HEARING ON MIRV SLATED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP71B00364R000200010019-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 2, 2001
Sequence Number: 
19
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 9, 1969
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP71B00364R000200010019-5.pdf97.19 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/11/15 : CIA-RDP71B00364R000200010019-5 ?W ASHING'1 Vii pVv.i itl JLL Iq Hearings an By George C. Wilson and Richard Homan Washington Post Staff Writers The Senate Foreien Relations Commits tee on Friday will try to add a new- dimension to the ABM debate by holding, Its own hearings on the impact of multi. ple warheads on the world's arms race. Chairman J. W. Fuibright (D-Ark.), in going ahead with the hearings during the Senate's debate on the ABM, will push MIRV into the center of the con- troversy. MIRV is the technique of putting sev- eral warheads on one rocket to use up the missiles defending the target nation. MIRV opponents argue that multiple warheads on one side will prompt more ABMs on the other side, pushing both nuclear superpowers up the arms ladder with no gain in security. See MIRV, AS, Col. 1 iuiKV, From Al Senators at Friday's , hear- ings will link the two systems together - something leading opponents of President Nix- on's Safeguard ABM have been unwilling to do in the current debate for fear of confusing the issue. Several Congressmen showed no such :hesitancy in striking out at. MIRY yesterday as a House Deign Affairs subcom- mittee opened its hearings on the Implications of the new nuclear weapon technology. Rep, Jonathan B. Bingham (D-N Y.) tk}~e Pentagon op- Poses a MIRY b oie [torium be- cause "tue joint cniets of Staff are basically hostile tole arms limitations." Rep. Jeffrey Cohelan (D- Calif.) warned that deploy- ment of MIRV might draw a first strike. i"There is an advantage to an attacker in destroying MTRV missiles in their silos, as for every MIRV missile launcher destroyed, several times that many deliverable warheads will be destroyed. Thus there is an advantage in attacking first before the other side, has launched its MIRV missiles," Cohelan said. The chief danger in MIRV, according to Cohelan, is its effect on the strategic balanp pproved "1t one side perceives.. we MIRV warheads of the other . . to be able to destroy a significant portion of its land- based ICBMs in a first strike. "If such a threat is per- ceived, the threatened site will have to deploy new offen- sive or defensive weapons to preserve its deterrent." Testimony by Defense Sec- retary Melvin R. Laird in re- cent weeks indicates that U.S. MIRVs could pose such a threat to Russia, Cohelan said. He quoted Laird's testimony that Poseidon MIRV " 1a an important program since it pcQr ises to improve the ac- of the Poseidon mis- alAr, 'wxua cLaLW11~iti~ 1tS eilec- tiveneaa against hard targets," If Laird believes "that our MIRV has a significant capa- bility against hardened tar- gets," Cohelan argued, "it seems inevitable that the So- viets must believe that our MIRV threatens their deter- rent forces." One Republican :Rep. James G. Fulton (R-Pa.)-of- fered an argument for uni- lateral U.S. suspension of MIRV testing, obviously tai- lored to win GOP support, as analogous to the Nixon Ad- ministration's plan for with- drawing U.S. troops frogs Vietnam. So far, 104 Congressmen have sponsored resoluna calling for a moratoria MIRY testing. But Pres Nixon has rejected all i to stop firing Poseidon \;ead Minuteman 3 with duigalgy MIRV warheads. Russia, in testing the rocket with three dummy war- heads recently,: m all.ia a bunch Ti .l ea about 19 miles apart. The trim 'MIRV (multiple-indepen. dently-targetable-re-entry ve- hicle) is the technique of send- ing the individual warheads to different targets hundreds of miles apart - something the U.S. has flight tested several times. The Soviet Union, in the view of military leaders, is faced with a MIRV gap. It is thus unlikely Russia would agree to freeze the technology until she catches up to the United States. Witnesses the Senate For- eign Relations Committee has asked to discuss these and oth- er aspects of MIRV are Gorr don MacDonald, of the Uni- versity of California and for- merly vice president for re- search at the Institute for De- fense Analyses; J. P. Ruins, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and formerly director of the Advanced Re. search Projects Agency; and Herbert York, of the Univeer- sity of California ana formerly .director of Pentagoa tesearch.