their secret orders provided for the slaughter of every Israeli-man, woman, and child. Events have proved that the Arabs meant what they said and indeed pro- vided us with a detailed blueprint of their aggressive intentions as witness the following excerpt from a broadcast of Radio Cairo on May 20,1967: With the closing of the Gulf of Aqaba, Israel is faced with two alternatives, either of which will destroy it: it will either be strangled to death by the Arab military and economic blockade, or it will perish by the fire of the Arab forces encompassing it from the south, from the north and from the east. It is now evident that the statements of King Hussein of Jordan regarding his solidarity with the Arab cause, which the United States tended to discount since it conflicted with its picture of a plucky little ruler strongly aligned with us by the massive economic and military aid the United States had furnished him, provided a precise account of the course of action Jordan would follow. On June 2, 1967, King Hussein said: There is no doubt that I am looking for- ward to further frank cooperation with Egypt and the other Arab States both to the east and to the west, so that we may march for- ward along the road which leads to the wip- ing out of our shame and to the liberation of Palestine. This is a basic cornerstone bf Jordan's general policy, both within the realm of Arab affairs, as well as in the spheres of internal and foreign policies. That "plucky little ruler" then pro- ceeded to initiate hostilities against the Israelis, employing the tanks, aircraft, and other weapons the 'United States furnished him to carry out plans which had previously been made in coordina- tion with the Egyptians, placed his forces under the Egyptian command, and opened his country to Iraqui forces which began to move several hundred tanks into the Jordanian salient 15 miles from Tel Aviv. This action by King Hussein came after a plea to him by Israel not to, attack ac- companied by Israel's pledge that, if he did not, there would be no Israeli inva- sion of the territory then held by him. It is time-that the United States took a good, hard look at the statements com- ing out of the Arab countries and begin to recognize that no matter how illu- sionary and irrational they may seem to S11276 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4., CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE August 10, 1967 us, they represent the hard convictions of the Arab rulers. Unless we do this, we will continue to base our policies and actions on the fanciful notions of what we would like the Intention of the Arab governments to be rather than on what is actually planned. Statements emanating from the Arab countries In recent weeks show not the slightest realization of the magnitude of their military defeat, of the loss of size- able territories to the Israelis, and of the resultant precarious economic situation which their aggression brought upon them. For Egypt it has meant the loss of the Suez Canal revenues. To put it briefly, their view is one of unremitting hostility both to the United States and to Israelstated In abusive and often vio- lent language. The United States is the arch villain, an imperialist, colonial power and Israel is its tool of aggression. Here are some samples: On July 19, 1967, the Cairo Voice of the Arabs stated: It appears that the outcome of the recent tripartite aggression masterminded by the United States has enthralled the Israeli gangs and driven them into a euphoria of self-de- lusion and arrogance, whereby they are now brazenly aspiring to realize dreams and am- bitions that will never be attained . . . Is- rael, the dog of imperialism and the panderer to the world imperialist forces, is today con- templating and dreaming of passage- through the Suez Canal ... This Zionist attempt enjoys the encouragement and support of the imperialist forces. No evidence of this could be more eloquent than the United States' insistence upon making the withdrawal of the aggressor forces contingent upon the fulfillment of the conditions contemplated by the United States, which are- of course in favor of the Israeli aggression: against the Arabs-such as free passage for Israel in the areas' waterways ... Lest these words again be dismissed as domestic propaganda, here is an excerpt from the July 23, 1967, statement of Egyptian President Nasser, which, unbe- lievably, has been greeted as a temperate and reasonable address by some news- papers in this country: A large part of the U.S. role in the recent aggression is still vague. But we already know a few things; We have already found the an- swers to several questions. What was behind the political and diplomatic role which the United States played before the battle? This role included the call for self-restraint, the threat that any action taken by us would expose the entire region to dangers, the pro- posal to send the U.S. vice president to con- fer with us on the subject, the approval of Zakariya Muhyi ad Din's trip to Washington to meet with Johnson to confer on the sub- ject and to try and reach a solution. All this took place before the aggression, before the battle. It was a deception. We must ask: in whose interest was this deception? Certainly it was in the Interest of the Imperialist Israeli ag- gression. The deception was part of a U.S. plan drawn up two years ago.. The aim of this plan was to overthrow the free revolutionary regimes, which do not heed the words of the big powers and refuse to be under anyone's influence. The New York Times, in a recent edito- rial appropriately entitled "Fantasy From Nasser" charges that in accusing the United States of an imperialist con- spiracy to destroy Egypt's Socialist revo- lution, Egypt is guilty of fantasy. The editorial goes on to say that: In spite of his impulsive seizure of Suez, his irreaponsibl be retaliations, and there were. These in the evening, a concert of folk music was When assault is resorted to by nations, it warlii a Arab acts, backing up verbal threats, offered. Now, I am very partial to this form is a violation of the United Nations Charter, would have been suicidal for the Israeli of entertainment, for one learns much from Article 2, Principle number 4. Yet for 19 years, Government to ignore. Arab leaders now be- uncontaminated folk songs. So I bought a Israel lived under constant assaults. gan riassing enormous armies with much ticket for the performance. In spite of my knowledge ,that a verbal first-rate equipment, and these gave every At the concert, I found a largenumber of assault is sometimes more destructive than a evider ce of being able to crush Israel. What Egyptian families with their children. It was physical battery, in spite of my recognition was most provocative of all, the leaders of a splendid night, filled with stars and cool- of Arab behavior as aggression, and in spite this night openly announced that they ness, and we sat back to watch a first-class of my experience with history that proves planned to launch a full-scale war. If ever performance of folk song and dance. The one aggression breeds another. I still clung a nation was forewarned by word and act choruses were strong, the dancers agile, and to my hope that as long as the Syrians and and specific promise of annihilation, it was the evening compared with others I had. en- the Egyptians confined themselves to wordy Israel. o abuse. Israel could learn to live with it as - What were the odds against Israel? A quick Ice City. Kyoto, Djakarta, Manila and Mex- abuse. of the peculiarities of Arab politics. I glance at the figures--46 million in the sur- A rather large cast performed, and this even began to understand why nations as far rounding Arab countries, 97 million in all, as made me wonder where the money to pay away as Morocco. Algeria and Pakistan agains ; 2.6 million Israelis-might lead one them came from, for the audience was not wanted to participate in the verbal cam- to believe that the Arab states would have unusually big, and the prices we had paid paign, for in this way, they kept their fran- little trouble in overwhelming Israel, except were only nominal. I shrugged my shoulders chise as Muslin states, I was pleased to see that twice before, in 1948 and 1956, they had and concluded that this was someone else's that more mature Muslim sovereignties like tried to do so and failed. Arab leaders grew problem, but when the regular performance Turkey, Iran and even Arab Tunisia wanted adept in explaining away the somber fact had ended, without a false note that I could no part of this folly. Again and again, I told that twice, a handful cf Jews had resisted detect, the bugles started blowing, excite- my Israeli friends and others who asked me. efforts to throw them into the sea. "In 1948," ment gripped the children in the audience, "As long as the Arabs confine themselves to explained the leaders, "we were betrayed by and the curtains parted to show a scene verbal threats alone, no great damage will Great Britain, and in 1956, it was the French in the year A.D. 2000. In a park much like and English arm:.es that defeated us through the one in which we were sitting, a group Unfortunately, the surrounding countries their invasion of the Suez." By June, 1967, of children played about the statue of an did not confine themselves to verbalisms. a persuasive legend had grown up, largely Egyptian' soldier while an old man watched. They also engaged in open acts of invasion, masking the truth that the Arab states had One of the children asked who the statue sabotage, terrorism and military action. I ever et:ted arms with the Israelis, and com- was, and by means of a dance, the old fel- myself witnessed the aftermaths of three pletely Ignoring that in each war, the Israelis low explained. Years dropped from his shoul- such actions. had been victorious. In a magic flood of ders. His cane became a gun. His ragged One day in 1963, I visited; the ancient words, history was repealed, clothes fell away to reveal a military uni- I blwanack-tebasald of see how Jews had ,worshiped in of fantitsyb oleaders created an ne demagogue lived on the pworld form, and as more bgles Vie of ro- his former companions In arms a' ppeared ghosts on- the time of Christ. It is believed that Jesus nounce;nents of the other, and in time, all stage, and in wonderfully choreographed vva~vi~i.iv~.71V?ty L1L i LIJIW - 6, NAiL August 10, 1967 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 August 10, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE pantomine, the Egyptian Army demonstrated how it had won the great war of 1956. The scene was at Suez, where a handful of heroic Egyptians held off and finally de- feated not an Israeli army but invaders storming ashore from French and English battleships. For each Egyptian soldier, scores of Frenchmen and Englishmen rushed on- stage, only to be overwhelmed by sheer cour- age. In the end, the invaders had to re- treat, whereupon the Egyptian defenders fell into a tableau of victory as fine as any I had ever seen. The great powers had been driven off, and Egyptian honor was once more secure. I looked about- me at the audience, and it was apparent that the adults, many of whom must have participated In the events thus portrayed, had begun to accept this version as history. Their eyes glowed, and a real patriotism suffused their faces. As we left the park, I saw one young boy of nine or ten lunging out with an imaginary bayo- net to hold off imaginary Frenchmen and Englishmen. When I made inquiries about the performance, I found that it was paid for by the government and was repeated throughout the year. The whole thing was fantasy, of course, and certainly no worse than similar versions of English history offered in London or French history in Paris. I am sure that parallel perversions could be found in Amer- ican folklore, and I doubt that much harm is done to children by this patriotic non- sense. But in the case of Egypt and the other Arab lands, there was an additional danger because adults, too, were accepting such fables: college professors, university stu- dents, newspaper editors, businessmen be- lieved that Egypt had won a great victory in 1956. I could find no evidence that anyone in public life was willing to admit that in Egypt's military adventure against a handful of Jews, the latter had easily won. All nations engage in fantasy, but few Indulge themselves with so virulent a dream as the twofold Arab dream that Israel does not exist and that the Jews who presently occupy the land of Israel can easily be pushed into the Mediterranean ... when- ever the Arabs finally decide to do so. Sometime in the spring of 1967, the Arab leaders decided that the time was ripe. Under incessant pressure from Ahmed Shukairy, leader of the Palestine Liberation Organiza- tion, who stood to win himself the satrapy of Palestine if he could goad Egypt. Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan and Saudi Arabia into declaring war on Israel, and with the full connivance of Gamal Abdel Nasser, who stood to win himself an emperorship if the war was successful, the Arab nations reached an understanding. These men who had lived so long on fantasy now conceived the supreme fantasy that they could quickly destroy the nation that had twice defeated them and had in the interim grown stronger socially, psy- chologically and morally, even though its air- planes and tanks had not kept pace in num- bers with those of the Arabs. On May 16, 1967, President Nasser initiated the two final moves. On that day, he elbowed the United Nations Emergency Force out of its peacekeeping positions along the Egyp- tian-Israeli border in the Sinai Peninsula and forced it ignominiously to retire from the area, thus depriving Israel of the one slim assurance it had that a surprise attack would not be launched from the desert. The fire engine that was supposed to protect the com- munity scuttled out of town at the first smell of smoke. In its place, President Nasser moved up his own divisions, and the stage was set for war. On May 22, 1967, he made his second crucial move. With the retreat of the United Nations troops, he found himself in sole con- trol of Sharm el Shiek, the fortress-com- manding the strait leading into the Gulf of Aqaba. It was a simple matter for him to an- nounce that henceforth, the Gulf would be closed to Israeli ships and even to ships of other nations carrying strategic materials bound for Israel. None would be permitted to enter and none to leave. This was a hos- tile act and had to be construed as a declara- tion of war. That President Nasser was aware of the gravity of his act, he took no pains to hide: "Sharm el Sheik and the blockade mean real confrontation with Israel. Taking such a step means that we should be ready to enter full-scale war with Israel. It is not an isolated operation." The Gulf has been recognized as an inter- national waterway because four sovereign nations lines its coasts: on the east, Saudi Arabia; on the west, Egypt; on the north, Israel; and on the northeast, Jordan. But it Is more important economically to Israel than to any of the other three, since Elath is a major port for handling oil and other heavy cargoes. If the Gulf of Aqaba were to be closed to all shipping, whether to Jordan or Israel, the blockade would damage Jordan, but it would prostrate Israel. However, ships intended for Jordan were allowed to pass, and during the exercise of the blockade, sev- eral did proceed unmolested to Jordan. This underlined the fact that the blockade was meant to be an act of war, and lest any mis- understand the intention, President Nasser proclaimed on May 26: "The Arab people want to fight ... "We have been waiting for the suitable day when we shall be completely ready, since if we enter a battle with Israel we should be confident of victory and should take strong measures. We do not speak idly. "We have lately felt that our strength is sufficient, and that if we enter the battle with Israel we shall, with God's help, be victorious. Therefore, we have now decided that I take real steps. "The battle will be a full-scale one, and our basic aim will be to destroy Israel." Obviously, the major maritime nations of the world, having anticipated that such a blockade might one day be attempted, in which case their ships would be powerless to enter the narrow strait, had long been on record regarding two points: (1) the Gulf of Aqaba was an international waterway, and (2) as such, it must be kept open for all nations to use equally without let or hin- drance. By flouting international law and block- ading the Gulf of Aqaba to Israeli shipping, President Nasser had effectively and some- what cleverly cut Israel's lifeline to the south. If the blockade were allowed to con- tinue unchallenged, Israel would experience what its Arab neighbors had been threaten- ing for so long-its strangulation. This was war, but still only an indirect version, in the economic field. One could reasonably hope that from it, President Nasser might back away, but such hopes were dashed on May 28, when he announced over the radio: "We intend to open a general assault against Israel. This will be total war. Our basic aim is the destruction of Israel." As the Arabs prepared for what they assured themselves was to be the final con- quest of Israel, their morale was at high pitch. And because of what they had been told so continuously over the previous eight years regarding their victory over the British and French in 1956, they believed in all honesty that this time they were going to crush Israel, and fairly easily. President Nasser encouraged this belief by his belligerent speeches. From Syria, Chief of State Al-Attassi thundered. that his army was impatient to begin marching. The foot soldiers, the aviators, the tank commanders and even the generals prepared to launch what they were convinced would be an easy, victorious sortie. In the fantasy world in which they had lived for so long, and to which they had contributed, words took the place of accomplishment, wishes S 11281 took the place of military discipline, and in- flated dreams of revenge superseded facts. If the Arabs with their verbal assaults had made life difficult for Israel, they had per- petrated a worse crime against themselves: for they had come to believe their own in- flated nonsense. At the hour of attack, the Voice of the Arabs radio station in Cairo issued this stirring call to its soldiers. It is the usual heartening battle cry that all nations use at a time of crisis and in general purpose is not much different from what Englishmen or Russians or Americans would shout to their soldiers: but In the cry for avenging 1948, one hears a unique and ominous overtone: "Destroy, ruin, liberate. Woe to Israel, your hour has arrived. The Arab nation is on its way to render its account. 0 Israel, this is your end. "Every Arab must take revenge for 1948, must cross the Armistice lines from all di- rections and head for Tel Aviv. We shall drive out of existence the shame of Zionism. Rescue the looted Palestine. Hit everywhere till the end. "There is no room for Israel in Palestine. This Is your responsibility. 0 Arab soldiers! Israel, taste death!" It required less than 72 hours in June to deflate this bombast. What can be done to awaken the Arab masses to the reality that Israel stands where it does and will presumably remain there for some -centuries? In the aftermath of 1948, the rest of the world permitted and perhaps encouraged the Arabs to fol- low a policy of blindly refusing to admit that Israel existed. The armistice commis- sions, which should have worked out re- gional policies, were not permitted to oper- ate effectively. Decisions upon which peace depended could not be made because the Arabs refused to acknowledge that history had produced an old-new nation that would prove most viable-that was too young to die. The normal intercourse between nations, such as Is conducted between Russia and Germany, which were certainly as bitter enemies as Egypt and Israel, was forbidden, and the region fumbled its way to the war of 1956. When Israel won handily, the refusal to admit realities persisted, and the same er- rors were allowed to continue. International commissions did not function, and normal Intercourse between nations did not mature, even though the Arab portion of the region and the Israeli form a marvelous, interlock- ing whole-a unit whose various segments could well profit from economic, medical, educational, developmental and planning co- operation. The blindness and the arrogant folly that produced this stalemate also pro- duced the speeches cited in this article. And they in turn produced the hysteria that led to a third war in less than 20 years. If the world, in 1948, had insisted that the nations of this area sit down in honest con- sultation,. 1956 might have been avoided. If the world, following the disaster of 1956, had insisted that the Arab nations at least awaken to the existence of Israel, the tremen- dous folly of 1967 could have been avoided. Now, the world has a third chance, and if some right decisions are made in the months ahead, the even greater tragedy of 1977 may be avoided. What is necessary is a reason- able revision of boundary lines: a sensible settlement of the Palestinian refugee prob- lem: a cessation of verbal assault and phy- sical battery; and a union of talents and interests, of resources and abilities, so that the region can move forward to a creative society in which all members live infinitely better than anyone there now does. Am I hopeful that the world will now sensibly tackle its problems when it refused to do so in the aftermath of 1948 and 1956? Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R00020030 043-4 S 11282 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE August 10, 1967 I am not. President Gamal Abdel Nasser -pulled out of the hat .one of the cleverest tricks of his career when, in the first hours of defeat, he invented the enticing theory that once again it was not Israelis who were crushing his armed might from every direc- tion but English and American; aviators. His explanation captivated the imagination of all Arabs, and within a few days was adopted as official dogma. In 1970, when I revisit the lovely waterfront of Alexandria, I expect to see a tableau explaining how, in a moment of travail in the spring of 1967, the Egyptians and their Arab allies stood bravely against the combined air might of Great Britain and the United States and repulsed it. That Israel was Involved will not be mentioned. At the moment when Egyptian armies were suffering their worst defeats, Egypt's unde- feated radio was broadcasting the following careful analysis of the situation: "The United States is the, enemy. Its fighters and bombers gathered in large groups to provide for Israel an air umbrella that prevents the Arabs from bombing Israel's towns and villages, while it is: moving fast all along the occupied frontiers of the Arabs. The United States, therefore,, Is the ag- gressor. "The United States saw Israel about to collapse under the blow of death. The Chicago gangs moved: the state of gangster- ism and bloodshed moved; it moved in order to protect its aggressive base in the Middle East. How vile and treacherous the United States has been in Its Collusion with the Zionists! It refrained from coming out openly to fight us. It refrained; from facing the Arabs with an open and daring hostility. No, Arabs. The United States is; too vile and too base to have the ethics of cavaliers. The United States threw, from all: its airports and aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean, huge and continuous massings of its fighters and bombers in order to provide that air umbrella that protected Israel from the revenge of the Arabs, from the; massings of the Arabs, and from the victory of the Arabs. "The battle is continuing, United States. It is going on until you: become, as Britain became after the 19y56 collusion, third-rate state. Here we shall bury the American international gangsterism. Here, Arabs, dig graves everywhere; dig them for every U.S. existence; dig them. Arabs. Dig all the homeland a grave for U.S. existence. Dig it, Arabs. Dig it, Arabs. Dig it, Arabs. "The curse of all the Arabs, from the ocean to the gulf and from every corner of the globe, is on you, America, and on your lackey, Israel; together with the curse of all free peoples, the curse of free men every- where." On the night when the defeat of the Arab armies was known to the world as one of the most crushing in history., I discussed matters on an all-night radio show with Dr. M. T. Mehdi, secretary-general of the Action Committee on American-Arab Relations, and he made these points: "Nothing has changed. Israel is worse than Nazi Germany, and the Arabs will have to drive her from the region. The war will continue precisely as it has been going for the past 19 years. And what the Americans and the English took away from the Arabs by their Intervention, the Arabs will recover at the conference table. Peace talks, of course, will have to be con- ducted through third parties at the United Nations, because no Arab leader will ever agree to sit down and talk with an outlaw nation like Israel. You'll see. The United Nations will force Israel back to her 1948 boundaries, after which all Arai} nations will unite in a war to exterminate her, because this is going to be just like the Crusades. For two hundred years, the Arabs will con- tinue their fight and in the end they'll do exactly what they've said. Push Israel into the sea." Nasser will probably gain more from the Arab world in defeat than he would have gained in victory. The war made him a tragic hero -ar fund whom the emotional Arabs can rally. Se ton, his new crop of generals will be making the old speeches of 1948, 1956 and 1967. H.s people will believe them, for fan- tasy is impossible to eradicate if one's whole society Is structured on the perpetuation of the Aralan Nights. Yet vie must dispel that fantasy. To do so is the , ob to which we are all committed . un:.ess we are content to watch this pathetic farce of Arab self-delusion repeated in 1977, 1988 and 1999. [From the New York Times, July 28. 1967] FANTASY FROM NASSER Presic.ent Nasser of the U.A.R. has been variously described as cautious and impul- sive, reasonable and Irresponsible, calculating and tee ipestuous. During his thirteen-year career is absolute ruler of his people and aspiring leader of pan-Arab Socialism, Gamal Abdel Sasser has displayed all of these con- tradictcry traits.. In sp.te of his impulsive seizure of Suez, his irresponsible campaign in Yemen and other fcrays into international politics, many informed observers have been inclined In the past to minimize the Egyptian leader's excesses, citing his relative caution in com- parison to other, more volatile, Arab leaders, and pointing to many reasonable and con- crete steps he has taken to try to rebuild Egypt's impoverished and demoralized feudal society. Today, however, it must be sadly noted that President Nasser has apparently thrown caution and reason to the desert winds. In calling on Egyptians once more to mobi- lize their meager resources for continuing warfare against azi Israel he refuses to recog- nize after a third, shattering Egyptian de- feat by Israeli armed forces, Nasser has be- trayed Ifs promise of a better life for 'the Egyptian people. He has shown himself to be -a pr Boner of the extreme Arab emotions he once sought to master. Speaking on the fifteenth anniversary of the Egyptian revolution the other day, Nasser charged there is "an American imperialist conspiracy to destroy our socialist revolu- tion." Thus have failure at home, where the ecoi Lamy is a shambles, and defeat abroad reduced a once-promising leader to fantasy. It is, rf course, no American conspiracy but Nasser's own intemperate ambitions and in- flexible antipathies that are destroying Egypt's hope to show the way to a better Arab society. AND REALITY On tie basis of well-authenticated evi- dence, Egypt has been using and is continu- ing to use poison gas against Yemeni royal- ists. Thy) United States has a last made public its beliief that gas may have in fact been employe d. An investigation by the United Nations Human Rights Commission is clearly called f )r. The IaternationaI Red Cross sentone team to a vilage called Gahar in north Yemen on may 15. While its report has not yet been oficiall3 released, the text has been printed in U.S. News World Report. The Red Cross doctors found proof of-the use of toxic gas by the Egyptian forces. Their report has been circulated offlcia:tly only to Egypt, Saudi Arabia and both sides in the Yemen civil war; but each of these parties has reasons to keep tho contents secret. Two hundred Members of Parliament of all parties in London have just called upon their Government to take the issue to the United Nations Foreign Secretary George Brown in- dicated that Britain would not take action. Although he did not say so, the reason is presumably that the British do not want to get int) more trouble with Egypt. Saudi Arabia, which is most concerned because it is support.ng the royalists and because Yemen is on Ila borders, evidently does not want further to disturb Arab unity in these critical times. Washington had been holding back for va- rious reasons. It had no positive proof and still has none, and it too was trying to get along with Nasser. However, relations with Cairo could not get worse than they are now. And the increasing evidence of the use of toxic gas has become too disturbing to ig- nore. It is believed that in recent bombings the Egyptians have used a modern, sophisti- cated nerve gas, whereas previously they had used World I phosgene. The State Department said yesterday that it will support International action to investi- gate this horror. Washington should do more. It should initiate such action. [From the Washington Post, July 30, 1967] ISRAEL FAKED EGYPT OUT OF' HER SOCKS (Excerpts from an article entitled "The 6- Day War" by Randolph and Winston Churchill) It all started with a lie---a Russian lie. In early May, the Soviet government passed to Cairo the story of a large Israeli troop con- centration on the Syrian border. During the following two weeks, Cairo received informa- tion from Moscow indicating that an Israeli force of up to 11 brigades was involved. At the time, the Israelis had no more than a company (120 men) in that particular area, waiting in ambush for Syrian saboteurs. The United Nations, which had observa- tion posts along the Israeli-Syrian border, confirmed, toward the end of May, that it had no evidence of the alleged troop move- ments. It seems that the: Russians, alarmed by the possibility that Israel might be plan- ning a punitive raid on Syria, wanted Egyp- tian President Nasser to commit his forces in Sinai as a diversion to deter the Israelis from attacking. The crisis had been building up for six months. In October and November, 1966, there had been an intensification of Arab terrorist activities against Israel by the El Fatah terrorist organization. On Nov. 4, Syria and Egypt signed a- defense agreement. There followed two incidents in which- the Israelis undertook major ,punitive action. On Nov. 13, a large Israeli force, including tanks and armored cars, rolled over the- Jor- danian border and attacked Samu, a village of 4000 people. Israel felt no great hostility toward Jordan but carried out the raid in order to show that she was not prepared to tolerate the use of Jordanian territory by the El Fatah organization. At the beginning of April, 1967, the Israelis decided to knock out Syrian artillery which was bombarding Israeli farm workers in a demilitarized zone near the Sea of Galilee. In the resulting air battle of April 7, the Syrians lost six Mig fighters, a significant proportion of their total air strength. EMBARRASSING FOR NASSER The situation was clearly becoming in- creasingly embarrassing for President Nasser. In particular, the presence of the United Nations Emergency Force, commanded by Gen. Rikhye of India, on the borders of Egypt and Israel was a subject of scandal and scorn among his Arab rivals. Nasser, believing that a confrontation be- tween Israel and Syria was imminent, felt bound to demonstrate the reality of his de- fense pact with Syria by some evidence of military zeal. On May 15, large numbers of Egyptian troops were seen moving through Cairo on their way to the Suez Canal. They were accorded the maximum publicity by the government-controlled press, radio and tele- vision. Then at 10 p.m. on May 18, the Egyptian chief of staff, Gen. Fawzy, sent a telegram to Gen. Rikhye: "For your information, I gavemy instruc- tions to all U.A.R. armed forces to be ready for action against Israel the moment it Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25: CIA-RDP69B 00200300043-4 August 10, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD t C ads to discuss the crisis with THE TURNING POINT an S 11283 might carry out any aggressive action against new o any Arab country ... For the sake of corn- Prime Minister Lester Pearson. The same day, On May 30, King Hussein of Jordan unex- plete secure (sic) of all U.N. troops which in- the Egyptian Defense Minister, accompanied pettedly arrived in Cairo and, after a stay of stall O.P.'s along our borders, I request that by a ten-man delegation, arrived in Moscow only six hours, signed a defense agreement you issue orders to withdraw all these troops to seek Russian support and material. with President Nasser. This surprised the Egyptian people as much as foreigners. The immediately ..." EBAN'S TREK WEST Gen. Rikhye immediately reported the On May 24, Israeli Foreign Minister Abba two men had for long been at loggerheads, Egyptian request to United Nations Secretary Eban left for Washington, via Paris and Lon- President Nasser having often denounced don, to see President Johnson and later to Hussein as a traitor to the Arab cause. General U The trot c New York and retired defense pact was undoubtedly the next bed. made broadcasts tof Cairo hat Gen. RRikhye adio the ted o had address the United Nations Security waiting Council. turning point between peace and war. Stra- been d to it clear that Gen. from On May 26, after keeping Eban waiting for tegically, an alliance between Egypt and Jor- bee n asked to withdraw his men from the most of the day, Mr. Johnson called him in clan could scarcely be tolerated by Israel. For border and concentrate them inside the Gaza for a talk. The President was disconcerted Israel would now be exposed to attack at its Strip. . No mention was made of the wave , when Eban produced a file of documents most vulnerable point, the "soft underbelly" Nations * U HThant w s a El telegram, Egyptian of a firm American commitment to uphold into Israel and provided a hostile base for rd on Ambassador n Kony, the the principle of "free and innocent passage" attack only 12 miles from the Mediterranean at t the e United Nations, , and in- through the Gulf of Aqaba. coast. representative formed him that a partial withdrawal of the Among these papers was the draft of a Thus the talkers were being overtaken by force was impossible. Nasser was therefore speech made by his immediate predecessor, events. While PresidenteJohnson and Prime told he must either request the complete Golds Meir, to the United Nations General Minister Wilson were hawking a document withdrawal of the U.N. Emergency Force from Assembly on March 1, 1957. This had been Egyptian territory or else allow it to remain prepared jointly by Eban, at thattime Israeli around d tthe he world rld seeking atito ons obtfaarin c the the su lupp- in its existing positions. Ambassador in Washington, and John Foster p to open the n or the on ertd IIAMMARSKJOLD LEGACY Dulles, and amended in Dulles' own hand. action o become a the minor of n issue s f Tiran, Israel. prob- deadly threat of m Arab military Israel. UNEF was the peacekeeping force which had Eban also reminded Mr. Johnson during lem had p controlled the border since the time of Suez. their 85-minute conversation of the Presi- along her bwas aaamount. It had originally been established there un- dent's record on the issue. When Mr. Johnson Israel, h, borders with or four of five men her army der an agreement concluded between Presi- was Senate Democratic Leader in 1955-6-7, civilians, could not afford to maintain her dent Nasser and the late Dag Hammarskjold, he had been strongly pro-Israel. He had orcea mobilized not afford rd to aintain, her could not afford to stand down from her high then United Nations Secretary General, in enburst into ed Israel with sanctions threat- f November, 1956. level of mobilization while the imminent Egypt and d the United Nation, according to drew from Sharm with danger of a concerted surprise attack by her this document, made a compact that at no In n his talk lk with h Eban, Mr. Johnson was i existed. withdrawal should take place before the full of friendly bluster-"I want to see that neighbors situation for her. Throughout an the country, intolerable and particularly her. "task" was accomplished. In the event of an little blue and white Israeli flag sailing down was the was growing unrest and dis- Egyptian request for the United Nations those straits"-but would make no firm com- the army, Throughout matter troops to leave. Hammarskjold recorded, "the mitment. satisfaction. army, there would at once be brought before the Eban was asked to give Washington ten signs in a dIt It was one ne o of those rare opinion non-election ywas able pu lie rraae di real Assembly. If the General Assembly days or a fortnight for negotiations. anon-electidemocracy when found that its task was completed, every- Eban genuinely believed that something pressure to on year a was ato bring thing would be all right. If they found that might be achieved through negotiations; he With their veteran leader BentGorton In the task was not completed, and Egypt, all has argued In private since the war that for retirement, r the Israeli leader turned now In the same maintained Its stand and enforced the sake of Israel's international reputation one man retirement, t.From Dayan, the Sinai vit- the withdrawal, Egypt would break the it was essential that the diplomatic method one of 1-.From Dayan they whe accept a tor agreement with the United Nations." be tested, even though it might be found decision to fight or to wait with complete Though U Thant has pointed out that the wanting. He also maintained that Israel conviction that the decision had been taken Hammarskjold memorandum was not an might have been accused of indecent haste for sound reasons. official United Nations document, it is inter- had she struck the moment the strait was r sound Peres, one of the leading lights of esting prede eo note how far he departed from his closed. DESTROY ISRAEL the Raft Party, has described the problems ssor's rInet code action. which confronted Israel in the days leading In the e event; however, , the Egyptians had On the day of President Johnson's meet- up to the war: "There were two questions to not waited for any formal response from ing with Eban, the situation in the Middle be resolved-the decision to go or not to go, U Thant. By 8 a.m. on May 17, they were East took another decisive turn. President and secondly, who should bear the responsi- already taking over UNEF observation posts Nasser, addressing the leaders of the Pan- bility for that decision. There was growing along the Egyptian-Israel border. In Cairo, Arab Federation of Trade Unions, said that resentment in the country and in the army, Foreign Minister Mahmoud Riad called in if war came, "it will be total and the objec- not because the government hadn't decided the envoys of each of the seven nations con- tive will be. to destroy Israel. We feel on war-but because it had taken no de- tributing to UNEF and demanded the with- confident that we can win and are ready cision." Raft was, broadly, 'the party of the drawal of their contingents, receiving imme- now for a war with Israel." "hawks," while the "doves" put their trust in diate assent from the Yugoslavs and Indians. The great powers were alarmed by Nasser's Eshkol and Eban of the Mapai Party. Shortly after midday on May 18, the Egyp- recklessness. He appeared to be losing his By May 24 Peres was the organizing center tians ordered the force of 32 United Nations balance. President Johnson sent a note the of a political alliance which could muster 50 troops manning observation posts at Sharm same day to the Egyptian ambassador in of the Knesset's 120 votes, and which aimed El-Sheikh to withdraw immediately. It was Washington requesting the Egyptians to ex- to overthrow Eshkol. went 4 p.m. when the official Egyptian request for ercise restraint and not to open fire first. withdrawal of the force reached the United That night Nasser was called out of bed at Discussions vainlyiscussss toions and with th the roughout May government 31 went on an up in Nations-too late for U Thant to preserve 3:30 a.m. to hear an urgent message from the aaimpt to get Dayan accepted in a position the integrity of the force. Soviet ambasadar in Cairo. He told Nasser at authority, either as Prime Mor At a brief ceremony in Gaza on May 19, that Egypt was strongly. advised not to ini- Minister Das Pr was Minister nisteis or dDefense, nse was prepared to have the flag of the United Nations was'lowered tiate the fighting. Minister but only Eshkol and UNEF was no more-an ignominious and While wishing to avoid any confrontation, him depressed. an advisory capacity, abrupt demise. the Russians were also aware of the inade- him In in viory capacity, Perhaps no one was more surprised than quate condition of Egyptian military prep- offering him deputy premiership committee r Nasser when U Thant acceded to his demands arations. A team of Soviet inspectors, check- for defense, of the the a e gae en 's Inner m 13 people. sisted of so promptly without even consulting the ing Egyptian airfields, found pilots who had Both positions which coonse involved respon le. Security Council or the General Assembly. not been airborne for days. Egypt's dummy Botty without power. On May 22, the crisis entered a new stage planes were unconvincing and their real ones at 3 p.m. on June 1, there was a when Egypt declared the Strait of Tiran were massed together where they would be Then a t the secretariat of Iv, there which closed to Israeli ships and to all strategic easy targets. meeting aOf these, a tut which 19 materials being shipped to Israel on board Nasser's judgment was distorted by the 24 people spoke. five backed Al19n, tchief non-Israeli vessels. President Nasser de- enormous failure of his sycophantic intelli- Dayan ayan only Minister of Labor. the 7 chief clared: "If Israel threatens us with war, we gence srvicewhich underestimated the of staff and Raft met and it was will reply thus: Go ahead, then." enemy's strength. There is little reason to Eshkol and and delegates now ow n agreed that Dayan should have the Defense lasted have more than m no On May 23, Levi Eshkol, the Israeli Prime believe that Nasser was bent on a military rt. t a yan should Minister, warned that interference with showdown with Israel from the outset. How- 10 minutes. Israeli shipping in the Strait of Tiran would ever, as Eban has put it, "Nasser was like a be regarded as an act of war. man who had gone to Monte Carlo with $100 An hour later, the Raft leadership met in On May 25, there were signs of mounting and staked it at the roulette wheel. Each time Ben-Gurion's house. After two hours of dis- pressure on the Israeli Prime Minister for his number came up he became more coura- cussion, Ben-Gurion approved Dayan's ap- Israel to "go it alone." President Johnson geous; he felt that fortune was smiling." pointment. By 11 p.m. the cabinet met and Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 S11284 Approved For 22pp LLQQ55/25 CIqRDP69B00369R000200300043-4 G eEss1u 7AL 1fECORD - SENATE August 10, 1967 iiayan's inclusion as Defense Minister was among the three additions made. It is now a controversial issue in Israeli politics as to who should be given credit for the decision to strike and for the successful conduct of the war. Dayan'sadmirers claim that when he entered the cabinet the deci- sion to fight had yet to be taken, and add that no detailed plan of attack had been worked out. Brig. Gen. Ezer Weizman has said that when Dayan became Minister of Defense, "he knew that there was a possibility that the decision to go might not be taken." Others claim that the Eshkol government was too fearful to make the decision without him. They wanted Dayan included so that if the whole thing ended in disaster they would not have to hold the bag alone. Eban and Allan recall events differently from Weizman. Eban says that the decision to fight had been- reached by June 1: it was dictated by the pact between Nasser and Hussein. Allan agrees. He says that prior to the defense pact there was a division in the cabinet, a majority still hoping for a diplo- matic solution. But after May 30 war was in- evitable. Dayan was included in the cabinet because the Eshkol government was being forced to two unavoidable conclusions: Israel had no alternative but to fight, and the Israeli gov- ernment needed Dayan because the nation demanded it and because it needed his knowl- edge, courage and optimism. Just as It had taken Hitler to make Churchill Prime Minister in 1940, so, as Dayan put it shortly before the start of the war, "it took 80,000 Egyptian soldiers to. get me into the Israeli cabinet." By the time Harold Wilson and Lyndon Johnson met in Washington on. June 2, it was too late for a diplomatic formula to succeed. War was certain. Only the date was open. SAFE TO ACT By the first weekend in June while diplo- macy was taking its course in the world capitals, two things were clear to the Israelis. First, that they would not incur the wrath of June 4 the soldiers and airmen knew that the There can be no doubt that overall, the following morning they would be at war. Israeli deception achieved its purpose. Egyp- It 7iad been an agonizing and anguished tian generals were seen that weekend on the decision for the cabinet. When Gen. Hod, the tennis courts of Cairo. h d f t ea o he air force told th tht ,ema their air force could destroy the air force of Egypt and Lny other Arab power that intervened The armed forces that Dayan was about to withoat Tel Aviv being subjected to enemy lead into battle made up a remarkable and bombardment, they found it hard to believe. unique military machine, largely composed So :ouch had been heard of the new Rus- of farmers, fruit dealers, taxi drivers and scan-trained Egyptian air force, equipped businessmen in they we In the defense of with more than 400 modern jet fighters and their own land, they v re one of the finest bombrrs-how was it possible to knock There out armies the was no ova aver lan such ,d force wish One blow and be sure that Gen was no ecrarl plan of campaign. Tel A`ivwould not be bombed? "We . Weinman, director of operations, said: But Moshe Dayan was an optimist and he have got a plan for everything-even for was oae of the few who knew that the air capturing the North Pole. The plans are like force could do what it promised. Dayan's bricks. They can be used one by one to build influe:ice over .he cabinet was perhaps his don't structure go in for pr or pre sieconceiveceived dn anddevelops. We most decisive contribution to the victory. - inflexible in and, therefore, Whim Dayan assumed the office of Defense Although master redt for Minisi er June 1, he was already very clearly the credit fIsraeli's air victory in the.picture. or the previous two weeks, was to to Gen. Hod, It was Gen. Weizman with the permission of both the Prime Min- who over er the past ten years was been archi- ister and the Chief of Staff, Gen. Rabin, he tect of the air force. It was his decision to had biien visiting the troops in the field and, devote available resources to create a strong in particular, going over all the plans with der rct them by havv ing a bomber a b bombers rbomber er f well. than squan well. A the individual commanders. bomber's th's major ha m centers of Between Juno, 1 and June 4, there can mber's prole Is to bomb had no o be no doubt that he made several alter- chest n population, which Israel had no air ations to the plans within the framework force foret h doing. Gen. Weizman enemy air of thu, original conception of the battle. which that could destroy any enemy force and This 1.ad been to hold the line of the-Jor- It was ar gtoe nd any a ground troopsthe Israel daniar. and Syrian fronts while destroying wb fore to find anyone n who in openly the Egyptian army in Sinai. weeks before the war began who openly For instance, the day before his appoint- wanted war, but without eirF> or bto go, the ment, Dayan visited den. Narkiss, the cen- men-and their cleft ther jhe to re and trai commander whose task it was to and fight for was that country. 'Their r they werTel Aviv, the densely populated coastal guard fighting strength was they they knew what ihy were and tt e Israeli part of Jerusalem from at- the for. Arabs They would realized Iriean the While defeat for tack, j)rtncipally by Jordan. They met in army, e loss of her Jerusa em and went over the plans, and- then xistence for Israel t would the the end o h went to a vante~ge point outside Jerusalem existence as a state and the ;annihilation of from which they surveyed the whole area. her people. Dayan suggested that Israeli troop move- the a an Israeli officer who had served with ents be kept to the bare minimum so as had British army in World War II and who into offer no provocation to the Jordanians. fought se Alamein put it: "This would In case of a Jordanian attack, which it was have. been a second Biblical massacre of Mas- felt would probably be a local one and in soda. When the Egyptians got here they would h eve .onstration or solidarity the President of the United States as they with hi3 fellow Arabs by King Hussein, Dayan had done in 1956; secondly, the Soviet Union warned Narkiss: "Don't bother the general would not intervene. staff w.th requests for reinforcements. Grit Whether this was merely a shrewd assess- your teeth and ask for nothing." went of the situation by the Israeli Intel- Days, a was known to be a man of action, ligence or whether In fact some wink had and on hearing of his inclusion in the Israeli been received through unofficial channels government, many people felt that this would from Mr. Johnson is impossible to say. Any- mean that a decision to fight would soon way, the Israelis felt that it was safe for them come. to act should the situation demand it. One if the fire,t tasks he set himself was The strategic situation outlined by Gen. to disc lute the world of any such idea by Yariv, heatl of Israeli intelligence, was black. a brilliant deception campaign and thus re- In addition to the fateful kiss between Nas- gain the element of surprise which was vital ser and King Hussein the Israelis now knew to Israel, It was at once pointed out that the that Egypt's Gen. Ftiadh hadi arrived in army, Rhich after two weeks of mobilization Amman to establish an advance command and waiting in the desert was demanding post and that Jordanian forces had been that a decision be taken, would accept a placed under his command. Besides this, on decision not to fight far better from a gov- the evening of June 4, the vanguard of an t r e mer; which includd D eayan. Iraqi infantry division reinforced by more than 150 tanks began crossing the Jordan Dayar_s first public appearance as Minister than into the West Bank area. ; e of Defei at Tuunne3 3. e-. He said it was was a press confer- The Iraqi buildup would be complete by ence military too late for a the middle of the week and posed gravrspontaneous mTiran reaction and to still t o os threat to the security of Israel. While she early to to oe, of draw the conclusions of the o l e could cope with 800 ormore Egyptian tanks outcome any conclusions of tpossible He added: In Sinai, Israel felt that the presence of 300 "The ome r me ent-befcore I became action. or 400 enemy tanks so close her major gar of ili -erkeed befa m must air bases and centers of mbark on diplomacy; we musintolerable danger. population was an give it e. chance." ound no one alive. I would have killed my wife and daughter rather than let them fall Into their hands. And I don't know anyone who wouldn't have done the same." IRAQ DETERMINED To "CRUSE[ ZIONIST AG- GRESSION"-WAR SPIRIT RAMPANT INBAGH- DAD (By Robert Dietsch) BAGHDAD, IRAQ, July 26.--The elevator bumps to halt on the ground floor of the Ho- tel Baghdad, the doors glide open and con- fronting me on the wall Is a poster reading: "We shall continue to crush economic in- terests of American, British and West Ger- man supporters of Zionist aggression against our peaceful Arab homeland." Outside the hotel, pasted on the wall of an East German airline office, another poster says: "Johnson, the servant of capitalists, mule of Zionists." Two hundred yards down the street, next to the Hungarian Embassy's commercial of- fice, are posted two dozen pictures from Red China. A cherubic Mao Tse-tung smiles from half them. SOVIET Exams'T Farther down the road is an exhibition of the 'Tigris Riveriiwhich Oil here Is h 200 bank yards wide but - I a In as a mbassy, mill pond--is the pad- The following day, the day immediately locked U.S. E In addition, the Egyptian ask force was preceding the outbreak of war, newspaper It is silent as a tomb and empty except for getting cocky. For 10 years there had been offices throughout the world received pic- a Belgian "caretaker" diplomat, a couple of no intrusion or violation of Israeli air space tures of Israeli troops on leave relaxing on cats and an Arab gardener. Atop the flag- by Egyptian aircraft. Now, in the past two the beac.ies. Several thousand Israeli soldiers pole flea the black, yellow and red flag of weeks, at least three flights had been made had been authorized to go on leave that week- Belgium. by Egyptian Mig 21s over Israel from the Dead end. Sea toward El Arish, a route over some of Inside the Is a Government buildings - Israel's mair bases and the area in which Follow to the cabinet sessions taken, which the along the Tigris a new Cabinet ruesp the bulk major her armor was deployed. was decision to strike had been taken, the corn- pointed last week by President: Abdel Rah- ANaemunique designed for use by papers June man Aref after visits to Cairo and Moscow. menticned only banal Israel's final doubts and hesitations were ranging irom aew bond issagenda of ue to the Items the West even Includes no roaders, but swept away or overcome. By the evening of fication cf a cultural accord with Belgium. men whose allegiances today are intertwined Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : Cl P6 R000200300043-4 S 11285 August 10, 19 6T CONGRESSIONAL REM - the Israeli victory, has rested with the eX- with Cairo and Damascus and bent toward Moscow and, perhaps, Peking. THEY FORGET This gives an idea of what is happening in Iraq since the Arab-Israeli waro c re- try completely has forgotten pre-war to encourage a limited amount of private enterprise and invite in Western business. Iraq broke relations with the U.S. on the ground that Washington helped Israel fight the war. No one gives any hope of restoring those ties soon. There were about 500 Americans in Iraq before the war. Most were evacuated they Today there are only 17 Americans in Bagh- dad, a city of 1.5 million. So far as I know, I was the first American granted a visa to visit Iraq since the war. Most Iraqis, even those in government, were surprised to see me here. I was treated cour- teously. but curtly. p ro I got to see only one government officer on Jordan. King Hussein reportedly wants the General Assembly, the Russians were eager an official basis. I talked with half a dozen Iraqis to leave, but they have made no move to get some kind of resolution through in others with the unspoken --understanding I to do so. order to show that the effort had not been wouldn't use their names. I also met three When the Iraqi troops departed for Jordan, in vain. The United States worked out with American businessmen here. I asked to talk President Aref saw them off saying: "See you the Soviet Union a compromise resolution with their Iraqi employes, but all refused. in Tel Aviv." that would have, at least dimly, recognized I walked to the streets in safety, but while The Iraqis were so cocky they talked of Israel's right to exist. taking a taxi tour of the city, the driver al- the war as a "picnic." In short they believed But the Algerians and Syrians saw the their own propaganda altho there was no resolution as a kind of Soviet quit-claim- ways told inquiries I was French specially when were were in thickly populated pro- training for mobilization for war. freeing the Russians from the obligation to Nasser mosque areas. Despite the continued anti-U.S. and anti- undo Israel's victory. They refused strong In the past seven weeks, Iraq has aligned Israel fever not all Iraqis foresee renewed Soviet pressure to support the resolution, itself with Arab extremists in Cairo and fighting soon, But they feel it must come and they were able to swing the rest of the Damascus who demand continued aggression in the long run. Most Iraqis are convinced Arab world with them. That is why the Gen- against Israel, a continued oil boycott against Israel wants to grab all the land between eral Assembly had to turn the problem over the U.S., Britain and West Germany, and the Nile and Euphrates Rivers. to the Security Council. wider boycotts against Western firms. Iraq has been in a series of upheavals This deadlock has induced among some Indeed, some sources say Iraq is the since 1958 when Gen. Abdul Karim Kassem American officials a keen disposition to find loudest voice of all the Arab nations demand- overthrew King Faisal and set up the eoun- a way out. Behind the scenes there have been ing stricter boycotts. Baghdad is flirting try's first socialist state. Kassem took Iraq heavy Administration pressures on Israel for openly with Moscow and Peking, talking out of the Baghdad Pact and terminated one-sided concessions. At one point, the trade and arms. several U.S. treaties. United States very nearly switched its United NEW PACTS He flirted with communism but in the end Nations vote from abstention to aye on a An Iraqi date-processing firm (produces took a fairly moderate socialist.line. Kassen Pakistani resolution which in effect called for 80 per cent of the world's dates) has signed was toppled in 1963 and for nine months, unconditional Israeli withdrawal from Jeru- a pact with Hungary for a new plant. Poland Iraq was ruled by the extremist Arab socialist Salem. has won a contract to supply Iraqi railways Ba'ath Party. This disposition to give way is particularly with 200 cars. Iraq has quit trying for a $2 Then the moderates regained power and disquieting because beneath the surface of million U.S. bank loan, turning instead to recently the Aref government did try for events there has been a considerable drift France, Russia, and Czechoslovakia. economic progress and encouraged participa- away from the extremist lead of Algeria and No U.S. newspapers or magazines have been tion in major projects with private Western Syria. permitted in Iraq since last month's war. Interests. Jordan Is obviously eager for talks. The oil- There is strict censorship of Baghdad's eight While Iraq remained basically a socialist rich states, insofar as they have boycotted daily newspapers. All mail is censored and all state all major industries and almost land Britain and the United States under pressure phone calls are monitored. are state-owned. As late as last spring, the of the extremists, have the best reasons for Iraq has sent arms, trade and even sports U.S. Embassy here was telling Washington wanting a return to business as usual. Most missions to Moscow. The army is in tight that progress was being made. important of all, there is the case of the control of the country as usual, but the voice But Western businessmen I talked to here, countries bordering Algeria and Syria. gime has of the pro-Nasser army element is growing disclaim any such progress. They say their In M o it a helre own labor been strong stronger. work was getting less efficient and less p enough to j - for One Iraqi government official said: "Iraq ductive all the time. stirring up anti-Jewish sentiment. In Ta- mst do like other Arab countries. We have EIGHTY MILLION DOLLARS nisia, President Habib Bourguiba is ready to recognize Israel diplomatically as soon as to act as one. We are acting as one." The three-week shutdown of oil production ral anion Kinaani, under secretary of cul- have cost peace talks begin. And Iraq-.-a country e-spokes access for man fo nean-has j stseated a new cabie to th thegovernment ctolde a"Iraq lacks tech- and Iraq an current estimated limited $80 million. production Major aggri- pendent nicians, scientists, equipment of all kinds, cultural production has slowed because of net which looks away from Syria and toward so si search for thm among our friends- On paper, Iraq has great agricultural, po- Egypt, of course, is the fulcrum of Arab "Americans s working g i n Iraq deserted us the fight of Western technicians. Egypt. Ro Ameri n, Fr tential. The Tigris and Euphrates River could opinion, the point where decisive swings w can made. And so far, on such issues as when the fighting began. Those on't know provide g the all the Romwateran needed. Empire this land-then the Arab summit and the Unite4 Nations why. They just ran away. ThoAmericans known During Mesopotamia-was a granary for resolutions, President Nasser has tried to bal-sees byd arsit like a gazelle--which can't the empire. But today, 1600 years later, so- ante among factions in order to maintain by its s earsins nstead of its eyes. You h u caann't cialist - Iraq doesn't produce enough grain top position in the Arab world. imagine the damage America did itself by even for itself and has to import wheat. But Egypt is about the last country in the its policies during this war. " Like almost every other Iraqi, this official From the Washington Post, July 30,; 19671 world able to hold a half-way position in remains convinced the U.S. helped Israel international affairs. It imports food and a fight and that the U.S. Navy communications PUTTING UP WITH AN ITCH-LOGIC IMPELS wide variety of goods consumed by its mid- ship Liberty was advising Israel. UNITED STATES To ALLOW TIME To PASS dle classes in Alexandria and Cairo. "The way the Israelis fought, the tactics BEFORE SEEKING MIDDLE EAST SETTLEMENT Every day the Egyptians are losing millions they used proves someone was helping them," (By Joseph Kraft) of dollars in foreign exchange from Suez Kinaani said. Impasse in the Middle East has bred the Canal tolls foregone, from an absence of DEFEAT'S EFFECT ' usual American itch to promote a settlement. tourists and from the closing down of oil This statement, heard so often in Arab But logic still argues for a waiting game, prospecting in Sinai. The country is in seri- nations, indicates the full effect of defeat aimed at allowing the forces now dominant ous economic trouble. And for all their gen- ons, ast-off erosity them pla Arab e everosince show a signcof pickingaup the tabRussialTs stilaccepted the yetlcomprehend the ext nt ofatheirhloses. in The init ative in the Arab worldse,lves conceded his country now is turning to the communists. He said: ,No matter who helps you in a plight, you turn to him. It makes no matter what kind of communists-Russian or Chinese. They proved our friends in war." This official also felt the Arab boycott will be extended to all U.S. and British goods and firms. He thought it already had been done but had not been announced officially. Kinaani said: "I once was against com- munism. I was wrong. Communism can't do any more harm to me than did Israel and U.S. policies." Another U.S.-trained official Said: "There is no doubt about it. Many intellectuals in Iraq who were against communism for years . STILL THERE summit meeting. During the war, Iraq sent two brigades A similar situation exists over the matter s to Jordan where they suffered of a compromise United Nations resolution. o of t of the treme left-wing regimes of Algeria and Syria. These governments have been pressing the other Arab states and Russia to keep the pot boiling. On two occasions, they have been able to head off steps that might have been the prologue to a settlement with Israel. First there Is the matter of a summit meeting of Arab leaders. It has been ardently advocated by King Hussein of Jordan. At a summit meeting, Hussein could ask the other Arabs to put up or shut up on the question of helping his shattered state survive. If they failed to meet his needs, as seems certain, the whole world would know about it. At that point, Hussein would be in a good position to turn to the United States for with lk s help, and even for an approach to ta But the Algerians and Syrians have, Israel Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 S 11286 Approved For ,~~pp04[05/25: CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 ~kSSUNAL RECORD- SENATE August 10, 1967 can be a In g this situation, doing proposition for the Ufa tea nothing paying States. The fills Television, like any other media, ful- to appeal to others to take an initiative more the -impasse more time goes by, the its noblest function when it moves on behalf of peace; we can take the ini- draws on without an agreement, the more peol>le to the good and better things of tiative ourselves. The procedures of the there will be promoted the Dense of realities life; when It motivates without preach- Security Council are open to this Nation which must precede any settlement. ing; When it corrects and changes with- as they are to any other to act on behalf out the discipline ever being noticed. of its own interests in the restoration of "THE ROAD TO NOWHERE," PRO- "The Road to Nowhere" is an example peace. of lc cal television at its finest. This Nation can move, in effect, to call GRAM OF KLZ-TV, DENVER, COLO. I congratulate KLZ-TV Denver, one up the resolution which. we introduced Mr. ALLOTT. Mr. President, I would of the Time-Life Broadcast family and see to it, if necessary, that the ques- like to call to the attention of the Mem- members, on a contribution in the pub- tion of taking it up is voted. The motion bers of this body the work of television lic interest that through its fine pro- is procedural and not subject to the veto. station KLZ-TV in Denver and a very grad "The Road to Nowhere" will be And if the resolution is taken up, this Na- remarkable program the station has sere. ng People for years to come. tion can move to see to it that all who created to help prevent teenage crime, I think every Senator here would be might be directly or indirectly involved called "The Road to Nowhere." it was interested in seeing this program and in the restoration of ;peace in Vietnam are produced by news director Jim Ben- l g it available to the people of his asked to appear before the Security net, written and filmed by Roly Dahl- oo t State. It is truly a very contributive Council in a discussion of this question- quist, and narrated by Don Roberts. if not in New York, then somewhere else, This fine station has an exceptional - perhaps in Geneva, in o record of public service down through pain session, face- the years. It has been the: winner of al- THE UNITED NATIONS-THE U.S. to-face meeting. most every major been award given for cr- RESOLUTION ON VIETNAM The invitation, moreover, can include not only ative public service programing. "The Mr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President, press any y other relevant and Hanoi but the NLF The Road to Nowhere" was recently given reports on yesterday indicate that the motion to invite, too, topang the well. T the coveted "Emmy" station award by executive branch is giving motion on the basis of sideration" to calling up the U.S. resolu- to veto. is procedural and not subject the National Academy of Television to veto. Arts and Sciences. tion on Vietnam which has been in a At-this late date I think it is essential I also wish to commend KLZ-TV and limbo at the Security Council since the that the world know where every member this fine program for additional bene- beginning of the year. I am delighted of the U.N. Security Council stands- fits it has wrought above and beyond that the Departments are thinking of the wherewe stand, where the Soviet Union, the awards it has won which, besides possi )ility because I know and can as- China, Hanoi, and all others stand-on the Emmy, include the Institute for Edu- sert ;hat the administration is most vi- the readiness to come to grips in prelim- cation by Radio, Sigma Delta Chi, and tally interested in the approach at the inary open discussions of the problems of Colorado Broadcasters Association. U.N. which was discussed the other day restoring peace in Vietnam, to the end "The Road to Nowhere" is a most by the distinguished Senator from Ken- that we may begin to find some basis for compelling indictment of crime and tucky [Mr. COOPER) and myself. the restoration of peace. criminal companions-but presented in I should like at this point to clarify Again, Mr. President, I compliment the such a mcomp ns -auto teenagers to what is involved in this approach, inas- executive branch and the :Department of stop and think-really stop and think- much as there are indications on the ba- State for giving serious consideration to before embarking on a life of crime., sis of Press reports from Moscow and this matter, and I express the hope that Prisoners tell the story of their own other sources that some sort of miracle or this Nation will take the 'lead in calling tragic lives in an attempt to let young- instant U.N. solution is expected by the up its own resolution on Vietnam at the sters g live of the ttemp to let young- Senator from Kentucky and myself. That Security Council in the near future. If we lawful sow o church, and of disobeying is the last thing that is anticipated. What are compelled to insist;upon votes on pre-ool, thorit paxental lawfuy. In an era that has seen too is exlse0ted, however, is an end to the unary and procedural questions, then much disregard for rightful authority, head-in-the-se,nd official position which I believe votes are in order, indeed, long the tone of this program: is most re- has been taken by the U.N. from the out- overdue. In my judgment, win or lose, the freshing-particularly when it is set by set. w hat is expected is a formal effort by effort to open discussions on peace in the prisoners themselves. the U.N. Security Council to create at Vietnam at the U.N. 'Security Council is KLZ-TV is making prints; of this half- least a small opening to peace, a small properly made and should be made at this hour program available free to televi- crack in the wall of war. time. Indeed, this Nation has everything sion stations around the United States Reports fror2 the Soviet Union indi- to gain and nothing to lose by making the with only two conditions attached; one, cate doubt in that nation as to the use- effort. that the film be shown at a time when fulness of the U.N. and a preference for Mr. COOPER. Mr.:President, will the young viewers have the best o time whe - a Geneva conference, yet the Soviet Senator yield? nity to see It; two, that a contribution Union has not :moved to convene a meet- Mr. MANSFIELD. I yield. In the amount of the station's choice be ing o f the Geneva conference-even Mr. COOPER. Mr. President, again, as sent to In of the New Life Founds- thoug] 1 it is it cochairman, and even I have in the past, I support the call of sins to Denver, o org Lifeion deli- though Great Britain, the other chair- the distinguished majority leader to our cated to the rehabilitation of prisoners man, has indicated time and time again Government to ask that it take the ini- on parole, and an organization which its willingness to join with Moscow to tiative, without any reservation, to bring feels It will be using the film for at least call fo, a reconvening of that conference. the matter of Vietnam before the Se- 5 years. Already "The Road to Nowhere" U 'chant has reiterated that he is curity Council of the - United Nations. has been shown in many: States and doubtful that any useful contribution I agree with him that whatever may be prints have been requested by five for- can bi: made by the Security Council; the disposition of other members of the eign countries. - yet he is not pursuing any unilateral ef- Security Council, and notwithstanding A Denver juvenile court judge keeps forts it this time and has announced statements of U Thant that it might not a film print in his office to show to teen- that he has no intention of doing so. be the most favorable! time, one never agers brought before him. The station I an impelled, therefore, to reiterate, knows what is the most favorable time. itself has telecast it three times since that the potential of the U.N., to con- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The time its first showing in November 1966, in tribute to peace in Vietnam has not been of the Senator from Montana has ex- prime evening time. More than 275 pri- explored, much less utilized. The U.N. is pired. vate showings of the film have been not a one-man show or a one-nation Mr. MANSFIELD. M:r. President, I ask made to club, civic, church, and school show. It is an organization with a charter unanimous consent that the Senator groups in the Denver area to audiences and procedures for moving in the kind from Kentucky be recognized for 3 totaling more than 26,000 and reserva- of situition which exists in Vietnam. minutes. tions for private showings, now handled This Nation should welcome help from The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without by Denver Junior- Chamber of Com- third parties, Mr. President, but we can.. objection, it is so ordered. merce, have been made for several not and should not wait for them to pur- Mr. COOPER. Now is the most favor- months in advance. sue our diplomacy for us. We do not have able time todo what is right and neces- Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 S 1136#pproved For Release C2" iWAF DWJ 69R ff%00043-4 August 10, 1967 projects or activities assisted under Federal programs to which funds may be allocated pursuant to this section. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY TRUST FUND SEC. 104 (a). There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the "Economic Oppor- tunity Trust Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the "Trust Fund"). The Trust Fund shall consist of such amounts as may be appropri- ated or credited to the Trust Fund as pro- vided in this section. (b) There is hereby appropriated to the Trust Fund, out of any money in the Treas- ury not otherwise appropriated, amounts equivalent to 33i/ per centum of the taxes which may be received under a surcharge on individual and corporate income tax liabili- ties. (c) The amounts appropriated by para- graph (b) shall be transferred at least monthly from the general fund of the Treas- ury to the Trust Fund on the basis of esti- mates by the Secretary of the Treasury of the amounts, referred to in_paragraph (b), received in the Treasury. Proper adjustments shall be made in the amounts subsequently transferred to the extent prior estimates were in excess of or less than the amounts required to be transferred. (d) There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Trust Funds, as repay- able advances or otherwise, such additional sums as may be required to make the ex- penditures referred to in subsection (f). (e) It shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Treasury to hold and manage the Trust Funds, and to,, the extent necessary and appropriate he shall have for this purpose the same powers as are conferred upon him by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1959 (23 U.S.C. sec. 101) to hold and man- age the Highway Trust Fund. (f) Amounts in the Trust Fund shall be available for expenditure and allocation un- der section 102 of this Act, and shall remain available until expended. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS SEC. 105 (a). The President shall carry out the programs established in this Act dur- ing the fiscal years ending June 30, 1968, and June 30, 1969, and during the succeed- ing eight fiscal years. For the purpose of carrying out this Act, there is hereby au- thorized to be appropriated the sum of $2 billion for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1968, $3 billion for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1969, and for succeeding years such sums may be appropriated as the Congress may hereafter authorize by law through June 30, 1977. (b) Such authorizations and any such appropriations shall be in addition to au- thorizations and appropriations already made for programs eligible for assistance under this Act. (c) Funds authorized and appropriated pursuant to this Act shall remain available for allocation or expenditure for two addi- tional fiscal years after the fiscal year for which they were authorized and ap- propriated. Mr. JAVITS. Mr. President, I conclude as follows: We have all been talking, at least a good deal of debate has been had, about the Marshall plan. I have done my best to implement this concept, in order to lay before the Senate what can con- ceivably be done in more specific terms than those which are usually loosely used when we speak of the Marshall plan. I have come up with a figure, Mr. Presi- dent, and a plan by which this might be started. I commend it to my fellow Sen- ators for study and careful thought. As one who has lived a full lifetime in and with the slums, I can tell my fellow Senators that I do not believe the job can be done any differently than through a massive application of resources at a given target within a given period of time. The means must be massive. Finally, Mr. President, this effort would infinitely more than pay for itself, even in the hardest-headed financial terms, in terms of increases in income, in the improved vitality and -skills of our people, in the devotion of our people to the American system, and in the enor- mously increased tax base which will re- sult for cities and States. It is accomplishable, Mr. President. In- deed, the figure which I have named- $50 billion-is a fraction of the gross an- nual product of the United States for 1 year. This is the order of magnitude which Is required. It implements the words "Marshall plan," which are magic words. The idea was an enormous success on the foreign front and I think it can be on the domestic front. It offers to the Sen- ate a plan and a channel through which this accomplishment can be effected. CORRECTION OF THE RECORD Mr. GRIFFIN. Mr. President, in the RECORD of August 8, 1967, on page 511089, my name appears as a cosponsor of amendment No. 246, which is referred to on that page. My name is included among the names of sponsors in error; and I ask unanimous consent that the permanent RECORD be corrected ac- cordingly. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. oQ `- L THAL GAS IN YEMEN Mr. GRIFFIN. Mr. President, per- sistent accounts of the use of lethal gas in Yemen have appeared from time to time in the Nation's press. Some of these charges were investigated by an Inter- national Committee of the Red Cross. On July 28, 1967, the New York Times published the full text of the Red Cross report, as follows: TEXT OF THE RED CROSS REPORT ON THE USE OF POISON GAS IN YEMEN (By Andre Rochat) WASHINGTON, July 27.-On May 11, 1967, the I.C.R.C. delegation in Jidda received ap- peals for assistance from the two villages of Gadafa and Gahar in the Wadi Herran, in the southwestern Jauf. According to these appeals a proportion of the inhabitants of these villages had been poisoned by gas dropped from raiding airplanes. Some hours later this news was confirmed by representatives of the Yemeni Royalists and by the Saudi Arabian authorities, who requested the I.C.R.C. delegation to go im- mediately to the assistance of the victims. The head of the delegation decided to pro- ceed immediately to the scene, accompanied by another delegate, two doctors and a male nurse; members of the I.C.R.C. medical team, and a Yemeni escort. The two-lorry convoy, loaded with food and medical supplies, left Amara on May 13, after having given due notice of its line of march and timetable to the Egyptian authorities. Unfortunately, following an air attack on the I.C.R.C. convoy, it was not until the night of May 16-16 that the mission reached Gahar. This village is situated atop a hill some 500 feet in height. All the houses are clustered closely together, giving the appear- ance of a small fortress. ACCOUNTS OF SURVIVORS According to the inhabitants, 75 people were gassed during a raid in the early hours of May 10, 1967. The account given by the survivors is as follows : The bombers circled the village for some time then dropped three bombs on the hill- side, east of and below the village, two or three hundred yards away to windward (wind direction from east to west). No houses were damaged. The explosions were relatively mild. The bomb craters were about eight feet in diameter and 20 inches deep, smaller than the usual craters. Twenty minutes after dropping the three gas bombs, the planes dropped four or five high-explosive bombs on the village and the western flank of the hill. Only one of these bombs caused any damage; this was sustained by a house in the center of the village. Many animals, Including almost 200 cat- tle, sheep, goats, donkeys and numerous birds, were also killed. The villagers, who were not contaminated, buried the dead ani- mals in a large pit west of the village, whilst the 75 humans killed were buried in four large communal graves. REPORT OF OBSERVATIONS The I.C.R.C. delegates, for their part, ob- served the following: They inspected the village for several hours, checking, whenever possible, the ac- curacy of the information mentioned above. The doctors examined the four surviving gas casualties. Their medical report is at- tached hereto. The head of the mission had one of the four communal graves opened. There were 15 corpses in it. An immediate autopsy by Dr. Brutschin and Dr. Janin left no doubt that death was due to pulmonary edema (see attached medical report and photo- graph). The 75 gas casualties were either within range of the gas when it was released or were in its path as it was blown by the wind. Some of the victims were found dead in their homes, as if they had died in their sleep. Other inhabitants, working in the fields or watching over the livestock, were east- ward of the area where the gas bombs fell, some of them very near to the spot, and none of them were affected. The four survivors who were In the con- taminated area are all in pain from their eyes and almost blind. All have pains in the chest and none has any wound. The doctors cannot testify to an air raid with gas bombs of which they were not per- sonally witness. On the other hand, they stress that all the evidence leads to the con- clusion that edema was caused by the breath- ing of poison gas. The delegates were later informed that on May 17 and 13 the villages of Gabas, Nofal, Gadr and, for the second time, Gadafa were raided with gas bombs and that as a result 243 persons were killed. Mr. President, the use of lethal gas in Yemen has been reported on several oth- er occasions by British as well as Yemeni sources. The Israel Government reported that gas containers were found in the Sinai desert at positions evacuated by the retreating Egyptian Army in tht wake of the Arab-Israel confict. Mr. President, the use of gas in war- fare was specifically condemned by tht 1925 Geneva Convention. As an instrument of death, poison gar does not discriminate between soldie and civilian. Borne by the prevailint - Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 August 10, 1967 ApprolTOa2~600T/, CIASRPA00369R000200300043011363 My bill would make a start on this effort by providing new money for the first 2 of these 10 years through an ear- marking of one-third of the revenues of the President's proposed income surtax, thereby producing about $5 billion. over the 2-year period. If the income surtax is not passed, the bill would make the added funds available by direct authori- zation and appropriation of $5 billion in new funds. The sound and fury of congressional and public reaction to the riots has al- ready produced the introduction of bills to provide emergency assistance. But the riots which have racked American cities in recent weeks are evidence of a deep- seated social illness which will not be cured in a day or a year. The breakdown of an orderly and adequate system for the redress of grievances and the wide- spread alienation of a significant portion of our population present a major na- tional crisis which requires a major na- tional commitment of long duration. Short-term and emergency measures are needed, but they must not divert us from the opportunity of seizing this occasion to face up to the long-term needs-of recognizing them and charting them out. The Administration must not and the Congress must not simply divert funds from one purpose to another to meet the emergency needs of the hour' and let it go at that. This is robbing Peter to pay Paul. We must heed the call of the Marshall plan concept for our cities, which was to my knowledge first raised by Whitney Young of the Urban League and was endorsed by me over a year ago and most recently by Vice President HUMPHREY and others, to make a new commitment and to advance new funds. My proposal would notcreate new pro- grams. We have, in. model cities, the Economic Opportunity Act, the Man- power Development and Training Act, the- Housing Act, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and in other laws of this type, all or most of the pro- gram authority which we need. What we do not have are the necessary authoriza- tions and appropriations within this existing framework. The bill I am intro- ducing would make new money avail- able to the President to be allocated to these existing programs, or to new pro- grams serving the same purposes, to increase their impact over the next 2 years and would include a moral com- mittment'if the program went well to continue it for a decade. The President would also be authorized to use such funds to help public and private organ- izations to meet their responsibilities under these Federal programs to pro- vide non-Federal matching funds.' The money for these purposes would come from either of two sources. First, and preferably, the bill would earmark one-third of the revenues to be raised under the President's new 2-ye4r in- come surtax proposal , if it is enacted into law, for expansion of these anti- slum and antipoverty programs. We are told that this is not a war tax; if that be the case then let us be sure of that fact by allocating some of its revenues to domestic programs of overriding priority. Since it is expected that $6.3 billion would be raised in fiscal year 1968, and mo:~e in fiscal year 1969, this earmarking p ovision would make funds on the order A $5 billion available over the' next 2 years for expansion of the programs designed to cure urban ills. The bill. provides a carryover of funds so that if as sy amou:,,its were not ex- pended in the .year for which they were appropriated they could be carried over for use in thi: succeeding 2 fiscal years. Funds thus earmarked from the Pres- ident's proposed income surtax would be appropriated to an "economic oppor- tunity trust fund," similar in operation to the highway trust fund. The establishment of this trust Sind assures a minimum level of expenditures and continuity for the programs dedicat- ed to eliminating poverty and providing economic sect Lrity. It should be doted that earmarking a prescribed p:rcentage of general re- venues for a specific purpose is not un- usual on the State level. In my own State of New York, fqr example, the law re- quires that ogle=ninth of the State's per- sonal income, fax collections be deposited in a fund now devoted to financing bonds for the construction of mental health facilities;' A second approach provided in the bill is direct autt orization. of appropriations from eneral Treasury revenues of $2 bil- lion fiscal year 1968 and $3 billion in fiscal year 1939. If funds were forthcom- ing nder they earmarking of the income surtx appropriations to implement this news uthoriztion would not have to be enae d. As evidence of the congression- al inte t to c .rry on these programs un- til the *eed is. satisfied, the bill makes reference - to authorizations extending through fis'r it year 1977 in the same manner in which the original Marshall plan legislatiunaf 1943 sought, in similar terms, to ind:.cate 'J,S. commitment over a 4-year pet iod without actually com- mitting fund: ? beyond thefirst year. This is an experience very fresh in my mind, as I participated in drafting that very provision of the Marsha .l~lan. The $5 bill: on that my bill would make available would, of course, only, be the beginning in terms of really meetlg the problem. I would hope that afte these first 2 yearn of additional allot ents the administration would recogni the need and would build up its existin pro- grams to nee led levels. And, letnc one think that these evels would tax our capacities beyond eason- able limits, for, as the freedom, budget pointed out, a provision of $1 ~5 billion a year would amount to anwerage of only 2 percent. of the estim d annual gross national product betten the 1966- 75 period. Ard as the aut ors of that re- port so aptl' pointed: What could better illustr3,te that the whole question of whether we "can (ford" the "freedom budget" is a mor question and not an economic, issae?t Mr. Presideirft, I ask unanimous con- sent that tly text of my bill be printed in the RECORD. The PP(EEIDING OFFICER. The bill will be.-'received and appropriately re- ferred" and, without objection, the bill will be printod in the RECORD, in accord- ance with the request of the Senator from New York. The bill (S. 2274) to provide addi- tional funds for programs designed to eradicate poverty and urban slums by reserving certain revenues raised under a surcharge on income tax liabilities and by other means, introduced by Mr.,JAVITS, was received, read twice by its title, re- ferred to the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, and ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: ,.-~ S. 2274 A'e it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the "Domestic Marshall Plan Act" of 1967. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF PURPOSE SECTION 101. The Congress hereby finds and declares that a new dedication of na- tional will and resources must be made to improve the quality of urban life and sub- stantially to eradicate poverty in the United States. The high concentration of unem- ployed and low-income persons in certain urban and rural areas, the heavy migration of persons of limited skills into urban areas, and the deterioration of housing and of pub- lic services in the city slums have resulted in conditions that degrade human dignity, are basic causes of riots and civil disturbance, threaten internal security, and require a re- assessment of our national priorities. The Congress further finds and declares that such conditions must not and need not be allowed to persist in this country and that it is the first domestic priority of the United States substantially to end poverty and to eradicate widespread urban blight and decay within the foreseeable future; and that pres- ent programs to achieve these purposes are receiving inadequate public funds and pri- vate participation. The purpose of this Act is to commit addi- tional resources over an extended period of time to programs of job training, employ- ment, economic development, small business, housing, health, income maintenance, com- munity development and individual and family services in order to dedicate this Na- tion to the elimination of poverty, to the eradication of degrading slums and the estab- lishment of economic security for our citizens. ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM SEC. 102. (a) The Presiden, with the advice of the Economic Opportunity Council, is au- thorized to allocate funds made available under this Act to existing programs, or to new programs adopted after the effective date of the Act, designed: (1) provide work training and employment opportunities, including supportive services, for unemployed or low-income persons; (2) promote economic - development in order to provide job opportunities for un- employed or low-income persons; (3) assist in the establishment or strength- ening of small business enterprises located in areas of high concentration of unemployed or low-income persons or owned by low- income residents of such areas; (4) provide public or private: housing for low-income persons; (5) promote community development ac- tivities in areas of substantial concentra- tion of low-income persons; (6) provide income support for low-income individuals or families; and (7) provide individual and family services, including health, education and legal serv- ices, to low-income persons. (b) The President is authorized to make grants or loans to public or private agencies or organizations to meet up to 80 percent of the aggregate amount of non-Federal con- tributions otherwise required to be made to Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 August 10, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE winds, gas inflicts its horror on men, wo- men, children, animals, and crops alike, without regard to status as combatants or noncombatants. Needless to say, the use of gas war- faxe invites retaliation in kind, In an age when sophisticated chemical warfare agents are readily available to almost every nation; the possibility of escalat- ing poison gas warfare looms as a ter- rifying prospect. To date, our State Department has "condemned" the use of poison gas, and our Government has voiced "concern" in the United Nations. But, Mr. President, that is not enough. I propose that the United States in- troduce a resolution in the Security Council of the United Nations calling for establishment of a five-nation Commis- sion to investigate and take action con- cerning the use of lethal gas in the Middle East. I believe that such a Commission should be authorized to- First, determine the source and loca- tion of such poison gas in the Middle East, if it exists; Second, seek assurances from the Soviet Union and other Communist bloc nations that no chemical warfare agents are now being supplied to the Middle East; Third, demand on-site inspection to insure observance of an embargo on such chemical warfare agents, and make sure that any existing supplies in the area are destroyed; and Fourth, insist upon reparations for the victims of poison gas attacks. Some apologists for the administration seem- to indicate that our Government may be reluctant to pursue this matter at the present time for fear of being re- garded as too "pro-Israel." I see no, reason to hesitate mer8ly because our words and actions might antagonize the perpetrators of such criminal acts. The use of poison gas is not just a crime against a race or a nation; it is a crime against humanity. From the first gas attacks in the trenches in France during World War I, to the murder of 6 million Jews in World War II, the use of poison gas in war has been universally and justifiably condemned. In Yemen, gas warfare has been a crime of Arab against Arab. As the leader of the free world, the United States should speak out and condemn such atrocities whenever they occur. As a great nation surely we have an obligation to do more than the record reflects to :date. The people of the United States have a right to expect no less than the action I propose today. I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the RECORD an article entitled "Why Israel Stocked Up on Gas Masks," written by Col. Ray Cromley, and pub- lished in the Detroit, Mich., News, of August 8, 1967. There being no objection, the article was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: WHY ISRAEL STOCKED UP ON GAS MASKS (By Col. Ray Cromley) WASHINGTON,--There is no longer doubt that the Soviet Union Is using the civil war in Yemen as a proving ground for some of Its advanced "poison gas" warfare chemicals. The Russian chemicals were supplied to Egyptian forces which are providing the bulk of the military power of the rebels against the Yemeni royalist government. The chemical agents have proven highly effective in some of the about five confirmed cases of their use in the desolate country at the southwestern tip of the Arabian penin- sula. This information was obtained from sources which this reporter respects. The Egyptian use of Russian mankilling chemicals in Yemen, first reported in Jan- uary, so worried the Israeli armed forces that they made heavy purchases of gas masks at the start of the June fighting with Egypt. The Saudi Arabian government, which sup- ports the Yemeni royalists, has protested this use of chemical warfare to the secretary- general of the United Nations. Thus far, Secretary-General U Thant has refused to take any action other than to ask Egypt if its troops were using gas in Yemen. The Cairo government replied that they were not. It can be stated, however, that the Russian chemicals were supplied to Egypt in the form of thin-walled "bombs" which break open and spread their chemical agents over a wide area. The Russian-sponsored experiments seem to have been systematic. The Egyptians have not used the chemicals generally in the war but only in certain areas. The attacks have been carefully selected and the techniques and agents used have varied. Russian-built IL-28s, which have been supplied in quantity to the Egyptian air force, were used to carry the bombs over the royalist targets. There is reason to be- lieve Russian technicians supervised the aerial attacks and the use of the chemical "bombs." There is no evidence that Russians piloted the planes. The chemicals being used are of several types. One is a particularly deadly nerve agent (commonly called a nerve gas) which kills quickly. Analysis of fabric found with bomb splinters after one raid showed traces of organic phosphorous compounds which are essential components of "nerve gas." According to Saudi Arabian medical re- ports, there are indications that several man-killer chemicals were used in combi- nation in some areas. In Russian scientific literature, Soviet sci- entists have reported finding chemical or bacteriological agents used in combination are more effective as killers than when used singly, Military experts make two points about these gas attacks: They recall that Russia as well as Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy used the 1936- 39 Spanish civil war as a proving ground for weapons and tactics used full-scale in World War II. The deserts and mountains of Yemen are an ideal location for such experiments since communications inside the country and with the outside world range from nonexistent to primitive. Few independent observers or journalists have been able to tour the battlefield areas. And quick follow-up Investigation of gas attacks Is essential since the evidence rap- idly fades away. The Yemen Unit 2 of the International Committee of the Red Cross did report to its regional office on Jan. 14 the gas attack nine days earlier on Kitaf, Yemen. The unit insisted that its members be provided with gas masks before they could continue their work. The isolated nature of Yemen explains in part, perhaps, the absence of any world out- cry against the use of toxic chemical warfare. In thoroughly reported Vietnam, the occa- sional use last year of nonlethal riot control gas by U.S. forces set off public demonstra- S 11365 tions and government criticism in both the Communist and non-Communist worlds. The failure to act of UN Secretary-General U Thant-is less easily explained. Thant took no steps toward sending an investigating team to interview victims of the attacks, to study gas samples or to analyze the remains of deal animals. There is no sign to date that the UN will ask both sides in the Yemeni fighting for the right to send an Investigating team into the area to discourage future attacks or to get the evidence if they occur. Thant has refused to make at this time even a general statement condemning the use of lethal gas without mentioning Yemen or implicating Egypt or the Soviet Union. In a letter on April 3 to Jamil Baroody, Saudi Arabian ambassador at the UN, Thant wrote: "In view of the fact that the secretary- general of the United Nations, in being faith- ful to the ideals and principles of the United Nations, is necessarily against war and all waxlike acts, including the, use of lethal gas anywhere by anyone, and since,- as you well know, I have repeatedly given expression to this attitude, I do not believe that any use- ful purpose would be served in acting on this suggestion at the present time." Baroody had noted in earlier correspond- ence that Secretary Thant had not been re- luctant to make statements about the war in Vietnam. CONTRIBUTION OF OEO EMPLOY- EES TO THE PREVENTION OF DISTURBANCES Mr. PELL. Mr. President, we have been deluged by statements concerning em- ployees of, or participants in, Office of Economic Opportunity programs and their alleged 'involvement in the civil disturbances which have recently oc- curred in our Nation. Most of these have been critical of the Office of Economic Opportunity people, blaming them for inciting, contributing to, or at least hav- ing an approving attitude about the riots. I am compelled to speak about these allegations. Recently, in my own State of Rhode Island, there were some disturbances. I am very happy to report that through the effective and wise work of the Provi- dence and State police, the city officials, and the important contribution of per- sons connected with Progress for Provi- dence, these disorders were held to a minimum. Progress for Providence, Inc., is the antipoverty agency in the capital city of Rhode Island. This agency is dedi- cated to the goal of improving living conditions among the poor. Categorically it can be said that one did not find em- ployees of this community action agency walking the streets calling for civil dis- orders-on the contrary they walked the streets of Providence on the 1st, 2d, 3d, and 4th of August calling on the people to return to their homes, and to use the vernacular, "cool it." These poverty workers have been given much of the credit for averting a major outbreak in Providence. After the first night of violence, the Providence Jour- nal carried the following feature, which I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the RECORD at this point. There being no objection, the article was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 S 11366 ANTIPOVERTY WORKERS PLAY AN ACTIVE ROLE Antipoverty workers were active along with police in South Providence last night and played a major role in trying to prevent a' major outbreak. One Incident, in particular, illustrated the role played by the volunteers from Progress for Providence, Inc., the city's antipoverty agency. At about 9:30 p.m., a group.of about 20 youths gathered on Prairie Avenue and began moving toward the Willard Avenue Shopping Center. Kenneth it. Delves, of 261 Rhodes St., a young assistant director of the agency's South Providence drop-in center on Prairie Avenue, began to, follow the group from its starting point at Blackstone Street. Using a bullhorn, he urged the crowd re- peatedly to go to the center. "Listen," he called. "We've got to get back to the drop-in center. That's why it's there." The gang continued to move toward Com- stock Avenue and the shopping plaza. Police remained in the background while Mr. Delves continued his pleading. When the crowd arrived at Comstock Ave- nue, it stopped and listened to a sailor who tried to stir them up with inflammatory re- marks. After a few minutes, however, Mr. Delves regained the youths' attention,, telling them firmly: "Now come on-I'm on my knees to you guys." The group heeded Mr. Delves' urging this time and moved to the drop-in center, where most of them remained. It was 15 minutes after Mr. Delves began using his bullhorn. It was one of those turning points that kept the area relatively calm before midnight. Mr. FELL. Mr. President; Sgt. Manuel Rodrigues of the Providence Police De- partment is quoted as saying about the poverty workers: They did a good job; a very good job. Going further than Sergeant Rod- rigues, Mayor Doorley, of Providence, stated: As far as I'm concerned, there's no telling how bad this might have been if it hadn't been for you guys. I ask unanimous consent to have printed at this point in the RECORD an article entitled, "Mayor Praises Work of Police, Poverty Aides," published in the Bulletin on Thursday, August 3, 1967. There being no ob7'ectibn, the article was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: MAYOR PRAISES WORK OF POLICE, POVERTY AIDES Providence Mayor Joseph A. Doorley Jr. today gave high praise to city police and antipoverty workers for their efforts in try- ing to head off and then quelling the dis- turbances in South Providence Monday and Tuesday nights. The police, the mayor told his press con- ference, showed "remarkable restraint" in handling the trouble, a factor that un- doubtedly prevented even greater violence. As for the antipoverty workers, the mayor said, they were invaluable in helping to deal with the people of the community and the city does not intend to lose contact with them. Some of these workers conceivably could have been on the other side during the dis- turbances in South Providence last summer, the mayor said. Now there is great rapport between them and the police, he added. Mr. PELL. Mr. President, these teams of poverty workers went without sleep and did everything possible to help offi- cials control the area-from getting peo- CONGRES,IONAL RECORD - SENATE August 10, 1967 pie home, informing them of the curfew, to helping the police in any way possible. Their w3rk was further described in the Providence Journal of August 3. I ask unanimous consent that this article be printed at this point in the RECORD. There being no objection, the article was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: "SOUL PATROL" CHECKS: QUIET WAS UNBELIEVABLE (By C. Fraser Smith) Team:r of Progress for Providence worker/ strolled through a bushed South Providence last night unable to believe the quiet of-,the Section in which most of them grew up. Organized into teams of four, the "Soul Patrol" moved out of the Willard. Avenue Shopping Center shortly after nine. With them v as a woman who was not aware of the curfew set by city officials yesterday. Escorting her home, they walked by the vacant house o:a Prairie Avenue between Dudley and Blackstone Streets where snipers exchan led fire with police'Tuesday night. Robert Young, 19, of 109 Chester Ave., stopped at the corner house on the north side of the street, He pointed at several bullet holes in the peeling white columns of the house. The night before the street had been tilled vith the sound of gunfire. Last night, the Entire area was calm. Four young people walked quickly by the white helmeted patrol.,They said they would get off the stl eet. "We are ope{ating on the theory that many people don't know about the curfew," one of the workerjy said. They turned left on Dud- ley Street, here firemen had been pelted by bottles a d pricks two nights before. For the fl, jet 10I yards along the unlighted street they : net o:ze. Barking dogs offered the only break In the stillness. "I've nev seen it this quiet here and I've been .iving this area for 12 years," Young said. "It's-almost too quiet," Said Felix Donaiwa, 27, v ho is Working with the antipoverty agency to develop a rehabilitation program for d: rug addict, Frcm the end of Dudley Street, they turned down West Clifford at about 9:10 p.m., after spealing to people in'a car. The driver had pulle i away immediately. At West Clifford and Peart;ytreet they cor- ralled three youngsters walking down from Broai Street. These three were esbprted home also. \ At Pearl Street and Prairie Avenue, a spot where a brick smashed the windshi Id of a police car on the first night of the sturb- ance r, they turned back toward the enter. The first police car they had seen assed slowly at 9:45 P.M. Coming again to the corner of Dudley Stre st, they turned left and moved ward Rhole.Island Hospital. A younger boy in a white tee shir passed going swiftly the other way. "The min's go- ing to grab you. It's going to cost yqu if you get naught," be was told. A aother youth taunted them g tly. "Why don't you guys have billy clubs. " he asked. `hey, I forgot where my souse is,'- he added. They kept walking as he left the street. "Any trouble up there yet, Robert," some- one yelled from the shadows referring to the cen ter. "Not yet, " he answered. At Dudley and Gay they met the only group who refused ':o listen: "They knew about the curfew, but they're going to stay out," said Lester Fairweather, 22, a detached worker. They turr..ed down Gay to Blackstone, turned right and moved past the Flynn School. Half way up the block they stopped to talk to Walter Steele, 58, of 239 Black- stone St. I just put my wife on the bus for Dela- ware, ' he said. "She's got a heart condition.". Mr. Steele, who has a grocery store at the corner of Blackstone and Gay Streets, said he hoped he'd get some sleep. "I CAN'T FIGHT" "I haven't been to sleep in two days," he said. He had been up watching the turmoil in the center from his porch, while keeping an eye on his store, he said. "I can't fight," he said. "I'm 58 years old. I'll fight for my rights, but I can't go up there with those guys." By then It was 10. A car passed and was stopped by Mr. Fairweather's whistle. "He was coming in from New Bedford. Didn't know about the curfew," he reported. Later, while checking out reports of fire bombs on the East Side, the workers said they had hoped the curfew would be ex- tended to that area. "What I'm worried about," said Lonnie Wilkinson, 22, of 105 Rugby St., "is what will happen at 1 a.m. when all those joints close down." He was afraid that a lot of people would begin to move back into the South Providence with trouble in mind, FAINTLY IN RED They drove beyond Cypress Street and stopped in front of a boarded store front with the letters painted faintly in red. Someone reported trouble on Pleasant Street. They turned around.. As their car came to the intersection of Pleasant and Camp Street, they stopped. The macadam disappeared down a black cav- ern. There were no street lights. "Boy, I'm not driving down there," the driver said, "Saul Brother or not." But they would walk, they decided. "If we can see them we can talk to them," they reasoned. More than 10 of the 29 Progress for Provi- dence workers were in the Camp Street area by then. They stopped each police car they passed. "Can we help you?" they asked. The police briefed them each time, There was teamwork. Mr. PELL, Mr. President, tribute for the job done came from all segments of the community. I think that an editorial from the Providence Evening Bulletin of August 4 aptly describes the role played by Progress for Providence during the outbreaks. I ask unanimous consent that this editorial be printed at this point in the RECORD. There being no objection, the editorial was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: ON THE SCENE To HELP if antipoverty workers have been instru- mental in stirring up trouble in some U.S. cities this summer, as charged, the evidence is quite the contrary in Providence. When trouble began in South Providence Monday night, workers for Progress for Provi- dence stepped in without hesitation to assist police officers on the scene. Donning helmets, they went among groups of. neighborhood youths, pleading for an end to the disturb- ance and asking them to disperse. One worker used a police bullhorn for three hours, ap- pealing for law and order. Observers said his efforts were effective. Tuesday night, volunteers from the agency again formed the vanguard of those attempt- ing to restore calm in the troubled area. Police held lack as the workers pleaded with the crowd. "Now come on," one volunteer shouted. "I'm on my knees to you guys." Eventually, gunfire forced the police to step in, but the volunteers' efforts had not been wasted. Mayor Joseph A. Doorley Jr. extended this well-earned praise. "As far as I'm concerned," he said, "there's no telling how bad this might have been if It hadn't been for you Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 August 10, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE principal of which shall be repayable in an- nual installments equal to 21/2 per centum of their face value. The principal amount of such bonds issued by the Secretary in any fiscal year shall not exceed the amount by which national defense expenditures for that fiscal year are greater than such expendi- tures for fiscal 1965. The provisions of section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 355) shall not apply to any obligations issued by authority of this Act. The authority pro- vided by this Act expires upon the determi- nation by the President that the United States is no longer engaged in hostilities to protect the independence of the Rgpublic of South Vietnam. B POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO ARAB REFUGEE PROBLEM The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under previous order of the House, the gentle- man from New York [Mr. FARSSTEIN] is recognized for 60 minutes. Mr. FARBSTEIN. Mr. Speaker, when Israel occupied substantial segments of territory previously held by Jordan, Egypt, and Syria during the war last June, many of us who were familiar with conditions in the Middle East felt a deep foreboding about the problem of the Arab refugees. Ever since the 1948 war, the refugee problem /had been one of the principal contributing factors to instability in the Middle East. During these 19 long years, the Arab States did nothing to resolve the problem and Israel, perhaps, did less than it might have done. But while Israel accepted hundreds of thousands of Jew- ish refugees from Arab lands, it, at least, made overtures to solve simultaneously the problem of the displaced Arabs. The Arab states, however, responded to none of these overtures and refused to hear of a settlement. In seeking to perpetuate the suffering of the refugees for their own political purposes, I believe the Arab States have borne the burden of respon- sibility for this misfortune. But we have all paid the price. Of the 1,300,000 refugees that were under UNWRA care, some 700,000 have now come under Israel jurisdiction. More refugees have since joined them, perhaps hundreds of thousands, victims 'of the war last June. The number is un- certain, for there has been a consistent pattern of disseml ling to inflate the re- fugee rolls. But Israel, a country of only 21/2 million itself, obviously cannot ab- sorb them, whether there are a million or 2 million. Not only are its resources inadequate, but it would be politically absurd for Israel to try to give homes to millions of people who have vowed their eternal enmity to Israel's existence. In a framework of peace and security Israel may be satisfied to negotiate the return of all or part of the land on which the refugees are currently settled; but since the Arab governments refuse to negotiate a peace, Israel has no choice but to maintain its jurisdiction. Arab leaders recognize that the presence of the refugees suits their purposes by mak- ing life difficult for Israel. As for the refugees themselves, the Arab States seem to consider them political pawns to be manipulated as policy demands. They have not treated the refugees as human beings, so it has been impossible to appeal to a humanitarian impulse within the Arab world. Within the past few days, Mr. Speaker, it has become increasingly clear that the Arab chiefs who look upon the refugees as a source of turmoil have assessed the situation with some accuracy. Arab propagandists are again at work with their messages of hate and destruction. The shock of the first days of war has worn off and the troublemakers again find receptive ears. We have only to take note of the general strikq of Arab mer- chants in Jerusalem last week. By the agreement of all observers, Israel has treated the Jerusalem Arabs well. The strike indicates the kind of behavior one could expect en masse if Israel tried to absorb some millions of Arabs. That be- havior might range from civil disobedi- ence, such as we saw in Jerusalem, or guerrilla warfare, such as was conducted for years from the Gaza Strip. The Arab refugees are restless. They are being stirred up. They may soon be contribut- ing actively, as they have in the past, to instability in the Middle East. Four years ago, I visited Israel and.I made an extensive study of the refugees living under United Nations jurisdiction on the Israel frontiers. I warned then that "unless the United States takes the initiative, another decade will find that the Palestine Arab refugees have become even more institutionalized and more difficult to integrate." I made 10 recom- mendations for the purpose of restoring fluidity to the situation. They were not followed-with a result that we all know-another round of destructive war. I visited Israel again last month and found the situation much worse than be- fore. Millions of dollars had been spent, most of them by the United States, to sustain the refugees. But the years brought no improvement. Conditions have obviously become more threaten- ing and all our money and efforts have been wasted. I repeat now that the United States must act if war is not again to be the fruit of our efforts. Mr. Speaker, it is against our national interest to allow the current refugee situ- ation to continue, deteriorating as it does week by week. If the volatile situation in the Middle East explodes once more, the price may be much heavier for all of us. I believe we cannot afford, no matter what the cost, to permit the current refugee problem to rigidify, as it did after the 1948 war. Solutions obviously become more difficult, Mr. Speaker, in ratio to their rigidity. Unfortunately, my recommendations of 4 years ago will no longer do. Had they been followed then, I believe the refugee problem would have been re- duced to manageable limits. But that is spilled milk and we must look elsewhere for an answer. That is why, Mr. Speaker, I believe that a dramatic gesture of constructive good will on our part is both mandatory and urgent. That is why I feel the time has come to divest ourselves of some pre- conceptions. It is the moment for cour- age and audacity. I would like, Mr. Speaker, for the Pres- ident of the. United States to announce at once his willingness to accept into this country 25,000 refugees of the Arab- Israeli wars. I have no animosity for the Arab peo- ple, nor do my fellow Americans. On the contrary, I believe they can make pro- ductive citizens of this country. My study into the refugees 4 years ago indi- cated that, with relatively little training, many of them could be made into highly skilled workers. I believe that many Arabs would gladly accept the offer to settle in the United States and that the United States would absorb them with almost no difficulty. It is delusive to expect miracles, Mr. Speaker, but I would hope that such a gesture on our part would produce a chain reaction that might lead to the end of one of the most troublesome as- pects of the Middle Eastern morass. I would look to the other countries of the West to make similar gestures. Most of the Western European countries are still short of labor. Australia and New Zealand welcome immigrants. Canada, Brazil, and Argentina have already of- fered to accept some Arab refugees. The West has room for more Arab peoples. The nations of the Communist bloc would, I hope, behave with equivalent magnanimity. Certainly they could do no less than the nations of the West to assist their recent allies. The various international philanthrop- ic organizations, including the agencies of the United Nations, would, I am sure, cooperate in a major resettlement pro- gram. If I am right in foreseeing events, then surely all the Arab States would be put to tremendous pressure to take in their own brethren, to the limit of their capac- ity. Certainly, we would help them make the transition, because we would rather spend our money on resettlement than on reconstruction made necessary by another war. How long could the Arab leaders resist welcoming the refugees, if they were being welcomed by peoples throughout the world? I have no doubt that Israel would also make its contribution, if such a chain of events were underway. Israel is ready to take a proportionate part of the re- sponsibility for the integration of the refugees into society, though obviously it cannot take the full responsibility. Israel has clearly indicated that it would help. Once the momentum of resettlement begins, we may be able to resolve this problem. The time has come, at least, to make a beginning. We will solve noth- ing by paralysis. The initiative in this field must lead to negotiations in a variety of other fields where differences remain acute. We must restore fluidity to a situation which is rapidly worsen- ing. Peace in the Middle East requires no less of us, and the cause is worth our ef- fort. Mr. Speaker, in my report to the Con- gress in 1963, I stated: Although I do not regard the solution of the Arab refugee problem as the key issue between Israel and the Arab states, I am convinced that the refugee problem is one of the problems that must be solved if there is to be peace and stability in the Near East. Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 H 10356 Approved For Release 2004/05/25: CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE August 10, 1967 Today, however, I am of the opinion that unless and until the Ai *b refugee problem is solved, there can be no peace. It is tragic, Mr. Speaker, that 4 years have passed since I made that report on the Near East and we have gone through another destructive war, but we are still left with the same dilemmas. The refugee problem is, as I said then, only one of the many differences that exist between Israel and the Arab States. But we Americans learned to our dis- may when we went to the brink of war last June that the problems of the Mid- dle East are the world's problems. A new war may be a world war. We :cannot af- ford to sit back waiting for the initiative to come from another quarter. We must not wait for the milk of human kindness to flow from sources which, in our time, have only been dry. We must show by our own good will what the possibilities are for peace. I believe we can set an ex- ample for the community of nations. We have the resources and the capacity for moral leadership. I call: upon the President to respond positively to my proposal to restore the movement toward permanent peace. Mr. TENZER. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield? Mr. FARBSTEIN. Yes, I will be glad to yield to the gentleman from. New York. Mr. TENZER. Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate the gentleman from New York, a member of the Committee on Foreign Relations, for his compassion and understanding of the problem. With- out the settlement of the Arab refugee problem in the Middle East, 'permanent peace cannot be established in that area of the world. And while I do not speak and cannot speak for what the State of Israel might do, I believe it is. commend- able that the suggestion is made that the United States take the lead in suggest- ing and promoting a worldwide program for the resettlement of the Arab refugees. Of course, the gentleman understands that 25,000 of the 1.3 million' refugees is a very small proportion. I would like to say to the: gentleman that on June 13, 1967, I made a state- ment on the floor of the House rather proposing an extensive program for re- settlement of the Arab refugees on the land available in the various territories around the State of Israel, and that it would cost far less to reclaim that and desert land than it would to conduct an arms race in that area. Again, Mr. Speaker, I want to com- mend the gentleman for all of his sug- gestions. They deserve the greatest con- sideration of our Government. Mr. FARBSTEIN. Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the gentleman for his remarks. I want to say his view and his idea is an excellent one. I might say that of course this is part of this plan. But Ii feel that if the entireworld felt a sense of awareness of this problem, if the entire world did something to break the logjam that has existed for 19 years, that today these Arab refugees who are presently under the control and direction of Israel will be permitted to emigrate from these areas where they are presently located, where previous to June 5 the Arab na- tions would not permit them to emigrate, because they used those Arab refugees as a po itical whip with which to beat Israel o'er the head. Mr. Speaker, K. again want to say to the gen;leman that any plan that will tend to break this long logjam is a plan that will lend to fluidity because if there is an agreement insofar as one item is concern xi, then who knows but one may lead to another, this may start a chain of events which will result in peace in the Mic dle East, which is necessary in order to have peace in the, world. RYAN 11ILL TO FACILITATE ITALIAN IMMIGRATION The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. SMITH cf Iowa). Under a previous order of the House, the gentleman from New York ^ Sr. RYAN]. is recognized for 30 minutes. Mr. F.YAN. Mr. Speaker, remedy as it did many of the irrational and inequi- table policies of our. previous laws, the Icnmigr:ition and Naturalization Act of 1965 ccntains certain defects-defects which tndercut specific policies embod- ied in that legislation. Under the preseht law certain aliens register-d in the fifth preference cate- gory for immigration into the United States find themselves in a situation which is clearly inconsistent with the policy of equality of treatment and that favoring reunification of families-pol- icies which are fundamental to our new philosophy regarding the treatment of aliens who wish to immigrate to the United States. Mr. 3peaker, as I will explain in greater detail, the effect of the immigra- tion lav, is to discriminate against Ital- ian brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens compared to brothers and sisters of other nationalities applying for perma- nent immigration visas. The Existing situation is such that an Italian brother and sister as well as his spouse ,end children, on behalf of whom a petition for immigration under the fifth, preference category is filed today, will wa:.t at the minimum 10 years be- fore he will receive a visa. A more real- istic estimate is that he will wait 15 to 20 year, ~. In comparison, one from any of the other f 3 nations for which the fifth preference is oversubscribed, for whom a similtsr petition is filed, will probably be required to wait, in most cases, no longer -han 1 or 2 years before receiv- ing an immigration visa. Convrsely, an Italian eligible for fifth preference status must have filed over 1.' years ago in order to receive an immigration visa. An alien, holding fifth preference status, from any of the other i3 nations for which that cate- gory is oversubscribed, must have filed only 13 months ago in order to receive a simils.r visa. The 'visa Office. of the Bureau of Se- curity f,nd Consular Affairs of the State Department informs me that as of the end of 1966 there were nearly 100,000 Italian:. who had been approved for fifth prefere:ace status. Under the current law the Italian quota ii,5,666 per year; but section 201 (c) and (d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965-8 U.S.C. 1151 (c) and (d)-provides that quota num- bers, unused in a preceedin?; fiscal year are to be put in an immigration pool for use duringthe next fiscal year. Im- migrants unable to obtain an immigra- tion visa. under the regular allotment for a specific preference category can ob- tain a visa fromthis pool during a sub- sequent fiscal year in accordance to their preference status and the date their petition was- filed with the Attor- ney General-section 203(d) of the Im- migration and Nationality Act of 1965- 8 U.S.C. 1153(c). Although the 1965 act abolishes the dis- criminatory national origin quota sys- tem, it does place a maximum limit of 170,000 on the number of permanent immigrants permitted to come into the United States each year from non- Western Hemisphere countries. Section 201(a)-8 U.S.C. 1151(a). Furthermore, section 202(a)-8 U.S.C. 1152(a)-re- stricts the number of permanent im- migrants from any one country to 20,000 per year. Special immigrants defined by section 101(a) (27) -8 U.S.C. 1101(a) (27)-and immediate relatives of U.S. citizens-defined in section 201(b)-8 U.S.C. 1115(b)--as children, spouses and parents of a citizen of the United States- are not subject to the numerical limita- tions. Under section 203(a) (5)-8 U.S.C. 1153(a) (5)-24 percent of the 170,000 annual maximum are permitted to immi- grate annually under the fifth prefer- ence classification. That is, 40,800 brothers and sisters, and their spouses and children, of U.S. citizens are per- mitted to come into the United States each year in the order in which their petition has been filed with the Attorney General-section 204(a)-8 U.S.C. 1154 (a); section 203(c)-8 U.S.C. 1153(c). I point out that the 40,800 limit in- cludes not only brothers and sisters of United Citizens, but a spouse or child- unmarried person under 21 years of age- who is not otherwise entitled to an im- migrant status and the immediate issu- ance of a visa, or to conditional entry, under another preference category-sec- tion 203(a) (9)-8 U.S.C. 1153(a) (9). Thus, for example, of the 3,538 perma- nent immigrant visas issued to fifth pref- erence Italians between December 1, 1965, and June 30, 1966, 1,269 were for brothers or sisters of a U.S. citizen; 726 were for spouses of those brothers and sisters; and 1,543 were for children of those brothers and sisters--Annual Re- port of the Visa Office, Bureau of Security and Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State, 1966, page 45. . Theoretically, any visas not required for the first four preference categories can be used by fifth preference applicants. Since the Visa Office has not, as yet, compiled figures regarding permanent visas issued for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1967, my projections are based upon the number of permanent visas is- sued between the effective date of the 1965 act, December 1, 1965, and June 30, 1966. During that period the number of permanent visas issued to Italians by perference category were as follows: Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4' A 4072 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - APPENDIX August lo, 1967 b ?s o , Mr. Sobsey recallea. The young soldier enlisted in the Army two days after his graduation from Albert Einstein High School, Kensington, Md., in June, 1966. BORN ON WEST COAST He was born in Los Angeles and grew up in Las Vegas, Nev. The family moved to Maryland in 1959, after the election of Sena- tor Cannon (D., Nev.), for Whom Mr. Sobsey is executive secretary. Pfc. Brunson is survived by his step- father; his mother, Mrs. Mary Alice Sobsey; his grandmother, Mrs. Tina Truman; a sis- ter, Barbre Alice Brunson; and two brothers, Stephen M. Sobsey and Robert L. Sobsey, all of Garrett Park. A Confused Call for Action EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. HASTINGS KEITH OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 10, 1967 Mr. KEITH. Mr. Speaker, recently there has been a great deal of publicity, most of it unfavorable, focused on the House of Representatives rejection of the resolution to consider the Rat Extermi- nation Act of 1967. My vote against the resolution was based on the conviction that rat eradi- cation can best be handled at the local level, and that the existing Federal pro- grams to provide financial assistance to fight rats do not require further prolifer- ation. No one, Mr. Speaker, ever denied that rats pose a serious problem to the health and economy of our Nation. Yet, there was a great hue and cry to the effect that Congress is impervious to the wel- fare of small children-that it spends millions to protect cows but spends noth- opposition was that the problem is one for suggested it probably "exceeds the popula- the cities. And it has been so considered. tion of Texas." It is noteworthy that, on the authority of No one should question paying his share Dr. Allan W. Donaldson, associate director when the nation is at war. It is little enough of the U.S. Bureau of Disease Prevention and by comparison with the sacrifices of men Environmental control, the city that has taken far from home to endure hardship, been most successful is none other than De- and possibly injury or death. troit, where rat bites were reduced from 123 Everyone has a right, though, to demand in 1951 to 17 in 1965. an end to concurrent waste. In this light, then, it is disturbing to re- And President Johnson has no right to con- view what the President has said within the fuse one with the other in trying to justify past few days: a 10 per cent addition to your tax bill. If we can spend millions of dollars to protect cows from screw worms, why can't - i n~ we spend a little more money to protect our i A ?J-'? Iv And, speaking to the nation after the ~ Nerve Gas: A First for Nasser Detroit madness, "A government that has spent millions to protect baby calves can EXTENSION OF REMARKS surely afford the same concern for bab b o and girls." y ys Sentiment has obscured reason in this ap- proach. Contagious disease among animals or humans, whether hookworm, hepatitis or cancer, is properly a challenge to the federal government. But there is no epidemic threat in this country from rats, says Dr. Donaldson. Rats would not be a threat without ac- cumulations of garbage and filth and proper- ty neglect, for which lazy or indifferent peo- ple and city governments share responsibility. It is at that level that Mr. Johnson should call for action, and not confuse the need for cleanliness with the causes of civil lawless- ness. You'll Pay for the Waste EXTENSION OF REMARKS HON. FRED SCHWENGEL OF IOWA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 10, 1967 Mr. SCHWENGEL. Mr. Speaker, the call by President Johnson for an income tax increase has not been greeted with enthusiasm in Iowa. On Friday, August 4, an editorial in the Davenport Times-rlmm-r.ot efle t d HON. ABRAHAM J. MULTER OF NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 10, 1967 Mr. MULTER. Mr. Speaker, President Nasser's inhumanity to his fellow man, and to his brother Arab no less, was once again demonstrated by his use of lethal nerve gas against the Yemenite popula- tion. The International Red Cross has con- firmed the use of this gas and has re- ported that women, children, and live- stock, as well as Yemenite troops, have fallen victim to Nasser's brutality. I commend to the attention of our col- leagues an article written by Ralph Mc- Gill, for the August 3, 1967, edition of the Washington Evening. Star. The ar- ticle concerns Nasser's atrocious acts and follows : NERVE GAS: A FIRST FOR NASSER In Yemen President Nasser's love and com- passion for his brother Arab is revealed by his army's use of lethal gas on villages and troops. Women, children, cattle and other livestock are among the victims. The International Red Cross has confirmed the use of these gases. The United Nations has a report. The gas is being dropped in bombs. It is a mixture of phosgene and nerve gas. Phosgene was the gas which attained no- toriety and condemnation in the First World War. The Germans initiated use of it against French and Canadian troops on the Ypres front, on April 22, 1915. Nerve gas has been used in Yemen for the first time in the history of warfare. It is, as used in Yemen, mixed with phosgene. Nerve gas, either in liquid or spray form, is a killer. There is an injection of atropine which, if taken immediately after exposure will save the victim's life. Adults, however, will find no comfort in news of the specific. Persons around 40 years old and above are not helped by the injection. The U.A.R. reportedly had stockpiles of the r c e Standard Times pointed out in an edi- It called for reduced domestic spend- torial of August 3, such claims are totally ing and elimination of waste. The edi- unjustified. I am pleased to bring to the tonal follows: attention of my colleagues what I con- YOV'LL PAY FOR THE WASTE sider to be a significant contribution to President Johnson linked a call for a 10 the rational consideration of the issue in per cent surcharge on income tax Thursday its proper perspective. As the editorial so with an announcement that American troop aptly points out, "sentiment has ob- strength in Vietnam will be increased by scured reason" in the rat, icciie 45,000 to 50,000. s ~.. cvn nV'1'1V1V be plain to all. He would have it appear President Johnson's continuing effort to war is the reason for measures toavertha make the proposed federal rat control pro- budget deficit which could surpass $28 bil- gram a symbol of what Congress could do lion. for urban harmony and peace is most regret- It is one of the compelling reasons, of table. course. This nation is pouring $66 million a The President is unfairly making a scape- day into that effort. goat of the House, which rejected the pro- The United States could finance a tre- gram, He is furnishing ammunition to riot mendously expensive war without such a inciters who need do no more than quote surtax, though, if it were not for the finan- the President. And, unfortunately, the issue cial waste which Mr. Johnson and the Con- has in reality, little or nothing to do with gress permit to continue in the Federal gov- civii rights or civil disorder ernment. The administration's idea is to spend $40 Pleas for greater fiscal responsibility are million for eradicating rats, over a three- Ignored. year period, with cities doubling U.S. grants Surveys reveal the cost of national defense the third year but contributing nothing up has not risen as rapidly as that for non-de- to then. Tense purposes. It is beyond contention that the rat Just how many dundthd lation is.substantial, that each year an un- Federal payroll~duri gathe Johnson Admin- determined number of children and, adults istration cannot be stated accurately except are bitten, and that material damage from When gas bombs on the Sinai desert. There also are persisting stories that Israeli troops captured some of the bombs and at a moment regarded as propitious for the best propaganda and diplomatic results will release them for pub- lic view. This story of the capture of such gas bombs is, as aforesaid, not confirmed. In Yemen it is confirmed. The Interna- tional Red Cross has even exhumed some bodies. Samples of tissue and blood have been laboratory tested and evidence found of phosgene and nerve gas. There also have been signs of the occasional use of mustard gas. Nasser has had 40,000 troops in Yemen for about two years. (The total was reduced to approximately 25,000 before the attack on date because it has been a continual) on- Israel.) His enemies are the "royalists." They continually are, for the most part, tribesmen who have Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 The device here is so transparent it mu t Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 August 10, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - APPENDIX policy the Executive Is imposing upon our win In Vietnap. The United States has the nation. power, the cajability, the history to win. We Nevertheless, I am happy to announce that must now demonstrate that we have the bridges are being built between the U.S. and will to win, wit only in Vietnam, but every- Rhodesia. But this time, they are being built where that Cnmmunisin presents its chal- from the other end. The Rhodesians: today lenge of world conquest. Ladies and Gentle- consider that they have won the battle of men, when wa do, Rhodesia will be stand- the sanctions. Not every sector of their econ- lug proudly k y our side. omy is up to par, but in the main the balance of trade favors Rhodesia. Despite the UN sanctions, Rhodesia is trading with the world. Meanwhile, Rhodesian chromite is on the banned list, So to make good on our policy of knifing our friends, the Administration has had to allow U.S. dollars to go abroad to the Soviet Union to import Communist chromite. So bridges are being built to Rhodesia, and they are being built from both sides. The wonderful turnout at this dinner this eve- ning is proof that many Americans are will- ing to indulge in "peaceful-coexistence" with Rhodesia. It shows that there may be some benefit in cultural exchanges after all. It may even be that by programs such as this we may cause Rhodesia to "mellow" and cease being the threat to world peace that Mr. Ambassador Goldberg keeps complaining about. Rhodesia's problem, If we may try to guess at the strange workings of the minds of our policymakers, seems to be that Rhodesians are still too anti-Communist. Rhodesia wants the West to win. The American policy is No- win. All around the world, we have been anti-anti-Communist. Our policy of Commu- nist containment has been less than success- ful. We have been far more successful at containing and demoralizing the anti-Com- munists. I have one more item to report as evidence of Rhodesian spirit. On May 7, the Rhodesian Minister of Internal Affairs, Mr. William Harper, spoke to the Rhodesian Reserve Offi- cers Association in Bulwayo. Mr. Harper expressed his personal view that the Rhodesian Government would be willing to allow Rhodesians to volunteer to help the American effort in Vietnam. Telegram con- A Tribute to Astronauts Grissom, White, and Chaffee EXTENSION OF REMARKS of HON. EDWARD J. GURNEY OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 10, 1967 Mr. GURNEY. Mr, Speaker, I have re- ceived a particularly impressive poem, dedicated t) the memory. of the three valiant astronauts who so tragically lost their lives early this year. It was written by John-Allen Seybolci and Donald A. Seybold, who have tizken a great interest in these thi ve astronauts, as a tribute to the special place these men have earned in our history. As Representative from the Fifth Dis- trict of Flo tide which includes the Ken- nedy Spaci Center, I felt particularly close to As:rdnauts Grissom, White, and Chaffee. Tlai poem vividly illustrates the contributief>; that these great men made to our spa;Q program, and I would like to share it with my colleagues. A PLACE To STAND (By John-Allen bold and Donald A. SeY W-MJ_ It Is well worth the risk In that sea If life is lost,-yet, never, Never in vain- And said another I have been there I have walked in God's own yard,, And nothing Has made me more aware That I had found a place to stand Where men and trouble Are of small regard- And the third of these valiant men so tali Said,--I wish to move the world Still, I must do it well Or not at all. That selfish infinite sea, their goal Ever reaching-but conquerable Yet, cruel and merciless, A vacuumed swell So determined to exact its toll-- But that seeming endless task Has only spelled their courage for a time. It has not abated their valor, Not one whit. Let them gain a running start In the spirit of their souls And they are joined By an entourage Of young men who demand with grit- Give to us that place to stand I Give to us the valiant goals I For only then, I stand to courage With pride and dignity- And they each say, together- Let not the hours that wound Retard your faith, But renew each moment soon, That others,-those behind us The many valiant young shall ;make That move to valor So that our souls may hear them say, Give me a place to stand Give me a heaven near I strive to move the world I yearn to hold God's hand. firms definite offer of Rhodesia to help. Now, For an insta nt- the men of the Rhodesian army and reserves The valiant young have shown their-courage, Montgomery GI Dies in Vietnam are superior trained fighters. They have had They have demonstrated a spirit, a fort e, experience with Communist guerrillas fight- Detelmined'.that the task shall be done ing hand to hand in Malaysia. More than A million moments of effort EXTENSION OF REMARKS that, they have the will to win. If the offer of May fail, the Rhodesian government is accepted by A million attempts the U.S. and South Vietnam, it is believed Without gams- that as many as 5,000 crack troops and ofii- Amid throei, cers would immediately make themselves Laments ar.d refrains- mvallable to go to Vietnam. There is nothing Yet, in anotler instant that Rhodesians would like better than to Courage wi:I prevail, help the West win the war against world Thai, one b:alliant moment Communism. When the valiant shall demand- I think that Rhodesia has solved many of When in their finest hour, Its problems. Its independence is no more a They will anrm matter of dispute by sensible observers. They I have a pia ice to stand, are willing to open up lines of conlmunica- And I shall move the world, tion with Britain on any matter that will not This,-an adage jeopardize their independence. They would As ancient as the world itself like to renew their relationship with Britain And still as trading partners, to the mutual advan- As young and as grand- tage of both. They are hoping that the U.S. That is all they have asked, will return to a position that at least ap- These vali int three. proaches neutrality, it not accepting the Give me a place, willing hand of friendship offered. Let me contribute tc the knowledge vast The question now stands with the United To contribute with honor States: Do we want victory over world Com- Toward the conquest in space munism? Are we so anxious to be friends Of that wideness sea- with the Communists that we want to They have embraced their courage squelch a valuable friend from the Western Embraced too, their love. tradition? Will the U.S. accept; the Rho- Then these three, deslan volunteers? If we accept the Rhode- These ver' valiant three of la have the will to win, as the Rhodesians have Give us a place to stand the will to win. Two years age when the Within the frame Rhodesians declared independence, every- Of God's town estate- body said that they couldn't win. They Whereupon-they stood didn't reckon with the spirit of courage, pa- To be wel. counted triotism, loyalty, and devotion that has As they s] tall be-ever pore- typically animated Western man', The Rho- Of these i hree, desians have it. That's why they are win- These val Cant who endeavored, Ming. That's why they want to help the West One has citen said,';o us, LION. CLARENCE D. LONG IN TIlE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 10, 1967 Mr. LONG of Maryland. Mr. Speaker, Pfc. I/ance D. Brunson, a young para- troop$r from Maryland, was recently kille in action in Vietnam. I wish to coninend the courage of this young man and to honor his memory by including tbb following article in the RECORD: , dONTGOMERY GI DIES IN VIETNAM-PFC. BRUNSON SERVED WITH 101ST AIRBORNE GARRETT PARE, Md, Aug. 9.-Pfc. Lance D. Brunson, a Montgomery county paratrooper, was killed Sunday In Vietnam, exactly three weeks after he left the United States, the Defense Department reported yesterday. Pfc. Brunson died of multiple wounds re- ceived on a combat mission, according to his stepfather, Chester B. Sobsey, of 10705 Mont- rose avenue, Garrett Park. Pfc. Brunson, 20, was stationed in a weapons platoon with the 101st Airborne Division, the "Screaming Eagles." He left the United States for Vietnam July 16. TRIPLE VOLUNTEER Pfc. Brunson was a.volunteer all the way, Mr. Sobsey said last. night--he volunteered for the Army, for the paratroopers and for Vietnam. "In his last letter he said there was no Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 August 10, 19167 CONGRESSIONAL. RECORD - APPENDIX remained loyal to their king, who was dis- .placed by a Nasser-supported coup. Despite the fact they are relatively untrained and possess few weapons, they have managed to stand off the Egyptian troops. Now, however, they are probably near de- feat. The first use of phosgene gas against them was in 1966. In January 1967, the International Red Cross reported another gas attack, largely against villagers. This was nerve gas, the first use of it in history. Over 200 villagers, in- cluding women and children, and livestock were killed. In May, shortly before mobilization against Israel, there was another attack. Since that war ended, Nasser has stepped up use of gas. On July 4, 5 and 10, nerve gas was dumped on the Yemen villagers and on areas where the stubborn army was holding out. There understandably is growing panic and fear among the people who have for so long opposed Nasser's army. There has been loud outcry because of the general use of napalm in recent warfare, in- cluding that in Vietnam. There was protest, even, against the use of defoliation sprays to kill leaves in jungle areas of heavy troops and arms concentration. But Nasser's brutal use of lethal gas against civilians and troops-all fellow Arabs-has gone unprotected in and out of the United Nations. The silence is out- rageous. Just why the Russians, who are now the most influential power with Nasser, do not use their connection to halt use of gas also is a question. It does not redound to Soviet credit to be rebuilding Nasser's armed strength and not demanding he cease the ugly and barbaric use of gas in Yemen. Key Job To Fill at State EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. PETER H. B. FRELINGHUYSEN OF NEW. JERSEY IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 10, 1967 Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN. Mr. Speaker, it is with regret that many Members of Congress learn that Wayne Fredericks, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, is leaving Government service. Mr. Fredericks is a man of un- usual qualifications and his absence will be felt in the State Department and here in Washington. I wish to insert an edi- torial from today's New York Times pay- ing tribute to Wayne Fredericks. The editorial is as follows: KEY Jon To FILL AT STATE A Deputy Assistant Secretary for African Affairs does not rank high in the State De- partment bureaucracy, but J. Wayne Fred- ericks transformed that post into a key in- strument of two-way education. He did much to educate leaders of the new Africa about America, but his greater contribution may have been the education of Americans about Africa's problems and prospects. Mr. Fredericks was a tireless advocate of an activeand distinctive American policy for a continent usually low on Washington's pri- ority list. He thus helped overcome that "tremendous institutional inertial force" at State of which Adlai Stevenson warned Presi- dent-elect Kennedy in 1960. He aroused an enduring interest in Africa on the part of intelligent young members of the Congress and many others in the community at large. This dedicated man could carry on such a free-wheeling, many-faceted operation in part because . he was not a career diplomat, beholden to the Foreign Service establish- ment. With his departure from Government, President Johnson and Secretary Rusk would be well advised to conclude that they can best fill the job by going outside the Foreign Service, as President Kennedy did when he appointed Mr. Fredericks in 1961. Providing an Improved Promotion Sys- tem for Medical and Dental Officers of the Armed Forces SPEECH OF HON. DURWARD G. HALL OF MISSOURI IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Monday, August 7, 1967 Mr. HALL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in sup- port of H.R. 10242 which would provide for an improved promotion system for medical and dental officers of the Armed Forces. This legislation was a long time coming and is urgently needed, in my considered opinion. By improving the promotional system the poor retention rate of physicians and dentists in the armed services will be im- proved. This, in turn, will provide for more experienced medical personnel, the end result being improved quality in medical care to our service men and women. Unsatisfactory promotion opportunity has long been an important factor in our poor retention rate in the medical and dental officer corps. Physicans and den- tists are highly trained and scarce com- modities of personnel who have never had equal promotion opportunity in the armed services. They have always had to compete with other officers in the line for promotion when a vacancy occurred. This new legislation will eliminate the wasteful and unnecessary competition with line officers, and will create new promotional opportunities in the Medi- cal and Dental Corps, especially for field grades. The legislation would also grant much needed relief of the presently severe re- striction in the number of authorized general or flag officer positions. As we well know, under existing regulations, we cannot expect to retain our senior colonels beyond the 20-year point un- less there is a reasonable opportunity for further promotion. I have introduced similar legislation which would assist in the elimination of this problem throughout the entire armed services which is entitled "selected extended tenure program." Coupled with this is the fact that the military is un- able at present, to promote their ex- perienced clinical specialists to general officer grade without removing them from their clinical position. What is re- quired is authorized flag and general of- ficer positions in our teaching hospitals and larger medical centers, so as to pro- vide the incentive for highly qualified physicians to remain in the military serv- ice. The remaining step is to possibly increase and certainly -compress spe- cialty professional and- proficiency pay. A4073 Mr. Speaker, in summary, this legis- lation not only provides new career in- centive through promotion and reten- tion, but it would substantially enhance the prestige of highly qualified physi- cians and dentists in the armed services. Parceling Out the Riot Blame EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. GEORGE M. RHODES OF PENNSYLVANIA - IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - Thursday, August 10, 1967 Mr. RHODES of Pennsylvania. -Mr. Speaker, the events of the last few weeks have demonstrated that there, is a need for a reappraisal of the problems facing the cities of America. However, rather than a serious reappraisal, what we are experiencing is a frantic effort to place the blame for these tragic events on the President, Congress, Governors, mayors, and others. I would commend to my colleagues a column written by Frank Getlein, and published in a recent issue of the Wash- ington Star. It illustrates-the futility of attempting to indict any one person or institution for riots and other ills of our society. The column follows: PARCELING OUT THE RIOT BLAME (By Frank Getlein) The amazing things about the recent riots in our cities is how perfectly they bore out the direst forebodings of practically every- one. It' isn't just that they didn't take any- one by surprise. Nothing takes anyone by surprise anymore. But beyond that, after the events-and even during them-the riots turned out to be- the predictable result of what everyone on all sides of every question has been arguing all the time. Take the gunnuts, pro and con, who are the easiest to identify with a simple, strong position. From the point of view of the anti- gunnuts, if only Congress had passed a fire- arms control law after the assassination of President $ennedy, - as the anti-gunnuts urged at the time, the riots would never have taken place, since the only guns around would be in the hands of the police, a likely story. The pro-gunnuts, by contrast, find that the riots prove their point that the worst thing Congress could do would be to pass a gun control law. When riots erupt, the law- abiding citizen is well-advised to have a shooting iron handy to protect his loved ones and his property. If shopowners and pedes- trians had only had more guns of their own, the riots wouldn't have happened, another likely story. - Moving from the surface froth to the surges of the deep, we find the same inter- esting manifestation of simultaneous ar- rival at the same place from opposite start- ing points by moving in opposite directions. One school holds that riots are the direct result of congressional inaction on adminis- tration proposals for expanding the poverty program. "If Sarge were only here," the thought goes, "these things wouldn't have happened." This seems to suppose that snip- ers and swipers are all subscribers to the Congressional Record and - hit the streets whenever their favorite magazine reports pad news for ole Sarge. Possible, of course. There have been stranger literary tastes than the Record, although it's - hard to think of one offhand. On the other side of that particular street, Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300043-4 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R00020030p043-4 A 4074 CONGRESS] ONAL RECORD - APPENDIX August 10, 1967 the view is that the riots are obviously that of Col. Daniel James, Jr., an Air African immigrant. I'm an American with caused by a Supreme court gone soft oft the Force f [ghter pilot stationed in Vietnam, several generations behind me in my rights of criminals. Civil rights are civil riots. as quoted by William Tuohy, writing in country. Tell potential rioters in advance that police the ho,; Angeles Times of August 9, and "If something is,..wrong with my country will not be allowed to listen to their con- right now, then I'm Willing to hold her hand fessions, that they have to be provided with carried in the Washington Post Au- fora while until she pulls out of it and gets lawyers, that if convicted they can be re- gust 10: right." leased at once for any of a dozen constitu- If something is wrong with my country Born in Pensacola, Fla., and a graduate of tional reasons, and naturally they'll riot, right ni w, then I'm willing to hold her hand Tuskegee Institute, James now lives in Tuc- Wouldn't you? for a while until she pulls out of it and gets son, Ariz. He has two sons, one in Air Force One of the most ingenious twists in the right. RQTC at the University of Arizona, and a argument is the one that blames the riots on daughter who was formerly an airline President Johnson for having aroused ex- So siiid Colonel James. tewardess. pectations he was totally unable to fulfill and Mr. tspeaker, those words should be en- ~-~~-- hoar} Tlnw:`. A -- - -- - i ' mer ca s d The implication here is that as long as the much snore powerful are the words of this wretched and oppressed don't. expect any- distinguished American who is serving thing they don't give any trouble, so let's his Country so well than the mouthings not disturb their despair.' In the historical of black power' advocate Stokely C8r- so of presidential y for the what first is mieha,a who would tear this country significant is s that at apparently ppareennttlly for _,_ _ --4, ro+hor than build her un_ of h is wrong w ith ing Mr. Speaker, somet A Push For ETV EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. WILLIAM S. MOORHEAD citizenry actually believed what a president said he would do for them and ran rioting when he didn't do it. Well, it's true that many Negroes have been deprived of a decent education, but surely they are not so totally deprived as to take a politician's word for his bond. . Equally comforting to those who hold it is the outside agitator theory of riots. The ap- proach here is that young unemployed Ne- groes in any given community are perfectly happy, all the time singing and doing the cake-walk, until those rascally outsiders come inside from the cold and make things hot. A particularly striking instance of the iden- tity of opposites in riot theory is found in the role of the police. In Detroit, the police are blamed for not moving in immediately with hard hats and hard noses and no non- sense. If only firm action had been taken from the first, it is righteously pointed out, nothing at all would have happened. On the other hand, the police in Milwaukee did move swiftly to control the situation and what are they, for their pains? Honky-fascists, that's what; guilty of police brutality and prema- ture tough-mindedness. It's not just that the police can't win; they can't even hope to stay even. No matter what they do, no matter whether a riot takes place or not, no matter whether people are killed or people are saved, the police are always wrong. And so, for that matter, is everyone else. From some point of view or other, everyone- President, Congress, poverty workers, black power shouters, mayors, governors, National Guard, police, white men, black men, begger- men, thieves-everyone is responsible for the riots. That's the beauty of it. What everyone is responsible for, nobody has to do anything about except sort out the blame onto all those other people. And that is what, in Con- gress, in committee, in state house and White House, in your house and my house, we are all engaged in doing. Negro Fighter Pilot Hits Black Power Carmichael, EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. GEORGE HANSEN OF IDAHO IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES credentials In the civil nights movement, In Pennsylvania, the Governor's Commit- James added, "Hell, I was in the original sit- tee on Public Television, cochaired by Albert Tuesday, August, 1967 in bask in 1943." J. Nesbitt, of Philadelphia, and Joseph D. Mr. HANSEN of Idaho: Mr. Speaker, He and nearly 100 other Negro Army Air Hughes, of Pittsburgh, met this week to the history of the United States is re- Corpu cadets refused to accept segregation at . begin a study of the creation of a statewide Selfr? dge Air Force Base in Michigan. They public television network as soon as pos- were with the words and deeds of men were all arrested and threatened with court- sible and to consider the desirability and who loved their country. The, words of mart.al, but they held their ground and the feasibility of establishing a, corporation for these patriots have been pertinent to charges later were dropped. public television. The committee will com- their times, and I know of no recent pub- "'Ghat I rea ly don't buy is that back-to- plete its work before the end of this year lie utterance more apt and moving than Africa stuff." James concluded. "I'm not an and hopefully the seven ETV stations pres- our country right now, thanks, in part, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES to the Carmichaels and the Rap Browns. Wednesday, August 9, 1967 So let us join with Colonel James-and not only "hold her hand for a while until Mr. MOORHEAD. Mr. Speaker, as the she pulls out of it and gets right"-but sponsor of legislation establishing a pri- help h-r to "get right." vate, nonprofit corporation to improve Mr. Tuohy's article on Colonel James noncommercial, educational radio and follow i. I commend it to all who love our television, I am pleased that support for country. public television is growing across the NEGRO FIGHTER PILOT HITS CARMICHAEL, Nation. BLACK POWER As the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette noted (By William Tuohy) in an editorial on July 1, National and DAN,,NG, SOUTH VIETNAM, AUGf~ST 9.- State committees are being formed "to "Stokety Carmichael is a big-mouth,, who is develop a public interest in educational making a profession out of being a` Negro, television, chiefly among practitioners of and hg's got no damn business speaki