KOSYGIN IS COOL TO MISSILE CURB

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70B00338R000300090117-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 9, 2006
Sequence Number: 
117
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 10, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70B00338R000300090117-7.pdf91.96 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/01/30 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300090117-7 n offensive the i iiterion upon which one added: 'The Soviet Union has KOSYGIN IS COOL hou ilb s~ u TO MISSILE C ' hould bay oneself in deciding no intention of ever allowing this problem." the Federal German Republic TO I,- suggested there worejo gain access to nuclear Tn MIN IF C1I10"other ways" of solving the' weapons. In London, He Calls Defense Build-Up Less Perilous Than Offensive Arms people." stockpiles"- a familiar Soviet It has been argued that if in disarmament talks. either the United States or the position Soviet Union built an antimis- I 'We Have Plenty' set the existing "balance oT'I from strength, not weakttess.l terror" because the country om take this position not s with an improved defense mighty c"We ause we have too few weapons then dare to strike the first but because we have plenty. blow without fear of being The Soviet Premier insisted ' wiped out by reprisal action. I that the spread of nuclear A new phase m the arms raceweapons "must be banned." v sold thereby be opened. Relating this issue to his re s 1111- Apart dange 1 c t in uclma tow phase, econ- PIy on whether there could be a mists have boggled at the stu-' moratorium on development of pendou.s cost that would be in-' an antimissile defense system, volved in providing a country he saiw that here. too, the real answer was that "mankind with an antimissile defense sys- most do away with nuclear tem. Pre ive." mier Kosygin dismissed weapons if it is to surv the "cost" argument. He said recent discussions in- It might be chaper to buiidi dicated that an agreement would By DANA ADAMS SCIIMIDTI special to The New York TP LONDON r Feb. 9 -Premier , 4leski N. Kosygin suggested atl 1 news conference today that systeeve antiballistic missile systems were less dangerous s and mankind that offensive systems therefore more desirablE leven if they should prove morf costly . While we to a question on the sub r Iect, he gave no encouragement to hopes for a morator1a"i'tl"` velopment as a means of Vot- ing the arms rare between the great powers. In Washington, the De- fense Department said that the Joint Chiefs of Staff had recommended heavy proter- tion Igainst missiles for 50 of the nation's largest cities.] Mr. Kosygin's remarks were made at ta he news conference given n by Association. More than 500 re- porters watched him answer extemporaneously for more than an hour. U.S. Seeks Understanding United States officials have tentatively sought an under- standing with the Soviet Union that would bar a new expensive race in the construction of anti- ballistic missile systems. Wash- ington officials have reported that Moscow has begun install- ing such systems in some parts of the Soviet Union. The Soviet leader did say, however, that he foresaw the of a treaty ion "soon' , onclus c to bar the spread' of nulear weapons. t The most important d;spdct of such a treaty from the Soviet point of view, he made clear, out is to keep nuclear weapons an hands. m G cr of The danger that the Soviet Union was beginning to build an antiballistic missile defense system was reported by dent Johnson in his State of the Union Message on Jan. 10. Limited Antimissile System He said that while increasing their offensive missile capabili- ties, the Russians had begun to place a "limited antimissile de- fense" near Moscow. He said the united States was not pre- pared to spend great amounts of money now on such a defense system. The Soviet Premier declined to reply directly on what he acknowledged as "an important problem of military policy." Instead he asked this question: "What heightens military ten- sion in the world more: an offensive or a defensive system?" His reply was that "a system that serves to ward off an at- tack does not heighten the ten- sion but serves to lessen the possibility of an attack that ontinued on rage 6, C"olunin S Approved For Release 2006/01/30 CIA-RDP70B00338R000300090117-7 defensive sys-soon be reached "whether West tha