NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

PENTAGON VOIDS ON-SITE POLICING FOR ABM PACT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70B00338R000300110020-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 9, 2006
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 29, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70B00338R000300110020-1.pdf91.9 KB
Body: 
2R ?e-6'7 Approved F Release 200 1/40: IA-RDP70B00338R000300110020-1 yenta on oid "it is an act of political cour- age these days for the Russians even tdt ..awn and talk with us, sAld one.American official, 4n Site Policinlr". "even their -formal attitude ward the Vietnam war and the he ~..---` r? charges - their rebellious Chinese wusius nuri at Lnem." o act The first public tip-off to the new American approach came FaBMT By GEORGE SHERMAN N speech Warnkme,eassweekS, ist assistant cretary Paul Star Staff Writer In an effort to lure the Rus, of defense, head of the powerful sians into talks about limiting office of International Security costly anti-ballistic missile sy? Affairs in. the Pentagon. tems, the Pentagon has quietly The bulk of the speach ex. dropped demands for on-site in: plained how McNamara's deci- spection to police any such arm; sion to build the so-called "thin" pact. ABM system was directed Policy-making officials say against the Chi pse, not the Rtis that President Johnson and De, sx2'ns fense Secretary Robert S. Mc But at the end Warnke turned: Namara have told the Soviet to the hope that "by parallel leadership that the first mutual actions; or by formal agree- reductions in ABM's could be ment" the Soviet Union and the made without either . formal United States can limit their agreement or any kind of inter- strategic offensive and defensive national inspection system. forces. These officials argue that "Moreover," he continued, American "detection de- should talks with the Russians vices"-space satellites a n d occur, "we hope to avoid bog- h i g h - fly i n g reconnaissance ging down in the perennially dif- planes-are now efficient en- ficult issue of international in- ough to verify any "informal" spection. agreement. In essence the same "In considering any possible "unilateral verification" used in agreement with the Soviet Union the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty to level off or reduce strategic would be applied to the ABM's. offensive and defensive systems, So far the Russians have not or,eyen the. possibility for paral- responded. They have said they lel! action on the part of the two will . talk about both offensive countries, we may have to de- and defensive missile systems, pend on our own unilateral capa- but have refused to set a date bility for verification." The conviction in official quar- ters is that they are deliberately Policy Shift Confirmed leaving the door open. American. officials confirm that Machinery Lack Suspected these passages mark a depar-j tune from, traditional policy on Experts believe that the Soviet the need for inspecting arms hierarchy is neither politically, agreements. nor technically equipped to make They explain that in the case a quick decision. The military of the ABMs, ?it is quite possible and Communist party leadership for the United States-and is too tightly fitted into separate 1~ presumably also the Soviet compartments to take the broad! Union-to tell from aerial recon- sophisticated approach of the' naissance when a site has been McNamara "whiz kids" to arms. bulldozed over. According to control in the nuclear age. these sources, it is virtually im- '. But the prediction here is that possible for either side to fool once the 50th anniversary cele- the other. ~ brations of the Bolshevik revolu- These officials hastily add that tion are over in November, the relaxation of the demand for! Russians will make their move- on-site policing of any ABM on the ABM's. And the Mc-, agreement does not carry over Namara strategy is to make it to other disarmament measures. as easy as possible for them by Warnke h i in s e 1 f said that avoiding initial and unnecessary "far-reaching agreements, par-! embarras?ments about demands titularly any involving substan- for on-site inspection and a tial reductions" of offensive) s ng arms e ntrol pact with misslies, would require agreed f theUniited Mates. international inspection. But the overwhelming consen- sus here is that such agreements lie too far A a to de- serve Beta ed s The more Approved For Release 2006/01/30 c RDR70B0 0G$0 110020-1 going on the most limited -steps