THIN ANTI-BALLISTIC-MISSILE SYSTEM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100083-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 12, 2006
Sequence Number: 
83
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 21, 1967
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100083-3.pdf382.3 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/01/30 :CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100083-3 September ~1, 196' CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE S 13407 i the demilitarized zone. The barrier, in short, will be manned by native troops, not U.S. Marines. This, at least, is the plan in the back of the mind of Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara and no military commanders in the field here dispute him. While not wildly enthusiastic, these commanders believe that even the first portion of the barrier along an already cleared strip of land called "the trace" will make it far more difftcult for Ho Chi Minh's northern legions to penetrate deeply into Quangtri Province. It is only atwo-minute hop by helicopter from the advance Marine base here at Dongha up to Conthien, the scene oP the most" savage fighting oP the war and only one mile from the DMZ. Through the pelt- ing rain, the first portion of the terrain cleared for the barrier is easily seen. It runs from the hilltop Marine stronghold of Conthien east for ten miles to Giolinh. This first stretch oP the incipient barrier still has neither fortification nor electronic devices installed, but these will start being emplaced soon. The work is excruciatingly slow and painful because of its easy access to enemy rackets from across and within the DMZ. But from the vantage point of Marine Brig- Gen. Louis Metzger's helicopter, the military advantage oP the barrier becomes instantly clear. The ten mile "trace" covers the flattest ground along the whole 45-mile DMZ: It is through this inviting stretch of easy terrain that the enemy has mounted his successive attacks on Conthien, slipping through in twos and threes at night, then regrouping for a dawn attack on the Marine strong- hold. Block this open door and the North Vietnamese will be forced either west, into rough and hilly country, or east, into the costal swamp that parallels the South China sea. The succeeding portions of the barrier will be constructed later, and they will not fol- low the natural contour of the land, cling- ing instead to the valleys and avoiding the mountains. From Conthien to the border oP Laos, the land rises from the coastal plan steeply to a aeries of razorback mountains, each one higher than the last. Consequently, the barrier will not at all -resemble the ill-fated Maginot Line. It will be a series of pieces, like a jagged Pence; with gaps where there are no valleys. Details 4P the fortifications to be built within the cleared strip oP terrain are top- secret, but' they will include the usixal border-style tort at periodic intervals, barbed wire, and highly-sophisticated electronic de- vices. As long as this war lasts, the enemy will continue to infiltrate across the DMZ, but when the barrier is completed, getting across to attack our troops will no longer be as easy as a midnight stroll in the park. The longer-range purpose, however, is more important: The Johnson Administra- tion is now planning far what is hopefully defined here as "the postwar period" and the barrier is a major component, built in advance, to help South Vietnam defend -it- self against the North without 600,000 Amer- ican troops. But that time is still far, far ofY. METRIC SYSTEM OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Mr. PELL. Mr. President, the Scale Manufacturers Association, Inc., has, in the person of its executive secretary, Arthur Sanders, spoken strongly in favor of the legislation proposed by Con- greS5men GEORGE MILLER, RICHARD OT- TINCER, ROBERT MCCLORY, DON EDWARDS, and me, authorizing the Commerce De- partment to study the feasibility of the United States converting to the metric system of weights and measures. In an article written for the Scale Journal, Mr. Sanders. has eloquently supported the need for making such a study as soon as possible. Mr. Sanders' arguments are so sound, Mr. President, that I ask unanimous con- sent that they be printed in the RECORD. There being no objection, the article was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: L9 GONGRESS GOING TO FORGET "ALL ABOUT THE METRIC SYSTEM AGAIN? (By Arthur Sanders, exeautive secretary, Scale Manufacturers Association, Ino.) As these words are written, it appears highly grobable that Congress will fail to act on important resolutions by Senator Claiborne Pell of Rhode Island and Con- gressmen George P. Miller of Galifornia and Richard Ottinger of New York. Bills have been introduced by Congressmen Don Edwards of California and Robert McClary of Illinois also. in case you've forgotten, Senator Pell and these Congressmen want to authorize the Commerce Department to make a serious study of just exactly what might be involved if the United States were to forsake measure- ments in pounds and ounces, inches and feet, and convert to the more precise, easier-to-use metric system. Aside from the scientific and business com- munities (and weights and measures people, of course!) it seems awfully hard to get most folks much interested. At a time when wa,r, race relations and higher taxes hold the head- lines, it just doesn't seem vital to most Americans what units of weights and mea- sures we use .. ,and mote's the pity for that. The United States is fast finding itself stand- ing alone as we stand pat and take no action ... or, worse still, seek no hard facts on what might be involved if we gat in step with the rest of the world in this vital matter. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and John Quincy Adaxns (to mention only a few Presidents) each in turn called upon Congress to take definitive ac- tion in the weights and measures field. 'We're still waiting. Washington, our first President, called upon the First Congress to establish a uni- form system of weights and measures. It was much needed. In the early days of ou:r Re- public, weights and measures were chaotic. As John Perry has pointed out in his book, The Story of Standards, in those times a bushel of oats, for example, varied all the way from 32 pounds in Connecticut to 38 pounds in the Washington Territory. There were many different "gallons". French, Dutch, Spanish and English weights and measures were in use in different areas of the United States. It hurt trade and confused business. Instead of setting up a unified system of weights and measures, Congress responded by appointing a Committee ... whioh asked the -first Secretary oP State, Thomas Jefferson, to recommend what ought to be done. Jefferson gave his recommendations :. .and nothing was done about them. In 1817, Congress got .around to looking into the matter of a national weights and measures law again. Another Committee asked then Secretary of State John Quincy Adams what ought to be done. The younger Adams' report on weights and measures is the most famous and scholarly treatise on the subject up to modern times. It fe a classic study. But no action resulted from it, either. Finally, the welter of confusing, confiiet- ing standards aP weights and measures be- came an intolerable burden on business and trade. A Treasury Department employee, Ferdinand Hassler, acting on his own, virtu- ally "adopted" a system of weights and measures for the United States-and made his decision stick. Hassler collected stand- ards from Europe and adapted these to AlxLerfcan use. Trade, commerce-and. the collection of taxes-demanded that standard units of weights and measures which meant the same thing to all men, When Congress found out what Hassler was doing, instead of being unhappy, it seems to have heaved a collective sigh of re, lief, and passed a Resolution urging him to hurry along with his work. So far, so good-in spite oP the delay. Hassler's units of weights and measures were adopted by the states... .the basis for our present system. Critics of Congress have often pointed a scornful finger at our national legislature for.. its reluctance to pass laws in the weights- and measures field. But, in some ways, it may be a sign of Congressional prudence and wis- dom-rather than the reverse. Taxes may go up or down, alliances may be formed or broken. But, when you go messing around with the weights and measures laws, it is controversial as well as important. Chaos can result if you don't know what you're doing. As Kings and even Dictators have found, it isn't merely a matter oP "passing a law". Usage must follow ..custom is important. But where does that leave us in the im- portant matter oP studying the metric sys- tem? In the early days of the Republic, inac- tion and lack oP hard facts .hurt .but perhaps- not too much. Modern science and technology, however, has transformed the world beyond recognition Prom what it was in Jefferson's time, for example. Then it might take a clipper ship two years to jour- ney-say-to China and return, Today, the transmission of news is instantaneous. De- fense needs, commerce, trade and travel have been accelerated to the same ratio. WE OUGHT TO HAVE FACTS, INFORMATION The Resolutions of Senator Pell and Con- gressman Ottinger call Por studies .not Por legislation compelling anybody to do any- thing. In a matter as important as weights and measures, it's absolutely vital to have the best facts and the most informed, im- partial opinion that it is possible to have. Every single thing that man wears,; eats, or uses have been weighed or measured at least once-and often many times in its'manu- facture, processing, distribution or sale. What might be involved in the wider use oP the metric system in the United States? If America ultimately switched over to it? For years, we've had debates and discus- sions. But most of these are by ardent advo- cates or ardent opponents of the metric system. The work of the National Bureau of Stand- ards of the Commerce Department com- mands universal respect among informed and intelligent people. It is neither an advo- cate nor an opponent of the metric system. Why. not let such an informed, impartial study be made? Then the discussion could be clarified. Decisions, if any, could be made on a more informed basis. Since 1866, the metric system has been legal but not compulsory in the United States-by Act of Congress which provided a conversion table to Hassler's weights and measures. Japan, Korea, India and Great Britain are recent converts to the metric system. Some 90% of the world's popula- tion now uses it. The United States, alone among the great powers and commercial nations, stands by our cumbersome system on the basis oP custom and practice. As the National Geographic Society re- cently pointed out: "In daily life, Americans employ at least 85 different weights and measures. Length comes by the inch, Poot, yard, chain, rod, furlong, league, and mile. Area may be in square miles or acres. Volumes and weights Approved For Release 2006/01/30 :CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100083-3 51340$ Approved For Fe~~e~l~~~1/~~:~~'~Iq~~70B~p~33~8~Q003001(~.Q~>~3~~3ber 21, 19E~ . ~~ are stated in teaspoons, quarts, pecks, gal- lons, barrels, bushels, drama, gilts and cords, There are three different torts, two pounds, three ounces, three quarts and three mites. The IInited States' inch dii3ered from that of Canada until 19b9:' The National t}eographic 6celety notes: "btany of our measures grew out of the Egyptian, Roman, and British gauges based on the httman hand and foot." The Egyptian cubit was the distance be- tween the elbow and the middle finger tip. The mile, from the Latin midde, or thousand, was determined by the thousand double steps of an average Roman soldier. Sing Henry I eatabiished medieval England's yard by measuring the distance between the tip of his Hnger and the tip of his nose. Ah early Scottish Sing defined the inch as the average width of the thumbnails of three men-large, medium, and small." It is true, of course, that the coats of converting to the metric system would be high. But how high? Gniy a factual study can tell us this.. And also, perhaps, how high the cost of continued inaction might be. 'Way back ih,l9ofl, Dr. Alexander Graham Belt, Inventor of the telephone and one of America's most distinguished sciontiats, ad- vocated the metric system. "It is a labor- saving device of the greatest importance and value," Bell sstd. It would be well ii Senator Pall's Resolu- tion or one of the House bills .. ,mere passed. Then, perhaps, we would start getting some informed answers on this important ANTI-BALLISTIC-MISSILE SYSTEM Mr. McGEE. Mr. President, in today's edition, the Christian Science Monitor has focused upon the remarkable pero- ration of Defense Secretary McNamara, which wound up his recent San Fran- cisco announcement about U,S. plans tcl construct a thin anti-ballistic-missile system. The Monitor does not see Mos- cow more willing to give up the power struggle, or forego stirring up the status quo, than in the past. But !t does find both 1Nashingtvn and Moscow more wlll- ing to concede reasonableness to each other than at any time since the rela- tions between the superpowers began tci thaw. It was reasonableness that Mr. McNamara called for !n San Francisco, and it is reasonableness which the world needs, rather than a new rape toward armament. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Monitor's editorial be printed in the RECORD. There being no objection, the edi- torial was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, aS-follows: REnsotvear.$x>rss "In the end, the root of man's security does not lie in his weaponry. "In the end, the root of man's security lion in his mind.. "What the world requires in lta 22d Year of the Atomic Age is not a new race to- wards armament. "What the world requires in its 22d Year of the Atomic Age la a new race toward reasonableness," These words were Bart of the remarkable peroration with which Defense Secretary McNamara wound up his aunottncement ra Ban Francisco that the United States had decided an "Chinese-oriented ABM deploy- ment " By an apt coincidence Mr. McNamara was speaking on the eve of the formal opening in New York of the 22d Genera! Aasembip of tho United Nations, With all Sts limitations and lmperiectione, the UN is still the best instrument utat men have devised set tar to bring the sovereign states of the world to- ward reaaoaabieness and the rule of law. Few have high hopes that ibis latest IIN gathering will bring the world aigniHcantip closer to a solutlan of its chronic problems and dioputes-hunger, over-population, Viet- nam, the Middle East, Cyprus, and Sashmir, to cite only a few of them. But there 1s some- thing novel about this 22d General Assembly. For the first time, tltla annual gathering will be presided over by the regreaentatice of a Communist land, Romanian Foreign Minister Manescu. Admittedly Romanians these days are. a rather. special brand of Com- munists, Allied with Moscow, they have Linea out to the nos-Comtattniet West and also try to maintain amenities with Peking. But Mr. Manescu's acceptabliitp ea assembly presi- dent to boat Moscow and Washington-with- out which he would not have gat the job-ia atin a token of thee. growing measure of rea- sonableness in relations between the two nuclear superpowers.. Certainly the Russians' installation of a limited ABM system of their own has played ao small part !rt convincing the Johnson ad- ministration that the IInited States could no longor stay naked W terms of this latest innovation in defense, Yet Mr. McNamara leaned aver backwards to telegraph to Mos- cow that VVaehington'e decision to put Sn an ABM system did not mean a sharpening of American attitudes toward the Ruealans. The American system, he insisted, was "designed against a possible Chinese attack:' Aad American deployment of the system "in no way indicates that we feel an agreement with the Soviet Union. on the limitation of strategic nuclear offensive and defensive tortes to ang the less urgent or desirable." ile so spoke because both Washington and Moscow are more w111dng to concede reaaon- ab'lenesa to Bach ether than perhaps at any time since the thaw began. This does not mean that the Russ[ana will retrain from stirring the statue quo when it is to their advantage to do sa. Th1e does not mean that the power struggle between them fa over, But tt does mean that both recognize the responslbilltlea Which go with being a nu- cieir superpower-11 the world is sot to be blown to smithereens. This IB a measure of reasonableness for which we can be grateful, even it we regret, that ]t was atilt not broad enough to make unnecessary the mutual deployment of ABM systems. FRANCIf3 X, GALLAGHER, OUT- STANDING MARYLAND PUBLIC SERVANT spectacular ti.efensive player on the same team. Over the years, the unsung hero award has b+;come one of the mast sig- nificant awards a high school boy in the Baltimore al'ea can earn. This award brings the unsung hero to the public's attention; he has already earned respect of his fallout- teammates long before he receives the liward. Mr. Presid~:nt, there should be an un- sung hero award for citizen contribution iri the field ~f publicaservice and civic activities. If such an award is ever de- veloped at ti +e national level, Maryland has a unanimous choice for receipt of the national award. My reference is to Francis Xavier Gallagher, lawyer, public servant, civic Ieader, businessman, father, and advisor to many of the principal political leaders in the Free State. I first met. Frank Gallagher when we were bath students at the University of Maryland School of Law. As any law stu- dent can tell ,rou, studying law is no part- tilne occupa~ion, However, Frank Gal- lagher had the mental dexterity and physical stanlina to wdrk for his master's degree in political science at the J'ohns- Hopkins University, work as a part-time reporter for the Baltimore Sun, teach at Loyola College, and assist in an investi- gation for the Baltimore City solicitor's office-ail at the same time he was com- piling an enl'fabte record at the Mary- land law schr:rol. This excellent perform- ance in a va_?iety of activities has been typical. of Frt+nk Gallagher's career from that day to this. _ Mr. Gallal:,-her's political acumen is well known in the State of Maryland. He is one of the most respected political ad- visors to the ~eaders oP the Free State of both parties. He may well have been elected Governor of the State of Mary- land at the a;e of 38 had he chosen this course of serv'iee, As a Knight of Saint Gregory, he is recognized as one of the foremast Cath- olic laymen in the United States. He is the principal legal adviser to Lawrence Cardinal 51:,ehan, Maryland's great churchman. Tn addition, he is recognized as one of the ~ most knowedgabie attor- neys in the held of church law in the united state+. i had the pleasure of serving itl the Maryland Ho+ise of Delegates with Flank Gallagher. Flank Gallagher now has the great opportl.nity to breath new life into Mr. TYDINGS. Mr. President, for the Mal?Zlanr. Legislature as a delegate many years a large company iIi Balt1- til the Maryii+nd Constitutional Conven- mcre City has presented an annual tion and chairman of the committee on award far outstanding contributions in the legislative branch, high school athletics known as the "un- Frank Gallsgher's service to the State sung hero award." This annual award is of Maryland has not been confined to given to that player in high school foot- the legal, -~oliticaI, and legislative bail and lacrosse in the Maryland Echo- worlds. He has served as chairman of lastic Association who, although having the Baltimore City Hospital board, as gone unnoticed by the press and most regional chat?man for the National Con- fans, has provided steady and inspire- Terence of Christians and Jews, as presi- tfonal readership on the football or Ia- dent of the Hibernian Society, as a mem- crosse field. Often the recipient is an bar of Mar land's Fair Employment offensive football lineman who has Opportunity i:'ammission, and as a mem- tenaciously protected his quarterback bar of the Beard of the Citizens' Hous- and consistently opened the holes in the ing and Planning Association. In 19fi5, opposing line. On other occaslans the he was namf?d Haly Name Man of the award is given to a defensive captain ar Year and before that he was named middle Linebacker who has displayed Young Man :lf the Year by the junior constant and steady performance al- chamber of c+>mmerce. Frank Gallagher though his work may have gone un- is also active irl the business world. As noticed because o1 a more colorful ar a member of the board of directors of Approved For Release 2006/01/30 :CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100083-3