CALLS FOR U.S. COUNTER-WEAPON INTENSIFY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70B00338R000300110025-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 9, 2006
Sequence Number: 
25
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 5, 1967
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70B00338R000300110025-6.pdf112.73 KB
Body: 
t) MN Pox c Oou+tn Approved For Release 2006/01/30 : CIA-RDP70B00338R000300110025-6 I Cals for U.S5touuitei-1eapoii By George C. Wilson Washington Post, Staff Writer The Soviets' new orbital rocket corfronts the United States with a whole new set of military problems be- eause it could be the first weapon to take the high ground of outer space. U.S. experts pointed out yesterday that the Fraction- al Orbital Bombardment System. (FOBS) the Soviets are `testing need got pass Pentagon cost-effectiveness tests to fulfill its mission. It is not supposed to be a bet- ter ICBM, but a terror weap- on. The psychological impact of a hydrogen bomb whirl- ing over the United States with the release button in the Kremlin cannot be ig- nored by the Johnson Ad- ministration. And. as the axl,i-ball.istic- missile debate showed, law- makers. are likely to insist that the Defense Depart- ment come 'un with some counter weapon. McNamara's Argument The argument, by Secre- tary of Defense Robert S. McNamara that the United States is already "naked against a massive ICBM at- tack, so why worry about. FOBS, ignores the fact that many lawmakers regard the anti-Chinese ABM as the first step tpward a Soviet one. Early Congressional reac- tion to FOB already shows that the UI 'ted States must , find a way to reach the same high ground taken by the Soviets. Sen. Henry M. Jackson (D-Wash.), for cxample,`said in an interview yesterday that the Russian orbital rocket "has opened up, a whole new dimension of problems." He said the United States, as a starter, would have to speed development of - anti- satellite weapons and build a lot more detection radar. He opens public hearings Monday to explore these questions with Administra- tion witnesses. Paul H. Nitze, newly named Deputy Secretary of Defense, and John S. Foster Jr., Pentagon research chief, are slated to lead off before Jackson's Military applica- tions Subcommittee of the Joint Atomic Energy Com- mittee. Republicans in Congress are already making an issue out of McNamara's state- ment that "I'm not con- cerned" about FOBS. Rep. William L. Dickinson (R, Ala.) said in a telegram to President Johnson yesterday that McNamara should be fired for such unconcern. Congressional critics are expected to press Pentagon witnesses for details on what working hardware the United States has against the FOBS. McNamara-in confirming Friday that the Soviets have been testing orbital rockets -said that States had a new detection radar: But officials admit it is limited. Over-the-horizon radar has been under devel- opment for years. But the type that really gives mean- ingful information about So- viet launches hidden from existing radar and spy satel- lites has only begun to oper- ate. Satellite Interception Also, the U.S. has no fool- proof system for intercept- ing and inspecting a for- eign satellite to see if a bomb is inside. And weap- ons in hand for knocking a hostile satellite down also have limited effectiveness. Gen. Earle G. Wheeler, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in testifying before the Senate Foreign Rela- tions Committee this spring on the treaty to ban weap- ons in outer space said the chiefs "remain concerned about the assured verifica- tion capability with regards to weapons in orbit. The de- ployment of prohibited orbit- al vehicles could have seri- ous implications, especially if it enabled an effective enemy surprise attack against our command and control facilities and mili- tary forces. "Weapons in orbit," Wheel- er continued, "could become a matter of grave conse- quence, particularly when utilized in conjunction with other strategic systems.. . ,s.x C.at can be answered ntensify only through intensified U.S. effort to develop capa- bilities to detect and verify the orbiting of nuclear weapons or those threaten- ing mass destruction. At the same hearings for- mer Deputy Secretary of De- fense Cyrus R. Vance and Wheeler agreed that "one or two or some very small number of weapons" could "be clandestinely orbited without being identified." But "to be militarily sib nificant," said Vance, "a large number of weapons would have to be deployed, and this would certainly' be detected." MIRV-multiple, inde- pendently targetable re-en- try vehicles-is one of the "strategic systems" which conceivably could be used with the Soviet orbiting rocket. Several Little Bombs MIRY is the technique of dividing a big bomb into several little ones and then sending each of them to a different target. Some military leaders fear the So- viets,might put a MIRY war- head on their 'orbital rocket Jackson said using MIRY with FOBS would make bombs "come down like Roman candles." Even with. out MIRY, he' argued, FOBS "represents a qualitative jump in their strategic weapons capability." The United States, he said, needs "more and improved de- fenses" against FOBS. It appears certain that by. testing an orbital weapons system the Russians have undercut McNamara's effort to hold back the arms race. The tests come at a time when he seemed to be mak- ing progress in convincing the American public and U.S. allies of the folly of building a bigger mountain CIA-RDP70B00338R0003010126weapons or a t fc missile defense. Approved For Release 2006/01/30 :