SOVIETS OFFER NUCLEAR INSPECTION PLAN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100115-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 12, 2006
Sequence Number: 
115
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 13, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100115-7.pdf74.31 KB
Body: 
Fos, 12~, 1z, A&? Approved For Release 2006/01/30 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100115-7 Soviets Offer Nuclear frispection Plan By Murrey Marder Washington Post Staff Writer A Soviet version of -a com- )romise to break the deadlock in the key inspection section if a treaty outlawing the spread of nuclear weapons vill be put before the North atlantic Council in Paris today. The proposal,-on the com- plex subject of conducting in- spections, is regarded, by American officials as a step forward. But agreement is not anticipated at this meeting of the NATO Ambassadors. Several nations, notably West Germany, a~ready have regis- tered reservations on the So- viet language.Soviet willingness to present a more flexible formula onl sped tion of their operations An earlier Western proposal) years suggested that for three of Eura Euratom inspection tom nations could be contin- ued while an inspection ar- rangement while happen if those negotia ons failed. The Soviet offer b now proposes arrangement, reportedly two years or less, but it also is now said to be ambiguous on what ,occurs if no accord is =tfe lvit i"in T of ime. Dan Morgan of The Washing- ton Post reported that the United States is circulating to its allies a new Soviet draft dealing with inspection. The newspaper Frankfurter Rund- schau said the new Russian "draft" would require inspec- tion of not only individual na- tions, but of Euratom itself. Euratom, in addition to hold- ing ownership of member na- tions' nuclear fuel, operates three major nuclear facilities. U.S. officials in Washington denied that inspection of Eura- tom itself is required under the Soviet language. They safe that this issue has.not arisen. The U.S. Arms Control an( Disarmament Agency (ACDA also took issue with the de scription of the new oviet Ian guage as a "draft." A spokes man aid: "We are consulting with our Allies about possible formulations for Article III which we have discussed with the Russians. There is as yet no agreement, however, be- tween the United States anc the Soviet Union on ArticlE .From none, 'West Germany, III." the initial operation of the treaty was counted on the American side as a significant development in itself. The draft of the proposed n u c l e a r nonproliferation treaty that the United States and the Soviet union submitted three weeks ago to the 18-na- tion disarmament conference at Geneva left blank the section on inspection, Artilcle III. The disagreement has cen- tered on whether inspection to Euratom. The Soviet Union has opposed that as "self-in- spection." The problem has been to inter-relate IAEA and Euratom inspection. While U.S. officials declined to make public the new propo to make public the new propos- al, it- was described as drop- ping what became known as a Soviet "guillotine clause.' That would have required IAEA inspection exclusively after a brief period of years, whether or not IAEA and Eu- ratom worked out a compro- mise a safeguard against the devel- clear weapons by non-nuclear nations will be conducted who ly by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), or shared with the six-nation (Western) European Atomic Energy Community (EURA- TOM). Approved For Release 2006/01/30 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300100115-7